Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

CSR Beyond Economy and Society: A Post-capitalist Approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this article, we draw on established views of CSR dysfunctionalities to show how and why CSR is regularly observed to be both shaped by and supportive of capitalism. We proceed to show that these dysfunctionalities are maintained by both the pro- and anticapitalist approaches to CSR, both of which imply an ill-defined separation of the economy and society as well an overly strong problem or solution focus on political and economic issues. Finally, we present a post-capitalist approach to CSR that overcomes (1) the ill-defined separation of the economy and society, (2) the capitalist bias towards economic rationalities, and (3) the overidentification of society with its political system; this approach thus helps to manage the abovementioned CSR dysfunctionalities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, C. A. (2008). A commentary on: Corporate social responsibility reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 365–370.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agafonow, A. (2014). Toward a positive theory of social entrepreneurship. On maximizing versus satisficing value capture. Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), 709–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali Aribi, Z., & Arun, T. (2015). Corporate social responsibility and Islamic financial institutions (IFIs): Management perceptions from IFIs in Bahrain. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(4), 785–794.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N. (2003). Polyphonic organizations. In T. Hernes & T. Bakken (Eds.), Autopoietic organization theory (pp. 151–182). Copenhagen: CBS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N., & Born, A. W. (2007). Heterophony and the postponed organization organizing autopoietic systems. TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 6(1/2), 176–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen, N., & Knudsen, H. (2014). Heterophony and hyper-responsibility. In M. Knudsen & W. Vogd (Eds.), Systems theory and the sociology of health and illness: Observing healthcare (pp. 81–99). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archel, P., Husillos, J., & Spence, C. (2011). The institutionalisation of unaccountability: Loading the dice of corporate social responsibility discourse. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 36, 327–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker, M., & Roberts, J. (2011). All in the mind? Ethical identity and the allure of corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 101, 5–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S. B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. The good, the bad, and the ugly. Critical Sociology, 34(1), 51–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, J., & Umlas, E. (2017). Making corporations responsible: The parallel tracks of the B Corp movement and the business and human rights movement. Business and Society Review, 122(3), 285–325.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization. Theory, Culture & Society, 20(2), 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergthaller, H., & Schinko, C. (2011). Introduction: From national cultures to the semantics of modern society. In H. Bergthaller & C. Schinko (Eds.), Addressing modernity. Social systems theory and U.S. cultures (pp. 5–34). Amsterdam: Edition Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besley, T., & Ghatak, M. (2007). Retailing public goods: The economics of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 1645–1663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumler, J. G., & Kavanagh, D. (1999). The third age of political communication: Influences and features. Political Communication, 16(3), 209–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society, 18(3), 161–188.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulding, K. E. (1981). Ecodynamics: a new theory of societal evolution. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bousquet, M. (2002). Cultural capitalism and the ‘James Formation’. In S. Grif n (Ed.), Henry James goes to the movies (pp. 210–239). Lexington: University of Kentucky Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brei, V., & Böhm, S. (2011). Corporate social responsibility as cultural meaning management: A critique of the marketing of ‘ethical’ bottled water. Business Ethics: A European Review, 20(3), 233–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brier, S. (2006). Construction of knowledge in the mass media. Systemic problems in the post-modern power-struggle between the symbolic generalized media in the Agora: The Lomborg case of environmental science and politics. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 23(5), 667–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., Hayes, L. A., Bernal, P., & Karri, R. (2008). Ethical stewardship–implications for leadership and trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1), 153–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, C., & Karri, R. (2005). Organizational governance and ethical choices: A covenantal approach to building trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1), 249–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalışkan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Çalışkan, K., & Callon, M. (2010). Economization, part 2: A research programme for the study of markets. Economy and Society, 39(1), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Callon, M. (2007). What does it mean to say that economics is performative? In D. MacKenzie, F. Muniesa, & L. Siu (Eds.), Do economists make markets? On the performativity of economics (pp. 311–357). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, Y.-C., Chen, M.-H., Yang, P. Y., & Hua, M. (2008). Universities as patent-and licensing income-generating institutions: A survey in Taiwan. International Journal of Technology Management, 42(3), 290–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky, N. (1999). Profit over people: Neoliberalism and global order. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, L. T., Morsing, M., & Thyssen, O. (2013). CSR as aspirational talk. Organization, 20(3), 372–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciesielska, M., & Iskoujina, Z. (2018). Sustainability: Insights from a business model perspective. Tamara: Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 15, 3–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, J. M. (1916). The changing basis of economic responsibility. Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 209–229.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costas, J., & Kärreman, D. (2013). Conscience as control–managing employees through CSR. Organization, 20(3), 394–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2(3), 70–76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1967). Understanding the social responsibility puzzle: What does the businessman owe to society? Business Horizons, 10, 45–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal, 16(2), 312–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • den Hond, F., Rehbein, K., de Bakker, F., & Lankveld, H. (2014). Playing on two chessboards: Reputation effects between Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) and Corporate Political Activity (CPA). Journal of Management Studies, 51, 790–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djelic, M. L., & Etchanchu, H. (2017). Contextualizing corporate political responsibilities: Neoliberal CSR in historical perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 142, 641–661.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durkheim, E. (1933). The division of labor. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edward, P., & Willmott, H. (2008). Corporate citizenship: Rise or demise of a myth? Academy of Management Review, 33(3), 771–773.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, P., & Jones, M. T. (2013). The end of corporate social responsibility: Crisis and critique. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., Wicks, A. C., Parmar, B., & de Colle, S. (2010). Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gemici, K. (2008). Karl Polanyi and the antinomies of embeddedness. Socio-Economic Review, 6(1), 5–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1987). The nation-state and violence (Vol. 2). Berkely: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. P., Akremi, E., Swaen, A., V., & Babu, N. (2017). The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38(2), 225–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J. P., & Nyberg, D. (2017). Materializing power to recover corporate social responsibility. Organization Studies, 38(8), 1127–1148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gond, J.-P., Palazzo, G., & Basu, K. (2009). Investigating instrumental corporate social responsibility through the mafia metaphor. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(1), 55–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J., & McCarthy, T. (1985). The theory of communicative action. Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason (Vol. 2). Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hafenbrädl, S., & Waeger, D. (2017). Ideology and the micro-foundations of CSR: Why executives believe in the business case for CSR and how this affects their CSR engagements. Academy of Management Journal, 60(4), 1582–1606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagen, R. (2000). Rational solidarity and functional differentiation. Acta Sociologica, 43(1), 27–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanlon, G. (2008). Rethinking corporate social responsibility and the role of the firm–on the denial of politics. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon & D. S. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 157–172). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jemielniak, D., & Greenwood, D. J. (2015). Wake up or perish: Neo-liberalism, the social sciences, and salvaging the public university. Cultural Studies? Critical Methodologies, 15(1), 72–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnsen, C. G., Nelund, M., Olaison, L., & Sørensen, B. M. (2017). Organizing for the post-growth economy. Ephemera, 17(1), 1–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T. (1996). Missing the forest for trees. Business & Society, 35(1), 7–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jönhill, J. I. (2012). Inclusion and exclusion—A guiding distinction to the understanding of issues of cultural background. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 29(4), 387–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kinderman, D. (2017). The business-led globalization of CSR: Channels of diffusion from the United States into Venezuela and Britain, 1962–1981. Business and Society (online first).

