Skip to main content
Log in

How Hybrids Manage Growth and Social–Business Tensions in Global Supply Chains: The Case of Impact Sourcing

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study contributes to the growing interest in how hybrid organizations manage paradoxical social–business tensions. Our empirical case is “impact sourcing”—hybrids in global supply chains that hire staff from disadvantaged communities to provide services to business clients. We identify two major growth orientations—“community-focused” and “client-focused” growth—their inherent tensions and ways that hybrids manage them. The former favors slow growth and manages tensions through highly integrated client and community relations; the latter promotes faster growth and manages client and community relations separately. Both growth orientations address social–business tensions in particular ways, but also create latent constraints that manifest when entrepreneurial aspirations conflict with the current growth path. In presenting and discussing our findings, we introduce preempting management practices of tensions, and the importance of geographic embeddedness and distance to the paradox literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Rockefeller Foundation portal on Impact Sourcing can be found at https://www.rockefellerfoundation.org/our-work/initiatives/digital-jobs-africa/ (accessed on 12/01/2016).

  2. NASSCOM Foundation portal on Impact Sourcing can be found at http://www.nasscomfoundation.org/get-engaged/impact-sourcing.html (accessed on 12/01/2016).

References

  • Accenture. (2012). Exploring the Value proposition for impact sourcing. Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from Rockefeller Foundation: https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20120314232314/Exploring-the-Value-Proposition-for-Impact-for-Impact-Sourcing.pdf.

  • Alter, K. (2007). Social enterprise typology. Seattle, WA: Virtue Ventures LLC.

    Google Scholar 

  • André, K., & Pache, A. C. (2016). From caring entrepreneur to caring enterprise: Addressing the ethical challenges of scaling up social enterprises. Journal of Business Ethics, 133(4), 659–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aurini, J. (2006). Crafting legitimation projects: An institutional analysis of private education businesses. Sociological Forum, 21(1), 83–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avasant. (2012). Incentives & opportunities for scaling the “impact sourcing” sector. Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from Rockefeller Foundation: https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20120901233822/Incentives-Opportunities-for-Scaling-the-Impact-Sourcing-Sector.pdf.

  • Babin, R., & Nicholson, B. (2010). Sustainability practices in global IT outsourcing, Manchester Business School Working Paper Series. Manchester, England: The University of Manchester.

  • Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., & Lee, M. (2014). Advancing research on hybrid organizing—Insights from the study of social enterprises. The Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 397–441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battilana, J., Sengul, M., Pache, A. C., & Model, J. (2015). Harnessing productive tensions in hybrid organizations: The case of work integration social enterprises. Academy of Management Journal, 58(6), 1658–1685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Battiliana, J., Lee, M., Walker, J., & Dorsey, C. (2012). In search of the hybrid ideal. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 10(3), 50–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billis, D. (Ed.). (2010). Hybrid organizations and the third sector: Challenges for practice, theory and policy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1954). What is wrong with social theory? American Sociological Review, 19(1), 3–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, B., Henning, N., Reyna, E., Welch, M., & Wang, D. (2009). Hybrid organizations: New business models for environmental leadership. Sheffield: Greenleaf Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carmel, E., Lacity, M. C., & Doty, A. (2014). The impact of impact sourcing: Framing a research agenda. In R. Hirschheim, A. Heinzl & J. Dibbern (Eds.), Information systems outsourcing: Towards sustainable business value (pp. 397–429). Berlin: Springer.

