Abstract
Climate change is predicted to have increasingly negative consequences for the agricultural sector. Thus, it is important that crop advisors encourage farmers to adopt management practices that help mitigate or adapt to these changes. However, widespread skepticism persists regarding the existence of anthropogenic climate change and the need for conservation practices. Previous research indicates that individuals who are skeptical of the existence of climate change may be resistant to adopting conservation behaviors when they are described as addressing climate change impacts. Framing such practices as instead addressing “weather extremes” may be one method to encourage recommendations of such conservation practices. In the current study, we examined whether framing cover crops—a climate change-adaptive practice that enhances soil health—as a way to address that weather extremes rather than climate change would enhance crop advisors’ reported likelihood of recommending cover crops to their farmers, particularly among advisors who are skeptical of the existence of climate change. Support for cover crops among crop advisors in our sample was quite high overall, but as predicted, those who were more skeptical of climate change were less likely to recommend cover crops. However, framing condition (whether cover crops were described as addressing weather variability vs. climate change vs. no frame) had no main or moderating effects. These findings suggest that the use of climate change messaging in the framing of farm management practices may not negatively influence crop advisors’ recommendations as much as previously thought, but more research using other conservation practices is needed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
12 June 2020
The original article has been updated.
Notes
Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, Ohio, South Dakota, and Wisconsin
References
Adams RM, Hurd BH, Lenhart S, Leary N (1998) Effects of global climate change on agriculture: an interpretative review. Clim Res 11:19–30. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr011019
Andrews AC, Clawson RA, Gramig BM, Raymond L (2013) Why do farmers adopt conservation tillage? An experimental investigation of framing effects. J Soil Water Conserv 68:501–511. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.68.6.501
Arbuckle JG Jr, Morton LW, Hobbs J (2013) Farmer beliefs and concerns about climate change and attitudes toward adaptation and mitigation: evidence from Iowa. Clim Chang 118:551–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0700-0
Arbuckle JG Jr, Hobbs J, Loy A, Morton LW, Prokopy LS, Tyndall J (2014) Understanding Corn Belt farmer perspectives on climate change to inform engagement strategies for adaptation and mitigation. J Soil Water Conserv 69:505–516. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.69.6.505
Arbuckle JG Jr, Morton LW, Hobbs J (2015) Understanding farmer perspectives on climate change adaptation and mitigation: the roles of trust in sources of climate information, climate change beliefs, and perceived risk. Environ Behav 47:205–234. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916513503832
Barnes AP, Toma L (2012) A typology of dairy farmer perceptions towards climate change. Clim Chang 112:507–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0226-2
Church SP, Dunn M, Babin N, Mase AS, Haigh T, Prokopy LS (2018) Do advisors perceive climate change as an agricultural risk? An in-depth examination of Midwestern US Ag advisors’ views on drought, climate change, and risk management. Agr Hum Values 35:349–365. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-017-9827-3
Dabney SM, Delgado JA, Reeves DW (2001) Using winter cover crops to improve soil and water quality. Commun Soil Sci Plan 32:1221–1250. https://doi.org/10.1081/CSS-100104110
Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Nearing MA, Goddard T, Reicosky D, Lal R, Kitchen NR, Rice CW, Towery D, Salon P (2011) Conservation practices to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66:118A–129A. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.118A
Delgado JA, Nearing MA, Rice CW (2013) Conservation practices for climate change adaptation. Adv Agron 121:47–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407685-3.00002-5
Dillman DA, Smyth JD, Christian LM (2014) Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
Druckman JN (2004) Political preference formation: competition, deliberation, and the (ir) relevance of framing effects. Am Political Sci Rev 98:671–686. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055404041413
Dunn M, Ulrich-Schad J, Prokopy L, Myers R, Watts C, Scanlon K (2016) Perceptions and use of cover crops among early adopters: findings from a national survey. J Soil Water Conserv 71:29–40. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.71.1.29
Eanes FR, Singh AS, Bulla BR, Ranjan P, Prokopy LS, Fales M, Wickerham B, Doran PJ (2017) Midwestern US farmers perceive crop advisers as conduits of information on agricultural conservation practices. Environ Manag 60:974–988. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0927-z
Franz NK, Piercy F, Donaldson J, Westbrook J, Richard R (2010) Farmer, agent, and specialist perspectives on preferences for learning among today’s farmers. J Ext 48:1–10
Gramig BM, Barnard MJ, Prokopy SL (2013) Farmer beliefs about climate change and carbon sequestration incentives. Clim Res 56:157–167. https://doi.org/10.3354/cr01142
Haden VR, Niles MT, Lubell M, Perlman J, Jackson LE (2012) Global and local concerns: what attitudes and beliefs motivate farmers to mitigate and adapt to climate change? PLoS One 7:1–7. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052882
Haigh T, Morton LW, Lemos MC, Knutson C, Prokopy LS, Lo YJ, Angel J (2015) Agricultural advisors as climate information intermediaries: exploring differences in capacity to communicate climate. Weather Clim Soc 7:83–93. https://doi.org/10.1175/WCAS-D-14-00015.1
Haigh T, Koundinya V, Hart C, Klink J, Lemos M, Mase AS et al (2018) Provision of climate services for agriculture: public and private pathways to farm decision-making. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 99(9):1781–1790
Kühberger A (1998) The influence of framing on risky decisions: a meta-analysis. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 75(1):23–55. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1998.2781
Lal R (2004) Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science 304:1623–1627. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1097396
Lal R, Delgado JA, Groffman PM, Millar N, Dell C, Rotz A (2011) Management to mitigate and adapt to climate change. J Soil Water Conserv 66:276–285. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.66.4.276