  • Kapp, K. W. (1975). The social costs of private enterprise. New York: Schocken Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani, A. (2011). “Doing well by doing good”: The grand illusion. California Management Review, 53(2), 69–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. R., & Lund-Thomsen, P. (2011). CSR as imperialism: Towards a phenomenological approach to CSR in the developing world. Journal of Change Management, 11(1), 73–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, F. R., Westwood, R., & Boje, D. M. (2010). ‘I feel like a foreign agent’: NGOs and corporate social responsibility interventions into Third World child labour. Human Relations, 63(9), 1417–1438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lash, S. (2007). Capitalism and metaphysics. Theory, Culture & Society, 24(5), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276407081281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laufer, W. S. (2003). Social accountability and corporate greenwashing. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 253–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. M., Park, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). Employee perception of CSR activities: Its antecedents and consequences. Journal of Business Research, 66(10), 1716–1724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M.-D. (2008). A review of the theories of corporate social responsibility: Its evolutionary path and the road ahead. International Journal of Management Reviews, 10, 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leisinger, K. (2016). Capitalism with a human face. In M. McIntosh (Ed.), Globalization and corporate citizenship: The alternative gaze (pp. 178–202). Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L. (2002). The communication turn in the theory of social systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(2), 129–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1977). Differentiation of society. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 2(1), 29–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). The paradox of system differentiation and the evolution of society. In J. C. Alexander & P. B. Colomy (Eds.), Differentiation theory and social change: comparative and historical perspectives (pp. 409–440). New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford: Standford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2013a). Theory of society (Vol. 2). Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (2013b). Introduction to systems theory. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: An integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(1), 3–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marens, R. (2012). Generous in victory? American managerial autonomy, labour relations and the invention of Corporate Social Responsibility. Socio-Economic Review, 10, 59–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx, K. (1867). Capital, critique of political economy (Vol I). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Towards an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, T. F. (1986). Models of the relationship of the firm to society. Journal of Business Ethics, 5(3), 181–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Dwyer, B. (2003). Conceptions of corporate social responsibility: The nature of managerial capture. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 16(4), 523–557.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palazzo, G., & Scherer, A. G. (2006). Corporate legitimacy as deliberation. A communicative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T., & Smelser, N. (1998). Economy and society: A study in the integration of economic and social theory. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini, F. (2006). The practitioner’s perspective on non-financial reporting. California Management Review, 48(2), 73–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, I., Beckmann, M., & Hielscher, S. (2014). The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the Aristotelian idea of individual citizenship. Business & Society, 53(2), 226–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, K. (1957). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. How to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, 89, 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Post, J. (1978). Corporate behavior and social change. Reston: Reston Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, L. E., & Post, J. E. (1981). Private management and public policy. California Management Review, 23(3), 56–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, J. (2003). The manufacture of corporate social responsibility: Constructing corporate sensibility. Organization, 10(2), 249–265.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., Clark, C., Trofimov, N., Mkrtichyan, A., Heidingsfelder, M., Appignanesi, L., Pérez-Valls, M., Berkel, J., & Kaivo-Oja, J. (2017b). Futures of a distributed memory. A global brain wave measurement (1800–2000). Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 307–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., Melkonyan, A., Kaivo-oja, J., Manke, B., & Dana L.-P. (2018b). Interfunctional business models. Map to an uncharted quadrant of the blue ocean. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Venturing, 10(5), 581–595.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., Sales, A., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2017a). Multiplying the division of labour: Functional differentiation of the next key variables in management research. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 34(2), 195–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., Valentinov, V., Augustinaitis, A., Mkrtichyan, A., & Kaivo-oja, J. (2018a). Was that capitalism? A future-oriented big data analysis of the English language area in the 19th and 20th century. Futures, 98, 41–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roth, S., Valentinov, V., Kaivo-oja, J., & Dana, L.-P. (2018c). Multifunctional organisation models. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 31(7), 1383–1400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahlin-Andersson, K. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: A trend and a movement, but of what and for what? Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(5), 595–608.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility: Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1096–1120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2011). The new political role of business in a globalized world: A review of a new perspective on CSR and its implications for the firm, governance, and democracy. Journal of Management Studies, 48(4), 899–931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, A. G., Palazzo, G., & Baumann, D. (2006). Global rules and private actors. Towards a new role of the TNC in global governance. Business Ethics Quarterly, 16(4), 502–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, W., & Hadamek, C. (2007). Steering as paradox: The ambiguous role of the political system in modern society. Cybernetics & Human Knowing, 14(2–3), 133–150.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schirmer, W., & Michailakis, D. (2014). Two ways of dealing with polycontextuality in priority-setting in Swedish health-care politics. In M. Knudsen & W. Vogd (Eds.), Systems theory and the sociology of health and illness: Observing healthcare (pp. 63–80). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. (2003). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, R. (2004). The de- radicalization of corporate social responsibility. Critical Sociology, 30(3), 669 89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131(3), 625–648.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siri, J., & Von Groddeck, V. (2012). Temporalized identities: How organizations construct identities in a society of presents. Tamara Journal of Critical Organisation Inquiry, 10(3), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staw, B. M., & Epstein, L. D. (2000). What bandwagons bring: Effects of popular management techniques on corporate performance, reputation, and CEO pay. Administrative Science Quarterly, 45, 523–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Streeck, W. (2011). Taking capitalism seriously: Towards an institutionalist approach to contemporary political economy. Socio-Economic Review, 9, 137–167.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, S., & Valentinov, V. (2017). The neglect of society in the theory of the firm: A systems-theory perspective. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 41(4), 1061–1085.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turban, D. B., & Greening, D. W. (1997). Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 658–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentinov, V. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and sustainability: Insights from Boulding and Luhmann. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 20(4), 317–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentinov, V. (2014). The complexity–sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(1), 14–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanderstraeten, R. (2005). System and environment: notes on the autopoiesis of modern society. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 22(6), 471–481.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Groddeck, V. (2010). The function of dysfunctions: The paradox of value-based leadership communication. European Journal of International Management, 5(1), 30–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Groddeck, V. (2011). Rethinking the role of value communication in business corporations from a sociological perspective–why organisations need value-based semantics to cope with societal and organisational fuzziness. Journal of Business Ethics, 100(1), 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, S. (2005). Madame chats with coquettes: The evolution of early modern theories of conversation. The Seventeenth Century, 20, 281–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1978). Economy and society. An outline of interpretative sociology. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Will, M. G., Roth, S., & Valentinov, V. (2017). From nonprofit diversity to organizational multifunctionality: A systems–theoretical proposal. Administration & Society, 0095399717728093.

  • Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zyglidopoulos, S., & Fleming, P. (2011). Corporate accountability and the politics of visibility in ‘late modernity’. Organization, 18(5), 691–706.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to four anonymous reviewers for their very helpful comments. The authors also gratefully acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Science and the European Regional Development Fund-ERDF/FEDER (National R&D Project ECO2015-66504-P).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. La Rochelle Business School, 102 Rue de Coureilles, 17000, La Rochelle, France

    Steffen Roth

  2. Yerevan State University, Alex Manoogian 1, 0025, Yerevan, Armenia

    Steffen Roth

  3. Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Central and Eastern Europe, Theodor-Lieser-Straße 2, 06120, Halle (Saale), Germany

    Vladislav Valentinov

  4. Habib University Karachi, 18, Faisal Cantonment, Karachi, Pakistan

    Markus Heidingsfelder

  5. University of Alméria, Ctra. Sacramento, s/n, 04120, La Cañada, Alméria, Spain

    Miguel Pérez-Valls

Authors
  1. Steffen Roth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vladislav Valentinov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Markus Heidingsfelder
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Miguel Pérez-Valls
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steffen Roth.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Annex

Annex

See Table 1.

Table 1 Social differentiation  (Roth et al. 2017a, p. 198)
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Roth, S., Valentinov, V., Heidingsfelder, M. et al. CSR Beyond Economy and Society: A Post-capitalist Approach. J Bus Ethics 165, 411–423 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4068-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4068-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation