Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Employee Volunteer Programs are Associated with Firm-Level Benefits and CEO Incentives: Data on the Ethical Dilemma of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ethical dilemmas arise when one must decide between conflicting ethical imperatives. One potential ethical dilemma is a manager’s decision of whether to engage in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. This decision could pit the ethical imperative of honoring unwritten obligations to society against the ethical imperative of honoring contractual obligations to the firm. However, CSR activities might only be a minor ethical dilemma or none at all if they simultaneously benefit the firm and society. To examine this I test the association between future-period employee productivity and current-period use of one type of CSR activity: employee volunteer programs. I use a unique sample of 1428 firm-years, hand-collected from sustainability reports of 373 firms. I find evidence that the current-period use of an employee volunteer program has a positive association with future-period employee productivity (moderated by the firm’s current-period employee productivity). I find this result in future periods up to 6 years after a firm uses an employee volunteer program. I also find a positive association between incentives that focus CEOs’ attention on long-term firm outcomes and more extensive employee volunteer programs (also moderated by current-period employee productivity).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data available from the public sources described in this paper.

Notes

  1. There is some similarity between this explanation of what motivates people to engage in CSR activities and what motivates workers to reciprocate when a gift wage is received (e.g. Kuang and Moser 2009; Fehr and Gächter 2000).

  2. I list improved employee skill level as a potential benefit from employee volunteer programs. This expectation may be more practical and intuitive than scholarly. Jones (2016) calls into question employee volunteer programs’ effect on employee skill level, arguing that the empirical evidence of this relationship is hardly compelling. Given that my hypotheses could be driven entirely by changes in employee loyalty, I expect that my conclusions would be largely unchanged if I were to remove any expectation that employee volunteer programs improve employee skill level.

  3. In my tests of the moderating effect of current-period employee productivity, I also control for a main effect of current-period employee productivity on future-period employee productivity. I discuss this further in subsequent sections.

  4. As explained in the “Sample and Measures” section and in the “Hypothesis Tests for H2a and H2b” subsection of the “Results” section, I define employee volunteer program extensiveness as the natural logarithm of total volunteer hours. I also include several firm-level measures to control for correlations between firm size and employee volunteer program extensiveness.

  5. The term ethical dilemma is often used to describe fictional scenarios designed to bring multiple ethical imperatives into conflict. As teaching tools, fictional ethical dilemmas require students to think carefully about the conflicting ethical imperatives and to develop strategies for maximizing ethical behavior, which can be useful when actual ethical dilemmas arise in practice. In an ethical dilemma, actual or fictional, managers have no first-best option that allows them to fully act in accordance with all ethical imperatives. How people go about maximizing ethical behavior in ethical dilemmas is, of course, a source of extensive study in the field of ethics (e.g. Ryan and Bisson 2011; Priem and Shaffer 2001; Barnett et al. 1994; McCabe et al. 1994; Weber 1994).

  6. Although I focus on improved employee loyalty and skill level as benefits of volunteer programs, volunteerism is also associated with several other types of self-improvement that might affect long-term employee productivity. For example, in summarizing research on the benefits of volunteerism, Brooks (2009) says, “People who volunteer do better financially [….] People who volunteer are happier [….] Volunteering actually gives people a mild sense of euphoria.”

  7. In the organizational productivity literature, employee productivity is defined using a logarithmic transformation of an income statement performance measure divided by the number of employees (e.g. Bloom and Van Reenen 2011; Munday and Peel 1997; Huselid 1995). I discuss and use several such measures for employee productivity in the “Sample and Measures” and “Results” sections.

  8. I am anecdotally aware of instances where this has happened, although I lack empirical evidence of the net effect these employees’ departure had on their respective firms.

  9. For example, it may be that employee volunteer programs tend to coincide with inconsistencies in CSR strategies. Scheidler et al. (2018) find that inconsistent CSR strategies tend to lead to higher employee turnover intentions, and higher firm-level employee turnover rates.

  10. Throughout the paper, I use period and year interchangeably. I refer to the current year as the current period and future years as future periods.

  11. Prior research provides some limited survey evidence that employee engagement in employee volunteer programs can be dramatically affected by top management’s involvement or lack of involvement in these programs (Benjamin 2001; Seagram and Sons 1989). A secondary reason for including analysis of CEO incentives in this paper is to provide additional evidence in this regard.

  12. At least, that is true for bankruptcy law in the United States. As described in the “Sample and Measures” section, my sample is restricted to United States firms.

