Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Morality of “new” CEO Activism

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

CEOs’ social and environmental activism attracts significant public and research interest. Positioned as an expression of personal morality, such activism is potentially highly influential because of CEOs’ public visibility and associated positional and resource-based power. This paper questions the assumption that CEO activism can only be explained in relation to individual moral action, and illuminates its wider social implications. We critically evaluate the recent upsurge in CEO activism by juxtaposing it against broader social activism, identifying its distinctive characteristics, and empirically examining two recent ‘moral episodes’: the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program and the Fetal Heartbeat Acts (FHAs). Our analysis demonstrates that CEO activism is more heterogeneous than research to date has shown. Building on this analysis, a refined understanding of the character and morality of CEO activism is developed by establishing a typology of its forms. We conclude that while CEO activism is an important and potent new phenomenon, it may not be universally appropriate to regard CEOs as moral leaders. Instead, it is paramount to question the motives and effects of what CEOs do in the name of morality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bloom, P., & Rhodes, C. (2018). CEO society: The corporate takeover of everyday life. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borisov, A., Goldman, E., & Gupta, N. (2015). The corporate value of (corrupt) lobbying. The Review of Financial Studies, 29(4), 1039–1071.

    Google Scholar 

  • Briscoe, F., & Gupta, A. (2016). Social activism in and around organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 671–727.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryant, A., & Charmaz, K. (2007). Grounded theory in historical perspective: An epistemological account. In A. Bryant & K. Charmaz (Eds.), The Sage handbook of grounded theory (pp. 31–57). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A., & Toffel, M. (2016). The Power of C.E.O. Activism: How politically outspoken executives sway public (and consumer) opinion. New York Times, 1 April, SR10. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/04/03/opinion/sunday/the-power-of-ceo-activism.html?_r=0 .

  • Chatterji, A., & Toffel, M. (2018). The new CEO activists. Harvard Business Review, 96(1), 78–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, H. S. (2011). Political activities on the internet: Slacktivism or political participation by another means? First Monday, 16, 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clegg, S., Kornberger, M., & Rhodes, C. (2007). Business ethics as practice. British Journal of Management, 18(2), 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L. (2000). Citizens and consumers in the United States in the century of mass consumption. In M. Daunton & M. Hilton (Eds.), The Politics of Consumption: Material Culture and Citizenship in Europe and America. Oxford: Berg Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1972). A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin, N., & McGarty, C. (2016). Expanding on psychological theories of engagement to understand activism in context(s). Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 227–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Porta, D. (2015). The global justice movement: An introduction. In D. Della Porta (Ed.), Global justice movement (pp. 11–38). Abingdon-on-Thames: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C., DeCelles, K. A., & Lenox, M. (2016). Through the mud or in the boardroom: Examining activist types and their strategies in targeting firms for social change. Strategic Management Journal, 37(12), 2425–2440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flacks, R. (1971). Youth and social change. Chicago, IL: Markham Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franz, C. E., & McClelland, D. C. (1994). Lives of women and men active in the social protests of the 1960s: A longitudinal study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(1), 196–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelles, D. (2018, July 25). C.E.O. Activism has become the new normal. New York Times, 25 July. https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/25/business/dealbook/ceo-activism-study.html.

  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Hawthorne, NY: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glickman, L. B. (2012). Consumer activism, consumer regimes, and the consumer movement: Rethinking the History of Consumer Politics in the United States. In F. Trentmann (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of the history of consumption. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, M. L. (1997). Ethics and activism: The theory and practice of political morality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hambrick, D. C., & Wowak, A. (in press). CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Academy of Management Review. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2018.0084.

