Skip to main content
Log in

Doing Good Business by Hiring Directors with Foreign Experience

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Using a manually collected dataset on the overseas experiences of directors of Chinese listed firms, we examine the effects of returnee directors on firms’ corporate social responsibility (CSR) engagement. Our results show that returnee directors significantly improve their firms’ CSR engagement. The positive relationship between the percentage of returnee directors and CSR engagement is more significant when a firm is in a competitive industry, when a firm has no government ownership, when a firm’s CEO is not politically connected, and when a firm’s CEO is older. Furthermore, we find that only long-term foreign professional or academic experience matters, whereas short-term visiting experience does not. Finally, our results are robust after controlling for endogeneity. Therefore, this paper offers clear policy implications by suggesting that hiring more returnees as corporate directors is an efficient way to enhance firms’ CSR, which may be of particular interest to regulators in emerging markets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. On September 11, 2008, the Gansu Health Bureau released an announcement that Sanlu Corporation, one of the largest dairy producers in China, had placed products contaminated by melamine on the market. Three critical consequences resulted from this contamination. First, more than 290,000 people (most of them children) were poisoned, leading to the deaths of six infants (Kong 2012). Second, twenty-two dairy producers in China, with total market shares of over 90% in liquid milk and over 50% in powdered milk, failed quality examinations due to melamine contamination (Dai et al. 2013). Third, the New Zealand dairy cooperative Fonterra, which comprised business partners and shareholders of Sanlu Group, wrote down the carrying value of its investments by NZ$ 139 million. In fact, the top managers of these dairy producers knew that their products contained melamine harmful to humans, but they were concerned about the loss of short-term profits and the damage to firm reputation if they recalled the products from the market. Currently, most Chinese families prefer milk products imported from New Zealand, Holland, and Japan. Therefore, Chinese milk companies lost their market shares and experienced financial distress.

  2. One anonymous referee raises the concern that director turnover may challenge our finding because turnover effectively changes the returnee-director ratio. Due to the limited sample observations, we did not filter the firms with director turnover. To alleviate the concern raised by the referee, we conduct a robustness check in an unreported regression. In the robustness check, we define a new dummy variable to indicate whether a firm experiences director turnover during the sample period. Then, we add the interaction term between overseas director ratio and the dummy variable of director turnover to the regression. The result shows that the coefficient of the interaction term is insignificant and that the coefficient of overseas director ratio remains positive and highly significant. This result suggests that our finding is not affected by director turnover. These results are available upon request.

  3. We remove the control variable for government ownership from the subsample analysis when we split the sample firms into with- and without-government-ownership subsamples. We also remove the control variable for leverage when we split the sample firms into high- and low-leverage subsamples. We thank the anonymous referee for this comment.

  4. In Table 8, we measure whether a firm has been included in the Running’s Report. Thus, the sample firms include all public firms listed on the Chinese stock market. This differs from previous test samples, which comprise only firms included in the Running’s report.

