Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Compliance with anti-human trafficking policies: the mediating effect of corruption

  • Published:
Crime, Law and Social Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Human Trafficking is an atrocious crime that represents a gross assault on human rights and the United Nations states that it is among the fast growing types of criminal activity. Recognizing the need for counteractive measures, in 2000, the United Nations General Assembly adopted the Convention against Transnational Organized Crime and its Protocol to Prevent, Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, especially Women and Children (Protocol). Using measures of country compliance with the Protocol, past research offers empirical evidence that corruption is a primary deterrent to compliance. Further, previous field studies and surveys suggest that a greater share of women in government should positively contribute to country compliance; however, this result is largely not borne out in empirical studies. It is hypothesized that the effect of the share of women in government on compliance is fully mediated by corruption, indicating that there is an indirect effect of women in government on compliance, rather than a direct effect. This hypothesis is empirically tested using a mediation model and the results indicate that the indirect effect is statistically significant. The empirical results presented suggest that a greater percentage of women in government reduces country corruption, which in turn increases country compliance with the Protocol. The policy implications of these findings are discussed and include suggestions to enhance female participation in government.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agbu, O. (2003). Corruption and human trafficking: The Nigerian case. West Africa Review, 4(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Studnicka, A. C. S. (2010). Corruption and human trafficking in Brazil: Findings from a multi-modal approach. European Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 29–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. United States Department of State. (2016). Trafficking in Persons Report 2016. https://www.state.gov/documents/organization/258876.pdf Accessed January 11, 2018.

  4. United Nations. (2012). Heinous, fast-growing crimes of human, drug trafficking will continue to ravage world’s economies without coordinated global action, Third Committee http://www.un.org/press/en/2012/gashc4039.doc.htm Accessed March 5, 2017.

  5. Dijk, J. V., & Mierlo, F. K.-V. (2014). Quantitative indices for anti-human trafficking policies: Based on reports of the U.S. Department and the Council of Europe. Crime, Law and Social Change, 61, 229–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wheaton, E. M., Schauer, E. J., & Galli, T. V. (2010). Economics of human trafficking. International Migration, 48(4), 114–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Winterdyk, J., & Reichel, P. (2010). Introduction to special issue human trafficking: Issues and perspectives. European Journal of Criminology, 7(1), 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Potrafke, N. (2013). Policies against human trafficking: The role of religion and political insitutions. CESifo Working Paper, No. 4278.

  9. Duong, K. A. (2012). Human trafficking in a globalized world: Gender aspects of the issue and antitrafficking politics. Journal of Research in Gender Studies, 2(1), 48.

    Google Scholar 

  10. United Nations Office of Drugs and Crime (UNODC). (2014). Global report on trafficking in persons 2014. Retrieved from https://www.unodc.org/documents/data-and-analysis/glotip/GLOTIP_2014_full_report.pdf.

  11. Fitchtelberg, A. (2008). Crime without borders: An introduction to international criminal justice. Upper Saddle River: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Cho, S-Y & Vadlamannati, K.C. (2010). Compliance for big brothers: An empirical analysis on the impact of the anti-trafficking protocol. Discussion Papers, Center for European Governance and Economic Development Research, No. 118.

  13. Cho, S.-Y., Dreher, A., & Neumayer, E. (2014). Determinants of anti-trafficking policies: Evidence from a new index. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(2), 429–454.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cho, S-Y. (2017). The economics of human trafficking. http://www.economics-human-trafficking.org/anti-trafficking-3p.html Accessed March 20, 2017.

  15. Heller, L. R., Lawson, R. A., Murphy, R. H., & Williamson, C. R. (2016). Is human trafficking the dark side of economic freedom? Defence and Peace Economics, (2016), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2016.1160604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cho, S-Y. (2010). International human rights treaty to change social patterns – the Convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women. Cege. Discussion Paper Series No.93. Georg-August University of Goettingen, Germany.

