Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modeling and representation of built cultural heritage data using semantic web technologies and building information model

  • S.I. : CMKBO
  • Published:
Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The process of diagnosis, intervention, conservation, restoration and maintenance of built cultural heritage requires complete and accurate knowledge about tangible as well as intangible aspects of their past and present. Comprehensive and precise knowledge about built cultural heritage structures, their functionality, location, environment and any sudden disturbance needs to be digitized for long lasting preservation of the resource. Discrepancy or scarcity of information can lead to errors and even irrecoverable damages. Both human and natural disasters are destroying cultural heritage objects, buildings and sites which have great value and significance in human history. This paper is aimed to provide a comprehensive discussion of state of the art knowledge representation and knowledge management solutions, specifically designed for improving built cultural heritage information preservation. This paper suggests that semantic digitization of built cultural heritage data is the best way forward. Traditional standards in built heritage metadata schemas lack the description of key aspects of 3-D modeling while, 3-D modeling standards such as geographical information system (GIS) and building information modeling (BIM) do not provide sufficient representation of historical data related to a built heritage (BH) structure. This paper proposes a model for representing architectural as well as historical data relevant to a BH site, using semantic web technologies and building information modeling standards.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Achille C, Lombardini N, Tommasi C (2015) BIM and cultural heritage: compatibility tests in an archaeological site. WIT Trans. Built Environ. 149(2015):593–604. https://doi.org/10.2495/BIM150481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acierno M, Cursi S, Simeone D, Fiorani D (2016) Architectural heritage knowledge modelling: an ontology-based framework for conservation process. J Cult Herit. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2016.09.0103

    Google Scholar 

  • Andaroodi E, Kitamoto A (2014) Online ontology based knowledge representation of historic buildings: publishing an RDF-based website. Int J Herit Digit Era 3(3):475–499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio FI, Gaiani M, Benedetti B (2012) 3D reality-based artefact models for the management of archaeological sites using 3D Gis: a framework starting from the case study of the Pompeii Archaeological area. J Archaeol Sci 39(5):1271–1287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2011.12.034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Apollonio FI, Gaiani M, Sun Z (2013) 3D modeling and data enrichment in digital reconstruction of architectural heritage. XXIV International CIPA Symposium, XL–5/W2, pp 43–48. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-52-43-2013

  • Beetz J, Dietze S, Berndt RA, Tamke M (2013) Towards the long-term preservation of building information models. In: Proceedings of Cib W78, pp 209–217

  • Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O (2001) The semantic web. Sci Am 284(5):34–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bing LI, Chan KCC, Carr L (2014) Using aligned ontology model to convert cultural heritage resources into semantic web. In: 2014 IEEE international conference on semantic computing (ICSC). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2014.39

  • Built Heritage (2017) What is Built Heritage?, modern heritage matters, 2017. http://modernheritage.com.au/mhm/understand–heritage/what–is–built–heritage/. Accessed 19 April 2017

  • Built Heritage |NSW Environment & Heritage. 2017. Environment.nsw.gov.au.://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/Heritage/aboutheritage/builtheritage.htm

  • Cacciotti R (2015) Integrated knowledge-based tools for documenting and monitoring damages to built heritage. In: The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences (ISPRS Archives) XL–5/W7, pp 57–63. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-xl-57-57-2015

  • Cacciotti R, Blaško M, Valach J (2015) A diagnostic ontological model for damages to historical constructions. J Cult Herit 16(1):40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2014.02.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damova D, Dannélls D (2011) Reason-able view of linked data for cultural heritage. Advances in intelligent and soft computing third international conference on software, services and semantic technologies S3T 2011, pp 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-23163-6_3

  • Dannélls D, Damova M, Enache R, Chechev M (2012) Multilingual online generation from semantic web ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on world wide web, pp 239–242

  • De Boer V, Wielemaker J, Van Gent J, Hildebrand M, Isaac A, Van Ossenbruggen J, Schreiber G (2012) Supporting linked data production for cultural heritage institutes: the Amsterdam museum case study. In: The semantic web: research and applications. Springer, Berlin, pp 733–747

  • De Roo B, Bourgeois J, De Maeyer P (2013) Conservation in past times: data models for ensuring the future of our Heritage. In: Toniolo L (ed) Built heritage: monitoring conservation management. Springer International Publishing, Cham, pp 982–988

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Mascio D, Pauwels P, De Meyer R (2013) Improving the knowledge and management of the historical built environment with BIM and ontologies: the case study of the Book Tower. In: 13th international conference on construction applications of virtual reality, pp 427–436

  • Dicker E (2010) The impact of blogs and other social media in the life of a curator. In: Trant J, Bearman D (eds) Proceedings of the international conference for culture and heritage on museums and the web. Denver, CO. http://www.archimuse.com/mw2010/papers/dicker/dicker.html

  • Doerr M (2003) The CIDOC conceptual reference module: an ontological approach to semantic interoperability of metadata. AI Mag 24(3):75. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v24i3.1720

    Google Scholar 

  • Dore C, Murphy M (2012) Integration of historic building information modeling (HBIM) and 3D GIS for recording and managing cultural heritage sites. In: Virtual Systems and Multimedia (VSMM), 18th International Conference, pp 369–376

  • El-Hakim SF, Beraldin JA, Gonzo L, Whiting E, Jemtrud M, Valzano V (2005) A hierarchical 3D reconstruction approach for complex heritage sites. In: CIPA 2005 XX International Symposium, Torino