Lemos MC, Lo YJ, Kirchhoff C, Haigh T (2014) Crop advisors as climate information brokers: building the capacity of US farmers to adapt to climate change. Clim Risk Manag 4-5:32–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2014.08.001
Lord A (2015) What your job says about your politics. The Huffington Post. Can be retrieved at <http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2015/06/03/jobpolitics-prediction_n_7503590.html>
Mase AS, Prokopy LS (2014) Unrealized potential: a review of perceptions and use of weather and climate information in agricultural decision making. Weather Clim Soc 6(1):47–61
Mase AS, Cho H, Prokopy LS (2015) Enhancing the social amplification of risk framework (SARF) by exploring trust, the availability heuristic, and agricultural advisors' belief in climate change. J Environ Psychol 41:166–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.12.004
Mase AS, Gramig BM, Prokopy LS (2017) Climate change beliefs, risk perceptions, and adaptation behavior among Midwestern U.S. crop farmers. Clim Risk Manag 15:8–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crm.2016.11.004
McCarl BA (2010) Analysis of climate change implications for agriculture and forestry: an interdisciplinary effort. Clim Chang 100:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9833-6
McCright AM, Dunlap RE (2011) The politicization of climate change and polarization in the American public’s views of global warming, 2001–2010. Sociol Q 52:155–194. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2011.01198.x
Monroe MC, Plate RR, Adams DC, Wojcik DJ (2015) Harnessing homophily to improve climate change education. Environ Educ Res 21:221–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.910497
Morley DD, Walker KB (1987) The role of importance, novelty, and plausibility in producing belief change. Commun Monogr 54:436–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637758709390243
Newman CL, Howlett E, Burton S, Kozup JC, Heintz Tangari A (2012) The influence of consumer concern about global climate change on framing effects for environmental sustainability messages. Int J Advert 31:511–527. https://doi.org/10.2501/IJA-31-3-511-527
Nisbet MC, Scheufele DA (2009) What’s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 96:12. https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.0900041
O'Connor RE, Bard RJ, Fisher A (1999) Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 19:461–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1999.tb00421.x
Parry ML, Carter TR (1989) An assessment of the effects of climatic change on agriculture. Clim Chang 15:95–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138848
Perdue S (2019) 2017 Census of Agriculture. in Agriculture USDo (ed.), United States
Prokopy LS, Arbuckle JG Jr, Barnes AP, Haden VR, Hogan A, Niles MT, Tyndall J (2015) Farmers and climate change: a cross-national comparison of beliefs and risk perceptions in high-income countries. Environ Manag 56:492–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0504-2
Reilly J (1995) Climate change and global agriculture: recent findings and issues. Am J Agr Econ 77:727–733. https://doi.org/10.2307/1243242
Rothman AJ, Salovey P (1997) Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. Psychol Bull 121:3–19. https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.121.1.3
Schattman RE, Méndez VE, Merrill SC, Zia A (2018) Mixed methods approach to understanding farmer and agricultural advisor perceptions of climate change and adaptation in Vermont, United States. Agroecol Sust Food 42:121–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2017.1357667
Singer JW, Nusser SM, Alf CJ (2007) Are cover crops being used in the US Corn Belt? J Soil Water Conserv 62:353–358
Smit B, Skinner MW (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology. Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 7:85–114. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1015862228270
Syal SS, Wilson RS, Mac Crawford J, Lutz J (2011) Climate change and human health—what influences the adoption of adaptation programming in the United States public health system? Mitig Adapt Strat Gl 16:911–924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-011-9302-1
Tversky, A. and Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. science, 211(4481), pp.453-458. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.7455683
Tomich TP, Brodt S, Ferris H, Galt R, Horwath WR, Kebreab E, Leveau JH, Liptzin D, Lubell M, Merel P (2011) Agroecology: a review from a global-change perspective. Annu Rev Environ Resour 36:193–222. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012110-121302
Walker BJA, Kurz T, Russel D (2018) Towards an understanding of when non-climate frames can generate public support for climate change policy. Environ Behav 50:781–806. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517713299
Wall E, Smit B (2005) Climate change adaptation in light of sustainable agriculture. J Sustain Agr 27:113–123. https://doi.org/10.1300/J064v27n01_07
Weber EU, Stern PC (2011) Public understanding of climate change in the United States. Am Psychol 66:315–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023253
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ezgi Ozgumus for assistance in data preparation and analysis.
Funding
This work was supported by a Purdue Climate Change Research Center Seed Grant and by USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Award Number 2011-68002-30220, project titled “Useful to Usable (U2U): Transforming Climate Variability and Change Information for Cereal Crop Producers.”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Our experimental procedures conformed to the ethical standards for research on human subjects as per the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and were approved by the Purdue University Institutional Review Board (approval #1603017474).
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
The original version of this article was revised: During proof correction, the author supplied new images that were unfortunately not included.
Highlights
• Support for cover crops is high among Midwestern US crop advisors
• Experiment used to ascertain support effects of different frames on cover crop support
• Skeptics of anthropogenic climate change less likely to recommend cover crops
• No effect of framing cover crops as addressing weather extremes vs. climate change
Appendix
Appendix
Control frame
Weather extremes frame
Climate change frame
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singh, A.S., Church, S.P., Dang, L. et al. Does climate change framing matter? Evidence from an experiment of crop advisors in the Midwestern United States. Climatic Change 162, 1031–1044 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02703-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-020-02703-8