References

  • Abratt, R., & Sacks, D. (1988). The marketing challenge: Towards being profitable and socially responsible. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(7), 497–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguilera, R. V., Williams, C. A., Conley, J. M., & Rupp, D. E. (2006). Corporate governance and social responsibility: A comparative analysis of the UK and the US. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 14(3), 147–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bae, K. H., Kang, J. K., & Wang, J. (2011). Employee treatment and firm leverage: A test of the stakeholder theory of capital structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(1), 130–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, J. H., & Karson, M. J. (1989). Managers, values, and executive decisions: An exploration of the role of gender, career stage, organizational level, function, and the importance of ethics, relationships and results in managerial decision-making. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(10), 747–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M. (1996). An empirical analysis of the relation between the board of director composition and financial statement fraud. Accounting Review, 71(4), 443–465.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benmelech, E., & Frydman, C. (2015). Military CEOs. Journal of Financial Economics, 117(1), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennedsen, M., Nielsen, K., Pérez-González, F., & Wolfenzon, D. (2007). Inside the family firm: The role of families in succession decisions and performance. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 647–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, N. K., & Nicolaievsky, D. (2007). Investor protection and the Coasian view. Journal of Financial Economics, 84(3), 738–771.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernile, G., Bhagwat, V., & Rau, P. R. (2016). What doesn’t kill you will only make you more risk-loving: Early-life disasters and CEO behavior. Journal of Finance. doi:10.1111/jofi.12432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhagwati, J., & Hamada, K. (1974). The brain drain, international integration of markets for professionals and unemployment: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Development Economics, 1(1), 19–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of Business Ethics, 119(3), 349–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, R., DuCharme, L., & Shores, D. (1995). Stakeholders’ implicit claims and accounting method choice. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 20(3), 255–295.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brüderl, J., Preisendorfer, P., & Zeigler, R. (1992). Survival chances of newly founded business organizations. American Sociological Review, 57, 227–242.

    Google Scholar 

  • Business Roundtable. (1990). Corporate governance and American competitiveness: A statement of the Business Roundtable. Business Lawyer, 46, 241–252.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrd, J., & Hickman, K. (1992). Do outside directors monitor managers? Evidence from tender offer bids. Journal of Financial Economics, 32(2), 195–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapple, W., & Moon, J. (2005). Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country study of CSR website reporting. Business and Society, 44(4), 415–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, S., & Bouvain, P. (2009). Is corporate responsibility converging? A comparison of corporate responsibility reporting in the USA, UK, Australia, and Germany. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(SUPPL. 1), 299–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • COM. (Ed.). (2001). Green paper: Promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility, COM (2001) 366 final, 18.7.2001. Brussels: Commission of the European Communities.

  • Cotter, J. F., Shivdasani, A., & Zenner, M. (1997). Do independent directors enhance target shareholder wealth during tender offers? Journal of Financial Economics, 43(2), 195–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cragg, J. G., & Donald, S. G. (1993). Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econometric Theory, 9, 222–240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dai, T., Kong, D., & Wang, M. (2013). Investor reactions to food safety incidents: Evidence from the Chinese milk industry. Food Policy, 43, 23–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D., Daily, C., Johnson, J., & Ellstrand, A. (1999). Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42(6), 674–686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dechow, P., Sloan, R., & Sweeney, A. (1996). Causes and consequences of earnings manipulation: An analysis of firms subject to enforcement actions by the SEC. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 1–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deng, X., Kang, J. K., & Low, B. S. (2013). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder value maximization: Evidence from mergers. Journal of Financial Economics, 110(1), 87–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dou, Y., Hope, O., & Thomas, W. B. (2013). Relationship-specificity, contract enforceability, and income smoothing. The Accounting Review, 88(5), 629–656.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmans, A. (2011). Short-term termination without deterring long-term investment: A theory of debt and buyouts. Journal of Financial Economics, 102(1), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esa, E., & Mohd Ghazali, N. A. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and corporate governance in Malaysian government-linked companies. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 12(3), 292–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fabrizi, M., Mallin, C., & Michelon, G. (2014). The role of CEO’s personal incentives in driving corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(2), 311–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fich, E. (2005). Are some outside directors better than others? Evidence from director appointments from Fortune 1000 firms. Journal of Business, 78(5), 1943–1971.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fombrun, C. J., & Wiedmann, K.-P. (2001). Unternehmensreputation und der ‘‘Reputation Quotient’’ (RQ). PR-Magazin, 32(12), 45–52.

  • Gao, Y. (2009). Corporate social performance in China: Evidence from large companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 89(1), 23–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giannetti, M., Liao, G., & Yu, X. (2015). The brain gain of corporate boards: Evidence from China. Journal of Finance, 70(5), 1629–1682.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gimeno, J., Folta, T. B., Cooper, A. C., & Woo, C. Y. (1997). Survival of the fittest? Entrepreneurial human capital and the persistence of underperforming firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42, 750–783.