  17. Neumayer, E. (2005). Do international human rights treaties improve respect for human rights? Journal of Conflict Resolution, 49(6), 925–953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bales, K. (2007). What predicts human trafficking. International Journal of Comparative and Applied Criminal Justice, 31(2), 269–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cho, S.-Y. (2015). Modeling for determinants of human trafficking: An empirical analysis. Social Inclusion, 3(1), 2–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rao, S., & Presenti, C. (2012). Understanding human trafficking origin: A cross-country empirical analysis. Feminist Economics, 18(2), 231–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Surtees, R. (2008). Traffickers and trafficking in southern and Eastern Europe. European Criminology, 5(1), 39–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. McCarthy, L. A. (2010). Beyond corruption: An assessment of Russian law enforcement’s fight against human trafficking. Demokratizatsiya, 18(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Uslaner, E. M. (2008). Corruption inequality, and the rule of law: The bulging pocket makes the easy life. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Olken, B. A. (2007). Monitoring corruption: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. Journal of Political Economy, 115(2), 200–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Rose-Ackerman, S. (2005). The challenge of poor governance and corruption. Especial 1 DIREITO GV L. Rev., 207.

  26. Jain, A. K. (2001). Corruption: A review. Journal of Economic Surveys, 15(1), 71–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. World Bank (n.d.) http://www.worldbank.org/en/about/unit/integrity-vice-presidency/what-is-fraud-and-corruption Accessed January 5, 2018.

  28. Aguilera, R. V., & Vadera, A. K. (2008). The dark side of authority: Antecedents, mechanisms, and outcomes of organizational corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 77, 431–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Johnston, M. (1996). The search for definition: The vitality of politics and the issue of corruption. International Social Science Journal, 48(149), 321–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Nye, T. S. (1967). Corruption and political development: A cost-benefit analysis. The American Political Science Review, 61(2), 417–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. United Nations Convention against Corruption. (n.d.) https://www.unodc.org/unodc/en/treaties/CAC/ Accessed January 5, 2018.

  32. Tanzi, V. (1998). Corruption around the world: Causes, consequences, scope, and cures. Washington, D.C.: IMF Staff Papers, 45(4) International Monetary Fund.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Adepoju, A. (2005). Review of research and data on human trafficking in sub-Saharan Africa. International Migration, 43(1/2), 75–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gajic-Veljanoski, O., & Stewart, D. E. (2007). Women trafficked into prostitution: Determinants, human rights and health needs. Transcultural Psychiatry, 44(3), 338–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Jac-Kucharski, A. (2012). The determinants of human trafficking: A US case study. International Migration, 50(6), 150–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. American Civil Liberties Union. (n.d.) https://www.aclu.org/other/human-trafficking-modern-enslavement-immigrant-women-united-states Accessed March 21, 2017.

  37. Sigmon, J. N. (2008). Combating modern-day slavery: Issues in identifying and assisting victims of human trafficking worldwide.Victims and Offenders, 3(2–3), 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bales, K., Trodd, Z., & Williamson, A. K. (2011). Modern Slavery: A Beginner's Guide. Oxford: Oneworld Publications.

  39. United Nations Global Initiative to Fight Human Trafficking. (2008). Background paper-corruption and human trafficking: The grease that facilitates the crime. Vienna, Austria.

  40. Bales, K. (2005). Understanding global slavery. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. Lyday, C. B. (2001). The shadow market in human beings: An anti-corruption perspective. Paper presented at Transparency International’s 10th International Anti-Corruption Conference, Prague, Czech Republic, 7–10 October.

  42. World Bank. (2016). http://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/governance/brief/anti-corruption Accessed March 20, 2017.

  43. DiRienzo, C. E., & Das, J. (2015). Innovation and the role of corruption and diversity: A cross-country study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 15(1), 51–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Holmes, L. (2009). Human trafficking & corruption: Triple victimization? Strategies against Human Trafficking: The Role of the Security Sector, National Defence Academy and Austrian Ministry of Defence and Sports. Vienna and Geneva, 83–114.

