Skip to main content
Log in

Clarifying Relations Between Thought-Action Fusion, Religiosity, and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms Through Consideration of Intent

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cognitive Therapy and Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Conflicting findings regarding the relations between thought-action fusion (TAF), religiosity, and obsessive compulsive disorder (OCD) may be due to a lack of clarity regarding the intent associated with the negative thoughts under consideration. In Study 1, we examined the perceptions of the immorality of intentional and unwanted morally-relevant thoughts (Moral TAF) and their relations with OCD symptoms, religiosity, and obsessive beliefs in a non-clinical sample. In Study 2, we randomly assigned participants to complete one of two versions of a previously used sentence neutralization task that was varied in terms of intent. Perception of the immorality of intentional negative thoughts but not unwanted negative thoughts was associated with Protestant/Catholic affiliation and greater prayer frequency, and perception of the immorality of unwanted thoughts was consistently associated with obsessive beliefs. Neither form of Moral TAF was associated with OCD symptoms. Further, reaction to the modified non-intentional neutralization task was associated with OCD symptoms, thought-action fusion, and scrupulosity, while reaction to the original intentional task was only associated with Moral TAF. Overall, the findings suggest that individuals differ in their perceptions of intentional versus unintentional thoughts. Perceptions of intentional morally-relevant thoughts appear related to religiosity, while perceptions of unintentional thoughts are likely to be of greater relevance to our understanding of OCD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. This quote has been attributed to Martin Luther, though there is no record of it in his writings.

References

  • Abramowitz, J. S., Huppert, J. D., Cohen, A. B., Tolin, D. F., & Cahill, S. P. (2002). Religious obsessions and compulsions in a non-clinical sample: The penn inventory of scrupulosity (PIOS). Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 825–838.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Antony, M. M., Bieling, P. J., Cox, B. J., Enns, M. W., & Swinson, R. P. (1998). Psychometric properties of the 42-item and 21-item versions of the depression anxiety stress scales in clinical groups and a community sample. Psychological Assessment, 10, 176–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, N. C., Abramowitz, J. S., Pardue, C. M., & Wheaton, M. G. (2010). The relationship between religion and thought-action fusion: Use of an in vivo paradigm. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 670–674.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, N. C., Abramowitz, J. S., Wheaton, M. G., Pardue, C. M., & Fabricant, L. (2011). Evaluation of an in vivo measure of thought-action fusion. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy: An International Quarterly, 25, 155–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bocci, L., & Gordon, P. K. (2007). Does magical thinking produce neutralising behaviour? An experimental investigation. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 1823–1833.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, D. A., & Purdon, C. (1993). New perspectives for a cognitive theory of obsessions. Australian Psychologist, 28, 161–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foa, E. B., Huppert, J. D., Leiberg, S., Langner, R., Kichic, R., Hajcak, G., et al. (2002). The obsessive–compulsive inventory: Development and validation of a short version. Psychological Assessment, 14, 485–496.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs, N. A. (1996). Nonclinical populations in research on obsessive–compulsive disorder: A critical review. Clinical Psychology Review, 16, 729–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry, J. D., & Crawford, J. R. (2005). The short form version of the depression anxiety stress scales (DASS-21): Construct validity and normative data in a large nonclinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 44, 227–239.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. J., Cougle, J. R., & Telch, M. J. (2005). Thought-action fusion and its relationship to schizotypy and OCD symptoms. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 29–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, H. J., & Telch, M. J. (2010). Differences in latent inhibition as a function of the autogenous-reactive OCD subtype. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 48, 571–579.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (2nd ed.). Sydney, Australia: The Psychology Foundation of Australia, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Obsessive Compulsive Cognition Working Group. (2005). Psychometric validation of the obsessive belief questionnaire and interpretation of intrusions inventory—Part 2: Factor analyses and testing of a brief version. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 43, 1527–1542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, B. O., Abramowitz, J. S., Williams, N. L., Connolly, K. M., & Lohr, J. M. (2007). Scrupulosity and obsessive-compulsive symptoms: Confirmatory factor analysis and validity of the penn inventory of scrupulosity. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 21, 771–787.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Olatunji, B. O., Williams, B. J., Haslam, N., Abramowitz, J. S., & Tolin, D. F. (2008). The latent structure of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: a taxometric study. Depression and Anxiety, 25, 956–968.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Purdon, C., Cripps, E., Faull, M., Joseph, S., & Rowa, K. (2007). Development of a measure of egodystonicity. Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy, 21, 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1993). Obsessions, responsibility, and guilt. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 31, 149–154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S. (1997). A cognitive theory of obsessions. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 35, 793–802.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rachman, S., Shafran, R., Mitchell, D., Trant, J., & Teachman, B. (1996). How to remain neutral: An experimental analysis of neutralization. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34, 889–898.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rassin, E., & Koster, E. (2003). The correlation between thought-action fusion and religiosity in a normal sample. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 41, 361–368.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P. M. (1985). Obsessional-compulsive problems, a cognitive-behavioural analysis. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 23, 571–583.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salkovskis, P., Shafran, R., Rachman, S., & Freeston, M. (1999). Multiple pathways to inflated responsibility beliefs in obsessional problems: possible origins and implications for therapy and research. Behavior Research and Therapy, 37, 1055–1072.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shafran, R., & Rachman, S. (2004). Thought-action fusion: a review. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 35, 87–107.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Shafran, R., Thordarson, D. S., & Rachman, S. (1996). Thought-action fusion in obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 10, 379–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siev, J., & Cohen, A. (2007). Is thought-action fusion related to religiosity? Differences between Christians and Jews. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 45, 829–837.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tolin, D. F., Abramowitz, J. S., Hamlin, C., Foa, E. B., & Synodi, D. S. (2002). Attributions for thought suppression failure in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 26, 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zucker, B. G., Craske, M. G., Barrios, V., & Holguin, M. (2002). Thought action fusion: Can it be corrected? Behaviour Research and Therapy, 40, 653–664.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jesse R. Cougle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cougle, J.R., Purdon, C., Fitch, K.E. et al. Clarifying Relations Between Thought-Action Fusion, Religiosity, and Obsessive–Compulsive Symptoms Through Consideration of Intent. Cogn Ther Res 37, 221–231 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9461-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10608-012-9461-8

Keywords

Navigation