Abstract
Population subdivision must be explicitly considered in the management of conservation programmes, as most populations of wild species at risk of extinction and those kept in captivity are spatially structured. The partition of gene and allelic diversity in within- and between-subpopulation components allows for the integral management of populations. We summarise the main aspects of this partition and some of its applications in terms of priorisation of populations for conservation and establishment of synthetic populations. The procedures for the maintenance of diversity in subdivided populations making use of molecular markers and its implementation by the software METAPOP are illustrated with empirical data.
References
Allendorf FW (1986) Genetic drift and the loss of alleles versus heterozygosity. Zoo Biol 5:181–190
Allendorf FW, Luikart G (2007) Conservation and the genetics of populations. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA, USA
Ballou J, Lacy R (1995) Identifying genetically important individuals for management of genetic variation in pedigreed populations. In: Ballou JD, Gilpin M, Foose TJ (eds) Population management for survival and recovery. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 76–111
Barker JSF (2001) Conservation and management of genetic diversity: a domestic animal perspective. Can J For Res 31:588–595
Bataillon TM, David JL, Schoen DJ (1996) Neutral genetic markers and conservation genetics: simulated germplasm collections. Genetics 144:409–417
Bennewitz J, Meuwissen THE (2005) Estimation of extinction probabilities of five german cattle breeds by population viability analysis. J Dairy Sci 88:2949–2961
Caballero A (1994) Developments in the prediction of effective population size. Heredity 73:657–679
Caballero A, Toro MA (2000) Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genet Res 75:331–343
Caballero A, Toro MA (2002) Analysis of genetic diversity for the management of conserved subdivided populations. Conserv Genet 3:289–299
Caballero A, Santiago E, Toro MA (1996) Systems of mating to reduce inbreeding in selected populations. Anim Sci 62:431–442
Cockerham C (1967) Group inbreeding and co-ancestry. Genetics 56:89–104
Comps B, Gömöry D, Letouzey J, Thiébaut B, Petit RJ (2001) Diverging trends between heterozygosity and allelic richness during postglacial colonization in the European beech. Genetics 157:389–397
Cornuet JM, Luikart G (1996) Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics 144:2001–2014
Crow JF, Kimura M (1970) An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper & Row, New York
Eding H, Crooijmans PMA, Groenne MAM, Meuwissen THE (2002) Assessing the contribution of breeds to genetic diversity in conservation schemes. Genet Sel Evol 34:613–633
El Mousadik A, Petit RJ (1996) High level of genetic differentiation for allelic richness among populations of the argan tree [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] endemic to Morocco. Theor Appl Genet 92:832–839
Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2001) Practical implementations of optimal management strategies in conservation programmes: a mate selection method. Anim Biodiv Conserv 24:17–24
Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2003) Fixed contributions designs versus minimization of global coancestry to control inbreeding in small populations. Genetics 165:885–894
Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2004) Managing individuals’ contributions to maximize the allelic diversity maintained in small, conserved populations. Conserv Biol 18:1–10
Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2008) Management of subdivided populations in conservation programs: development of a novel dynamic system. Genetics 179:683–692
Foulley JL, Ollivier L (2006) Estimating allelic richness and its diversity. Livest Sci 101:150–158
Frankham R, Ballou JD, Briscoe DA (2002) Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Galbusera P, Lens L, Schenck T, Waiyaki E, Matthysen E (2000) Genetic variability and gene flow in the globally, critically-endangered Taita thrush. Conserv Genet 1:45–55
Hill WG, Rasbash J (1986) Models of long term artificial selection in finite populations. Genet Res 48:41–50
Hulbert SH (1971) The nonconcept of species diversity: a critique and alternative parameters. Ecology 52:577–586
James JW (1970) The founder effect and response to artificial selection. Genet Res 16:241–250
Kimura M, Crow JF (1963) On the maximum avoidance of inbreeding. Genet Res 4:399–415
Lacy R (1995) Clarification of genetic terms and their use in the management of captive populations. Zoo Biol 14:565–578
Leberg PL (2002) Estimating allelic richness: effects of sample size and bottlenecks. Mol Ecol 11:2445–2449
Lindgren D, Gea LD, Jefferson PA (1996) Status number for measuring genetic diversity. Forest Res 4:69–76
Luikart G, Allendorf F, Cornuet JM, Sherwin W (1998) Distortion of allele frequency distributions provides a test for recent population bottlenecks. J Hered 89:238–247
Malécot G (1948) Les Mathématiques de l’Hérédité. Masson et Cie, Paris, France
Margan SH, Nurthen RK, Montgomery ME, Woodworth LM, Lowe EH, Briscoe DA, Frankham R (1998) Single large or several small? Population fragmentation in the captive management of endangered species. Zoo Biol 17:467–480
Meuwissen THE (2007) Operation of conservation schemes. In: Oldenbroek K (ed) Utilisation and conservation of farm animal genetic resources. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, The Netherlands, pp 167–193
Nei M (1973) Analysis of gene diversity in subdivided populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 70:3321–3323
Nei M, Maruyama T, Chakraborty R (1975) The bottleneck effect and genetic variability in populations. Evolution 29:1–10
Notter DR (1999) The importance of genetic diversity in livestock populations of the future. J Anim Sci 77:61–69
Ollivier L, Foulley JL (2005) Aggregate diversity: new approach combining within- and between-breed genetic diversity. Livest Prod Sci 95:247–254
Ollivier L, Foulley JL (2009) Managing genetic diversity, fitness and adaptation of farm animal genetic resources. In: Werf J, van der Graser H-U, Frankham, Gondro C, Gondro C (eds) Adaptation and fitness in animal populations—evolutionary and breeding perspectives on genetic resource management. Springer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, pp 201–227
Pérez-Figueroa A, Saura M, Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2009) METAPOP—a software for the management and analysis of subdivided populations in conservation programs. Conserv Genet 10:1097–1099
Persson H, Widén B, Andersson S, Svensson L (2004) Allozyme diversity and genetic structure of marginal and central populations of Corylus avellana L. (Betulaceae). Plant Syst Evol 244:157–179
Petit RJ, El Mousadik A, Pons O (1998) Identifying populations for conservation on the basis of genetic markers. Conserv Biol 12:844–855
Piyasatian N, Kinghorn BP (2003) Balancing genetic diversity, genetic gain and population viability in conservation programmes. J Anim Breed Genet 120:137–149
Robertson A (1964) The effect of nonrandom mating within inbred lines on the rate of inbreeding. Genet Res 5:164–167
Sanders HL (1968) Marine benthic diversity: a comparison study. Am Nat 102:243–282
Santiago E, Caballero A (1998) Effective size and polymorphism of linked neutral loci in populations under selection. Genetics 149:2105–2117
Saura M, Pérez-Figueroa A, Fernández J, Toro MA, Caballero A (2008) Preserving population allele frequencies in ex situ conservation programs. Conserv Biol 22:1277–1287
Simianer H (2005) Using expected allele number as objective function to design between and within breed conservation of farm animal biodiversity. J Anim Breed Genet 122:177–187
Sonesson AK, Meuwissen THE (2000) Mating schemes for optimum contribution selection with constrained rates of inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 32:231–248
Stefenon VM, Gailing O, Finkeldey R (2008) Genetic structure of plantations and the conservation of genetic resources of Brazilian pine (Araucaria augustifolia). Forest Ecol Manag 255:2718–2725
Toro MA, Pérez-Enciso M (1990) Optimization of selection response under restricted inbreeding. Genet Sel Evol 22:93–107
Toro MA, Fernández J, Caballero A (2009) Molecular characterization of breeds and its use in conservation. Livest Sci 120:174–195
Tyler T (2002) Geographic structure of genetic variation in the widespread woodland grass Milium effusum L. A comparison between two regions with contrasting history and geomorphology. Genome 45:1248–1256
Villanueva B, Woolliams JA, Simm G (1994) Strategies for controlling rates of inbreeding in MOET nucleus schemes for beef cattle. Genet Sel Evol 26:517–535
Wang J (1997) Effect of excluding sib matings on inbreeding coefficient and effective size of finite diploid populations. Biometrics 53:1354–1365
Wang J (2005) Monitoring and managing genetic variation in group breeding populations without individual pedigrees. Conserv Genet 5:813–825
Wang J, Caballero A (1999) Developments in predicting the effective size of subdivided populations. Heredity 82:212–226
Weitzman ML (1998) The Noah’s Ark problem. Econometrica 66:1279–1298
Wright S (1969) Evolution and the genetics of populations. The theory of gene frequencies, vol 2. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Acknowledgements
We thank Jeffrey G. Beasley for the English corrections. This work was funded by the Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación and Fondos Feder (CGL2009-13278-C02), and Xunta de Galicia. A.C. benefited from the ESF Science Networking Programme ConGen.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Caballero, A., Rodríguez-Ramilo, S.T., Ávila, V. et al. Management of genetic diversity of subdivided populations in conservation programmes. Conserv Genet 11, 409–419 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0020-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10592-009-0020-0