Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A fully-implicit parallel framework for complex reservoir simulation with mimetic finite difference discretization and operator-based linearization

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Computational Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As the main way to reproduce flow response in subsurface reservoirs, the reservoir simulation could drastically assist in reducing the uncertainties in the geological characterization and in optimizing the field development strategies. However, the challenges in providing efficient and accurate solutions for complex field cases constrain further utilization of this technology. In this work, we develop a new reservoir simulation framework based on advanced spatial discretization and linearization schemes, the mimetic finite difference (MFD) and operator-based linearization (OBL), for fully implicit temporal discretization. The MFD has gained some popularity lately since it was developed to solve for unstructured grids and full tensor properties while mimicking the fundamental properties of the system (i.e. conservation laws, solution symmetries, and the fundamental identities and theorems of vector and tensor calculus). On the other hand, in the OBL the mass-based formulations are written in an operator form where the parametric space of the unknowns is treated in a piece-wise manner for the linearization process. Moreover, the values of these operators are usually precomputed into a nodal tabulation and with the implementation of multi-linear interpolation, the values of these operators and their derivatives during a simulation run can be determined in an efficient way for the Jacobian assembly at any time-step. This saves computational time during complex phase behavior computations. By first coupling these two schemes within a parallel framework, we can solve large and complex reservoir simulation problems in an efficient manner. Finally, we present a benchmark case that compares the numerical solutions to a Buckley-Leverett analytical solution to assure their accuracy and convergence. Moreover, we test three challenging field cases to demonstrate the performance of the advanced parallel framework for complex reservoir simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abushaikha, A.S., Voskov, D.V., Tchelepi, H.A.: Fully implicit mixed-hybrid finite-element discretization forgeneral purpose subsurface reservoir simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 346, 514–538 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hjeij, D., Abushaikha, A. S.: Comparing advanced discretization methods for complex hydrocarbon reservoirs. In: SPE Reservoir characterisation and simulation conference and exhibitions. Society of Petroleum Engineers (2019)

  3. Aavatsmark, I., Barkve, T., Bøe, Ø., Mannseth, T.: Discretization on non-orthogonal, curvilinear grids for multi-phase flow. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Røros, Norway (1994)

  4. Aavatsmark, I., Barkve, T., Bøe, Ø., Mannseth, T.: Discretization on non-orthogonal, quadrilateral grids for inhomogeneous, anisotropic media. J. Comput. Phys. 127, 2–14 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aavatsmark, I., Barkve, T., Bøe, Ø., Mannseth, T.: A class of discretization methods for structured and unstructured grids in anisotropic, inhomogeneous media. In: Proceedings of 5th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Leoben, Austria (1996)

  6. Aavatsmark, I., Barkve, T., Mannseth, T.: Control-volume discretization methods for 3D quadrilateral grids in inhomogeneous, anisotropic reservoirs. SPE J. 3, 146–154 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Edwards, M. G., Rogers, C. F.: A flux continuous scheme for the full tensor pressure equation. In: Proceedings of the fourth European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Røros (1994)

  8. Edwards, M.G., Rogers, C.F.: Finite volume discretization with imposed flux continuity for the general tensor pressure equation. Comput. Geosci. 2(4), 259–290 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, L., Khait, M., Voskov, D. V., Abushaikha, A. S.: Parallel framework for complex reservoir simulation with advanced discretization and linearization schemes. In: the SPE Europec featured at 82nd EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Amsterdam, Netherlands. SPE-200615-MS (2020)

  10. Brezzi, F., Fortin, M.: Mixed and Hybrid Finite Element Methods. Springer, Berlin (1991)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Chavent, G., Roberts, J.: A unified physical presentation of mixed, mixed-hybrid finite elements and standard finite difference approximations for the determination of velocities in water flow problems. Adv. Water Resour. 14, 329–348 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Younes, A., Fontaine, V.: Efficiency of mixed hybrid finite element and multipoint flux approximation methods on quadrangular grids and highly anisotropic media. Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 76(3), 314–336 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tikhonov, A.N., Samarskii, A.A.: Homogeneous difference schemes. Comput. Math. Math. Phys. 1(1), 5–67 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lipnikov, K., Manzini, G., Shashkov, M.: Mimetic finite difference method. J. Comput. Phys. 257, 1163–1227 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Alpak, F.O.: A mimetic finite volume discretization method for reservoir simulation. SPE J. 15(2), 436–453 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Abushaikha, A.S., Terekhov, K.M.: A fully implicit mimetic finite difference scheme for general purpose subsurfacereservoir simulation with full tensor permeability. J. Comput. Phys. 406, 109194 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang, N., Abushaikha, A.: An implementation of mimetic finite difference method for fractured reservoirs using a fully implicit approach and discrete fracture models. J. Comput. Phys. 446, 110665 (2021)

  18. Zhang, N., Abushaikha, A. S.: Fully implicit reservoir simulation using mimetic finite difference method in fractured carbonate reservoirs. In: SPE reservoir characterisation and simulation conference and exhibition, 17–19 September, Abu Dhabi, UAE. SPE-196711-MS (2019)

  19. Li, L., Voskov, D.V., Yao, J., et al.: Multiphase transient analysis for monitoring of CO2 flooding. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 160, 537–554 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu, L., Yao, J., Sun, H., et al.: Compositional modeling of shale condensate gas flow with multiple transportmechanisms. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 172, 1186–1201 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Sun, H., Yao, J., Gao, S., Fan, D.Y., Wang, C.C., Sun, Z.X.: Numerical study of CO2 enhanced natural gas recovery and sequestration in shale gas reservoirs. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Control. 19, 406–419 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Yao, J., Sun, H., Fan, D., Wang, C.C., Sun, Z.X.: Numerical simulation of gas transport mechanisms in tight shale gas reservoirs. Pet. Sci. 10(4), 528–537 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Liu, P., Li, J., Sun, S., Yao, J., Zhang, K.: Numerical investigation of carbonate acidizing with gelled acid using a coupled thermal-hydrologic-chemical model. Int. J. Therm. Sci. 160, 106700 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Namdar Zanganeh, M.: Simulation and optimization of foam EOR processes. Master dissertation, TU Delft, Netherlands (July 2011)

  25. Voskov, D.V.: Operator-based linearization approach for modeling of multiphase multi-component flow in porous media. J. Comput. Phys. 337, 275–288 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Khait, M., Voskov, D.V.: Operator-based linearization for general purpose reservoir simulation. J. Pet. Sci. Eng. 157, 990–998 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Khait, M., Voskov, D.V.: Operator-based linearization for efficient modeling of geothermal processes. Geothermics. 74, 7–18 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Khait, M., Voskov, D. V.: Adaptive parameterization for solving of thermal/ compositional nonlinear flow and transport with buoyancy. SPE J. 23 (02) (2018)

  29. Wang, Y., Voskov, D.V., Khait, M., Bruhn, D.: An efficient numerical simulator for geothermal simulation: a benchmark study. Appl. Energy. 264, 114693 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Al-Jundi, A., Li, L., Abushaikhaa, A. S.: Investigation of the accuracy and efficiency of the operator-based linearization through an advanced reservoir simulation framework. In: 17th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2020)

  31. Lyu, X., Voskov, D. V., Rossen, W.: Simulation of foam-assisted CO2 storage in saline aquifers. In: 17th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery, Edinburgh, United Kingdom (2020)

  32. Li, L., Abushaikha, A. S.: Development of an advancing parallel framework for reservoir simulation. In: Third EAGE WIPIC workshop: Reservoir Management in Carbonates, Doha, Qatar (2019)

  33. Li, L., Abushaikha, A.: An advanced parallel framework for reservoir simulation with mimetic finite difference discretization and operator-based linearization. In ECMOR XVII-17th European conference on the mathematics of oil recovery (2020)

  34. Li, B., Chen, Z., Huan, G.: Comparison of solution schemes for black oil reservoir simulations with unstructured grids. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 193, 319–355 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Killough, J. E.: Ninth SPE comparative solution project: A Reexamination of Black-Oil Simulation. In: SPE Reservoir simulation symposium, San Antonio, Texas. SPE-29110-MS (1995)

  36. Jansen, J.D., Fonseca, R.M., Kahrobaei, S., Siraj, M.M., van Essen, G.M., van den Hof, P.M.J.: The egg model: a geological ensemble for reservoir simulation. Geosci. Data J. 1, 192–195 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Nardean, S., Ferronato, M., Abushaikha, A.: A novel block non-symmetric preconditioner for mixed-hybrid finite-element-based Darcy flow simulations. J. Comput. Phys. 442, 110513 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This publication was supported by the National Priorities Research Program grant NPRP11S-1210-170079 from Qatar National Research Fund.

Nomenclature

B Formation volume factor

cr Rock compressibility factor

K Permeability tensor

krα Relative permeability of phase α

Nf Number of interfaces of element E

ni Outward normal on interface i

p Pressure

pref Reference pressure for the porosity ϕ0

Qα,i Flux of phase α on interface i

q Component rate per unit volume

R Gas solubility

S Saturation

t Time

u Velocity

zc Mass fraction of component c

ρ Phase density

ϕ Reservoir porosity

μ Viscosity

g Gas phase

o Oil phase

w Water phase

st Standard condition

n Previous time step

n + 1 Current time step

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Sustainable Development, College of Science and Engineering, Hamad Bin Khalifa University, Qatar Foundation, Doha, Qatar

    Longlong Li & Ahmad Abushaikha

Authors
  1. Longlong Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ahmad Abushaikha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Longlong Li or Ahmad Abushaikha.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, L., Abushaikha, A. A fully-implicit parallel framework for complex reservoir simulation with mimetic finite difference discretization and operator-based linearization. Comput Geosci 26, 915–931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-021-10096-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-021-10096-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation