Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Reading with a Crayon: Pre-conventional Marginalia as Reader Response in Early Childhood

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Children's Literature in Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Child-produced marginalia, annotations written or drawn in the margins of a text by a young reader, have been stigmatized as devaluing the book on which it was created and often dismissed as “graffiti.” Recent historical studies of marginalia created by older children, those who have mastered conventional writing and drawing, have challenged this notion by looking at extratextual annotations as a means to understanding children’s diverse uses of books as both intellectual and physical objects. However, pre-conventional scribbles on books by very young children have not been explored as artifacts of emergent literacy practices or reader response. Yet, scholarship in the fields of literacy education, art education, early childhood education and theories of place suggest that children can develop expectations for books in the first few years of life and that their earliest drawing experiences show evidence of intentionality. This reader response study draws from video data of three-year-old Elijah and his eighteen-month-old sister, Hannah, to explore the production, of pre-conventional marginalia in early childhood. The findings of this study suggest that toddlers and preschool-aged children can understand books as distinct and pleasurable artifacts in their immediate environments, that the marks they make in their picturebooks are evidence of reader response, that the act of drawing enables them to engage in a fictional landscape, and that pre-conventional marginalia can provide us with insight into very young children’s earliest aesthetic responses to texts.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arizpe, Evelyn and Styles, Morag. (2003). Picturebooks and Metaliteracy: How Children Describe the Processes of Creation and Reception. In Art, Narrative and Childhood. Sterling, VA: Trentham Books Limited.

  • Baghban, Marcia. (2007). Scribbles, Labels, and Stories: The Role of Drawing in the Development of Writing. Young Children, 62(1), 20–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benton, Michael. (2009). Readers, Texts, Contexts: Reader-Response Criticism. In Peter Hunt (Ed.), Understanding Children’s Literature (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

  • Cambourne, Brian. (1995). Towards an Educationally Relevant Theory of Literacy Learning: Twenty Years of Inquiry. The Reading Teacher, 49(3), 182–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Corte, E., Verschaffel, Lieven and Van De Ven, A. (2001). Improving Text Comprehension Strategies in Upper Primary School Children: A Design Experiment. British Journal of Education Psychology, 71, 531–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doake, David. (1985). Reading-Like Behavior: Its Role in Learning to Read. In Angela Jaggar and Trika Smith-Burke (Eds.), Observing the Language Learner (pp. 92–99). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Anne Haas. (1986). Transitions and Tensions: Interrelationships Between the Drawing, Talking, and Dictating of Young Children. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(4), 379–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dyson, Anne Haas. (1992). From Prop to Mediator: The Changing Role of Written Language in Children’s Symbolic Repertoires (pp. 5–28). Berkeley, CA: National Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, Howard. (1980). Artful Scribbles: The Significance of Children’s Drawing New York:Basic Books Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geertz, Clifford. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grenby, Matthew. (2011). The Child Reader, 1700–1840. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holdaway, Don. (1982). Shared Book Experience: Teaching Reading Using Favorite Books. Theory into Practice, 21(4), 293–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huck, Charlotte. (1982). Children’s Literature in the Elementary Classroom. Chicago: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, Heather. (2001). Marginalia: Readers Writing in Books. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, Rhoda. (1970). Analyzing Children’s Art. Palo Alto, CA: National Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindler, Anna and Darras, Bernard. (1997). Map of Artistic Development. In Anna Kindler (Ed.), Child Development in Art (pp. 17–44). Reston, VA: National Art Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Lesley. (2007). Representing the Ways of the World: How Children Under Three Start to Use Syntax in Graphic Signs. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(2), 123–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapp, Diane, Grant, Maria, Moss, Barbara and Johnson, Kelly. (2013). Students’ Close Reading of Science Texts: What’s Now? What’s Next? The Reading Teacher, 67(2), 109–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lerer, Seth. (2012). Devotion and Defacement: Reading Children’s Marginalia. Representations, 118(1), 126–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowenfeld, Viktor. (1947). Creative and Mental Growth. New York: McMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mavers, Diane. (2012). Transcribing Video (pp. 1–21). London:National Centre for Research Methods.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meek, Margaret. (1987). How Texts Teach What Readers Learn. Great Britain: Thimble Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neufeld, Paul. (2005). Comprehension Instruction in the Content Area Classes. The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 302–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nodelman, Perry and Reimer, Mavis. (2003). The Pleasures of Children’s Literature, 3rd ed Boston, MA:Allyn & Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owocki, Gretchen and Goodman, Yetta. (2002). Books and Book Handling. In Kidwatching: Documenting Children’s Literacy Development. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

  • Patton, Michael Quinn. (2001). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner-Sanchez, Andrea. (2012). Jake and the Neverland Pirates: A Skipping Day. New York: Golden Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulte, Christopher. (2013). Verbalization as a Threshold in Children’s Drawing Encounters. Visual Arts Research, 39(2), 54–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shane, Ruth and Shane, Harold. (1975). The New Baby. Racine, WI: Western Publishing Company Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Christine Marmé. (1990). “I make a mark”: The Significance of Talk in Young Children’s Artistic Development. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 5, 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, Christine Marmé. (2014). Lines of Flight: Trajectories of Young Children Drawing. Visual Arts Research, 40(1), 141–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unt, Liina. (2010). Playing with Places: The Aesthetic Experience of Place in a Play Situation. In Phenomenology and Existentialism in the Twentieth Century (Vol. 104).

  • Wilson, Marjorie and Wilson, Brent. (2009). Teaching Children to Draw, 2nd ed. Worcester, MA: Davis Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlwend, Karen. (2011). Playing Their Way into Literacies: Reading, Writing, Belonging, in the Early Childhood Classroom. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sarah Fischer.

Additional information

Sarah Fischer is Assistant Professor of Literacy Education at Messiah College in Mechanicsburg, Pennsylvania where she teaches literacy methods and children’s literature courses.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fischer, S. Reading with a Crayon: Pre-conventional Marginalia as Reader Response in Early Childhood. Child Lit Educ 48, 134–151 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9292-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10583-016-9292-4

Keywords

Navigation