Skip to main content
Log in

Comparing Income and Housing of Former Prisoners After Imprisonment with their Situation Before Imprisonment

  • Published:
European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is ample evidence that imprisonment deteriorates the income and housing situation of former prisoners. Little is known about the degree to which income and housing of (former) prisoners deteriorates during imprisonment. The objective of this article is to give a more detailed description of the changing income situation and housing situation during imprisonment by describing income and housing of (former) prisoners directly before and directly after imprisonment. To this end we make use of data on the entire population of prisoners who were released from Dutch prisons during the second half of 2008. Our results show that prisoners are characterised by a considerably problematic profile with regard to income and housing both before and after imprisonment. The income and housing situation of prisoners is worse directly after imprisonment than directly before imprisonment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In total, this involves 32.2 % of all prisoners who have completed their sentence.

  2. In this research we consider shelter as having an accommodation, although in the US shelter stays are sometimes used as an indicator of homelessness. We do so, because in Dutch aftercare policy shelter is considered as a type of accommodation, because their aim is to get prisoners off the streets.

References

  • Adamczuk, H. (2007). Meeting the housing needs of prisoners and ex-offenders in the UK: Opportunities and limitations. Birmingham: University of Central England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D. A., & Bonta, J. (2006). The psychology of criminal conduct (4th ed.). Newark: Lexis/Nexis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, E., McDonnell, D., Maplesston, P., & Peeters, M. (2003). Ex-prisoners and accomodation: What bearing do different forms of housing have on social reintegration? Melbourne: AHURI.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldry, E., McDonnell, D., Maplesston, P., & Peeters, M. (2006). Ex-prisoners, homelessness and the State in Australia. The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Criminology, 39(1), 20–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blokland, A., & Nieuwbeerta, P. (2005). The effects of life circumstances on longitudinal trajectories of offending. Criminology, 43(4), 1203–1240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blom, M., Oudhof, J., Bijl, R. V., & Bakker, B. F. M. (2005). Verdacht van Criminaliteit: Allochtonen en Autochtonen Nader Bekeken. Den Haag: WODC/CBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. (1996). The housing needs of ex-prisoners. Yourk: Joseph Rowntree foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheliotis, L. K. (2009). Before the next storm: Some evidence-based reminders about temporary release. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 53(4), 420–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DJI. (2008). Annual Report 2007: Safely working towards change. Den Haag: DJI.

    Google Scholar 

  • DJI (2012). Overzicht erkende penitentiaire programma’s van 1 April 2011 – 1 April 2012. Available online at: http://www.dji.nl/Onderwerpen/Volwassenen-in-detentie/Straffen-en-maatregelen/.

  • Geller, A., & Curtis, M. A. (2011). A sort of homecoming: incarceration and the housing security of urban men. Social Science Research, 40, 1196–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geller, A., Garfinkel, I., & Western, B. (2006). The Effects of Incarceration on Employment and Wages – An Analysis of the Fragile Families Survey. Available online at: http://www.saferfoundation.org/files/documents/Princeton-Effect%20of%20Incarceration%20on%20Employment%20and%20Wages.pdf.

  • Gendreau, P., Smith, P., & French, S. A. (2006). The theory of effective correctional intervention: empirical status and future directions. In F. T. Cullen, J. P. Wright, & K. R. Blevins (Eds.), Taking stock: The status of criminological theory (pp. 419–446). New Brunswick: Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISt (Inspectorate for the Implementation of Sanctions). (2008). Aansluiting nazorg in het gevangeniswezen. Den Haag: ISt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2001). Understanding desistance from crime. In M. Tonry (Ed.), Crime and justice: A review of research (Vol. 28, pp. 1–69). Chicago, IL/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laub, J. H., & Sampson, R. J. (2003). Shared beginnings, divergent lives: Delinquent boys to age 70. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipsey, M. W., & Cullen, F. T. (2007). The effectiveness of correctional rehabilitation: a review of systematic reviews. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 3, 297–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, M., Hutson, S., & Nolan, J. (2007). Accomodation for ex-prisoners in the south west region. Pontypridd: University of Glamorgan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maruna, S. (2001). Making good: How ex-convicts reform and rebuild their lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, B., & Hagan, J. (1991). Homelessness: a criminogenic situation? British Journal of Criminology, 31(4), 393–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metraux, S., & Culhane, D. P. (2004). Homeless shelter use and reincarceration following prison release. Criminology & Public Policy, 3(2), 139–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niven, S., & Olangundoye, J. (2002). Jobs and Homes: A Survey of Prisoners near Release. Home Office Findings 173.

  • Pettit, B., & Lyons, C. J. (2009). Incarceration and the legitimate labor market: examining age-graded effects on employment and wages. Law & Society Review, 43(4), 725–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roman, C. G., & Travis, J. (2006). Where will I sleep tomorrow? Housing, homelessness, and the returning prisoner. Housing Policy Debate, 17(2), 389–418.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sampson, R. J., & Laub, J. H. (1993). Crime in the making: Pathways and turning points through life. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skardhamar, T., & Telle, K. (2012). Post-release employment and recidivism in Norway. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 28(4), 629–649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tripodi, S. J., Kim, J. S., & Bender, K. (2010). Is employment associated with reduced recidivism? The complex relationship between employment and crime. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 706–720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uggen, C. (2000). Work as a turning point in the life course of criminals: a duration model of age, employment, and recidivism. American Sociological Review, 67, 529–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venkatesh, S. A. (2006). Off the books: The underground economy of the urban poor. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warr, M. (1998). Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology, 36(2), 183–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartna, B. S. J., et al. (2009). Recidivism Report 1997–2006: Development in the reconviction rate of Dutch offenders. Den Haag: WODC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Western, B., Kling, J. R., & Weiman, D. F. (2001). The labor market consequences of incarceration. Crime & Delinquency, 47(3), 410–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gijs Weijters.

Appendix 1

Appendix 1

Table 8 Relation between background characteristics and obtaining and losing one’s income and housing

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Weijters, G., More, A. Comparing Income and Housing of Former Prisoners After Imprisonment with their Situation Before Imprisonment. Eur J Crim Policy Res 21, 35–48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-013-9225-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10610-013-9225-3

Keywords

Navigation