    Google Scholar 

  • Godos-Díez, J. L., Fernández-Gago, R., & Martínez-Campillo, A. (2011). How important are CEOs to CSR practices? An analysis of the mediating effect of the perceived role of ethics and social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 98(4), 531–548.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heaton, J. B. (2002). Managerial optimism and corporate finance. Financial Management, 31(1), 33–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hegarty, W. H., & Sims, H. P. S. (1978). Some determinants of unethical decision behavior: An experiment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 63(4), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effect of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial Management, 20(4), 101–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1998). Endogenously chosen board of directors and their monitoring of the CEO. Economic Policy Review: Federal Reserve Bank of New York, 9(1), 7–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (2003). Board of directors as an endogenously determined institution: A survey of the economic literature. American Economic Review, 88(1), 96–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. P., Ainscough, T., Shank, T., & Manullang, D. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and socially responsible investing: A global perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 70(2), 165–174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, S. K. (2013). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 20(4), 234–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Q., Jiang, F., Lie, E., & Yang, K. (2014). The role of investment banker directors in M&A. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(2), 269–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (2001). Multi-stakeholder approaches to ethical trade: Towards a reorganisation of UK retailers’ global supply chains? Journal of Economic Geography, 1(4), 421–437.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husted, B., & de Jesus Salazar, J. (2006). Taking Friedman seriously: Maximising profit and social performance. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 75–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ip, P. K. (2008). The challenge of developing a business ethics in China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(1), 211–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48(3), 831–880.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs, and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, R. A., & Greening, D. W. (1999). The effects of corporate governance and institutional ownership types on corporate social performance. Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), 564–576.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. T. (1999). The institutional determinants of social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 20(2), 163–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S., Klebanov, M., & Sorensen, M. (2012). Which CEO characteristics and abilities matter? Journal of Finance, 67(3), 973–1007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W. R. (2008). Ethnic scientific communities and international technology diffusion. Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(3), 518–537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A., Muttakin, M. B., & Siddiqui, J. (2013). Corporate governance and corporate social responsibility disclosures: Evidence from an emerging economy. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(2), 207–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khanna, T. (2008). Billions of entrepreneurs: How China and India are reshaping their futures and yours. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A. (1998). Firm performance and board committee structure. Journal of Law and Economics, 41(1), 275–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knox, S., Maklan, S., & French, P. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: Exploring stakeholder relationships and programme reporting across leading FTSE companies. Journal of Business Ethics, 61(1), 7–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knyazeva, A., Knyazeva, D., & Masulis, R. W. (2013). The supply of corporate directors and board independence. Review of Financial Studies, 26(6), 1561–1605.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, D. M. (2012). Does corporate social responsibility matter in the food industry? Evidence from a nature experiment in China. Food Policy, 37, 323–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (1999). Corporate ownership around the world. Journal of Finance, 54(2), 471–517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlois, C. C., & Schlegelmich, B. B. (1990). Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 519–539.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, P. R. (1969). How to deal with resistance to change. Harvard Business Review, 41(1), 4–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Zhang, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility, ownership structure, and political interference: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 96(4), 631–645.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malmendier, U., & Tate, G. (2005). CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. Journal of Finance, 60(6), 2661–2700.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manner, M. H. (2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(Supplement 1), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCuddy, M. K., & Cavin, M. C. (2009). The demographic context of servant leadership. Journal of the Academy of Business and Economics, 9(2), 29–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2010). Creating and capturing value: Strategic corporate social responsibility, resource-based theory, and sustainable competitive advantage. Journal of Management. doi:10.1177/0149206310385696.