Abstract
The thickness of cotton fiber cell walls is an important property that partially determines the economic value of cotton. To better understand the physical and chemical manifestations of the genetic variations that regulate the degree of fiber wall thickness, we used a comprehensive set of methods to compare fiber properties of the immature fiber (im) mutant, called immature because it produces thin-walled fibers, and its isogenic wild type Texas Marker-1 (TM-1) that is a standard upland cotton variety producing normal fibers with thick walls. Comprehensive structural analyses showed that im and TM-1 fibers shared a common developmental process of cell wall thickening, contrary to the previous report that the phase in the im fiber development might be retarded. No significant differences were found in cellulose content, crystallinity index, crystal size, matrix polymer composition, or in ribbon width between the isogenic fibers. In contrast, significant differences were detected in their linear density, cross-section micrographs of fibers from opened bolls, and in the lateral order between their cellulose microfibrils (CMFs). The cellulose mass in a given fiber length was lower and the CMFs were less organized in the im fibers compared with the TM-1 fibers. The presented results imply that the disruption of CMF organization or assembly in the cell walls may be associated with the immature phenotype of the im fibers.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abidi N, Hequet E, Cabrales L, Gannaway J, Wilkins T, Wells LW (2008) Evaluating cell wall structure and composition of developing cotton fibers using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and thermogravimetric analysis. J Appl Polym Sci 107:476–486
Abidi N, Cabrales L, Hequet E (2010) Fourier transform infrared spectroscopic approach to the study of the secondary cell wall development in cotton fiber. Cellulose 17:309–320
Abidi N, Cabrales L, Haigler CH (2014) Changes in the cell wall and cellulose content of developing cotton fibers investigated by FTIR spectroscopy. Carbohyd Polym 100:9–16
Agarwal UP, Reiner RS, Ralph SA (2010) Cellulose I crystallinity determination using FT-Raman spectroscopy: univariate and multivariate methods. Cellulose 17:721–733
ASTM standard D1442-00 (2012a) Standard test method for maturity of cotton fibers (sodium hydroxide swelling and polarized light procedures). American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken
ASTM standard D1577-07 (2012b) Standard test method for linear density of textile fibers. Option A, Fiber bundle weighing. American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia
Atalla RH, Vanderhart DL (1984) Native cellulose: a composite of two distinct crystalline forms. Science 223:283–285
Barnette AL et al (2011) Selective detection of crystalline cellulose in plant cell walls with sum-frequency-generation (SFG) vibration spectroscopy. Biomacromolecules 12:2434–2439
Benedict CR, Kohel RJ, Jividen GM (1994) A cellulose cotton fiber mutant: effect on fiber strength. In: Jividen GM, Benedict CR (eds) Proceedings of biochemistry of cotton workshop. Cotton Incorporated, Raleigh, pp 115–120
Benedict CR, Kohel JR, Lewis HL (1999) Cotton fiber quality. In: Smith CW, Cothren JT (eds) Cotton:origin, history, technology, and production. Wiley, New York, pp 269–288
Boylston EK, Thibodeaux DP, Evans JP (1993) Applying microscopy to the development of a reference method for cotton fiber maturity. Text Res J 63:80–87. doi:10.1177/004051759306300203
Bradow JM, Davidonis GH (2000) Quantitation of fiber quality and the cotton production-processing interface: a physiologist’s perspective. J Cotton Sci 4:34–64
Brims M, Hwang H (2010) Introducing Cottonscope: a rapid and precise measurement of cotton fibre maturity based on siromat. National Cotton Council, New Orleans
Greene PR, Bain CD (2005) Total internal reflection Raman spectroscopy of barley leaf epicuticular waxes in vivo. Colloids Surf B 45:174–180
Haigler C (2010) Physiological and anatomical factors determining fiber structure and utility. In: Stewart JM, Oosterhuis DM, Heitholt JJ, Mauney JR (eds) Physiology of cotton. Springer, New York, pp 33–47
Haigler CH, Betancur L, Stiff MR, Tuttle JR (2012) Cotton fiber: a powerful single-cell model for cell wall and cellulose research. Front Plant Sci 3(104):1–7
Hieu HC, Tuan NA, Li H, Miyauchi Y, Mizutani G (2011) Sum frequency generation microscopy study of cellulose fibers. Appl Spectrosc 65:1254–1259
Kafle K, Xi X, Lee CM, Tittmann BR, Cosgrove DJ, Park YB, Kim SH (2014) Cellulose microfibril orientation in onion (Allium cepa L.) epidermis studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and vibrational sum frequency generation (SFG) spectroscopy. Cellulose 21:1075–1086
