Abstract
Recent literature has investigated if socialization and identity protect against the criminogenic effects of strainful experiences for African Americans. Here Latinas are brought to the forefront. This study not only investigates if a positive ethnic identity increases fortitude against strainful events, but if its effects are further influenced by gender socialization. Results reveal ethnic identity increases resilience against the criminogenic effects of vicarious victimization and acculturation and gendered ethnic identity protects against direct victimization. This study reinforces the need for further investigation into cultural explanations for within group differences in criminogenic outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The word Color, and other racial ethnic group categories, are capitalized out of respect and recognition that it is often an important component of one’s identity (see Potter 2015).
The following series of analyses utilize the third wave of the PHDCN cohort study along with the structural variables from the community survey (Earls et al. 1997, 2007a).
Or anyone with self-identified origins in Mexico, Central and South America, and the Spanish-speaking Caribbean were classified as Latinx.
One question included in the acculturation strain factor asking, “To what degree are your home customs American or ethnic?” with responses ranging from 1 = very ethnic to 4 = very American (reverse coded from original), was missing 44.2% of its responses. The next highest missingness rate was for income at 14.4%. No other questions included in the final dataset were missing more than 7% of their response (i.e., four of the six negative affect questions), with most questions missing none or less than 1% of responses.
Multiple imputation involves imputing missing values several times, analyzing across the imputed values, and pooling the results (van Buuren 2012). The present analyses draw from five imputed datasets, the default in SPSS.
Third wave data were collected between 2000 and 2002, and the present subsample involves cohorts originally aged 9, 12, 15, and 18 in 1995. The present analyses are limited to the third wave because it is the only time point when all the theoretical variables were administered. For more information on the data structure of the PHDCN see Earls et al. (2005, 2006b, 2007a) and Sampson et al. (1997).
Respondents were asked, “In the last year have you…” and provided a yes or no response to the following behaviors: carried a weapon; purposefully damaged or destroyed property that did not belong to you; purposely set fire to a house, building or vacant lot; entered or broken into a building to steal something; snatched someone’s purse or wallet or picked someone’s pocket; stolen from a car; knowingly bought or sold stolen goods; stolen a car or motorcycle to keep or sell; sold marijuana or pot; sold cocaine or crack; sold heroin; hit someone you live with with the idea of hurting them; hit someone you did not live with with the idea of hurting them; attacked someone with a weapon; used a weapon or force to get money or things from people; thrown objects at people; chased someone to scare or hurt them; shot someone; shot at someone; been in a gang fight in which someone was hurt or threatened with harm; threatened to physically hurt someone; had or tried to have sexual relations with someone against their will.
While interpersonal violence and child abuse are significant forms of victimization greatly experienced by Latinas (Breiding et al. 2014; Ulibarri et al. 2009), the present data do not allow for the identification of one’s assailant, and therefore determination of the relationship between the participant and their victimizer. Thus, interpersonal violence and child abuse are likely imbedded in the present measure, but cannot be currently separated from other forms of victimization.
Principal components analysis was used to create a measure of acculturation strain. Factor loadings are as follows: English proficiency = 0.665; English preference = 0.666; U.S. nativity = 0.607; U.S. citizenship = 0.775; and home customs = 0.751. Such methodology was deemed necessary given the variation in the unit of measurement between the component questions.
The Youth Self Report Protocol was developed by Achenbach System of Empirically Based Assessment, and more information of the psychometric development, including which items measure which emotional traits, may be found at aseba.org.
Measures of socioeconomic status (SES) are meant to capture individual’s access to social and economic resources. Income is a common proxy and is a stronger predictor of associated outcomes (e.g., health) than other SES indicators such as education and occupation (Duncan et al. 2002). In the present analysis, income is based on primary caregiver income for respondents in cohorts 9 and 12 and self-reported income for respondents in cohorts 15 and 18.
