Skip to main content
Log in

Is Leader Humility a Friend or Foe, or Both? An Attachment Theory Lens on Leader Humility and Its Contradictory Outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As studies continue to accumulate on leader humility, it has become clear that humility (one of the moral virtues) in a leader is largely beneficial to his or her followers. While the majority of the empirical research on this topic has demonstrated the positive effects of leader humility, this study challenges that consensus by arguing that a leader’s humble behavior can have contradictory outcomes in followers’ voice behavior. Drawing on attachment theory, we develop a model which takes into account the ways in which leader humility influences the seemingly contradictory voice behavior of followers, i.e., inducing challenging voice (promoting the flexibility toward changes), and defensive voice (showing the persistence toward changes) depending on the followers’ sense of security as reflected by feeling trusted (sensing the leaders’ confidence in them) and self-efficacy for voice (sense of self-confidence). The results of this empirical study confirm that leader humility influences followers’ voice in a contradictory way through their sense of security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 123–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andriessen, J. (1978). Safe behaviour and safety motivation. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 1, 363–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Argandona, A. (2015). Humility in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 132, 63–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aryee, S., Walumbwa, F. O., Mondejar, R., & Chu, C. W. (2014). Core self-evaluations and employee voice behavior test of a dual-motivational pathway. Journal of Management, 43, 946–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashford, S. J., & Tsui, A. S. (1991). Self-regulation for managerial effectiveness: The role of active feedback seeking. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 251–280.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M. D., Dhensa-Kahlon, R. K., Colquitt, J. A., Rodell, J. B., Outlaw, R., & Long, D. M. (2015). Uneasy lies the head that bears the trust: The effects of feeling trusted on emotional exhaustion. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 1637–1657.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1999). Social cognitive theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research (pp. 154–196). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. (1991). Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 941–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & McClelland, D. C. (1977). Social learning theory. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby, J. (1969/1982). Attachment and Loss: Attachment. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowling, N. A., Eschleman, K. J., & Wang, Q. (2010). A meta-analytic examination of the relationship between job satisfaction and subjective well-being. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 915–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, D., Zollo, J., Thompson, C., Vancouver, J., Shewring, K., & Sims, E. (2000). A quantitative review of the effects of manipulated self-efficacy on performance. Paper presented at the Poster session presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Society Miami, FL.

