Skip to main content
Log in

Dis-epistemologies of Abolition

  • Published:
Critical Criminology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There are various critiques laid out against the framework of carceral abolition (as it appears currently in prison abolition and deinstitutionalization): that it is abstract, only critiques but does not suggest specific solutions; that it is a utopian vision of the world; and that it is unrealistic in the world we currently occupy. Throughout this article I will demonstrate how such critiques can be conceptualized as strengths of these movements and frameworks for liberation. I argue that carceral abolition (as it appears in prison abolition and deinstitutionalization) is a form of knowledge, an ethical position. My first claim is that this knowledge is rooted in maroonage and I show the consequences of not engaging with abolition from intersectional frameworks. My second claim is that we can understand abolition as a dis-epistemology that rejects ways of knowing tied to certainty, optimism and certain notions of futurity and temporality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. I use the term ‘race neutral’ as opposed to ‘color blind’, which I find to be a confusing and ableist term.

  2. Maroon refers to the communities of runaway slaves and indigenous people that have formed in the Americas since the seventeenth century.

  3. http://www.szasz.com/abolitionist.html.

  4. The organization disbanded in 1980. Szasz (2002) book alludes to slavery and its abolition and its relation, or mostly analogy to, psychiatry. I discuss this history and the AAAIMH in more detail in my larger project.

  5. In 1979 for example, self advocates in Nebraska held a press conference stating that all institutions should be closed. See Williams and Shoultz (1982).

  6. "The State-sanctioned or extralegal production and exploitation of group-differentiated vulnerability to premature death."

  7. See the insightful work of Erica Meiners (2009) on the topic of ‘stranger danger’ and sex offender registries.

  8. It is important to keep in mind however that many of these accounts of disability culture and epistemology do not often provide the kind of intersectional analysis, especially in relation to race, that fugitive knowledges demand, see also Puar (2017).

  9. Although I do draw here on conceptualizations from some European or diasporic theorists, my research and claims here are grounded in the North American context, particularly carceral abolition movements in the U.S., and should be read from this specific geographical and historical context.

References

  • Ahmed, S. (2010a). Killing joy: Feminism and the history of happiness. Signs, 35(3), 571–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, S. (2010b). The promise of happiness. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander, M. (2012). The new Jim Crow: Mass incarceration in the age of colorblindness. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Moshe, L. (2013). The tension between abolition and reform. In M. Nagel & A. J. Nocella II (Eds.), The end of prisons: Reflections from the decarceration movement. Value inquiry book series. Amsterdam: Rodopi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Moshe, L. (forthcoming). Politics of (En)closure: Deinstitutionalization, prison abolition and disability. University of Minnesota Press.

  • Ben-Moshe, L., Chapman, C. & Carey, A. C. (2014). Disability incarcerated: Imprisonment and disability in the United States and Canada. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M., & Schept, J. (2017). New abolition, criminology and a critical carceral studies. Punishment & Society, 19(4), 440–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burstow, B., LeFrançois, B. A., & Diamond, S. (Eds.). (2014). Psychiatry disrupted: Theorizing resistance and crafting the (r) evolution. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s Press-MQUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase, R. T. (2015). We are not slaves: Rethinking the rise of carceral states through the lens of the prisoners’ rights movement. The Journal of American History, 102(1), 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, C. (2011). Death and rebirth of a movement: Queering critical ethnic studies. Social Justice, 37(4), 126–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (1998). Racialized punishment and prison abolition. In J. James (Ed.), The Angela Y. Davis reader (pp. 96–107). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (2000). From the convict lease system to the super-max prison. In J. James (Ed.), States of confinement: Policing, detention, and prisons. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (2003). Are prisons obsolete?. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y. (2005). Abolition democracy: Beyond empire, prisons, and torture. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, A. Y., & Rodriguez, D. (2000). The challenge of prison abolition: A conversation. Social Justice, 27(3), 212–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Haan, W. (1990). The politics of redress: Crime, punishment and penal abolition. London: Unwin Hyman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Du Bois, W. E. B. (1935). Black reconstruction in America: An essay toward a history of the part which black folk played in the attempt to reconstruct democracy in America, 1860–1880. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanuzzi, R. (2014). Abolition. In B. Burgett & G. Hendler (Eds.), Keywords for American cultural studies. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, R. A. (2004). Aberrations in black: Toward a queer of color critique. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman, J., Jr. (2012). Racial critiques of mass incarceration: Beyond the new Jim Crow. NYUL Review, 87, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, K. (2000). Slavery and prison—Understanding the connections. Social Justice, 27(3), 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. W. (2002). Fatal couplings of power and difference: Notes on racism and geography. The Professional Geographer, 54(1), 15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. W. (2006). Golden gulag: Prisons, surplus, crisis, and opposition in globalizing California. California: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. W. (2011). What is to be done? American Quarterly, 63(2), 245–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmore, R. W. (2014). Forward. In D. Berger (Ed.), The struggle within: Prisons, political prisoners, and mass movements in the United States. Oakland: PM Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. (2004). Keeping good time: reflections on knowledge, power and people. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottschalk, M. (2006). The prison and the gallows: The politics of mass incarceration in America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (2011). The queer art of failure. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hames-Garcia, M. R. (2004). Fugitive thought: Prison movements, race, and the meaning of justice. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harbin, A. (2016). Disorientation and moral life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harney, S., & Moten, F. (2013). The undercommons: Fugitive planning and black study. Wivenhoe: Minor Compositions.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, S. V. (1997). Scenes of subjection: Terror, slavery, and self-making in nineteenth-century America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, J. (2005). The new abolitionists: (Neo)slave narratives and contemporary prison writings. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaba, M. (2014). Prison reform’s in vogue and other strange things… In Truthout Magazine, March 21, 2014, from http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/22604-prison-reforms-in-vogue-and-other-strange-things.