The original PHDCN investigators constructed the factor scores currently used from ten items from the 1990 U.S. Census. The percentage of African Americans, juveniles, unemployed, female-headed households, individuals living below the poverty line, and people on public assistance in a neighborhood cluster were combined to gauge concentrated disadvantage. Residential stability comes from the percentage of individuals who have resided in the same home since 1985 and percentage of those who own their home. The percentage of Latinxs and the percentage of other foreign-born individuals measure immigrant concentration. Original items used to create the given factor scores were eliminated from the restricted data presently utilized and obtain from the Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. For further discussion of the measures see Earls et al. (2007a) and Sampson et al. (1997).
Ethnic heterogeneity was originally labeled “immigrant concentration,” but presently relabeled because it captures those that identify as Latinx as well as foreign-born individuals. Additionally, research finds immigrants are significantly less likely to engage in violent crime, especially if they reside in communities with high concentrations of immigrants (Feldmeyer and Steffensmeier 2009). This measure, therefore, is presently included for traditional theoretical consistency (Sampson et al. 1997; Shaw and McKay 1942) as well as a conservative measure control for the complex relationship between ethnicity and place.
The present outcome variable contains a high number of zeroes, and the variance (s2 = 0.555) greatly exceeds the mean (\( \bar{x} = 0.277 \)) violating the assumptions of a Poisson distribution. The Stata14 command “countfit” was used to compare the model residuals between negative binomial regression and zero-inflated negative binomial regression to determine which distribution best fits the present sample. While the predicted outcomes are similar, comparisons of model fit statistics suggest negative binomial distribution significantly fits the present data better. Countfit outcomes available upon request. .
VIF were all below 5.0; available upon request.
For GST, negative emotions are a primary causal link between strain and crime. Agnew (1992, 2006) argues anger energizes individuals to action while depression inspires retreatist behaviors. Yet, research often finds negative emotions, particularly anger, directly affect criminogenic outcomes in addition to strain (e.g., Brezina 2010; Mazerolle et al. 2003; Roberton et al. 2015). For theoretical consistency and to provide a conservative assessment of the mediating effects of negative emotions (Baron and Kenny 1986), ordinary least squares regressions were used to assess the direct effects of victimization, discrimination, and acculturation on anger and depression. Vicarious victimization is significantly associated with anger, but no other significant effects were revealed for the present sample. These results are available upon request. While a thorough assessment of the mediating effects of negative emotions are warranted for a full test of GST, that is not the primary aim of the present study. While theoretically grounded in GST, the present study seeks to highlight the conditioning effects of ethnic and gendered ethnic identity within a strain-based model. Further investigation into the mediating effects of negative emotions for Latinas is warranted in future research, but is beyond the present scope.
“margins” is the command; see Buis (2010) for full discussion.
Low values are one standard deviation below the mean and high values are one standard deviation above the mean.
Only the multiplicative effects of high and low ethnic and gendered ethnic identity on high levels of significant strains are presently presented, but all effects are available upon request.
Marginal effects are calculated by taking the multiplicative effect (presented in Table 7) of high vicarious victimization and low ethnic identity and subtracting it from the multiplicative effect of high vicarious victimization and high ethnic identity (Buis 2010). This is repeated for each significant interaction pair. The significance level is determined by calculating the z-score and determining the p value (Buis 2010; Paternoster et al. 1998).
I.e., subordination to others, silencing self to maintain harmony, being the family pillar, and being a spiritual pillar; though, the latter are somewhat controlled for with the inclusion of familism, religion, and Catholicism in the present study.
References
Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology, 30(1), 47–87.
Agnew, R. (2002). Experienced, vicarious, and anticipated strain: An exploratory study on physical victimization and delinquency. Justice Quarterly, 19(4), 603–632.
Agnew, R. (2006). Pressured into crime: An overview of general strain theory. Los Angeles, CA: Roxbury Publishing Company.
Agnew, R., & Brezina, T. (1997). Relational problems with peers, gender, and delinquency. Youth & Society, 29, 84–111.
