Skip to main content
Log in

On the Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: International Evidence on the Financial Industry

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article sets out to undertake a thorough, point-by-point examination of the theory postulated by Campbell (2007), in which an attempt is made to specify the conditions under which corporations may or may not act in socially responsible ways. In order to ensure the overall reliability of our study, and to attempt to provide a new understanding of, and greater insights into, whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) is affected by financial and institutional variables, we empirically investigate a total of 520 financial firms in 34 countries, between the years 2003 and 2005. Our empirical findings are: (i) firms with larger size are more CSR minded, and the financial performance and CSR are not related; (ii) firms would actually act in more socially responsible ways to enhance their competitive advantages when the market competitiveness is more intense; (iii) financial firms in countries with stronger levels of legal enforcement tend to engage in more CSR activities; however, interestingly and rather strikingly, those firms in countries with stronger shareholder rights tend to engage in less CSR activities; and (iv) self-regulation within the financial industry has a significantly positive effect on CSR, with firms being found to act in more socially responsible ways in those countries which have more cooperative employer–employee relations, higher quality management schools, and a better macroeconomic environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Campbell, J.L. (2007). Why Would Corporations Behave In Socially Responsible Ways? An Institutional Theory Of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chih, H.-L. and R.-K. Cheng: 2008, ‹Banking Competition, Profitability Persistence and Access to Finance: Some International Evidence’, Working Paper, College of Business, National Taipei University

  • Chih, H.-L., Shen, C.-H., & Kang, F.-C. (2008). Corporate Social Responsibility, Investor Protection, and Earnings Management: Some International Evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(1-2), 179–198. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9383-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2004). What Drives Bank Competition? Some International Evidence. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking, 36, 563–583. doi:10.1353/mcb.2004.0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombs, J.E., & Gilley, K.M. (2005). Stakeholder Management as a Predictor of CEO Compensation: Main Effects and Interactions with Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 827–841. doi:10.1002/smj.476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dierkes, M. and R. Coppock: 1978, ‹Europe Tries the Corporate Social Report’, Business and Society Review Spring, 25, 21–24

  • Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 33, 233–258. doi:10.2307/256324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, T. L.: 2008, ‹The Great Unraveling’, New York Times, OP-ED Columnist, 16 Dec 2008

  • Griffin, J.J., & Mahon, J.F. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance and Corporate Financial Performance Debate: Twenty-Five Years of Incomparable Research. Business & Society, 36, 5–31. doi:10.1177/000765039703600102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman, A.J., & Keim, G.D. (2001). Shareholder Value, Stakeholder Management, and Social Issues: What’s the Bottom Line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139. doi:10.1002/1097-0266(200101)22:2<125::AID-SMJ150>3.0.CO;2-H

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1997). Legal Determinants of External Finance. The Journal of Finance, 52(3), 1131–1150. doi:10.2307/2329518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (1998). Law and Finance. The Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155. doi:10.1086/250042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R.W. (2002). Agency Problems and Dividend Policies around the World. The Journal of Finance, 55(1), 1–33. doi:10.1111/0022-1082.00199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leuz, C., Nanda, D., & Wysocki, P.D. (2003). Investor Protection and Earnings Management: an international comparison. Journal of Financial Economics, 69(3), 505–527. doi:10.1016/S0304-405X(03)00121-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, J.D., & Walsh, J.P. (2003). Misery Loves Companies: Rethinking Social Initiatives by Business. Academy of Management Review, 48, 268–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, D. 1974, “Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior,” In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2000). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification? Strategic Management Journal, 21, 603–609. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(200005)21:5<603::AID-SMJ101>3.0.CO;2-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127. doi:10.2307/259398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, P. (2006). Corporate Social Responsibility: Strategic Implications. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 1–18. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00580.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norris, F.: 2002, ‹The Market: Market Place: Yes, He Can Top That’, New York Times, 17 Jul 2002, p. A-1

  • Panzar, J.C., & Rosse, J.N. (1987). Testing for ‹Monopoly’ Equilibrium. The Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 443–456. doi:10.2307/2098582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pava, M.L., & Krausz, J. (1996). The Association Between Corporate Social-Responsibility and Financial Performance: The Paradox of Social Cost. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 321–357. doi:10.1007/BF00382958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M., & Kramer, M. (2002). The Competitive Advantage of Corporate Philanthropy. Harvard Business Review, 80(12), 57–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, P.W., & Dowling, G.R. (2002). Corporate Reputation and Sustained Superior Financial Performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 1077–1093. doi:10.1002/smj.274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowley, T., & Berman, S. (2000). A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance. Business & Society, 39(4), 397–418. doi:10.1177/000765030003900404.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shen, C.-H., & Chih, H.-L. (2005). Investor Protection, Prospect Theory, and Earnings Management: An International Comparison of the Banking Industry. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29, 2675–2697. doi:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.10.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer, A.: 2004, ‹Does Competition Destroy Ethical Behavior?’, American Economic Review 94(2), 414–418

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, W., & Kohers, T. (2002). The Link Between Social and Financial Performance: Evidence from the Banking Industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 97–109. doi:10.1023/A:1013082525900.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trotman, K., & Bradley, G. (1981). Associations Between Social Responsibility Disclosure and Characteristics of Companies. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 6, 355–362. doi:10.1016/0361-3682(81)90014-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddock, S.A., & Graves, S.B. (1997). The Corporate Social Performance- Financial Performance Link. Strategic Management Journal, 18(4), 303–319. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199704)18:4<303::AID-SMJ869>3.0.CO;2-G.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh James P., Klaus Weber and Joshua D. Margolis. (2003). Social Issues and Management: Our Lost Cause Found. Journal of Management, 29(6), 859–881.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsiang-Hsuan Chih.

Additional information

Hsiang-Lin Chih is the Chairperson and Professor of Department of Banking and Cooperative Management at National Taipei University, Taiwan. His current research focuses on corporate social responsibility, corporate governance, and financial institutions management. His writings have appeared in Journal of Quantitative and Financial Analysis, Journal of Banking and Finance, Corporate Governance: An International Review, Journal of Business Ethics, Academia Economic Papers and in other journals. He received his Ph.D. from the National Taiwan University in 1998.

Hsiang-Hsuan Chih is currently the Associate Professor of Department of Finance in National Dong Hwa University in Taiwan. Her current research focuses on corporate finance, behavioral finance and corporate governance. Her recent publications include Journal of Management, Review of Securities and Futures Markets, and Review of Financial Risk Management. She received her Ph.D. degree from National Central University in 2003.

Tzu-Yin Chen is a research assistant for the Department of Banking and Cooperative Management at National Taipei University, Taiwan. Her research focuses on corporate social responsibility and financial institutions management. She received her master degree from the Department of Cooperative Economics, College of Business, National Taipei University, Taiwan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chih, HL., Chih, HH. & Chen, TY. On the Determinants of Corporate Social Responsibility: International Evidence on the Financial Industry. J Bus Ethics 93, 115–135 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0186-x

Key words

Navigation