  45. Uddin, M. B. (2014). Human trafficking in South Asia: Issues of corruption and human security. International Journal of Social Work and Human Services Practice, 2(1), 18–27.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Cho, S. Y. (2015). Modelling for determinants of human trafficking. Economics of Security Working Paper, No. 70. https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/119396/1/diw_econsec0070.pdf Accessed March 24, 2017.

  47. Chattopadhyay, R., & Duflo, E. (2004). Women as policy makers: Evidence from a randomized policy experiment in India. Econometrica, 72(5), 1409–1443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Bartilow, H. (2010). Gender representation and international compliance against human trafficking. Manuscript, the University of Kentucky.

  49. Biesanz, J. C., Falk, C. F., & Savalei, V. (2010). Assessing mediational models: Testing and interval estimation for indirect effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45(4), 661–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. James, L. R., & Brett, J. M. (1984). Mediators, moderators and tests for mediation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69, 307–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1981). Process analysis: Estimating mediation in treatment evaluations. Evaluation Review, 5, 602–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Dollar, D., Fisman, R., & Gatti, R. (2001). Are women really the ‘fairer’ sex? Corruption and women in government. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 46, 423–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Swamy, A., Knack, S., Lee, Y., & Azfar, O. (2001). Gender and corruption. Journal of Development Economics, 64(1), 25–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Esarey, J., & Chirillo, G. (2013). ‘Fairer sex’ or purity myth? Corruption, gender, and institutional context. Politics & Gender, 9(4), 361–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Sung, H.-E. (2003). Fairer sex or fairer system? Gender and corruption revisited. Social Forces, 82(2), 703–723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Sung, H.-E. (2012). Women in government, public corruption, and the liberal democracy: A panel analysis. Crime, Law and Social Change, 58, 195–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Berg, E. (2001). How should corruption be measured? MSc economics extended essay. London: London School of Economics and Political Science.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Sampford, C., A. Shacklock, C. Connors, and F. Galtung, eds. (2006). Measuring corruption. Ashgate e-Book, Grower House, Hampsire, England.

  60. Jones, S., Dietsche, E., & Weinzierl, S. (2006). Corruption: Measuring prevalence and costs. Oxford: Oxford Policy Management.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Lancaster, T. D., & Montinola, G. R. (1997). Toward a methodology for the comparative study of political corruption. Crime, Law and Social Change, 27, 85–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Serra, D. (2006). Empirical determinants of corruption: A sensitivity analysis. Public Choice, 126, 225–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Iqbal, Z., & Starr, H. (2008). Bad neighbors: Failed states and their consequences. Conflict Management and Peace Science, 25, 315–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Leicht, K. T., & Jenkins, J. C. (1998). Political resources and direct state intervention: The adoption of the public venture capital programs in the American states, 1974 – 1990. Social Forces, 76(40), 1323–1345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Poddar, T., Goswami, M., Solé, J., and Icaza, V.E. (2006). Interest rate determination in Lebanon. IMF Working Paper, WP/06/94. Available http://www.mafhoum.com/press9/278E12.pdf Accessed January 8, 2018.

  66. United Nations. (2012). Heinous, fast-growing crimes of human, drug trafficking will continue to ravage world’s economies without coordinated global action, Third Committee told. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/press/en/2012/gashc4039.doc.htm Accessed March 24, 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Elon University, 2075 Campus Box, Elon, NC, 27244, USA

    Cassandra DiRienzo

Authors
  1. Cassandra DiRienzo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cassandra DiRienzo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

DiRienzo, C. Compliance with anti-human trafficking policies: the mediating effect of corruption. Crime Law Soc Change 70, 525–541 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9780-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-018-9780-0

Search

Navigation