Kim HJ (2015) Fiber biology. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton. Agronomy monograph, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 97–127
Kim HJ, Triplett BA (2001) Cotton fiber growth in planta and in vitro. Models for plant cell elongation and cell wall biogenesis. Plant Physiol 127:1361–1366
Kim HJ, Moon HS, Delhom CD, Zeng L, Fang DD (2013a) Molecular markers associated with the immature fiber (im) gene affecting the degree of fiber cell wall thickening in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Theor Appl Genet 126:23–31
Kim HJ, Tang Y, Moon HS, Delhom CD, Fang DD (2013b) Functional analyses of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) immature fiber (im) mutant infer that fiber cell wall development is associated with stress responses. BMC Genom 14:889
Kim SH, Lee CM, Kafle K (2013c) Characterization of crystalline cellulose in biomass: basic principles, applications, and limitations of XRD, NMR, IR, Raman, and SFG. Korean J Chem Eng 30:2127–2141
Kim HJ, Rodgers J, Delhom C, Cui X (2014) Comparisons of methods measuring fiber maturity and fineness of Upland cotton fibers containing different degree of fiber cell wall development. Text Res J 84:1622–1633
Kohel RJ, McMichael SC (1990) Immature fiber mutant of upland cotton. Crop Sci 30:419–421
Kohel R, Richmond T, Lewis C (1970) Texas marker-1. Description of a genetic standard for Gossypium hirsutum L. Crop Sci 10:670–671
Kohel RJ, Quisenberry JE, Benedict CR (1974) Fiber elongation and dry weight changes in mutant lines of cotton. Crop Sci 14:471–474
Kohel RJ, Stelly DM, Yu JZ (2002) Tests of six cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) mutants for association with aneuploids. J Hered 93:130–132
Kothari N, Abidi N, Hequet E (2007) Wilkins T Fiber quality variability within a plant. In: World cotton research conference-4, Lubbock, 10–14 Sept 2007. International Cotton Advisory Committee (ICAC)
Langan P, Nishiyama Y, Chanzy H (2001) X-ray structure of mercerized cellulose II at 1 Å resolution. Biomacromol 2:410–416
Lee CM, Mohamed NM, Watts HD, Kubicki JD, Kim SH (2013) Sum-frequency-generation vibration spectroscopy and density functional theory calculations with dispersion corrections (DFT-D2) for cellulose Iα and Iβ. J Phys Chem B 117:6681–6692
Lee CM, Kafle K, Park YB, Kim SH (2014) Probing crystal structure and mesoscale assembly of cellulose microfibrils in plant cell walls, tunicate tests, and bacterial films using vibrational Sum Frequency Generation (SFG) spectroscopy. Phys Chem Chem Phys 16:10844–10853
Lee CM, Dazen K, Kafle K, Moore A, Johnson DK, Park S, Kim SH (2015a) Correlations of apparent cellulose crystallinity determined by XRD, NMR, IR, Raman, and SFG methods. In: Rojas OJ (ed) Cellulose chemistry and properties: fibers, nanocelluloses and advanced materials. Advances in polymer science. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland, pp 115–131
Lee CM, Kafle K, Belias DW, Park YB, Glick RE, Haigler CH, Kim SH (2015b) Comprehensive analysis of cellulose content, crystallinity, and lateral packing in Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense cotton fibers using sum frequency generation, infrared and Raman spectroscopy, and X-ray diffraction. Cellulose 22:971–989
Li F et al (2015) Genome sequence of cultivated Upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum TM-1) provides insights into genome evolution. Nat Biotechnol 33:524–530
Lutterotti L (2010) Total pattern fitting for the combined size–strain–stress–texture determination in thin film diffraction. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res, Sect B 268:334–340
Moharir AV (1998) True-spiral angle in diploid and tetraploid native cotton fibers grown at different locations. J Appl Polym Sci 70:303–310
Moharir AV, Van Langenhove L, Van Nimmen E, Louwarie J, Kiekens P (1999) Stability of X-ray cellulose crystallite orientation parameters in native cotton with change of location and year of growth. J Appl Polym Sci 72:269–276
Montalvo JGJ (2005) Relationships between micronaire, fineness, and maturity. Part I. Fundamentals. J Cotton Sci 9:81–88
Nam S, French AD, Condon BD, Concha M (2016) Segal crystallinity index revisited by the simulation of X-ray diffraction patterns of cotton cellulose Iβ and cellulose II. Carbohyd Polym 135:1–9
Nishiyama Y, Langan P, Chanzy H (2002) Crystal structure and hydrogen-bonding system in cellulose Iβ from synchrotron X-ray and neutron fiber diffraction. J Am Chem Soc 124:9074–9082
Park YB, Lee CM, Koo B-W, Park S, Cosgrove DJ, Kim SH (2013) Monitoring meso-scale ordering of cellulose in intact plant cell walls using sum frequency generation spectroscopy. Plant Physiol 163:907–913
Paudel D, Hequet E, Noureddine A (2013) Evaluation of cotton fiber maturity measurements. Ind Crops Prod 45:435–441
Percy R, Hendon B, Auld D (2015) Qualitative genetics and utilization of mutants. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton. Agronomy monograph, vol 57, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of Americ, Madison, pp 155–186
Rodgers J, Delhom C, Hinchliffe D, Kim HJ, Cui X (2013) A rapid measurement for cotton breeders of maturity and fineness from developing and mature fibers. Text Res J 83:1439–1451. doi:10.1177/0040517512471744
Rodgers J, Naylor GR, Cui X, Delhom C, Hinchliffe D (2015) Cottonscope fiber maturity, fineness, and ribbon width measurements with different sample sizes. Text Res J 85:897–911
Schwarz E, Hotte G (1935) Micro-determination of cotton fibre maturity in polarized light. Text Res J 5:370–376
Seagull RW, Oliveri V, Murphy K, Binder A, Kothari S (2000) Cotton fiber growth and development 2. Changes in cell diameter and wall birefringence. J Cotton Sci 4:97–104
Shofner FM, Williams GF, Bragg KC, PE Sasser (1988) Advanced fiber information system: a new technology for evaluating cotton. Paper presented at the conference of the Textile Institute, Coventry, Dec 7–8, 1988
Snider JL, Oosterhuis DM (2015) Physiology. In: Fang DD, Percy RG (eds) Cotton. Agronomy monograph, vol 57, 2nd edn. American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America, and Soil Science Society of America, Madison, pp 339–400
Thibodeaux DP, Evans JP (1986) Cotton fiber maturity by image analysis. Text Res J 56:130–139
Thibodeaux DP, Rajasekaran K (1999) Development of new reference standards for cotton fiber maturity. J Cotton Sci 3:188–193
Thyssen GN et al (2016) The immature fiber mutant phenotype of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum) is linked to a 22-bp frame-shift deletion in a mitochondria targeted pentatricopeptide repeat gene. G3: Genes| Genomes| Genetics 6:1627–1633
Updegraff DM (1969) Semimicro determination of cellulose in biological materials. Anal Biochem 32:420–424
Wakelyn PJ et al (2010) Cotton fiber chemistry and technology, vol 17. CRC Press, New York
Wang C, Zhang T, Guo W (2013) The im mutant gene negatively affects many aspects of fiber quality traits and lint percentage in cotton. Crop Sci 53:27–37
Wang C, Lv Y, Xu W, Zhang T, Guo W (2014) Aberrant phenotype and transcriptome expression during fiber cell wall thickening caused by the mutation of the Im gene in immature fiber (im) mutant in Gossypium hirsutum L. BMC Genom 15:94
Xu B, Huang Y (2004) Image analysis for cotton fibers part II: cross-sectional measurements. Text Res J 74:409–416
Zhang H-B, Li Y, Wang B, Chee PW (2008) Recent advances in cotton genomics. Int J Plant Genomics. doi:10.1155/2008/742304
Zhang T et al (2015) Sequencing of allotetraploid cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L. acc. TM-1) provides a resource for fiber improvement. Nat Biotechnol 33:531–537
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by the USDA-ARS CRIS Project # 6435-21000-016-00D, and Cotton Incorporated-sponsored project #12-199. The SFG, IR, Raman, and XRD portion of this work were supported by the Center for Lignocellulose Structure and Formation, an Energy Frontier Research Center funded by the U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences, under Award Number DE-SC0001090. Authors thank Dr. Devron Thibodeaux of Fiber Physics for critically reviewing the manuscript. We thank Dr. Russell J. Kohel of USDA-ARS-SPARC for providing cottonseeds of TM-1 and im. The authors acknowledge Ms. Tracy Condon for growing cotton plants and measuring fiber properties, Ms. Holly King for microscopic and gravimetric work, Ms. Jeannine Moraitis for Cottonscope, Ms. Raisa Moiseyev for HVI and AFIS measurements, and Mr. Wilson Buttram and Keith Stevenson for assisting cotton field works. Mention of trade names or commercial products in this publication is solely for the purpose of providing specific information and does not imply recommendation or endorsement by the USDA that is an equal opportunity employer.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kim, H.J., Lee, C.M., Dazen, K. et al. Comparative physical and chemical analyses of cotton fibers from two near isogenic upland lines differing in fiber wall thickness. Cellulose 24, 2385–2401 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1282-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10570-017-1282-1