Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Work process improvement through simulation optimization of task assignment and mental workload

  • Manuscript
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The outcome of a work process depends on which tasks are assigned to which employees. However, sometimes optimized assignments based on employees’ qualifications may result in an uneven and ineffective workload distribution. Likewise, an even workload distribution without considering the employee’s qualifications may cause unproductive employee-task matching that results in low performance. This trade-off is even more noticeable for work processes during critical time junctions, such as in military command centers and emergency rooms that require fast, effective and error free performance. This study evaluates optimizing task-employee assignments according to their capabilities while also maintaining a workload threshold. The goal is to select the employee-task assignments in order to minimize the average duration of a work process while keeping the employees under a workload threshold to prevent errors caused by overload. Due to uncertainties related with the inter-arrival time of work orders, task durations and employees’ instantaneous workload, a simulation–optimization approach is required. A discrete event human performance simulation model was used to evaluate the objective function of the problem coupled with a genetic algorithm based meta-heuristic optimization approach to search the solution space. A sample work process is used to show the effectiveness of the developed simulation–optimization approach. Numerical tests indicate that the proposed approach finds better solutions than common practices and other simulation–optimization methods. Accordingly, by using this method, organizations can increase performance, manage excess-level workloads, and generate higher satisfactory environments for employees, without modifying the structure of the process itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acuna S, Juristo N (2004) Assigning people to roles in software projects. Softw Pract Exper 34(7):675–696. https://doi.org/10.1002/spe.586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acuna S, Juristo N, Moreno AM (2006) Emphasizing human capabilities in software development. Software IEEE 23(2):94–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/ms.2006.47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Aomar R (2006) Incorporating robustness into Genetic Algorithm search of stochastic simulation outputs. Simul Model Pract Theory 14(3):201–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2005.05.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amaran S, Sahinidis NV, Sharda B, Bury SJ (2016) Simulation optimization: a review of algorithms and applications. Ann Oper Res 240(1):351–380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-2019-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andradottir S (2006) Chapter 20 an overview of simulation optimization via random search. In: Shane GH, Barry LN (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 617–631

    Google Scholar 

  • April J, Better M, Glover F, Kelly J, Laguna M (2006) Enhancing business process management with simulation optimization. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, WSC 06, 3–6, Dec 2006

  • Azadivar F, Tompkins G (1999) Simulation optimization with qualitative variables and structural model changes: a genetic algorithm approach. Eur J Oper Res 113(1):169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00430-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton R (2005) Response surface methodology. In: Henderson SG, Nelson BL (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science: simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Bay OF, Akcayol MA (2017) A modified genetic algorithm for a special case of the generalized assignment. Turkish J Electr Eng Comput Sci 25:794–805. https://doi.org/10.3906/elk-1504-250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Better M, Glover F, Kochenberger G, Wang H (2008) Simulation optimization: applications in risk management. Int J Inf Technol Decis Making 7(4):571–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhunia AK, Biswas A, Samanta SS (2017) A genetic algorithm-based approach for unbalanced assignment problem in interval environment. Int J Logist Syst Manage 27(1):62–77. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJLSM.2017.10003920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierbaum CR, Fulford LA, Hamilton DB, Fort RAL (1990) Task Analysis/Workload (TAWL) User’s Guide. Version 3.0. Defense Technical Information Center, Ft. Belvoir

    Google Scholar 

  • Bommer SC, Fendley M (2016) A theoretical framework for evaluating mental workload resources in human systems design for manufacturing operations. Int J Ind Ergon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.10.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain B (2007) A Review of the Mental Workload Literature CANADA: Defence Research and Deelopment Canada Toronto

  • Carley KM (1995) Computational and mathematical organization theory: perspective and directions. Comput Math Org Theory 1(1):39–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01307827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (2002) Computational organizational science and organizational engineering. Simul Model Pract Theory 10(5–7):253–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1569-190X(02)00119-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson Y, Maria A (1997) Simulation optimization: methods and applications. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

  • Cavazzuti M (2013) Deterministic optimization optimization methods. Springer, Berlin, pp 77–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Chu X (2012) Task assignment with multiskilled employees and multiple modes for product development projects. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 61(1–4):391–403. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3686-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu PC, Beasley JE (1997) A genetic algorithm for the generalised assignment problem. Comput Oper Res 24(1):17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0305-0548(96)00032-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahn D, Laughery KR (1997) The integrated performance modeling environment; simulating human-system performance. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 29th conference on Winter simulation, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

  • Daniel JSR, Rajendran C (2005) A simulation-based genetic algorithm for inventory optimization in a serial supply chain. Int Transact Oper Res 12(1):101–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-3995.2005.00492.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daskal L (2016) 7 Reasons the Best Employees Quit, Even When They Like Their Job. Inc

  • Dengiz B, Alabas C (2000) Simulation optimization using tabu search. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, Orlando, Florida

