Skip to main content
Log in

Discussion of “Encouraging Professional Skepticism in the Industry Specialization Era”

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2002). Consideration of fraud in a financial statement audit. Statements on auditing standards No. 99. New York: AICPA.

  • Bowlin, K. (2011). Risk-based auditing, strategic prompts, and auditor sensitivity to the strategic risk of fraud. The Accounting Review, 86(4), 1231–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Liburd, H. L., Cohen, J. R., & Trompeter, G. (2012). Effects of earnings forecasts and heightened professional skepticism on the outcomes of client-auditor negotiation. Journal of Business Ethics, 116(2), 311–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenier, J. H. (2016). Encouraging professional skepticism in the industry specialization era. Journal of Business Ethics. doi:10.1007/s10551-016-3155-1

  • Hurtt, R. K., Brown-Liburd, H., Earley, C. E., & Krishnamoorthy, G. (2013). Research on auditor professional skepticism: Literature synthesis and opportunities for future research. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 32(sp1), 45–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. E., Jamal, K., & Berryman, R. G. (1991). Effects of framing on auditor decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(1), 75–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, K. Y. (2004). The effects of industry specialization on audit risk assessments and audit planning decisions. The Accounting Review, 79, 201–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, M. (2009). A model and literature review of professional skepticism in auditing. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 28(2), 1–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, E. A., & Ramsay, R. J. (2005). Fraud risk assessments and auditors’ professional skepticism. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(3), 321–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2007). Observations of auditors’ implementation of PCAOB standards relating auditors’ responsibilities with respect to fraud. Release No. 2007-1. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). (2008). Report on the PCAOB’s 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 inspections of domestic annually inspected firms. Release No. 2008-008. Washington, DC: PCAOB.

  • Shaub, M. K., & Lawrence, J. E. (1999). Differences in auditors’ professional skepticism across career levels in the firm. Advances in Accounting Behavioral Research, 2(1), 61–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, M. H. (2000). The effects of industry specialization on auditors’ inherent risk assessments and confidence judgments. Contemporary Accounting Research, 17, 693–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helen L. Brown-Liburd.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Brown-Liburd, H.L. Discussion of “Encouraging Professional Skepticism in the Industry Specialization Era”. J Bus Ethics 142, 257–258 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3146-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3146-2

Keywords

Navigation