  • Clifford, J., Markey, K., & Malpani, N. (2013). Measuring social impact in social enterprise: The state of thought and practice in the UK. London: E3M.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2008). Basics of qualitative research 3e. London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davenport, T. H. (2005). The coming commoditization of processes. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 100–108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diesing, P. (1979). Patterns of discovery in the social sciences. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doh, J. P. (2005). Offshore outsourcing: Implications for international business and strategic management theory and practice. Journal of Management Studies, 42(3), 695–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahim, A., Battilana, J., & Mair, J. (2014). The governance of social enterprises: Mission drift and accountability challenges in hybrid organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 34, 81–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007). Theory building from cases: Opportunities and challenges. Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emirbayer, M., & Mische, A. (1998). What is agency? 1. American Journal of Sociology, 103(4), 962–1023.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, J. H., & Audia, P. G. (2006). Community ecology and the sociology of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology, 32, 145–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedland, R., & Alford, R. R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices and institutional contradictions. In W. W. Powell & P. J. Dimaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (1st ed., pp. 232–263). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  • Gereffi, G., Humphrey, J., & Sturgeon, T. (2005). The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy, 12(1), 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., & Hinings, C. R. (1993). Understanding strategic change: The contribution of archetypes. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 1052–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Raynard, M., Kodeih, F., Micelotta, E. R., & Lounsbury, M. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. The Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R. (1995). Social structure and alliance formation patterns: A longitudinal analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(4), 619–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulati, R., & Gargiulo, M. (1999). Where do interorganizational networks come from? American Journal of Sociology, 104(5), 1439–1493.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, T., Pinkse, J., Preuss, L., & Figge, F. (2015). Tensions in corporate sustainability: Towards an integrative framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 127(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. J. (2012). Hybrid organizations: The next chapter of sustainable business. Organizational Dynamics, 41(2), 126–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N., & Hoffman, A. J. (2014). The new heretics hybrid organizations and the challenges they present to corporate sustainability. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 223–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N., Kennedy, E. D., & Walker, J. (2015a). Hybrid organizations as shape-shifters. California Management Review, 57(3), 59–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haigh, N. L., Walker, J., Bacq, S., & Kickul, J. (2015b). Hybrid organizations: Origins, strategies, impacts and implications. California Management Review, 57(3), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haveman, H. A., & Rao, H. (2006). Hybrid forms and the evolution of thrifts. American Behavioral Scientist, 49(7), 974–986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, J., Dicken, P., Hess, M., Coe, N., & Yeung, H. W.-C. (2002). Global production networks and the analysis of economic development. Review of International Political Economy, 9(3), 436–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffman, A. J., Badiane, K. K., & Haigh, N. (2012). Hybrid organizations as agents of positive social change: Bridging the for-profit & non-profit divide. In K. Golden-Biddle & J. Dutton (Eds.), Using a positive lens to explore social change and organizations: Building a theoretical and research foundation (pp. 131–153). New York: Routledge.

  • Humphrey, J., & Schmitz, H. (2002). How does insertion in global value chains affect upgrading in industrial clusters? Regional Studies, 36(9), 1017–1027.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IAOP. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility matter? International Association of Outsourcing Professionals. Retrieved from IAOP: https://www.iaop.org/content/23/126/1698.

  • Jay, J. (2013). Navigating paradox as a mechanism of change and innovation in hybrid organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 137–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kannothra, C., & Manning, S. (2015). Impact sourcing at ServImpact. Managing people, clients, and growth. In J. Sydow, E. Schuessler, & G. Mueller-Seitz (Eds.), Managing interorganizational relationships—Debates and cases. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kistruck, G. M., & Beamish, P. W. (2010). The interplay of form, structure, and embeddedness in social intrapreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(4), 735–761.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolk, A. (2005). Corporate social responsibility in the coffee sector: The dynamics of MNC responses and code development. European Management Journal, 23(2), 228–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostova, T. (1999). Transnational transfer of strategic organizational practices: A contextual perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 308–324.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacity, M., Rottman, J., & Carmel, E. (2012). Emerging ITO and BPO markets: Rural sourcing and impact sourcing. IEEE Readynotes, IEEE Computer Society.

  • Lee, M., & Battilana, J. (2013). How the zebra got its stripes: Imprinting of individuals and hybrid social ventures. Harvard Business School Organizational Behavior Unit Working Paper (14-005).

  • Lee, M., & Jay, J. (2015). Strategic responses to hybrid social ventures. California Management Review, 57(3), 126–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, A. Y., Massini, S., & Peeters, C. (2009). Why are companies offshoring innovation? The emerging global race for talent. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(6), 901–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, M. W. (2000). Exploring paradox: Toward a more comprehensive guide. Academy of Management Review, 25(4), 760–776.

    Google Scholar 

  • London, T., Anupindi, R., & Sheth, S. (2010). Creating mutual value: Lessons learned from ventures serving base of the pyramid producers. Journal of Business Research, 63(6), 582–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin, G., Moss, T. W., Gras, D. M., Kato, S., & Amezcua, A. S. (2013). Entrepreneurial processes in social contexts: How are they different, if at all? Small Business Economics, 40(3), 761–783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maak, T., & Stoetter, N. (2012). Social entrepreneurs as responsible leaders: ‘Fundacion paraguaya’and the case of martin burt. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 413–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Battilana, J., & Cardenas, J. (2012). Organizing for society: A typology of social entrepreneuring models. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 353–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mair, J., Mayer, J., & Lutz, E. (2015). Navigating institutional plurality: Organizational governance in hybrid organizations. Organization Studies, 36(6), 713–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S. (2013). New Silicon Valleys or a new species? Commoditization of knowledge work and the rise of knowledge services clusters. Research Policy, 42(2), 379–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S., Boons, F., Von Hagen, O., & Reinecke, J. (2012). National contexts matter: The co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecological Economics, 83, 197–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manning, S., Larsen, M. M., & Bharati, P. (2015). Global delivery models: The role of talent, speed and time zones in the global outsourcing industry. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(7), 850–877.

  • Manning, S., Lewin, A., & Massini, S. (2008). A dynamic perspective on next-generation offshoring: The global sourcing of science and engineering talent. Academy of Management Perspectives, 22(3), 35–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., & Battilana, J. (2009). Acting globally but thinking locally? The enduring influence of local communities on organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 29, 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marquis, C., Lounsbury, M., & Greenwood, R. (2011). Introduction: Community as an institutional order and a type of organizing. In Communities and organization: research in the sociology of organizations (pp. 9–27).

  • Martin, X., Swaminathan, A., & Mitchell, W. (1998). Organizational evolution in the interorganizational environment: Incentives and constraints on international expansion strategy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43(3), 566–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massini, S., & Miozzo, M. (2012). Outsourcing and offshoring of business services: Challenges to theory, management and geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 46(9), 1219–1242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery, A. W., Dacin, P. A., & Dacin, M. T. (2012). Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi, R. (2008). Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(5), 699–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 145–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2010). When worlds collide: The internal dynamics of organizational responses to conflicting institutional demands. Academy of Management Review, 35(3), 455–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patibandla, M., & Petersen, B. (2002). Role of transnational corporations in the evolution of a high-tech industry: the case of India’s software industry. World Development, 30(9), 1561–1577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (1990). The competitive advantage of notions. Harvard Business Review, 68(2), 73–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, competition, and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Portes, A., & Sensenbrenner, J. (1993). Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology, 98(6), 1320–1350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouder, R., & John, C. H. S. (1996). Hot spots and blind spots: geographical clusters of firms and innovation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1192–1225.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. (2012). Bottom of the pyramid as a source of breakthrough innovations. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 29(1), 6–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad, C. K., & Hammond, A. (2002). Serving the world’s poor, profitably. Harvard Business Review, 80(9), 48–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy, P. (1997). New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: A survey from India. World Development, 25(11), 1821–1837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinecke, J., Manning, S., & Von Hagen, O. (2012). The emergence of a standards market: Multiplicity of sustainability standards in the global coffee industry. Organization Studies, 33(5–6), 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rivera-Santos, M., Holt, D., Littlewood, D., & Kolk, A. (2015). Social entrepreneurship in sub-Saharan Africa. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(1), 72–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockefeller Foundation. (2011). Job creation through building the field of impact sourcing. Rockefeller Foundation. Retrieved from Rockefeller Foundation: https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20110314231120/Job-Creation-Through-Building-the-Field-of-Impact-Sourcing.pdf.

  • Rockefeller Foundation. (2013). Digital jobs in Africa: Catalyzing inclusive opportunities for youth. Retrieved from Rockefeller Foundation: https://assets.rockefellerfoundation.org/app/uploads/20131217164951/Catalyzing-Inclusive-Opportunities-For-Youth.pdf.

  • Santos, F., Pache, A. C., & Birkholz, C. (2015). Making hybrids work. California Management Review, 57(3), 36–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schad, J., Lewis, M. W., Raisch, S., & Smith, W. K. (2016). Paradox research in management science: Looking back to move forward. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 5–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., Gonin, M., & Besharov, M. L. (2013). Managing social-business tensions: A review and research agenda for social enterprise. Business Ethics Quarterly, 23(03), 407–442.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Lewis, M. W. (2011). Toward a theory of paradox: A dynamic equilibrium model of organizing. Academy of Management Review, 36(2), 381–403.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, W. K., & Tushman, M. L. (2005). Managing strategic contradictions: A top management model for managing innovation streams. Organization Science, 16(5), 522–536.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Procedures and techniques for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, P. H., & Ocasio, W. (1999). Institutional logics and the historical contingency of power in organizations: Executive succession in the higher education publishing industry, 1958–1990. American Journal of Sociology, 105(3), 801–843.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tracey, P., & Phillips, N. (2007). The distinctive challenge of educating social entrepreneurs: A postscript and rejoinder to the special issue on entrepreneurship education. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 264–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly , 42(1), 35–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S., & McIntosh, M. (2011). Business unusual: Corporate responsibility in a 2.0 world. Business and Society Review, 116(3), 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weerawardena, J., & Mort, G. S. (2006). Investigating social entrepreneurship: A multidimensional model. Journal of World Business, 41(1), 21–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, H. W.-C., Liu, W., & Dicken, P. (2006). Transnational corporations and network effects of a local manufacturing cluster in mobile telecommunications equipment in China. World Development, 34(3), 520–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: design and methods: Design and methods (Vol. 5). London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chacko G. Kannothra.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kannothra, C.G., Manning, S. & Haigh, N. How Hybrids Manage Growth and Social–Business Tensions in Global Supply Chains: The Case of Impact Sourcing. J Bus Ethics 148, 271–290 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3585-4

Keywords

Navigation