  • Eiselt HA, Marianov V (2008) Employee positioning and workload allocation. Comput Oper Res 35(2):513–524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2006.03.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskandari H, Mahmoodi E, Fallah H, Geiger CD (2011) Performance analysis of comercial simulation-based optimization packages: OptQuest and witness optimizer. Proceedings - Winter Simulation Conference 2005:2358–2368. https://doi.org/10.1109/WSC.2011.6147946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltl H, Raidl GR (2004) An Improved hybrid genetic algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. In: Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, ACM, New York,USA, pp 990–995 https://doi.org/10.1145/967900.968102

  • Fu MC (2002) Optimization for simulation: theory vs practice. INFORMS J Comput 14(3):192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu MC (2005) Gradient Estimation. In: Henderson SG, Nelson BL (eds) Hansbooks in operations research and management science: simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodfriend JH (1995) Discrete event systems: sensitivity analysis and stochastic optimization by the score function method. Technometrics 37(1):124–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1995.10485910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman TJ, Miller ME, Rusnock CF, Bindewald JM (2017) ScienceDirect effects of agent timing on the human-agent team. Cognit Syst Res 46:40–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsys.2017.02.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grooms BE (2009) Close Air Support

  • Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research human mental workload. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 139–183

    Google Scholar 

  • He J, Huang Y, Chang D (2015) Simulation-based heuristic method for container supply chain network optimization. Adv Eng Inform 29(3):339–354. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aei.2014.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland JH (1975) Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  • Huey BM, Wickens CD (1993) Workload transition: implications for individual and team performance. The National Academies Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunn BP, Schweitzer KM, Cahir JA, Finch MM (2008) IMPRINT analysis of an unmanned air system geospatial information process. Army Research Laboratory, Aberdeen Proving Ground

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson E (2014) The top 8 reasons your best people are about to quit – and how you can keep them Forbes. http://www.forbes.com/sites/ericjackson/2014/05/11/the-top-8-reasons-your-best-people-are-about-to-quit-and-how-you-can-keep-them/#12a43731719b

  • Kamrani F, Ayani R, Moradi F, Holm G (2009). Estimating performance of a business process model. Paper presented at the Winter Simulation Conference, Austin, Texas

  • Kamrani F, Ayani R, Moradi F (2012) A framework for simulation-based optimization of business process models. Simulation 88(7):852–869. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549711417880

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller J (2002) Human performance modeling for discrete-event simulation: workload. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference, IEEE, San Diego, 8–11 2002

  • Kelton WD (2000) Design of experiments: experimental design for simulation. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 32nd conference on Winter simulation, Orlando, Florida

  • Keskin BB, Melouk SH, Meyer IL (2010) A simulation-optimization approach for integrated sourcing and inventory decisions. Comput Oper Res 37(9):1648–1661. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2009.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim SH, Nelson BL (2005) Selecting the Best System. In: Henderson SG, Nelson BL (eds) Handbooks in Operations Research and Management Science: Simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen KJ, Yoogalingam R (2009) Improving performance in outpatient appointment services with a simulation optimization approach. Prod Oper Manage 18(4):447–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1937-5956.2009.01021.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin JT, Chen C (2015) Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory Simulation optimization approach for hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in semiconductor back-end manufacturing. Stimul Model Pract Theory 51:100–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.simpat.2014.10.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lipski, J. (2013). Optimization of Production Process (A. Świć & J. Lipski Eds.). Lublin, Poland: Lublin University of Technology

  • Liu YY, Wang S (2015) A scalable parallel genetic algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Parallel Comput 46:98–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.parco.2014.04.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorena LAN, Narciso MG, Beasley JE (2003) A constructive genetic algorithm for the generalized assignment problem. Evol Optim 5:1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorscheid I, Heine B-O, Meyer M (2012) Opening the `black box’ of simulations: increased transparency and effective communication through the systematic design of experiments. Comput Math Org Theory 18(1):22–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-011-9097-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mao M, Xie F, Hu J, Su B (2014) Analysis of workload of tank crew under the conditions of informatization. Def Technol 10:17–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dt.2013.12.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazahery A, Shabani MO, Elrefaei A (2014) Searching for the superior solution to the population-based optimization problem: processing of the wear resistant commercial AA6061 AMCs. Int J Damage Mech 23(7):899–916. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056789513518951

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack R, Coates G (2015) A simulation model to enable the optimization of ambulance fleet allocation and base station location for increased patient survival. Eur J Oper Res 247(1):294–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2015.05.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minxin S, Gwo-Hshiung T, Liu D-R (2003) Multi-criteria task assignment in workflow management systems. Paper presented at the 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, IEEE, Big Island, 6–9 2003

  • Mitchell D (2000) Mental Workload and ARL Workload Modeling Tools Army Research Laboratory

