Skip to main content
Log in

I. Mani and J. Pustejovsky: Interpreting motion: grounded representations for spatial language

Oxford University Press, Oxford, 2012

  • Book Review
  • Published:
Language Resources and Evaluation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Becker, A. (1997). Theoretical framework. In A. Becker & M. Carrol (Eds.), The acquisition of spatial relations in a second language (pp. 13–33). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herkovits, A. (1986). Language and spatial cognition: An interdisciplinary study of the prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marotta, G. (2010). Why space in language? The reasons for a meeting. In G. Marotta, A. Lenci, L. Meini, & Rovai, F. (Eds.), Space in Language. Proceedings of the Pisa International Conference (pp. 11–25). Pisa: ETS.

  • Meini, L., Marotta, G., Lenci, A. & Donati, M. (2012). Annotating space in a corpus of spoken Italian. In LREC 2012 Proceedings. http://www.lrec-conf.org/lrec2012/.

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1948). La représentation de l’espace chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (1995). The generative lexicon. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pustejovsky, J. (2001). Type construction and the logic of concepts. In P. Buillon & F. Busa (Eds.), The syntax of word meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinha, C., & Kuteva, T. (1995). Distributed spatial semantics. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18, 167–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D. I. (2004). The many ways to search for a frog. In S. Strömqvist & L. Verhoeven (Eds.), Relating events in narrative (Vol. II, pp. 219–257)., Typological and contextual perspectives Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slobin, D.I. (2008). Typology and usage: Beyond Verb-framed and Satellite-framed. Talk given at frames and constructions: A Conference in Honor of Charles J. Fillmore. Berkeley: University of California.

  • Slobin, D.I. (2009). From S-language and V-language to PIN and PIV. Talk given at the Human Locomotion Across Languages Workshop, Njemegen: Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics.

  • Talmy, L. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Shopen, T. (Ed.), Language typology and syntactic description, Vol. III: Grammatical categories and the lexicon (pp. 57–149) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  • Talmy, L. (1991). Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. In Berkeley Working Papers in Linguistics, pp. 480–519.

  • Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Volume I: Concept structuring systems. Volume II: Typology and process in concept structuring. Cambridge: MIT Press.

  • Vandeloise, C. (1991). Spatial prepositions. A case study from French, Chicago: University of Chicago Press [1st ed. (1986). L’espace en français: sémantique des prepositions spatiales, Paris: Éditions du Seuil].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giovanna Marotta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Marotta, G. I. Mani and J. Pustejovsky: Interpreting motion: grounded representations for spatial language. Lang Resources & Evaluation 48, 533–538 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-014-9270-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10579-014-9270-7

Navigation