Aranda, M., Castaneda, I., Lee, P., & Sobel, E. (2001). Stress, social support, and coping as predictors of depressive symptoms: Gender differences among Mexican Americans. Social Work Research, 25, 37–48.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
Bauer, H. M., Rodríguez, M. A., Quiroga, S. S., & Flores-Ortiz, Y. G. (2000). Barriers to health care for abused Latina and Asian immigrant women. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved, 11, 33–44.
Bettie, J. (2000). Women without class: Chicas, cholas, trash and the presence/absence of class identity. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 26(1), 1–35.
Bettie, J. (2002). Exceptions to the rule: Upwardly mobile white and Mexican American high school girls. Gender & Society, 16(3), 403–422.
Bettie, J. (2003). Women without class: Girls, race, and identity. Berkley: University of California Press.
Breiding, M. J., Chen J., & Black, M. C. (2014). Intimate partner violence in the United States—2010. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Center for Disease Control and Prevention.
Brezina, T. (2010). Anger, attitudes, and aggressive behavior: Exploring the affective and cognitive foundations of angry aggression. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 186–203.
Broidy, L. M. (2001). A test of general strain theory. Criminology, 30(1), 9–35.
Broidy, L., & Agnew, R. (1997). Gender and crime: A general strain theory perspective. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency, 34(3), 275–306.
Buis, M. L. (2010). Stata tip 87: Interpretation of interactions in nonlinear models. The Stata Journal, 10(2), 305–308.
Burgess-Proctor, A. (2006). Intersections of race, class, gender, and crime: Future directions for feminist criminology. Feminist Criminology, 1(1), 27–47.
Bursik, R. J., & Grasmick, H. G. (1993). Neighborhoods and crime. New York: Lexington.
Burt, C. H., Simons, R. L., & Gibbons, F. X. (2012). Racial discrimination, ethnic-racial socialization, and crime: A micro-sociological model of risk and resilience. American Sociological Review, 77, 648–677.
Campesino, M., Saenz, D. S., Choi, M., & Krouse, R. S. (2012). Perceived discrimination and ethnic identity among breast cancer survivors. Oncology Nursing Forum, 39(2), E91–E100.
Castillo, L. G., & Cano, M. A. (2007). Mexican American psychology: Theory and clinical application. In C. Negy (Ed.), Cross-cultural psychotherapy: Toward a critical understanding of diverse client populations (2nd ed., pp. 85–102). Reno, NV: Bent Tree Press.
Castillo, L. G., Perez, F. V., Castillo, R., & Ghosheh, M. R. (2010). Construction and initial validation of the marianismo beliefs scale. Counseling Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 163–175.
Céspedes, Y. M., & Huey, S. J. (2008). Depression in Latino adolescents: A cultural discrepancy perspective. Cultural Diversity & Ethnic Minority Psychology, 14, 168–172.
Chesin, M. S., & Jeglic, E. L. (2012). Suicidal behavior among Latina college students. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 34(3), 421–436.
Chesney-Lind, M., Morash, M., & Stevens, T. (2008). Girls’ trouble, girls’ delinquency, and gender responsive programming: A review. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 41, 162–189.
Chomsky, A. (2014). Undocumented: How immigration became illegal. Boston: Beacon Press.
Cianelli, R., Ferrer, L., & McElmurry, B. (2008). Issues on HIV prevention among low-income Chilean women: Machismo, marianismo, and HIV misconceptions. Culture, Health and Sexuality, 10(3), 297–306.
Cortes, D. E. (2003). Idioms of distress, acculturation, and depression: The Puerto Rican experience. In K. M. Chun, P. B. Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 207–222). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Cuevas, C. A., Bell, K. A., & Sabina, C. (2014). Victimization, psychological distress, and help-seeking: Disentangling the relationship for Latina victims. Psychology of Violence, 4(2), 196–209.
D’Alonzo, K. T. (2012). The influence of marianismo beliefs on physical activity of immigrant Latinas. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 23(2), 124–133.
De Coster, S., & Zito, R. C. (2010). Gender and general strain theory: The gendering of emotional experiences and expressions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 26(2), 224–245.
Delgado Bernal, D. (2002). Critical race theory, Latino critical theory, and critical raced-gendered epistemologies: Recognizing Students of color as holders as creators of knowledge. Qualitative Inquiry, 8(1), 105–126.
Delgado, R., & Stefancic, J. (2012). Critical race theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). New York: New York University Press.
Denner, J., & Guzmán, B. L. (Eds.). (2006). Latina girls: Voices of adolescent strength in the United States. New York: New York University Press.
Díaz-Cotto, J. (2006). Chicana lives and criminal justice: Voices from el barrio. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Douglass, S., & Umaña-Taylor, A. J. (2015). Development of ethnic-racial identity among Latino adolescents and the role of family. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 41, 90–98.
Duncan, G. J., Daly, M. C., McDonough, P., & Williams, D. R. (2002). Optimal indicators of socioeconomic status for health research. American Journal of Public Health, 92(7), 1151–1157.
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2005). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Master File, Wave 1, 1994–1997. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2006a). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Demographic File, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2006b). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Master File, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2006c). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Self Report of Offending, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007a). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Community Survey, 1994–1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007b). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Gangs, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007c). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Household Composition, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007d). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): My Exposure to Violence (Subject and Young Adult), Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007e). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Personal Identity, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007f). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): provision of social relations (subject and young adult), Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007 g). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): School interview, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007h). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Young Adult Self Report, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Earls, F. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Sampson, R. J. (2007i). Project on Human Development in Chicago Neighborhoods (PHDCN): Youth self report, Wave 3, 2000–2002. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor].
Else-Quest, N. M., & Morse, E. (2015). Ethnic variations in parental ethnic socialization and adolescent ethnic identity: A longitudinal study. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(1), 54–64.
Ertl, M. M., Dillion, F. R., Martin, J. L., Babino, R., & De La Rosa, M. (2017). Alcohol use exacerbates acculturative stress among recently immigrated, young adult Latinas. Journal of Immigrant Minority Health. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-017-0586-4.
Faulkner, S. L. (2003). Good girl or flirt girl: Latinas’ definitions of sex and sexual relationships. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 25(2), 174–200.
Feldmeyer, B., & Steffensmeier, D. (2009). Immigration effects on homicide offending for total and race/ethnicity-disaggregated populations (white, black, and Latino). Homicide Studies, 13, 211–226.
Fernandez-Esquer, M. E., Diamond, P., & Atkinson, J. (2010). Lazos que atan: The influence of normative gender beliefs on sexual risk behaviors of Latino men and women. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40, 2969–2994.
Finch, B. K., Kolody, B., & Vega, W. A. (2000). Perceived discrimination and depression among Mexican-origin adults in California. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 41, 295–313.
Fisher, C. B., Wallace, S. A., & Fenton, R. E. (2000). Discrimination distress during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 29, 679–695.
Foley, A. (2008). The current state of gender-specific delinquency programming. Journal of Criminal Justice, 36, 262–269.
French, S. E., Kim, T. E., & Pillado, O. (2006). Ethnic identity, social group membership, and youth violence. In N. G. Guerra & E. P. Smith (Eds.), Preventing youth violence in a multicultural society (pp. 47–73). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Galanti, G. (2003). The Hispanic family and male-female relationships: An overview. Journal of Transcultural Nursing, 14, 180–185.
Gándara, P. (2015). Fulfilling America’s future: Latinas in the U.S., 2015. Washington, DC: The White House Initiative on Educational Excellence for Hispanics.
Garcia, L., Hurwitz, E. L., & Kraus, J. F. (2004). Acculturation and reported intimate partner violence among Latinas in Los Angeles. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20, 569–590.
