Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The FCPA and the OECD Convention: Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although corruption is ubiquitous, attitudes toward it differ among countries. Until the 1997 OECD Convention, the U.S. had been one of the only two countries with an explicit extraterritorial anti-bribery law, the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) of 1977. The FCPA employs a two-pronged approach to control the supply side of corruption: (1) anti-bribery provisions; and (2) accounting (books and record and internal controls) provisions. I offer evidence, albeit indirect, to show that the FCPA had limited success. The OECD Convention adopts the same two-pronged approach, but, since it is a multilateral treaty, is likely to be more successful provided that enforcement is vigorous enough. The signatory nations effectively form a cartel to reduce the cost of doing business. As with any cartel, however, each multinational corporation has an incentive to deviate. Thus, the mutual enforcement of the agreement is crucial for its success. However, the two-pronged approach is not sufficient, since internal control does not adequately monitor decisions made at the top level. I argue that the two lessons drawn from the U.S. experience are: (1) law enforcement must be credible; and (2) internal controls alone are not sufficient. Stronger and more effective corporate governance within an appropriate regulatory framework is needed to ensure that multinational corporations conduct their business in an ethical manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal, A., J. Jaffe, and J. Karpoff: 1999, `Management Turnover and Governance Changes Following the Revelation of Fraud,` Journal of Law and Economics, 41, 309-342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A. and B. Weder: 2002, `Do Corrupt Governments Receive Less Foreign Aid?’ American Economic Review 92(4), 1126-1137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beasley, M., J.V. Carcello, and D.R.Hermanson: 1999, ‘Fruadulent Financial Reporting: 1987-1997, An Analisis of U.S. Public Companies,’ COSO, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, P. J., M. W. Maher, and A. E. Tchoegl: 1991, `The Impact of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on US Exports,’ Managerial and Decision Economics, 12, 295-303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, D. R. and J. D. Bond: 1978, ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act – Its Implication to Financial Management’, Financial Executive 46(8), August, 26–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Borrus, A.: 1995, ‘A World of Greased Palms’, Business Week, November 6

  • Briloff, A. J.: 2002, ‘Accountancy and Society: A Covenant Desecrated’, Prepared Statement for U.S. Senate Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs, March 2

  • Carmichael, D. R: 1996, Auditing Concepts and Method: A Guide to Current Theory and Practice 6th ed. (McGraw Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO): 1992, ‘Internal Control – Integrated Framework’, May

  • Cragg, W. and W. Woof: 2002, `The U. S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: A Study of Its Effectiveness’, Business and Society Review, 107(1), 98-144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, M. A.: 1997, ‘Corporate Governance: The Board of Directors and Internal Control’, Cardozo Law Review 19, September/November, 237–264

    Google Scholar 

  • Getz, K. A.: 2006, ‘The Effectiveness of Global Prohibition Regimes: Corruption and the Antibribery Convention,’ Business & Society, 45(3), 254-281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, K. A. and R. J. Volkema: 2001, `Culture, Perceived Corruption, and Economics,’ Business and Society, 40(1), 7-30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, P. A.: 1976, ‘Disclosure Policy and the Securities Market: The Impact of the 1975-76 Sensitive Payment Disclosures’, Summary of a Research Report Prepared at the Request of the SEC Advisory Committee on Corporate Disclosure, Washington, DC, November

  • Herlihy, E. D. and T. A. Levine: 1976, `Corporate Crisis: The Overseas Payment Problem,’ Law & Policy in International Business, 8(54), 547-629.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J. R. Jr.: 1995, ‘Forbidden Payment: Foreign Bribery and American Business After 1977’, NBER Working Paper 5266, September

  • Information Systems Audit and Control Foundation: 1996, Control Objectives for Information and related Technology (Rolling Meadows, II)

  • Jensen, M. C.: 1993, ‘The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems,’ Journal of Finance, 48, 831–880.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaikati, J. G., G. M. Sullivan, J. M. Virgo, T. R. Carr, and K. S. Virgo: 2000, `The Price of International Business Morality: Twenty Years under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,’ Journal of Business Ethics, 26(3), 213-222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knutson, P. H.: 1994, ‘In the Public Interest -Is it Enough?’, The CPA Journal 64(1), January, 32–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, K. A. and B. C. George: 1998, ‘Expansion of SEC Authority into Internal Corporate Governance: The Accounting Provisions of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act’, Journal of Transnational Law & Policy 7, Spring, 119–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, J. G., J. A. McKinney, and C. W. Moore: 1988, `The Ethical Issue of International Bribery: A Study of Attitudes Among U.S. Business Professionals,’ Journal of Business Ethics 7, 341-346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher, W. M,, C, P. Stickney, and R, L. Weil: 2006, Managerial Accounting (Thomson South-Western, Mason, Ohio)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews, A. F.: 1984, ‘Current Issues in Corporate Governance: Internal Corporate Investigations’, Ohio State Law Journal 45, Summer, 655–702

  • Morrissey, J.: 2000, ‘Corporate Responsibility and the Audit Committee’, Speech by SEC Staff, the General Audit Management Conference, New Orleans, March 21

  • National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting: 1987, Report of the National Commission on Fraudulent Financial Reporting. Washington, DC: Author

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcomb, D.: 2008, FCPA Digest of Cases and Review Releases Relating to Bribes to Foreign Officials under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act of 1977 (New York)

  • Noonan, J. T: 1984, Bribes (Macmillan Publishing, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: 2005, United States: Phase 2, Follow-up Report on the Implementation of the Phase 2 Recommendations on the Application of the Convention and the 1997 Recommendation on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions (Author, Paris)

  • Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development: 1999, OECD Principles of Corporate Governance, SG/CG(99)5 (Author, Paris)

  • Salbu, S. R.: 1997, `Bribery in the Global Market: A Critical Analysis of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,’ Washington & Lee Law Review, 54, 229-287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R.: 2005, `Determinants of Bribery in International Business: the Culture and Economic Factors,’ Journal of Business Ethics 59, 139-145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SEC: 1997, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 889, February 27: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-9262 (Triton Energy), Litigation Release No. 15266: SEC v Triton Energy Corporation, et al., Civil Action No. 1: 97CV00401 (D.D.C.)

  • SEC: 2000, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1355, December 21: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10397 (IBM)

  • SEC: 2001a, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1380, Litigation Release No. 16948, March 30 (Montedison)

  • SEC: 2001b, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1422, July 18: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10532 (American Bank Note Holographics)

  • SEC: 2001c, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1444, September 12: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10572 (Baker Hughes)

  • SEC: 2001d, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1463, October 3: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10613 (Chiquita Brands International)

  • SEC: 2002a, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1494, September 12: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10678 (BellSouth)

  • SEC: 2002b, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1687 and 1688, December 10: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-10969 (Syncor International)

  • SEC: 2003a, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 1710, January 30: Administrative Proceedings File No. 3-11024 (American Rice)

  • SEC: 2003b, ‘Report Pursuant to Section 704 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002’, January 24

  • SEC: 2008a, ‘SEC Charges Siemens AG for Engaging in Worldwide Bribery’, Release 2008-294, http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2008/2008-294.htm.

  • SEC: 2008b, Accounting and Auditing Enforcement Release No. 2911, December 15 (Siemens)

  • Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny: 1997, `A Survey of Corporate Governance,’ Journal of Finance 52(2), 737-783.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smeltzer, L. and M. M. Jennings: 1998, `Why An International code of Business Ethics Would Be Good for Business,’ Journal of Business Ethics 17, 57-66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank: 2000, ‘Helping Countries Combat Corruption: Progress at the World Bank since 1997’, June

  • Transparency International: 2008, Corruption Perception Index and Bribe Payers Index, various years http://www.transparency.org/policy_research/surveys_indices/cpi.

  • Tronnes, R. D.: 2000, ‘Ensuring Uniformity in the Implementation of the 1997 OECE Convention on Combating Bribery of Foreign Public Officials in International Business Transactions’, The Washington International Law Review 33, 97–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Urofsky, P. and D. Newcomb 2009 Recent Trends and Patterns in the Enforcement of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act. Shearman & Sterling LLP

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. General Accounting Office: 1981, ‘Report to the Congress: Impact of Foreign Corrupt Practices Act on U.S. Business’, GAO Report, March 4

  • Wei, S.: 2000, `How Taxing is Corruption on International Investors,’ The Review of Economics and Statistics 82(1), 1-11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismann, M.: 2009, ‘The Foreign Corrupt Practices Act: The Failure of the Self-Regulatory Model of Corporate Governance in the Global Business Environment’, Journal of Business Ethics 88(4), September, 615–661

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I am grateful to Sara Berman, Donal Byard, Aloke Ghosh, Michael Maher, Marilyn Neimark, Rita Ormsby, Fred Thompson, and the participants at the seminar at Rutgers University for their insightful comments. I also acknowledge a PSC-CUNY grant.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masako N. Darrough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Darrough, M.N. The FCPA and the OECD Convention: Some Lessons from the U.S. Experience. J Bus Ethics 93, 255–276 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0219-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0219-5

Key words

Navigation