  • Bromley, D. B. (1993). Reputation, Image and Impression Management. New York, NY: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brower, H. H., Lester, S. W., Korsgaard, M. A., & Dineen, B. R. (2009). A closer look at trust between managers and subordinates: Understanding the effects of both trusting and being trusted on subordinate outcomes. Journal of Management, 35, 327–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, E. R. (2012). The risks and rewards of speaking up: Managerial responses to employee voice. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 851–875.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, N. L., & Miller, L. C. (1994). Self-disclosure and liking: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 457–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cropanzana, R., Bowen, D. E., & Gilliland, S. W. (2007). The management of organizational justice. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 21, 34–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidovitz, R., Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P. R., Izsak, R., & Popper, M. (2007). Leaders as attachment figures: Leaders’ attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers’ performance and mental health. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 632–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door really open? Academy of Management Journal, 50, 869–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Edmondson, A. C. (2011). Implicit voice theories: Taken-for-granted rules of self-censorship at work. Academy of Management Journal, 54, 461–488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detert, J. R., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Speaking up to higher-ups: How supervisors and skip-level leaders influence employee voice. Organization Science, 21, 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duan, J., Li, C., Xu, Y., & Wu, C. h. (2017). Transformational leadership and employee voice behavior: A Pygmalion mechanism. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 650–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyne, L. V., Ang, S., & Botero, I. C. (2003). Conceptualizing employee silence and employee voice as multidimensional constructs. Journal of Management Studies, 40, 1359–1392.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eden, D., & Leviatan, U. (1975). Implicit leadership theory as a determinant of the factor structure underlying supervisory behavior scales. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 736–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson, A. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44, 350–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehrlich, H. J., & Graeven, D. B. (1971). Reciprocal self-disclosure in a dyad. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 389–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Exline, J. J., & Geyer, A. L. (2004). Perceptions of humility: A preliminary study. Self and Identity, 3, 95–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frostenson, M. (2016). Humility in business: A contextual approach. Journal of Business Ethics, 138, 91–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao, L., Janssen, O., & Shi, K. (2011). Leader trust and employee voice: The moderating role of empowering leader behaviors. The Leadership Quarterly, 22, 787–798.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, D. G., & Pierce, J. L. (2011). A question of false self-esteem: Organization-based self-esteem and narcissism in organizational contexts. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 682–699.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E. (1987). Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12, 472–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E., & Mitchell, T. R. (1992). Self-efficacy: A theoretical analysis of its determinants and malleability. Academy of Management Review, 17, 183–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Schwartz, B. (2011). Too much of a good thing the challenge and opportunity of the inverted U. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 61–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, R. (1973). Jewish ethics and the virtue of humility. The Journal of Religious Ethics, 1, 53–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, L. t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O., & Gao, L. (2015). Supervisory responsiveness and employee self-perceived status and voice behavior. Journal of Management, 41, 1854–1872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, E. E., & Pittman, T. S. (1982). Toward a general theory of strategic self-presentation. Psychological Perspectives on the Self, 1, 231–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. R. (1986). Socialization tactics, self-efficacy, and newcomers’ adjustments to organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 29, 262–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller, T. (2003). Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: An attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 141–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kipnis, D. (1972). Does power corrupt? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 24, 33–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, E., & Harvey, W. (2015). Managing exploration and exploitation paradoxes in creative organisations. Management Decision, 53, 809–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korsgaard, M. A., Brower, H. H., & Lester, S. W. (2014). It isn’t always mutual a critical review of dyadic trust. Journal of Management, 41, 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kupfer, J. (2003). The moral perspective of humility. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 84, 249–269.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D. C., Lam, L. W., & Wen, S. S. (2014). Examining the effects of feeling trusted by supervisors in the workplace: A self-evaluative perspective. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 35, 112–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D., Choi, Y., Youn, S., & Chun, J. U. (2017). Ethical leadership and employee moral voice: The mediating role of moral efficacy and the moderating role of leader–follower value congruence. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25, 760–776.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, X., Chen, Z. X., Herman, H., Wei, W., & Ma, C. (2017). Why and when employees like to speak up more under humble leaders? The roles of personal sense of power and power distance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3704-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, S., Liao, J., & Wei, H. (2015). Authentic leadership and whistleblowing: Mediating roles of psychological safety and personal identification. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 107–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, W., Mao, J., & Chen, X. (2017). Leader humility and team innovation: investigating the substituting role of task interdependence and the mediating role of team voice climate. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1115–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lüscher, L. S., & Lewis, M. W. (2008). Organizational change and managerial sensemaking: Working through paradox. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 221–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maurer, R. (1996). Beyond the wall of resistance: Unconventional strategies that build support for change. Austin: TX Bard Austin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An integrative model of organizational trust. Academy of Management Review, 20, 709–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, R. C., & Gavin, M. B. (2005). Trust in management and performance: Who minds the shop while the employees watch the boss? Academy of Management Journal, 48, 874–888.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynes, T. D., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2014). Speaking more broadly: An examination of the nature, antecedents, and consequences of an expanded set of employee voice behaviors. Journal of Applied Psychology, 99, 87–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayseless, O. (2010). Attachment and the leader—follower relationship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 27, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Means, J. R., Wilson, G. L., Sturm, C., Biron, J. E., & Bach, P. J. (1990). Humility as a psychotherapeutic formulation. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 3, 211–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, J. A., Brotheridge, C. M., & Urbanski, J. C. (2005). Bringing humility to leadership: Antecedents and consequences of leader humility. Human Relations, 58, 1323–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, E. W. (1993). Newcomer information seeking: Exploring types, modes, sources, and outcomes. Academy of management Journal, 36, 557–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadelhoffer, T., Wright, J. C., Echols, M., Perini, T., & Venezia, K. (2016). Some varieties of humility worth wanting. Journal of Moral Philosophy, 14, 168–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, D. L. (1991). Psychological contracting and newcomer socialization: An attachment theory foundation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 55–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, R., Marrone, J. A., & Slay, H. S. (2010). A new look at humility: Exploring the humility concept and its role in socialized charismatic leadership. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 33–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P. (2009). Humility in organizational leadership. (PhD Dissertation), University of Washington, USA. (3370531).

  • Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2012). Modeling how to grow: An inductive examination of humble leader behaviors, contingencies, and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 787–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., & Hekman, D. R. (2015). How does leader humility influence team performance? Exploring the mechanisms of contagion and collective promotion focus. Academy of Management Journal, 59, 1088–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013). Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership. Organization Science, 24, 1517–1538.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Rowatt, W. C., & Wilkins, A. L. (2011). Exploring the relevance and implications of humility in organizations. In K. Cameron & G. Spreitzer (Eds.), Handbook of positive organizational scholarship (pp. 260–272). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, B. P., Wallace, A. S., & Waldman, D. A. (2015). Leader narcissism and follower outcomes: The counterbalancing effect of leader humility. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100, 1203–1213.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, S. K., Williams, H. M., & Turner, N. (2006). Modeling the antecedents of proactive behavior at work. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 636–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, J. L., & Gardner, D. G. (2004). Self-esteem within the work and organizational context: A review of the organization-based self-esteem literature. Journal of Management, 30, 591–622.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 879–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M. (2002). Narcissism and attachment patterns of personalized and socialized charismatic leaders. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 19, 797–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Amit, K. (2009). Attachment and leader’s development via experiences. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 749–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, M., & Mayseless, O. (2003). Back to basics: Applying a parenting perspective to transformational leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 41–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. (1973). Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Cunha, M. P., & Clegg, S. R. (2012). The virtues of leadership: Contemporary challenges for global managers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., Owens, B., Yam, K. C., Bluhm, D., Cunha, M. P. e., Silard, A.,…Liu, W. (2017). Leader humility and team performance: exploring the mediating mechanisms of team psycap and task allocation effectiveness. Journal of Management. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206316688941.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rego, A., & Simpson, A. V. (2018). The perceived impact of leaders’ humility on team effectiveness: An empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 148, 205–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowatt, W. C., Powers, C., Targhetta, V., Comer, J., Kennedy, S., & Labouff, J. (2006). Development and initial validation of an implicit measure of humility relative to arrogance. Journal of Positive Psychology, 1, 198–211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. D., & Oestreich, D. K. (1991). Driving fear out of the workplace: How to overcome the invisible barriers to quality, productivity, and innovation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salamon, S. D., & Robinson, S. L. (2008). Trust that binds: The impact of collective felt trust on organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93, 593–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker, B. R., & Weigold, M. F. (1989). Self-identification and accountability. In R. A. Giacalone & P. Rosenfeld (Eds.), Impression management in the organization (pp. 21–43). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmons, B. L., Gooty, J., Nelson, D. L., & Little, L. M. (2009). Secure attachment: Implications for hope, trust, burnout, and performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30, 233–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36, 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1992). Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (2003). A better way to think about business: How personal integrity leads to corporate success. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. N. (1994). Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgements: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59, 452–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tangirala, S., & Ramanujam, R. (2008). Exploring nonlinearity in employee voice: The effects of personal control and organizational identification. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 1189–1203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H. (2017). Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization, 1476127017733142.

  • Turner, R. E., Edgley, C., & Olmstead, G. (1975). Information control in conversations: Honesty is not always the best policy. The Kansas Journal of Sociology, 11, 69–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998a). Helping and voice extra-role behaviors: Evidence of construct and predictive validity. Academy of Management Journal, 41, 108–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., & LePine, J. A. (1998b). Predicting voice behavior in work groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 853–858.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., & Kendall, L. N. (2006). When self-efficacy negatively relates to motivation and performance in a learning context. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91, 1146–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, E. C., & Putka, D. J. (2002). Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vera, D., & Rodriguez-Lopez, A. (2004). Strategic virtues: Humility as a source of competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 33, 393–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S., & Peterson, S. J. (2008). Authentic leadership: Development and validation of a theory-based measure. Journal of Management, 34, 89–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walumbwa, F. O., & Schaubroeck, J. (2009). Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: Mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94, 1275–1286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G. (1998). Recasting Janis’s groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73, 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G., & Saks, A. M. (2007). The effects of self-efficacy on behavior in escalation situations. Human Performance, 20, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H., & Parker, S. K. (2012). The role of attachment styles in shaping proactive behaviour: An intra-individual analysis. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 523–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H., & Parker, S. K. (2014). The role of leader support in facilitating proactive work behavior a perspective from attachment theory. Journal of Management, 43, 1025–1049.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, C.-H., Parker, S. K., & De Jong, J. P. (2014). Feedback seeking from peers: A positive strategy for insecurely attached team-workers. Human Relations, 67, 441–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Waldman, D. A., Han, Y.-L., & Li, X.-B. (2015). Paradoxical leader behaviors in people management: Antecedents and consequences. Academy of Management Journal, 58, 538–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study is not funded.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to K. Bharanitharan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

In this study, we collected data from employees (human) in an IT organization. Before collecting data, we have got an ethical approval from the Australian National University’s (ANU) human ethics committee. Therefore, all procedures performed in study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ANU’s human ethics committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bharanitharan, K., Chen, Z.X., Bahmannia, S. et al. Is Leader Humility a Friend or Foe, or Both? An Attachment Theory Lens on Leader Humility and Its Contradictory Outcomes. J Bus Ethics 160, 729–743 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3925-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-3925-z

Keywords

Navigation