  13. This portion of my search was complicated slightly by the fact that company websites are constantly updated, and I sought sustainability reports that might be several years old. On occasion GRI or the company website indicated a report existed, but it was not in the GRI database and the current version of the company website held no active links to it. In these cases, I searched for and occasionally found these sustainability reports on company websites using an internet search engine.

  14. A small number of sustainability reports contain data for multiple firm-years.

  15. Table 1 includes all three of my main proxies for employee volunteer programs, two of which are discussed in the “Alternative Proxies for Employee Volunteer Programs” subsection. I include variable definitions below Table 2. Reports in the GRI database were observed in 2016. Some GRI figures referenced in Table 1 may change over time as additional reports are released.

  16. That is, \({\text{ln}}\left(\frac{\text{sales}}{\text{employees}}\right)\). See, for example, Bloom and Van Reenen (2011).

  17. It was more economical to hand-collect employee volunteer program variables than to use an automated protocol. Sustainability reports contain many different references to “hours,” such as total reportable incidence rate (which refers repeatedly to 200,000 work-hours as the basis for the rate), work hours without a loss-time event, training hours, hotlines (answered “24 hours a day”), kilowatt-hours, megawatt-hours, working hours, and so forth. Error rates from an automated protocol would be high. In “Alternative Proxies for Employee Volunteer Programs” I perform supplemental analysis that requires a determination of whether firms track total volunteer hours. This would be difficult to measure using an automated protocol.

  18. LNTOTALHOURS has notable correlations with my three proxies for employee volunteer programs. As discussed later, VOLMENTION indicates whether companies’ CSR disclosures use the word “volunteer” and VOLSYSTEM indicates whether companies’ volunteer hours are presented as total hours. As shown in Table 4, VOLSYSTEM has a significant positive correlation with LNTOTALHOURS. This may mean that implementing a volunteer hour reporting system—allowing one to arrive at “total volunteer hours”—increases the completeness of volunteer hours reported. It could also mean that such a reporting system motivates employees to volunteer more.

  19. I limit FUTURE_YEAR to year 6 to ensure a meaningful number of firms and firm-years are in my analysis.

  20. Throughout the “Results” section, I use two-tailed significance tests at the 90% confidence interval. I use this relatively low confidence interval because many factors affect employee productivity and because I generally expect hypothesized effects to be small. I report significance using stricter confidence intervals in the tables. I also report raw p values in parentheses in Table 5 through 13

  21. I also re-test each regression in Tables 5, 6 and 7 using two-digit industry indicator variables to control for industry fixed effects. When I do this, statistical support for H1a and H1b using GPPROD improves (i.e. all six future years produce a significant effect) and statistical support for H1a and H1b using SALESPROD and EARNPROD remains the same.

  22. A more extensive treatment of the value and informativeness of monitoring systems (or simply information systems) is given by Marschak and Miyasawa (1968). The relevant equation in their analysis is Eq. 4.6 on page 145; that equation is comparable to Christensen and Demski’s (2003) Eq. 6.9, presented on page 114.

  23. Table 3 shows a general pattern of monotonic increases in employee volunteer programs for each proxy of them and for every year in the sample. However, between 2008 and 2010, the percentage of firms that reported total volunteer hours (i.e. VOLSYSTEM) decreased precipitously. This is consistent with volunteer hour reporting systems being costly and with the recession from 2008 to 2009 affecting how many firms were willing to incur the additional costs of a volunteer hours reporting system.

  24. In my initial tests of H1a and H1b, reported in Table 5 through 13, 31 of the 54 regressions I run support both H1a and H1b (at the 90% level of confidence, two-tailed). When I re-run these regressions with the fixed effects indicator variables described above, seven additional years provide significant results that support H1a and H1b (again at the 90% level of confidence, two-tailed). Using VOLPROGRAM, year 4 and year 5 with the proxy GPPROD are now significant. Using VOLMENTION, year 5 and year 6 with the proxy GPPROD are now significant. Using VOLSYSTEM, year 5 and year 6 with the proxy SALESPROD are now significant, as is year 4 with the proxy EARNPROD. Generally similar results obtain when I lower the confidence level to 95% or 99%.

  25. If I raise the confidence level to 95%, three of these years are no longer significant: year 3 for SALESEMPROD and year 4 for GPPROD and EARNPROD.

  26. I also re-run my Model 2 tests with added two-digit industry indicator variables to control for industry fixed effects. Results are unchanged in direction and significance.

  27. The negative f2 statistics in Table 13 and 16 are most likely due to numerical artifacts, such as rounding. Given that the R2 statistics reported are a composite of both within-firm and between-firm variation (due to my data’s cross-sectional and longitudinal nature). This leads to the possibility of small negative, and erroneous, f2 statistics due to these composite R2 statistics.

  28. Data in my sample are coded to the year in which the volunteering activity takes place rather than the year in which the report comes out.

References

  • Allen, K. (2012). What is an ethical dilemma. New Social Worker, 19, 4–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, T., Bass, K., & Brown, G. (1994). Ethical ideology and ethical judgment regarding ethical issues in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(6), 469–480.

    Google Scholar 

  • Basil, D. Z., Runte, M. S., Easwaramoorthy, M., & Barr, C. (2009). Company support for employee volunteering: A national survey of companies in Canada. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 387–398.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaudoin, C. A., Cianci, A. M., Hannah, S. T., & Tsakumis, G. T. (2018). Bolstering managers’ resistance to temptation via the firm’s commitment to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3789-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin, E. J. (2001). A look inside corporate employee volunteer programs. Journal of Volunteer Administration, 19(2), 16–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhatti, K. K., & Qureshi, T. M. (2007). Impact of employee participation on job satisfaction, employee commitment and employee productivity. International Review of Business Research Papers, 3(2), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, N., & Van Reenen, J. (2011). Human resource management and productivity. Handbook of Labor Economics, 4, 1697–1767.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth, J. E., Park, K. W., & Glomb, T. M. (2009). Employer-supported volunteering benefits: Gift exchange among employers, employees, and volunteer organizations. Human Resource Management, 48(2), 227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, A. C. (2009). Why Giving Matters. Speech presented at BYU forum address, Provo, Utah. Retrieved August 25, 2017, from https://speeches.byu.edu/talks/arthur-c-brooks_giving-matters-2/.

  • Cassell, C. A., Huang, S. X., Sanchez, J. M., & Stuart, M. D. (2012). Seeking safety: The relation between CEO inside debt holdings and the riskiness of firm investment and financial policies. Journal of Financial Economics, 103(3), 588–610.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caudron, S. (1994). Volunteer efforts offer low-cost training options. Personnel Journal, 73(6), 38–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen, J. A., & Demski, J. S. (2003). Accounting theory: An informational content perspective. Boston: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edn). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Gilder, D., Schuyt, T. N., & Breedijk, M. (2005). Effects of an employee volunteering program on the work force: The ABN-AMRO case. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(2), 143–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Roeck, K., & Maon, F. (2016). Building the theoretical puzzle of employees’ reactions to corporate social responsibility: An integrative conceptual framework and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–17.

  • Dearden, L., Reed, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2006). The impact of training on productivity and wages: Evidence from British panel data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 68(4), 397–421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Li, O. Z., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2011). Voluntary nonfinancial disclosure and the cost of equity capital: The initiation of corporate social responsibility reporting. The Accounting Review, 86(1), 59–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhaliwal, D. S., Radhakrishnan, S., Tsang, A., & Yang, Y. G. (2012). Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: International evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. The Accounting Review, 87(3), 723–759.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T. W., & Donaldson, T. (1999). Social contract approaches to business ethics: Bridging the “Is-Ought” gap. In R. E. Frederick (ed.), A Companion to Business Ethics, (pp. 38–55). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, W. B., Jackson, K. E., Peecher, M. E., & White, B. J. (2013). The unintended effect of corporate social responsibility performance on investors’ estimates of fundamental value. The Accounting Review, 89(1), 275–302.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Fairness and retaliation: The economics of reciprocity. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(3), 159–181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henning, J. B., & Jones, D. A. (2013). Volunteer programs in the corporate world. In Olson-Buchanan, J. B., Bryan, L. L. K., & Thompson, L. F. (Eds.), Using industrial-organizational psychology for the greater good: Helping those who help others. New York: Routledge, 110–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heskett, J. L., Sasser, W. E., & Schlesinger, L. A. (1997). Service profit chain: How leading companies link profit and growth to loyalty, satisfaction, and value. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holzer, H. J. (1990). The determinants of employee productivity and earnings. Industrial Relations: A Journal of Economy and Society, 29(3), 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huselid, M. A. (1995). The impact of human resource management practices on turnover, productivity, and corporate financial performance. Academy of Management Journal, 38(3), 635–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. (2011). Hiring a corporate volunteering consultant? Here’s what to expect. Retrieved June 5, 2017, from http://www.realizedworth.com/2011/07/hiring-corporate-volunteering.html.

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2010). Does serving the community also serve the company? Using organizational identification and social exchange theories to understand employee responses to a volunteerism programme. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83(4), 857–878.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A. (2016). Widely assumed but thinly tested: Do employee volunteers’ self-reported skill improvements reflect the nature of their volunteering experiences? Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 495.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. A., Willness, C. R., & Madey, S. (2014). Why are job seekers attracted by corporate social performance? Experimental and field tests of three signal-based mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(2), 383–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H. R., Lee, M., Lee, H. T., & Kim, N. M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility and employee–company identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(4), 557–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y., Park, M. S., & Wier, B. (2012). Is earnings quality associated with corporate social responsibility? The Accounting Review, 87(3), 761–796.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koys, D. J. (2001). The effects of employee satisfaction, organizational citizenship behavior, and turnover on organizational effectiveness: A unit-level, longitudinal study. Personnel Psychology, 54(1), 101–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuang, X., & Moser, D. V. (2009). Reciprocity and the effectiveness of optimal agency contracts. The Accounting Review, 84(5), 1671–1694.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lys, T., Naughton, J. P., & Wang, C. (2015). Signaling through corporate accountability reporting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 60(1), 56–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschak, J., & Miyasawa, K. (1968). Economic comparability of information systems. International Economic Review, 9(2), 137–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, P. (2014). Corporate social responsibility: Three experimental studies. Dissertation. University of Pittsburgh, 2014.

  • Martin, P. R., & Moser, D. V. (2016). Managers’ green investment disclosures and investors’ reaction. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61(1), 239–254.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, D. L., Dukerich, J. M., & Dutton, J. E. (1994). The effects of professional education on values and the resolution of ethical dilemmas: Business school vs. law school students. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 693–700.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, J. M., & Good, D. J. (2016). The moral metacognition scale: Development and validation. Ethics & Behavior, 26(5), 357–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munday, M., & Peel, M. J. (1997). The Japanese manufacturing sector in the UK: A performance appraisal. Accounting and Business Research, 28(1), 19–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J. (2009). The challenge of measuring financial impacts from investments in corporate social performance. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1518–1541.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peloza, J., Hudson, S., & Hassay, D. N. (2009). The marketing of employee volunteerism. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 371–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, D. K. (2004). Benefits of participation in corporate volunteer programs: Employees’ perceptions. Personnel Review, 33(6), 615–627.

    Google Scholar 

  • Priem, R. L., & Shaffer, M. (2001). Resolving moral dilemmas in business: A multicountry study. Business & Society, 40(2), 197–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodell, J. B. (2013). Finding meaning through volunteering: Why do employees volunteer and what does it mean for their jobs? Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1274–1294.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. G., & Bisson, J. (2011). Can ethics be taught? International Journal of Business and Social Science, 2(12), 44–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheidler, S., Edinger-Schons, L. M., Spanjol, J., & Wieseke, J. (2018). Scrooge posing as Mother Teresa: How hypocritical social responsibility strategies hurt employees and firms. Journal of Business Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3788-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seagram and Sons. (1989). The Chivas regal report on working Americans: Emerging values for the 1990s. New York, NY: Research & Forecasts, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundaram, R. K., & Yermack, D. L. (2007). Pay me later: Inside debt and its role in managerial compensation. The Journal of Finance, 62(4), 1551–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, J. A., & Hart, D. W. (2006). Psychological contracts: A nano-level perspective on social contract theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 229–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1994). Ethical dilemmas in business. Business and Society, 33(3), 329.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahller, K., Arnold, V., & Roberts, R. W. (2015). Using CSR disclosure quality to develop social resilience to exogenous shocks: A test of investor perceptions. Behavioral Research in Accounting (In-Press).

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am indebted to Chan Li and Dhinu Srinivasan, whose archival accounting research seminar at University of Pittsburgh helped provide impetus and background for this study. I am grateful for many helpful comments, including comments from participants at an October 2014 University of Pittsburgh brownbag, comments from the discussants (Elizabeth Almer, Joleen Kremin, Jim Cannon, Andrew Glover, and Scott Jackson) and participants at the 2015 Brigham Young University Accounting Research Symposium, and comments from the discussant (Nathan Stuart) and participants at the 2016 Management Accounting Section mid-year meeting. I also acknowledge, with great appreciation, significant and invaluable effort from anonymous reviewers.

Funding

This article received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian D. Knox.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that he has no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by the author.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knox, B.D. Employee Volunteer Programs are Associated with Firm-Level Benefits and CEO Incentives: Data on the Ethical Dilemma of Corporate Social Responsibility Activities. J Bus Ethics 162, 449–472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4005-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4005-0

Keywords

Navigation