Abstract
The conventional paradigm for predicting future reservoir performance from existing production data involves the construction of reservoir models that match the historical data through iterative history matching. This is generally an expensive and difficult task and often results in models that do not accurately assess the uncertainty of the forecast. We propose an alternative re-formulation of the problem, in which the role of the reservoir model is reconsidered. Instead of using the model to match the historical production, and then forecasting, the model is used in combination with Monte Carlo sampling to establish a statistical relationship between the historical and forecast variables. The estimated relationship is then used in conjunction with the actual production data to produce a statistical forecast. This allows quantifying posterior uncertainty on the forecast variable without explicit inversion or history matching. The main rationale behind this is that the reservoir model is highly complex and even so, still remains a simplified representation of the actual subsurface. As statistical relationships can generally only be constructed in low dimensions, compression and dimension reduction of the reservoir models themselves would result in further oversimplification. Conversely, production data and forecast variables are time series data, which are simpler and much more applicable for dimension reduction techniques. We present a dimension reduction approach based on functional data analysis (FDA), and mixed principal component analysis (mixed PCA), followed by canonical correlation analysis (CCA) to maximize the linear correlation between the forecast and production variables. Using these transformed variables, it is then possible to apply linear Gaussian regression and estimate the statistical relationship between the forecast and historical variables. This relationship is used in combination with the actual observed historical data to estimate the posterior distribution of the forecast variable. Sampling from this posterior and reconstructing the corresponding forecast time series, allows assessing uncertainty on the forecast. This workflow will be demonstrated on a case based on a Libyan reservoir and compared with traditional history matching.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aanonsen, S.I.: The ensemble Kalman filter in reservoir engineering—a review. SPE J. 14(3), 393–412 (2009)
Ahlbrandt, T.S.: The Sirte Basin Province of Libya: Sirte-Zelten total petroleum system. US Geological Survey. CO: US Department of the Interior, Denver (2001)
Bellman, L.H., Kouwe, W., Yielding, G.: Fault seal analysis in the N-97 Oil Field in Wintershall Concession C97-I, Libya. 2nd EAGE International Conference on Fault and Top Seals—from pore to basin scale 2009, pp 101–104. EAGE, Montpellier (2009)
Brooks, R.H., Corey, A.T.: Hydraulic properties of porous media and their relation to drainage design. Trans. ASAE 7(1), 26–28 (1964)
Chalmers, A.F.: What is this thing called science? St Lucia, Hackett Publishing (2013)
England, W.A.: The effects of faulting on production form a shallow marine reservoir—a study of the relative importance of fault parameters. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, pp 279–292. Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans (1988)
Fenwick, D.S.: Quantifying asymmetric parameter interactions in sensitivity analysis: application to reservoir modeling. Math. Geosci. 46(4), 493–511 (2014)
Fornberg, B., Zuev, J.: The Runge phenomenon and spatially variable shape parameters in RBF interpolation. Computers & Mathematics with Applications 54(3), 379–398 (2007)
Gelman, A., Meng, X.-L., Stern, H.: Posterior predictive assessment of model fitness via realized discrepancies. Stat. Sin., 733–760 (1996)
Gelman, A., Shalizi, C.R.: Philosophy and the practice of Bayesian statistics. Br. J. Math. Stat. Psychol. 66(1), 8–38 (2013)
Hermans, T., Klepikova, M., Caers, J.: Assessing heat tracing experiment data sets for direct forecast of temperature evolution in subsurface models: an example of well and geophysical monitoring data. Geophysical Research Abstracts, p 5105. European Geosciences Union, Vienna (2016)
Hermans, T. , Erasmus, O., Caers, J: Direct prediction of spatially and temporally varying physical properties from time-lapse electrical resistance data. Water Resources Research (in press) (2017)
Hohl, D.S.: Field experiences with history matching an offshore turbiditic reservoir using inverse modeling. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, p. 9. Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Antonio (2006)
Jolliffe, I.: Principal component analysis Hoboken. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd (2002)
Justel, A.D.: A multivariate Kolmogorov-Smirnov test of goodness of fit. Statistics & Probability Letters 35(3), 251–259 (1997)
Krzanowski, W.: Principles of multivariate analysis. OUP Oxford, Oxford (2000)
Kullback, S., Leibler, R.: On information and sufficiency. Ann. Math. Stat. 22(1), 79–86 (1951)
Oliver, D.S., Chen, Y.: Recent progress on reservoir history matching: a review. Comput. Geosci. 15(1), 185–221 (2011)
Ramsay, J.O.: Applied functional data analysis: methods and case studies. Springer, New York (2002)
Ramsay, J.O.: Functional data analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, Hoboken (2006)
Ramsay, J.O.: Some tools for functional data analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc., 539–572 (1991)
Sarma, P.L.: Kernel principal component analysis for efficient, differentiable parameterization of multipoint geostatistics. Math. Geosci. 40(1), 3–32 (2008)
Satija, A.: Reservoir forecasting based on statistical functional analysis of data and prediction variables 162. Stanford, Stanford University (2015)
Satija, A., Caers, J.: Direct forecasting of subsurface flow response from non-linear dynamic data by linear least-squares in canonical functional principal component space. Adv. Water Resour. 77, 69–81 (2015)
Scheidt, C.R.: Prediction-focused subsurface modeling: investigating the need for accuracy in flow-based inverse modeling. Math. Geosci., 1–19 (2014)
Smirnov, N.: Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann. Math. Stat., 279–281 (1948)
Strebelle, S.: Conditional simulation of complex geological structures using multiple-point statistics. Math. Geol. 34(1), 1–24 (2002)
Tarantola, A.: Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. SIAM, Philadelphia (2005)
Thompson, B.: Canonical correlation analysis: uses and interpretation. Sage, London (1984)
Thore, P., Shtuka, A., Lecour, M., Ait-Ettajer, T., Cognot, R.: Structural uncertainties: Determination, management, and applications. Geophysics 67, 840–852 (2002)
Yang, C.N.: Reservoir model uncertainty quantification through computer-assisted history matching. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, p. 12. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Anaheim (2007)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Satija, A., Scheidt, C., Li, L. et al. Direct forecasting of reservoir performance using production data without history matching. Comput Geosci 21, 315–333 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9614-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-017-9614-7