  • Mitchell DK (2009) Workload Analysis of the Crew of the Abrams V2 SEP: Phase I Baseline IMPRINT Model (U. S. A. R. Laboratory, Trans.): Human Research and Engineering Directorate, ARL

  • Mitchell, D. K., Samms, C. L., Henthorn, T., & Wojciechowski, J. Q. (2003). Trade Study: A Two- Versus Three-Soldier Crew for the Mounted Combat System (MCS) and Other Future Combat System Platforms (U. S. A. R. Laboratory, Trans.): Human Research & Engineering Directorate

  • Oh RPT, Sanchez SM, Lucas TW, Wan H, Nissen ME (2009) Efficient experimental design tools for exploring large simulation models. Comput Math Org Theory 15(3):237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-009-9059-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ólaffson S (2005) Metaheuristics. In: Henderson SG, Nelson BL (eds) Handbooks in operations research and management science: simulation. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Otero LD, Centeno G, Ruiz-Torres AJ, Otero CE (2009) A systematic approach for resource allocation in software projects. Comput Ind Eng 56(4):1333–1339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2008.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Otero CE, Otero LD, Weissberger I, Qureshi A (2010) A Multi-criteria Decision Making Approach for Resource Allocation in Software Engineering. Paper presented at the 12th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), IEEE, Cambridge, 24–26 Mar 2010

  • Park W, Co C (1998) The Guided Genetic Algorithm and its application t o the Generalized Assignment Problem. In: Tenth IEEE International Conference on Tools with Artificial Intelligence, pp 336–343

  • Parker D (2011) Employee overload is bad for business. The Australian Business Review

  • Perdu D (1997) Distributed Process Coordination in Adaptive Command and Control Teams. (Ph. D.), George Mason University, Fairfax, VA. (GMU/C3I-184-T)

  • Perdu DM, Levis AH (1998) Adaptation as a Morphing Process: a Methodology for the Design and Evaluation of Adaptive Organizational Structures. Comput Math Org Theory 4(1):5–41. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009628813441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusnock CF, Borghetti BJ (2016) International journal of industrial ergonomics workload profiles: a continuous measure of mental workload. Int J Ind Ergon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ergon.2016.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rusnock CF, Maxheimer EW, Oyama KF, Valencia VV (2017) Simulation-based evaluation of the effects of patient load on mental workload of healthcare staff. Simul Healthc 12(4):260–267. https://doi.org/10.1097/SIH.0000000000000248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samms C, Mitchell D (2010) Predicting the consequences of workload management strategies with human performance modeling. Army Research Laboratory, Maryland

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz J, Erikson R (2009) Prepare now or lose your best employees soon Forbes

  • Shabani MO, Mazahery A (2013) Composites: part B Application of GA to optimize the process conditions of Al Matrix nano-composites. Compos Part B 45(1):185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.07.045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai H-T, Moskowitz H, Lee L-H (2003) Human resource selection for software development projects using Taguchi’s parameter design. Eur J Oper Res 151(1):167–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(02)00600-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vazan P, Tanuska P (2012) A short Reflection on the Strengths and Weaknesses of Simulation Optimization. Eng Technol Int J Comput 6(5):640–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Wan J, Kleijnen JPC (2006) Simulation for the optimization of (s, S) inventory system with random lead times and a service level constraint by using arena and OptQuest. Simul Model Pract Theory 15:354–362

    Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 3(2):159–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickens CD (2008) Multiple resources and mental workload. Hum Factors 50(3):449–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JM (1997) A genetic algorithm for the generalised assignment problem. J Oper Res Soc 48(8):804–809. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2600431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang T, Kuo Y, Chang I (2004) Tabu-search simulation optimization approach for flow-shop scheduling with multiple processors—a case study. Int J Prod Res 42(19):4015–4030. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207540410001699381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin P, Wu T, Hsu P (2017) Risk management of wind farm micro-siting using an enhanced genetic algorithm with simulation optimization. Renew Energy 107:508–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Q, Yang Z (2009) Integrating simulation and optimization to schedule loading operations in container terminals. Comput Oper Res 36(6):1935–1944. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2008.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng Q, Diabat A, Zhang Q (2015) A simulation optimization approach for solving the dual-cycling problem in container terminals. Marit Policy Manage 42(8):806–826. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2015.1043362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhen L, Wang K, Hu H, Chang D (2014) A simulation optimization framework for ambulance deployment and relocation problems. Comput Ind Eng 72:12–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2014.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering, Izmir University of Economics, Izmir, Turkey

    Cansu Kandemir

  2. Engineering Management & System Engineering, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, USA

    Holly A. H. Handley

Authors
  1. Cansu Kandemir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Holly A. H. Handley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cansu Kandemir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kandemir, C., Handley, H.A.H. Work process improvement through simulation optimization of task assignment and mental workload. Comput Math Organ Theory 25, 389–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9275-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-9275-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation