Abstract
The existence of a firm can be seen as a necessary condition for the existence of stakeholders. However, in the stakeholder literature, the firm has remained a relatively underdeveloped and fuzzy construct. In this essay, we examine how the firm has been conceptualized (explicitly or implicitly) in earlier research and suggest that, at least in stakeholder thinking, the firm can be considered as having an emergent nature. We elaborate this idea by building on the resent philosophical discussions of emergence and, as a result, propose the emergentist stakeholder model of the firm.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Agle, B. R., Donaldson, T., Freeman, R. E., & Jensen, M. C. (2008). Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory. Business Ethics Quarterly, 18, 153–190.
Ahlstedt, L., & Janhukainen, I. (1971). Yritysorganisaatio yhteistoiminnan ohjausjärjestelmänä. Helsinki: Weilin+Göös.
Archer, M. S. (1995). Realist social theory: The morphogenetic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Bhaskar, R. (1998). The possibility of naturalism. London: Routledge.
Bunge, M. (1999). The sociology-philosophy connection. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
Bunge, M. (2003). Emergence and convergence: Qualitative novelty and the unity of knowledge. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Clarkson, M. B. E. (1995). A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 20, 92–117.
Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20, 65–91.
Elder-Vass, D. (2007). For emergence: Refining Archer’s account of social structure. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 37, 25–44.
Fassin, Y. (2008). Imperfections and shortcomings of the stakeholder model’s graphical representations. Journal of Business Ethics, 80, 879–888.
Fassin, Y. (2009). The stakeholder model refined. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 113–135.
Fodor, J. A. (1974). Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis). Synthese, 28, 97–115.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Marshfield: Pitman Publishing.
Freeman, R. E., & Evan, W. M. (1990). Corporate governance: A stakeholder interpretation. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19, 337–359.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24, 191–205.
Hill, C. W. L., & Jones, T. M. (1992). Stakeholder-agency theory. Journal of Management Studies, 29, 132–154.
Hodgson, G. M. (2002). The legal nature of the firm and the myth of the firm-market hybrid. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 9, 37–60.
Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305–360.
Laplume, A. O., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. A. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34, 1152–1189.
March, J. G. (1962). The business firm as a political coalition. Journal of Politics, 24, 662–678.
Mintzberg, H. (1983). Power in and around organizations. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22, 853–886.
Näsi, J. (1979). Yrityksen suunnittelun perusteet. Tampere: Tampereen yliopisto.
Näsi, J. (1995). A Scandinavian approach to stakeholder thinking: An analysis of its theoretical and practical uses 1964–1980. In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 97–115). Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Pajunen, K. (2006a). Stakeholder influences in organizational survival. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 1261–1288.
Pajunen, K. (2006b). Living in agreement with a contract: The management of moral and viable firm–stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 68, 243–258.
Pajunen, K. (2008). The nature of organizational mechanisms. Organization Studies, 29, 1449–1468.
Rhenman, E. (1964). Företagsdemokrati och företagsorganisation. Stockholm: AB Thule.
Rowley, T., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28, 204–219.
Sawyer, R. K. (2001). Emergence in sociology: Contemporary philosophy of mind and some implications for sociological theory. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 551–585.
Wan, P. Y. (2011). Emergence à la Systems Theory: Epistemological Totalausschluss or Ontological Novelty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 41, 178–210.
Wimsatt, W. C. (1997). Aggregativity: Reductive heuristics for finding emergence. Philosophy of Science, 64, S372–S384.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pajunen, K. A “Black Box” of Stakeholder Thinking. J Bus Ethics 96 (Suppl 1), 27–32 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0940-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0940-8