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D. S., & Wright, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Strategic implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 38(2), 163–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Shen, X. (2010). CSR in China research: Salience, focus, and nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(4), 613–629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, A., & Kolk, A. (2010). Extrinsic and intrinsic drivers of corporate social performance: Evidence from foreign and domestic firms in Mexico. Journal of Management Studies, 47(1), 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ng, E. S., & Sears, G. J. (2012). CEO leadership styles and the implementation of organizational diversity practices: Moderating effects of social values and age. Journal of Business Ethics, 105(1), 41–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I. (1994). A dynamic theory of organizational knowledge creation. Organization Science, 5(1), 14–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunn, N. (2007). Relationship-specificity, incomplete contracts and the pattern of trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(2), 569–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-González, F. (2006). Inherited control and firm performance. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1559–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy and society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84, 78–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, B. Z., & Schmidt, W. H. (1984). Values and the American manager: An update. California Management Review, 26(3), 202–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raman, K., & Shahrur, H. (2008). Relationship-specific investments and earnings management: Evidence on corporate suppliers and customers. The Accounting Review, 83(4), 1041–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramasamy, B., & Yeung, M. (2009). Chinese consumers’ perception of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Journal of Business Ethics, 88(SUPPL. 1), 119–132. doi:10.1007/s10551-008-9825-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roll, R. (1986). The hubris hypothesis of corporate takeovers. Journal of Business, 59(2), 197–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal, 40(3), 534–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Integrative management of sustainability performance, measurement and reporting. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing, and Performance Evaluation, 3(1), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaiger, M. (2004). Components and parameters of corporate reputation: An empirical study. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56(1), 46–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, S. J., & Franke, G. R. (1999). Antecedents, consequences and mediating effects of perceived moral intensity and personal moral philosophies. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(1), 19–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spender, J. C. (1996). Making knowledge the basis of a dynamic theory of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 17(2), 45–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanwick, P. A., & Stanwick, S. D. (1998). The relationship between corporate social performance and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(2), 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teece, D. J. (1998). Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for knowhow, and intangible assets. California Management Review, 40(3), 55–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Terpstra, D. E., Rozell, E. J., & Robinson, R. K. (1993). The influence of personality and demographic variables on ethical decisions related to insider trading. Journal of Psychology, 127(4), 375–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorpe, J., & Prakash-Mani, K. (2003). Developing value: The business case for sustainability in emerging markets. Greener Management International, 44(Winter), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D., Siegel, D., & Javidan, M. (2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H., & Qian, C. (2011). Corporate philanthropy and corporate financial performance: The roles of stakeholder response and political access. Academy of Management Journal, 54(6), 1159–1181.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbach, M. S. (1988). Outside directors and CEO turnover. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 431–460.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1979). Transaction-cost economics: The governance of contractual relations. Journal of Law and Economics, 22(2), 233–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wimbush, J. C., & Shepard, J. M. (1994). Toward an understanding of ethical climate: Its relationship to ethical behavior and supervisory influence. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(8), 637–647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright, M., Liu, X., Buck, T., & Fliatotchev, I. (2008). Returnee entrepreneurs, science park location choice and performance: An analysis of high-technology SMEs in China. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 131–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zu, L., & Song, L. (2009). Determinants of managerial values on corporate social responsibility: Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 88(Supplement), 105–117.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editor, Prof. Joelle Vanhamme, two anonymous referees for their valuable comments and suggestions. We also thank Shasha Liu, Juan Luo, Yawen Qiu, Rui Shen, and Limin Xu for their comments and suggestions that have greatly improved the paper. We also wish to thank the participants of the 2015 Auckland Finance Meeting, New Zealand, and the seminar in the Sun Yat-sen University in 2016 for their comments and suggestions on earlier versions of this paper. Dongmin Kong acknowledges the financial support of National Natural Science Foundation of China (71372130 and 71173078).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ji Wu.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 10.

Table 10 Variable definition

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Kong, D. & Wu, J. Doing Good Business by Hiring Directors with Foreign Experience. J Bus Ethics 153, 859–876 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3416-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3416-z

Keywords

Navigation