Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Community Characteristics and Changes in Toxic Chemical Releases: Does Information Disclosure Affect Environmental Injustice?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well known that environmental burdens are more pronounced in socioeconomically disadvantaged communities, a phenomenon known as environmental injustice. Yet, there have been few studies that have addressed whether the degree of environmental injustice has changed over time. We analyze toxic releases in the United States over the first 26 years of the toxics release inventory and examine whether the decreases in toxic releases differ according to characteristics of the communities in which the emitters reside. We find that decreases over these years are universal but far more substantial in high-income areas. Our results speak to both the nascent literature on information disclosure and that on environmental justice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. For details of this order, see http://www2.epa.gov/laws-regulations/summary-executive-order-12898-federal-actions-address-environmental-justice.

  2. While the data are widely available, the data are complex enough that groups such as the Right-to-Know network and academic researchers are still active in aggregating the data and analyzing trends.

References

  • Agarwal, N., Banternghansai, C., & Bui, L. T. M. (2010). Toxic exposure in America: Estimating fetal and infant health outcomes from 14 years of TRI reporting. Journal of Health Economics, 29, 557–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, R., & Schill, M. (1991). Black, brown, poor, and poisoned: Minority grassroots environmentalism and the quest for eco-justice. Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 1, 69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berchicci, L., & King, A. (2007). Postcards from the edge: A review of the business and environment literature. The Academy of Management Annals, 1, 513–547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bollinger, B., Leslie, P., Sorensen, A. (2010). Calorie posting in chain restaurants (No. w15648). National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge.

  • Campbell, H. E., Peck, L. R., & Tschudi, M. K. (2010). Justice for all? A cross-time analysis of toxics release inventory facility location. Review of Policy Research, 27(1), 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty, J., Maantay, J. A., & Brender, J. D. (2011). Disproportionate proximity to environmental health hazards: Methods, models, and measurement. Journal Information, 101(S1), S27–S36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., Levine, D. I., & Toffel, M. W. (2009). How well do social ratings actually measure corporate social responsibility? Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 18(1), 125–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chatterji, A. K., & Toffel, M. W. (2010). How firms respond to being rated. Strategic Management Journal, 31(9), 917–945.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delmas, M. A., & Toffel, M. W. (2012). Institutional pressures and organizational characteristics: Implications for environmental strategy. In P. Bansal & A. J. Hoffman (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of business and the environment (pp. 229–247). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi, A. R., Dowell, G. W. S., & Toffel, M. W. (2013). How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 1209–1231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dowell, G., Hart, S., & Yeung, B. (2000). Do corporate global environmental standards create or destroy market value? Management Science, 46(8), 1059–1074.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L. (1998). Environmental injustice: Is race or income a better predictor? Social Science Quarterly, 79, 766–778.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downey, L., & Hawkins, B. (2008). Race, income, and environmental inequality in the United States. Sociological Perspectives, 51(4), 759–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Protection Agency. (1997). Chemicals in the environment: History of the toxics release inventory. Accessed from http://www.epa.gov/opptintr/cie/archive/issue06j.pdf.

  • Etzion, D. (2007). Research on organizations and the natural environment, 1992-present: A review. Journal of Management, 33(4), 637–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fortunato, L., Abellan, J., Beale, L., LeFevre, S., & Richardson, S. (2011). Spatio-temporal patterns of bladder cancer incidence in Utah (1973–2004) and their association with the presence of toxic release inventory sites. International Journal of Health Geographics, 10(16), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freudenberg, N., Pastor, M., & Israel, B. (2011). Strengthening community capacity to participate in making decisions to reduce disproportionate environmental exposures. Journal Information, 101(S1), S123–S130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fung, A., & O’Rourke, D. (2000). Reinventing environmental regulation from the grassroots up: Explaining and expanding the success of the toxics release inventory. Environmental Management, 25, 115–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garcia, C., & Levenson, H. (1975). Differences between Blacks’ and Whites’ expectations of control by chance and powerful others. Psychological Reports, 37(2), 563–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. S., Bergesen, A. J., & Jones, A. W. (2002). Organizational size and pollution: The case of the US chemical industry. American Sociological Review, 67, 389–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1995). Economic growth and the environment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(2), 353–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. T. (1995). Testing for environmental racism: Prejudice, profits, political power? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14(1), 107–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S. L. (2010). Capitalism at the crossroads: Next generation business strategies for a post-crisis world (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendryx, M., & Luo, J. (2013). Cancer hospitalizations in rural–urban areas in relation to carcinogenic discharges from toxics release inventory facilities. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 23(2), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hester, R. T, Jr. (1987). Participatory design and environmental justice: Pas de deux or time to change partners? Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 4, 289–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, A., & Lenox, M. (2002). Exploring the locus of profitable pollution reduction. Management Science, 48(2), 289–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., & Hendryx, M. (2011). Environmental carcinogen releases and lung cancer mortality in rural-urban areas of the United States. The Journal of Rural Health, 27(4), 342–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, J., Hendryx, M., & Ducatman, A. (2011). Association between six environmental chemicals and lung cancer incidence in the United States. J Environ Public Health,. doi:10.1155/2011/463701.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (1998). A behavioral approach to the rational choice theory of collective action. American Political Science Review, 92(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ringquist, E. J. (1993). Environmental protection at the state level: Politics and progress in controlling pollution. New York: ME Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ringquist, E. J. (2005). Assessing evidence of environmental inequities: A meta-analysis. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 223–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha, S., & Mohr, R. D. (2013). Media attention and the toxics release inventory. Ecological Economics, 93, 284–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (2005). Equity and Information: Information regulation, environmental justice, and risks from toxic chemicals. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 24(2), 373–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suro, R. (1990). Grass roots groups show power battling pollution closer to home. New York Times, 2, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, D. E. (2014). Toxic communities: Environmental racism, industrial pollution, and residential mobility. New York: NYU Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Church of Christ. (1987). Toxic wastes and race in the United States: A national report on the racial and socio-economic characteristics of communities with hazardous waste cites.

  • Weil, D., Fung, A., Graham, M., & Fagotto, E. (2006). The effectiveness of regulatory disclosure policies. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 25(1), 155–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinberg, A. S. (1998). The environmental justice debate: A commentary on methodological issues and practical concerns. Sociological Forum, 13(1), 25–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yandle, B., Bhattarai, M., & Vijayaraghavan, M. (2004). Environmental Kuznets curves: A review of findings, methods, and policy implications. Research study, 2, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arturs Kalnins.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalnins, A., Dowell, G. Community Characteristics and Changes in Toxic Chemical Releases: Does Information Disclosure Affect Environmental Injustice?. J Bus Ethics 145, 277–292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2836-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2836-5

Keywords

Navigation