  • Kafer, A. (2013). Feminist, queer, crip. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandaswamy, P. (2006). Innocent victims and brave new laws. In M. B. Sycamore (Ed.), Nobody passes: Rejecting the rules of gender and conformity. Derby: Seal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, R. (2017). How to end mass incarceration. Jacobin Magazine, August 18, 2017, from https://www.jacobinmag.com/2017/08/mass-incarceration-prison-abolition-policing.

  • Lorde, A. (1997). The cancer journals: Special edition. San Francisco: Aunt Lute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinot, S., & Sexton, J. (2003). The avant-garde of white supremacy. Social Identities, 9(2), 169–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathiesen, T. (1974). The politics of abolition. New York: Halsted Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meiners, E. R. (2009). Never innocent: Feminist trouble with sex offender registries and protection in a prison nation. Meridians: feminism, race, transnationalism, 9(2), 31–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, D. T., & Snyder, S. L. (2015). The biopolitics of disability: Neoliberalism, ablenationalism, and peripheral embodiment. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, R. (1995). Penal abolition, the practical choice: A practical manual on penal abolition. Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz, J. E. (2009). Cruising Utopia: The then and there of queer futurity. New York: New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overboe, J. (1999). `Difference in itself’: Validating disabled people’s lived experience. Body & Society, 5(4), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, O. (1982). Slavery and social death. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. (2010). In the wake of it gets better. The Guardian. Accessed June 10, 2016, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/cifamerica/2010/nov/16/wake-it-gets-better-campaign.

  • Puar, J. K. (2017). The right to maim: Debility, capacity. Disability: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richie, B. (2012). Arrested justice: Black women, violence, and America’s prison nation. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchie, A. J. (2017). Invisible no more: Police violence against Black women and women of color. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, C. J. (1983). Black marxism: The making of the Black radical tradition. Chapel Hill: Univ of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodriguez, D. (2006). Forced passages: Imprisoned radical intellectuals and the U.S. prison regime. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saleh-Hanna, V. (2015). Black feminist hauntology. Rememory the ghosts of abolition? Champ pénal/Penal field, 12.

  • Spade, D. (2015). Normal life: Administrative violence, critical trans politics, and the limits of law. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury, J. (2004). A world without prisons: Resisting militarism, globalized punishment, and empire. Social Justice, 31(1/2), 9–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudbury, J. (2008). Maroon abolitionists: Black gender-oppressed activists in the anti-prison movement in the U.S. and Canada. Meridians: Feminism, Race, Transnationalism, 9(1), 1–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (1961). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Hoeber-Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. S. (2002). Liberation by oppression: A comparative study of slavery and psychiatry. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wacquant, L. (2009). Punishing the poor. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Whalley, E., & Hackett, C. (2017). Carceral feminisms: The abolitionist project and undoing dominant feminisms. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(4), 456–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilderson, F. B. (2003). The prison slave as hegemony’s (silent) scandal. Social Justice, 30(2), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P., & Shoultz, B. (1982). We can speak for ourselves: Self-advocacy by mentally handicapped people. London: Souvenir Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liat Ben-Moshe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ben-Moshe, L. Dis-epistemologies of Abolition. Crit Crim 26, 341–355 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9403-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-018-9403-1

Navigation