Skip to main content
Log in

Usefulness of left ventricular diastolic function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging over invasive coronary flow reserve measurement for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Heart transplant recipients undergo annual screening of early-stage cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) by invasive coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurement. We compared the sensitivity for CAV detection between the CFR measurement and noninvasive magnetic resonance (MR) assessment of left ventricular (LV) diastolic function. In 46 asymptomatic recipients (29 men, aged 35.2 ± 16.1 years) 7.9 ± 4.3 years after transplantation, we measured LV peak filling rate (PFR) using cine MR and CFR in the left anterior descending artery by Doppler guidewire; classified recipients of class 0–2 as negative for CAV and class 3–4, positive, according to Stanford classification assessed by IVUS; compared those values between the 2 groups; and calculated receiver operating characteristic curve in the relationship between PFR value and CAV. We classified 20 recipients (43 %) positive and 26 (57 %) negative for CAV. Although there was no significant difference in CFR value, the PFR value was significantly lower in the positive (3.54 ± 0.84 EDV/s) than in negative group (4.39 ± 0.85 EDV/s, P = 0.002). Area under the curve was 0.78, and the sensitivity was 78 % and specificity, 61 %, when PFR cut-off value was 4.20. MR PFR measurement provides noninvasive prediction of CAV, preceding impaired CFR in asymptomatic recipients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stehlik J, Edwards LB, Kucheryavaya AY, Aurora P, Christie JD, Kirk R et al (2010) Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-seventh official adult heart transplant report-2010. J Heart Lung Transplant 29:1089–1103

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Silverman JF, Lipton MJ, Graham A, Harris S, Wexler L (1974) Coronary arteriography in long-term human cardiac transplantation survivors. Circulation 50:838–843

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ramzy D, Rao V, Brahm J, Miriuka S, Delgado D, Ross HJ (2005) Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: a review. Can J Surg 48:319–327

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kapadia SR, Nissen SE, Tuzcu EM (1999) Impact of intravascular ultrasound in understanding transplant coronary artery disease. Curr Opin Cardiol 14:140–150

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Rickenbacher PR, Pinto FJ, Lewis NP, Hunt SA, Alderman EL, Schroeder JS et al (1995) Prognostic importance of intimal thickness as measured by intracoronary ultrasound after cardiac transplantation. Circulation 92:3445–3452

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gould KL, Lipscomb K, Hamilton GW (1974) Physiologic basis for assessing critical coronary stenosis: instantaneous flow response and regional distribution during coronary hyperemia as measures of coronary flow reserve. Am J Cardiol 33:87–94

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Doucette JW, Corl PD, Payne HM, Flynn AE, Goto M, Nassi M et al (1992) Validation of a Doppler guide wire for intravascular measurement of coronary artery flow velocity. Circulation 85:1899–1911

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Treasure CB, Vita JA, Ganz P, Ryan TJ Jr, Schoen FJ, Vekshtein VI et al (1992) Loss of the coronary microvascular response to acetylcholine in cardiac transplant patients. Circulation 86:1156–1164

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Gagliardi MG, Crea F, Polletta B, Bassanco C, La Vigna G, Ballerini L et al (2001) Coronary microvascular endothelial dysfunction in transplanted children. Eur Heart J 22:254–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shubert S, Abdul-Khaliq H, Wellnhofer E, Hiemann NE, Ewert P, Lehmkuhl HB et al (2007) Coronary flow reserve measurement detects transplant coronary artery disease in pediatric heart transplant patients. J Heart Lung Transplant 27:514–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Machida H, Nunoda S, Okajima K, Shitakura K, Sekikawa A, Kubo Y et al (2012) Magnetic resonance assessment of left ventricular diastolic dysfunction for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in recipients of heart transplants. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 28:555–562

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. St. Goar FG, Pinto FJ, Alderman EL, Valantine HA, Schroeder JS, Gao SZ et al (1992) Intracoronary ultrasound in cardiac transplant recipients. In vivo evidence of “angiographically silent” intimal thickening. Circulation 85:979–987

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Klauss V, Ackermann K, Henneke KH, Spes C, Zeitlmann T, Werner F et al (1997) Epicardial intimal thickening in transplant coronary artery disease and resistance vessel response to adenosine: a combined intravascular ultrasound and Doppler study. Circulation 96:II-159–II-164

    Google Scholar 

  14. Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH (1998) Maximum-likelihood estimation of ROC curves from continuously-distributed data. Stat Med 17:1033–1053

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vasan RS, Levy D (2000) Defining diastolic heart failure: a call for standardized diagnostic criteria. Circulation 101:2118–2121

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yamano T, Nakamura T, Sakamoto K, Hikosaka T, Zen K, Nakamura T et al (2003) Assessment of left ventricular diastolic function by gated single-photon emission tomography: comparison with Doppler echocardiography. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 11:1532–1537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bach DS, Armstrong WF, Donovan CL, Muller DW (1996) Quantitative Doppler tissue imaging for assessment of regional myocardial velocities during transient ischemia and reperfusion. Am Heart J 132:721–725

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Derumeaux G, Ovize M, Loufoua J, Andre-Fouet X, Minaire Y, Cribier A et al (1998) Doppler tissue imaging quantitates regional wall motion during myocardial ischemia and reperfusion. Circulation 97:1970–1977

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Doria E, Agostoni P, Loaldi A, Fiorentini C (1990) Doppler assessment of left ventricular filling pattern in silent ischemia in patients with Prinzmetal’s angina. Am J Cardiol 66:1055–1059

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Mahmarian JJ, Pratt CM (1990) Silent myocardial ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease. Possible links with diastolic left ventricular dysfunction. Circulation 81:III33–III40

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Najos-Valencia O, Cain P, Case C, Wahi S, Marwick TH (2002) Determinants of tissue Doppler measures of regional diastolic function during dobutamine stress echocardiography. Am Heart J 144:516–523

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA (1997) Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1527–1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Armstrong AT, Binkley PF, Baker PB, Myerowitz PD, Leier CV (1998) Quantitative investigation of cardiomyocyte hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis over 6 years after cardiac transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 32:704–710

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Hiemann NE, Wellnhofer E, Knosalla C, Lehmkuhl HB, Stein J, Hetzer R et al (2007) Prognostic impact of microvasculopathy on survival after heart transplantation: evidence from 9713 endomyocardial biopsies. Circulation 116:1274–1282

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Korosoglou G, Osman NF, Dengler TJ, Riedle N, Steen H, Lehrke S et al (2009) Strain-encoded cardiac magnetic resonance for the evaluation of chronic allograft vasculopathy in transplant recipients. Am J Transplant 9:2587–2596

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. van Dalen BM, Soliman OI, Kauer F, Vletter WB, van der Zwaan HB, Ten Cate FJ et al (2010) Alterations in left ventricular untwisting with ageing. Circ J 74:101–108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alam M, Wardell J, Anderson E, Samad BA, Nordlander R (1999) Characteristics of mitral and tricuspid annular velocities determined by pulsed wave Doppler tissue imaging in healthy subjects. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 12:618–628

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Munagala VK, Jacobsen SJ, Mahoney DW, Rodeheffer RJ, Bailey KR, Redfield MM (2003) Association of newer diastolic function parameters with age in healthy subjects: a population-based study. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 16:1049–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagueh SF, Middleton KJ, Kopelen HA, Zoghbi WA, Quinones MA (1997) Doppler tissue imaging: a noninvasive technique for evaluation of left ventricular relaxation and estimation of filling pressures. J Am Coll Cardiol 30:1527–1533

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Lieber SC, Aubry N, Pain J, Diaz G, Kim SJ, Vatner SF (2004) Aging increases stiffness of cardiac myocytes measured by atomic force microscopy nanoindentation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 287:H645–H651

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Miller S, Simonetti OP, Carr J, Kramer U, Finn JP (2002) MR imaging of the heart with cine true fast imaging with steady-state precession: influence of spatial and temporal resolutions on left ventricular functional parameters. Radiology 223:263–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ventura HO, Mehra MR, Smart FW, Stapleton DD (1995) Cardiac allograft vasculopathy: current concepts. Am Heart J 129:791–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Neish AS, Loh E, Schoen FJ (1992) Myocardial changes in cardiac transplant-associated coronary arteriosclerosis: potential for timely diagnosis. J Am Coll Cardiol 19:586–592

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Heroux AL, Silverman P, Costanzo MR, O’Sullivan EJ, Johnson MR, Liao Y et al (1994) Intracoronary ultrasound assessment of morphological and functional abnormalities associated with cardiac allograft vasculopathy. Circulation 89:272–277

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Hartmann A, Weis M, Olbrich HG, Cieslinski G, Schacherer C, Burger W et al (1994) Endothelium-dependent and endothelium-independent vasomotion in large coronary arteries and in the microcirculation after cardiac transplantation. Eur Heart J 15:1486–1493

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kushwaha SS, Bustami M, Lythall DA, Barbir M, Mitchell AG, Yacoub MH (1994) Coronary endothelial function in cardiac transplant recipients with accelerated coronary disease. Coron Artery Dis 5:147–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Weis M, Hartmann A, Olbrich HG, Hoer G, Zeiher AM (1998) Prognostic significance of coronary flow reserve on left ventricular ejection fraction in cardiac transplant recipients. Transplantation 65:103–108

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Klauss V, Spes CH, Rieber J, Siebert U, Werner F, Stempfle HU et al (1999) Predictors of reduced coronary flow reserve in heart transplant recipients without angiographically significant coronary artery disease. Transplantation 68:1477–1481

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Hoffmann U, Globits S, Stefenelli T, Loewe C, Kostner K, Frank H (2001) The effects of ACE inhibitor therapy on left ventricular myocardial mass and diastolic filling in previously untreated hypertensive patients: a cine MRI study. J Magn Reson Imaging 14:16–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Caudron J, Fares J, Bauer F, Dacher JN (2011) Evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function with cardiac MR Imaging. Radiographics 31:239–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kudelka AM, Turner DA, Liebson PR, Macioch JE, Wang JZ, Barron JT (1997) Comparison of cine magnetic resonance imaging and Doppler echocardiography for evaluation of left ventricular diastolic function. Am J Cardiol 80:384–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Nunoda.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Machida, H., Nunoda, S., Shitakura, K. et al. Usefulness of left ventricular diastolic function assessed by magnetic resonance imaging over invasive coronary flow reserve measurement for detecting cardiac allograft vasculopathy in heart transplant recipients. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 29, 151–157 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0070-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10554-012-0070-0

Keywords

Navigation