  • Fai S, Graham K, Duckworth T, Wood N, Attar R (2011) Building information modeling and heritage documentation. In: Proceedings of the 23rd international symposium, international scientific committee for documentation of cultural heritage (CIPA), Prague, pp 12–16

  • Gabellone F (2013) Integrated technologies for museum communication and interactive Apps in the PON DiCet project. http://saperi.forumpa.it/node/74640

  • Garagnani S, Manferdini AM (2013) Parametric accuracy: building information modeling process applied to the cultural heritage preservation. In: International archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences, Xl, pp 25–26

  • Ghiselli C, Bozzato L, Trombetta A (2005) Representation and management of ontologies in cultural heritage domain. CEUR Workshop Proc. 166, January

  • Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications by a translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl Acquis 5:199–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hor A, Jadidi A, Sohn G (2016) BIM-GIS integrated geospatial information model using semantic web and RDF Graphs. ISPRS Ann Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 3:73–79. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-III-4-73-2016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kakali C, Lourdi I, Stasinopoulou T, Bountouri L, Papatheodorou C, Doerr M, Gergatsoulis M (2007) integrating Dublin Core metadata for cultural heritage collections using ontologies. In: International conference on Dublin Core and metadata applications, p 128

  • Kasse P, Tsolis D (2014) Semantic archeological sites/monuments management system. IISA 2014, The 5th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications

  • Korzun D, Varfolomeyev A, Yalovitsyna S et al (2017) Semantic infrastructure of a smart museum: toward making cultural heritage knowledge usable and creatable by visitors and professionals. Pers Ubiquit Comput 21:345. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-016-0996-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maietti F, Di Giulio R, Balzani M, Piaia E, Medici M, Ferrari F (2017) Digital memory and integrated data capturing: innovations for an inclusive cultural heritage in Europe through 3D semantic modelling. In: Ioannides M, Magnenat-Thalmann N, Papagiannakis G (eds) Mixed reality and gamification for cultural heritage. Springer, Cham

    Google Scholar 

  • Noor S, Jamil S, Gohar N et al (2018) Knowledge retrieval of historic concepts using semantic web. Clus Comput. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10586-018-1883-y

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreni D, Brumana R, Della Torre S, Banfi F, Barazzetti L, Previtali M (2014) Survey turned into HBIM: the restoration and the work involved concerning the basilica di collemaggio after the earthquake (L â˘A´ZAQUILA). II, pp 23–25. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsannals-ii-5-267-2014

  • Park H, Smiraglia RP (2014) Enhancing data curation of cultural heritage for information sharing: a case study using open government data. In: Metadata and semantics research. Springer International Publishing

  • Pauwels P, Bod R, Di Mascio D, De Meyer R (2013) Integrating building information modeling and semantic web technologies for the management of built heritage information. Digit Herit Int Congr (Digit-Herit) IEEE 1:481–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pauwels P, Zhang S, Cheol Lee Y (2017) Semantic web technologies in AEC industry: a literature overview. Autom Constr 73:145–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2016.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peroni S, Tomasi F, Vitali F (2013) The aggregation of heterogeneous metadata in web-based cultural heritage collections: a case study. Int J Web Eng Technol 8(4):412–432. https://doi.org/10.1109/iisa.2014.6878795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponrec, IN.CUL.TU.RE. Innovation culture in tourism and restoration (2011). http://www.ponrec.it/opendata/progetti/schedaprogetto?ProgettoID=5527. Accessed 12 May 2017

  • Schreiber G, Amin A, Van Assem M, De Boer V (2006) MultimediaN E-culture demonstrator. In: International semantic web conference, pp 951–958

  • Seppälä K et al (2009) CultureSampo—finnish culture on the semantic web 2. 0: thematic perspectives for the end–user. In: Proceedings, museums and the web, pp 15–18

  • Simeone D, Cursi S, Toldo I, Carrara G (2014) Bim and knowledge management for building heritage. Acadia 2014:681–690

    Google Scholar 

  • Tallerås K, Massey D, Ruud Husevåg A-S, Preminger M, Pharo N (2014) Evaluating (linked) metadata transformations across cultural heritage domains. MTSR

  • The Pennsylvania State University (2011) Computer integrated construction research program. BIM project execution planning guide—version 2.1. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University, 2011. http://bim.psu.edu

  • Tobiáš P (2016) BIM, GIS and semantic models of cultural heritage buildings. Geoinf FCE CTU 15(2):27–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toniolo L (ed) (2015) Built heritage: monitoring conservation management, research for development. Springer, Berlin. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08533-3_29

    Google Scholar 

  • Törmä S (2013) Semantic linking of building information models. In: Proceedings—2013 IEEE 7th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), pp 412–419. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSC.2013.80

  • Zalamea O (2016) From a CityGML to an ontology-based approach to support preventive conservation of built cultural heritage. In: Proceedings of the 19th AGILE international conference on geographic information science, https://doi.org/10.1007/978364234234-9

  • Zapounidou S, Sfakakis M, Papatheodorou C (2014) Library data integration: towards BIBFRAME mapping to EDM. In Metadata and Semantics Research, Springer International Publishing pp 262–273

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salma Noor.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Noor, S., Shah, L., Adil, M. et al. Modeling and representation of built cultural heritage data using semantic web technologies and building information model. Comput Math Organ Theory 25, 247–270 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-09285-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10588-018-09285-y

Keywords

Navigation