Gong, F., Takeuchi, D. T., Agbayani-Siewert, P., & Tacata, L. (2003). Acculturation, psychological distress, and alcohol use: Investigating the effects of ethnic identity and religiosity. In K. M. Chun, P. B. Organista, & G. Marin (Eds.), Acculturation: Advances in theory, measurement, and applied research (pp. 198–206). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Grasmick, H. G., Hagan, J., Blackwell, B. S., & Arneklev, B. J. (1996). Risk preferences and patriarchy: Extending power-control theory. Social Forces, 75(1), 177–199.
Guzmán, I. M., & Valdivia, A. N. (2004). Brain, brow, and booty: Latina iconicity in U.S. popular culture. The Communications Review, 7(2), 205–221.
Hay, C. (2003). Family strain, gender, and delinquency. Sociological Perspectives, 46(1), 107–135.
Hay, C., & Evans, M. M. (2006). Violent victimization and involvement in delinquency: Examining predictions from general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice, 34, 261–274.
Hess, R. S., & Richards, M. L. (1999). Developmental and gender influences on coping: Implications for skills training. Psychology in Schools, 36, 149–158.
Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Hill Collins, P., & Bilge, S. (2016). Intersectionality. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
Hirschi, T. (1969). Causes of delinquency. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Hunting, G. (2014). Intersectionality-informed qualitative research: A primer. Vancouver, BC: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, Simon Fraser University.
Huq, N., Stein, G. L., & Gonzalez, L. M. (2016). Acculturation conflict among Latino youth: Discrimination, ethnic identity, and depressive symptoms. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 22(3), 377–385.
Hurtado, A. (1996). The color of privilege: Three blasphemies on race and feminism. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
Hurtado, A. (2003). Voicing Chicana feminisms: Young women speak out on sexuality and identity. New York: New York University Press.
Hurtado, A., & Sinha, M. (2016). Beyond machismo: Intersectional Latino masculinities. Austin: University of Texas Press.
Isom, D. (2016). Microaggressions, injustices, and racial identity: An empirical assessment of the theory of African American offending. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice, 32(1), 27–59.
Isom Scott, D. (2017). The new Juan Crow? Unpacking the links between discrimination and crime for Latinxs. Race and Justice. 10.1177/2153368717721613.
Jackson, M. (2013). Fact sheet: The state of Latinas in the United States. Washington, DC: Center for American Progress.
Jang, S. J., & Johnson, B. R. (2003). Strain, negative emotions, and deviant coping among African Americans: A test of general strain theory. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 19(1), 79–105.
Johnson, K. R. (2000). LatCrit IV symposium: Rotating centers, expanding frontiers: LatCrit theory and marginal intersections: Foreward: Celebrating LatCrit theory: What do we do when the music stops? University of California Davis Law Review, 753(33), 753–786.
Kaplan, M. S., & Marks, G. (1990). Adverse effects of acculturation: Psychological distress among Mexican American young adults. Social Science and Medicine, 31, 1313–1319.
Kasturirangan, A., & Williams, E. N. (2003). Counseling Latina battered women: A qualitative study of the Latina perspective. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 31, 162–178.
Kelly, U. (2006). ‘What will happen if I tell you?’ Battered Latina women’s experiences with health care. CJNR. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research, 38, 78–95.
Lin, W. H., Cochran, J. K., & Mieczkowski, T. (2011). Direct and vicarious violent victimization and juvenile delinquency: An application of general strain theory. Sociological Inquiry, 81(2), 195–222.
Loeber, R., & Farrington, D. P. (2014). Age-crime curve. In G. Bruinsma & D. Weisburd (Eds.), Encyclopedia of criminology and criminal justice. New York: Springer.
López, V., & Chesney-Lind, M. (2014). Latina girls speak out: Stereotypes, gender and relationship dynamics. Latino Studies, 12(4), 527–549.
López, V., & Nuño, L. (2016). Latina and African-American girls in the juvenile justice system: Needs, problems, and solutions. Sociology Compass, 10(1), 24–37.
Martinez, R. O., & Dukes, R. L. (1997). The effects of ethnic identity, ethnicity, and gender in adolescent well-being. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 26, 503–516.
Masuoka, N. (2008). Defining the group: Latino identity and political participation. American Politics Research, 36(1), 33–61.
Mazerolle, P., Piquero, A. R., & Capowich, G. E. (2003). Examining the links between strain, situational and dispositional anger, and crime: Further specifying and testing general strain theory. Youth & Society, 35(2), 131–157.
McGee, Z. T., Barber, A., Joseph, E., Dudley, J., & Howell, R. (2005). Delinquent behavior, violent victimization, and coping strategies among Latino adolescents. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation, 42(3), 41–56.
Medible, M. (2007). From bananas to buttocks: The Latina body in popular film and culture. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Messerschmidt, J. W. (1997). Crime as structured action: Gender, race, class and crime in the making. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Messing, J. T., Becerra, D., Ward-Lasher, A., & Androff, D. K. (2015). Latinas’ perceptions of law enforcement: Fear of deportation, crime reporting, and trust in the system. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 30(3), 328–340.
Miller, J. (2014). Doing crime as doing gender? Masculinities, femininities, and crime. In R. Gartner & B. McCarthy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender, sex, and crime (pp. 19–39). New York: Oxford University Press.
Niemann, Y. F. (2001). Stereotypes about Chicanas and Chicanos: Implications for counseling. The Counseling Psychologist, 29, 55–90.
Nuñez, A., González, P., Talavera, G. A., Sanchez-Johnsen, L., Roesch, S. C., Davis, S. M., et al. (2016). Machismo, marianismo, and negative cognitive-emotional factors: Findings from the Hispanic community health study/study of Latinos sociocultural ancillary study. Journal of Latina/o Psychology, 4(4), 202–2017.
Pasko, L. (2017). Beyond confinement: The regulation of girl offenders’ bodies, sexual choices, and behavior. Women & Criminal Justice, 27, 4–20.
Pasko, L., & López, V. (2015). The Latina penalty: Juvenile correctional attitudes toward the Latina juvenile offender. Journal of Ethnicity in Criminal Justice. https://doi.org/10.1080/15377938.2015.1015196.
Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859–866.
Peck, J. H. (2013). Examining race and ethnicity in the context of general strain theory, depression, and delinquency. Deviant Behavior, 34, 706–726.
Pérez, D. M., Jennings, W. G., & Gover, A. R. (2008). Specifying general strain theory: An ethnically relevant approach. Deviant Behavior, 29, 544–578.
Perry, L. (2016). The cultural politics of U.S. immigration: Gender, race, and media. New York: New York University Press.
Pew Hispanic Center. (2009/2013). Between two worlds: How young Latinos come of age in America. Washington, DC.
Phinney, J. S. (1992). The multigroup ethnic identity measure: A new scale for use with diverse groups. Journal of Adolescent Research, 7, 156–176.
Piquero, A. R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Haapanen, R. (2002). Crime in emerging adulthood. Criminology, 40, 137–169.
Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2004). Gender and general strain theory: A preliminary test of Broidy and Agnew’s gender/GST hypothesis. Justice Quarterly, 21(1), 125–158.
Piquero, N. L., & Sealock, M. D. (2010). Race, crime, and general strain theory. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 8, 170–186.
Posick, C., Farrell, A., & Swatt, M. L. (2013). Do boys fight and girls cut? A general strain theory approach to gender and deviance. Deviant Behavior, 34(9), 685–705.
Potter, H. (2015). Intersectionality and criminology: Disrupting and revolutionizing studies of crime. New York: Routledge.
Powell, C., & Lee, J. H. (2002). Recognizing the interdependence of rights in the antidiscrimination context through the world conference against racism. Columbia Human Rights Review, 34, 235–243.
Reynoso, J. (2004). Perspectives on intersections of race, ethnicity, gender, and other grounds: Latinas at the margins. Harvard Latino Law Review, 7, 63–73.
Riina, E. M., Martin, A., Gardner, M., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2013). Context matters: Links between neighborhood discrimination, neighborhood cohesion and African American Adolescents’ adjustment. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 42, 136–146.
Roberton, T., Daffern, M., & Bucks, R. S. (2015). Beyond anger control: Difficulty attending to emotions also predicts aggression in offenders. Psychology of Violence, 5(1), 74–83.
Rodríguez, M. A., Sheldon, W. R., Bauer, H. M., & Pérez-Stable, E. J. (2001). The factors associated with disclosure of intimate partner abuse to clinicians. The Journal of Family Practice, 50, 338–344.
Rouhani, S. (2014). Intersectionality-informed quantitative research: A primer. Vancouver, BC: The Institute for Intersectionality Research & Policy, Simon Fraser University.
Sabina, C., Cuevas, C. A., & Schally, J. L. (2015). The influence of ethnic group variation on victimization and help seeking among Latino women. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 21(1), 19–30.
Sampson, R. J., & Groves, W. B. (1989). Community structure and crime: Testing social disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology, 94, 774–802.
Sampson, R. J., Raudenbush, S. W., & Earls, F. (1997). Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science, 277, 918–924.
Sanchez, D., Vanderwater, E. A., & Hamilton, E. R. (2017). Examining marianismo, gender role attitudes, ethnic identity, mental health, and substance use in Mexican American early adolescent girls. Journal of Ethnicity in Substance Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332640.2017.1356785.
Scharrón-Del Río, M. R., & Aja, A. A. (2015). The case for ‘Latinx’: Why intersectionality is not a choice. Retrieved from http://www.latinorebels.com/.
Serrano-Villar, M., & Calzada, E. J. (2016). Ethnic identity: Evidence of protective effects for young, Latino children. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 42, 21–30.
Shaw, C. R., & McKay, H. D. (1942). Juvenile delinquency and urban areas. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Solorzano, D. G., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a critical race and latcrit theory framework: Chicana and Chicano students in an urban context. Urban Education, 36, 308–342.
Stith, S. M., Smith, D. B., Penn, C. E., Ward, D. B., & Tritt, D. (2004). Intimate partner physical abuse perpetration and victimization risk factors: A meta-analysis review. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 10(1), 65–98.
Ulibarri, M. D., Ulloa, E. C., & Camacho, L. (2009). Prevalence of sexually abusive experiences in childhood and adolescence among a community sample of Latinas: A descriptive study. Journal of Child Sexual Abuse, 18(4), 405–421.
Umaña-Taylor, A. J., Alfaro, E. C., Bámaca, M. Y., & Guimond, A. B. (2009). The central role of familial ethnic socialization in Latino adolescents’ cultural orientation. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71, 46–60.
U.S. Census Bureau. (2017). Hispanic origin. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/topics/population/hispanic-origin.html.
Unnever, J. D., & Gabbidon, S. L. (2011). A theory of African American offending. New York: Routledge.
van Buuren, S. (2012). Flexible imputation of missing data. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.
Vargas, D. H. (2010). Representations of Latino/a sexuality in popular culture. In M. Asencio (Ed.), Latino/a sexualities: Probing, passions, practices, and politics (pp. 117–139). New Bruswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Yancey, A. K., Aneshensel, C. S., & Driscoll, A. K. (2001). The assessment of ethnic identity in diverse urban youth populations. Journal of Black Psychology, 27, 190–208.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Scott, D.I. Latina Fortitude in the Face of Disadvantage: Exploring the Conditioning Effects of Ethnic Identity and Gendered Ethnic Identity on Latina Offending. Crit Crim 26, 49–73 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9380-9
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10612-017-9380-9