  • Hartley, L. K., Lala, G., Donaghue, N., & McGarty, C. (2016). How activists respond to social structure in offline and online contexts. Journal of Social Issues, 72(2), 376–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haslam, S. A., Turner, J. C., Oakes, P. J., McGarty, C., & Reynolds, K. (1998). The group as a basis for emergent stereotype consensus. European Review of Social Psychology, 28, 755–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hensby, A. (2014). Networks, counter-networks and political socialisation–paths and barriers to high-cost/risk activism in the 2010/11 student protests against fees and cuts. Contemporary Social Science, 9(1), 92–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huberman, A. M., & Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428–444). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphries, C. (1991). Corporations, PACs and the strategic link between contributions and lobbying activities. Western Political Quarterly, 44, 353–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasko, K., Szastok, M., Grzymala-Moszczynska, J., Maj, M., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2019). Rebel with a cause: Personal significance from political activism predicts willingness to self-sacrifice. Journal of Social Issues, 75(1), 314–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue-contingent model. Academy of Management Review, 16, 366–395.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, C. (2019). Alabama governor signs nation's most restrictive anti-abortion bill into law. CNN Politics, 16 May. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from https://edition.cnn.com/2019/05/15/politics/alabama-governor-signs-bill/index.html.

  • King, B. (2008). A political mediation model of corporate response to social movement activism. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(3), 395–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R. (2004). Movements and media: Selection processes and evolutionary dynamics in the public sphere. Theory and Society, 33(3–4), 367–391.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korschun, D., Aggarwal, A., Rafieian, H., & Swain, S. D. (2016). Taking a stand: Consumer responses to corporate political activism. Available at SSRN 2806476.

  • Koudenburg, N., Postmes, T., & Gordijn, E. H. (2011). Disrupting the flow: How brief silences in group conversations affect social needs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 512–515.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozinets, R. V., & Handelman, J. M. (2004). Adversaries of consumption: Consumer movements, activism, and ideology. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 691–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahon, J. F., & Waddock, S. A. (1992). Strategic issues management: An integration of issue life cycle perspectives. Business & Society, 31(1), 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, D. (2017). The law and ethics of CEO social activism. Journal of Law, Business & Ethics, 23, 21.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D. (1986). Recruitment to high-risk activism: The case of Freedom Summer. American Journal of Sociology, 92(1), 64–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • McAdam, D., & Rucht, D. (1993). The cross-national diffusion of movement ideas. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 528(1), 56–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, D. S., & Whittier, N. (1994). Social movement spillover. Social Problems, 41(2), 277–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milkman, R. (2017). A new political generation: Millennials and the post-2008 wave of protest. American Sociological Review, 82(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennial Impact Project. (2019). 10 years looking back. Understanding how millennials engage with causes and social issues. Retrieved January 31, from https://www.themillennialimpact.com/sites/default/files/images/2018/MIR-10-Years-Looking-Back.pdf.

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. London: Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olzak, S., & Soule, S. A. (2009). Cross-cutting influences of environmental protest and legislation. Social Forces, 88(1), 201–255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Openstates. (2019). Fetal Heartbeat Act. HB 154. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from https://openstates.org/al/bills/2017rs/HB154/.

  • Packer, D. J. (2008). On being both with us and against us: A normative conflict model of dissent in social groups. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 12, 50–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pullen, A., & Rhodes, C. (2014). Corporeal ethics and the politics of resistance in organizations. Organization, 21(6), 782–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes, C., & Pullen, A. (2018). Critical business ethics: From corporate self-interest to the glorification of the Sovereign Pater. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(2), 483–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, B. C., & Cavich, J. (2017). Nonmarket signals: Investment in corporate political activity and the performance of initial public offerings. Business & Society, 59(3), 419–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudy, B. C., & Johnson, A. F. (2019). The chief political officer: CEO characteristics and firm investment in corporate political activity. Business & Society, 58(3), 612–643.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schallhorn, K. (2018). Trump travel ban: Timeline of a legal journey. Fox News, 26 June. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-travel-ban-timeline-of-a-legal-journey.

  • Scherer, A. G., Rasche, A., Palazzo, G., & Spicer, A. (2016). Managing for political corporate social responsibility: New challenges and directions for PCSR 20. Journal of Management Studies, 53(3), 273–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schurman, R. (2004). Fighting “Frankenfoods”: Industry opportunity structures and the efficacy of the anti-biotech movement in Western Europe. Social Problems, 51(2), 243–268.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, M. D. (2019). Trump Has Right to End DACA, Justice Dept. Tells Supreme Court. New York Times, 19 August. Retrieved September 13, 2019 from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/08/19/us/politics/daca-trump.html.

  • Smith, L. G. E., & Postmes, T. (2011). Shaping stereotypical behaviour through the discussion of social stereotypes. British Journal of Social Psychology, 50, 74–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L. G., Thomas, E. F., & McGarty, C. (2015). “We must be the change we want to see in the world”: Integrating norms and identities through social interaction. Political Psychology, 36(5), 543–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soergel, A. (2016). Corporate activism and the rise of the outspoken CEO. US News & World Report, 8 April. https://www.usnews.com/news/articles/2016-04-08/corporate-activism-and-the-rise-of-the-outspoken-ceo.

  • Soule, S. A. (2009). Contention and corporate social responsibility. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Carter, M. J. (2012). A theory of the self for the sociology of morality. American Sociological Review, 77(1), 120–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Washington Post. (2019). Georgia governor signs ‘heartbeat bill,’ giving the state one of the most restrictive abortion laws in the nation. Retrieved January 31, 2020 from https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/georgia-governor-signs-heartbeat-bill-giving-the-state-one-of-the-most-restrictive-abortion-laws-in-the-nation/2019/05/07/d53b2f8a-70cf-11e9-8be0-ca575670e91c_story.html.

  • Thomas, R. (2006). A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation, 27(2), 237–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1977). Repertoires of contention in America and Britain, 1750–1830. Working paper, University of Michigan. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.1023.6384&rep=rep1&type=pdf.

  • Vecchione, M., Schwartz, S. H., Caprara, G. V., Schoen, H., Cieciuch, J., Silvester, J., & Mamali, C. (2015). Personal values and political activism: A cross-national study. British Journal of Psychology, 106(1), 84–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, D. (2019). Disney C.E.O. Warns Georgia Abortion Law Would Make it ‘Very Difficult’ to Film in the State. The New York Times, 30 May. . Retrieved January 31, 2020 from https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/30/business/media/disney-georgia-boycott-abortion.html.

  • Voegtlin, C., Crane, A., & Noval, L. (2019). When CEO sociopolitical activism attracts new talents: Exploring the conditions under which CEO activism increases job pursuit intentions. Available at SSRN 3410382.

  • Walker, E. T., Martin, A. W., & McCarthy, J. D. (2008). Confronting the state, the corporation, and the academy: The influence of institutional targets on social movement repertoires. American Journal of Sociology, 114(1), 35–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warde, A. (2015). The sociology of consumption: Its recent development. Annual Review of Sociology, 41, 117–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiskopf, R., & Willmott, H. (2013). Ethics as critical practice: The “Pentagon Papers”, deciding responsibly, truth-telling, and the unsettling of organizational morality. Organization Studies, 34(4), 469–493.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd, M., & Hais, M. (2014). How millennials could upend Wall Street and corporate America. Governance Studies at Brookings. 28 May. https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Brookings_Winogradfinal.pdf.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Macquarie Business School, Macquarie University, 4, Eastern Road, Macquarie Park, NSW, 2113, Australia

    Layla Branicki, Stephen Brammer & Alison Pullen

  2. UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, 14-28 Ultimo Rd, Ultimo, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Carl Rhodes

Authors
  1. Layla Branicki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Stephen Brammer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Alison Pullen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Carl Rhodes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Brammer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

The authors declare that this research has been carried out fully to comply with the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Branicki, L., Brammer, S., Pullen, A. et al. The Morality of “new” CEO Activism. J Bus Ethics 170, 269–285 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04656-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04656-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation