Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The education of students and professionals in business ethics is an increasingly important goal on the agenda of business schools and corporations. The present study provides a meta-analysis of 25 previously conducted business ethics instructional programs. The role of criteria, study design, participant characteristics, quality of instruction, instructional content, instructional program characteristics, and characteristics of instructional methods as moderators of the effectiveness of business ethics instruction were examined. Overall, results indicate that business ethics instructional programs have a minimal␣impact on increasing outcomes related to ethical perceptions, behavior, or awareness. However, specific criteria, content, and methodological moderators of effectiveness shed light on potential recommendations for␣improving business ethics instruction. Implications for␣future research and practice in business ethics are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

*Articles included in Meta-Analysis

  • *Abdolmohammadi, M. J. and M. F. Reeves: 2000, ‹Effects of Education and Intervention on Business Students’ Ethical Cognition: A Cross Sectional and Longitudinal Study’, Teaching Business Ethics 4, 269–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Academy of Management: 2008, Academy of Management Code of Ethics. http://aomonline.org/aom.asp?id=268.

  • Arthur Jr. W., Bennett Jr. W., Huffcutt A. I. (2001). Conducting meta-analysis using SAS. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baetz, M. C., & Sharp, D. J. (2004). Integrating ethics content into the core business curriculum: Do core teaching materials do the job? Journal of Business Ethics, 51, 53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baldwin, T. T., & Ford, J. K. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1117–1127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinkmann, J., & Sims, R. R. (2001). Stakeholder-sensitive business ethics teaching. Teaching Business Ethics, 5, 171–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Cagle, J. A. B. and M. S. Baucus: 2006, ‹Case Studies of Ethics Scandals: Effects on Ethical Perceptions of Finance Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 64, 213–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. P. (1989). An agenda for theory and research. In: I. L. Goldstein (Eds), Training and development in organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. pp 469–486

    Google Scholar 

  • Carson, T. L. (2003). Self–Interest and business ethics: Some lessons of the recent corporate scandals. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 389–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castro, B. (1995). Business ethics: Some observations on the relationship between training, affiliation, and disciplinary drift. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 781–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Cohen, E. and L. Cornwell: 1989, ‹A Question of Ethics: Developing Information System Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 431–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Colquitt, J. A., LePine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 678–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conn, V. S., Valentine, J. C., Cooper, H. M., & Rantz, M. J. (2003). Grey literature in meta-analyses. Nursing Research, 52, 256–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowton, C. J., & Cummins, J. (2003). Teaching business ethics in UK higher education: Progress and prospects. Teaching Business Ethics, 7, 37–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Delaney, J. S.: 2005, ‹The Impacts of Ethics Education on the Moral Reasoning Ability of Accounting Students (Doctoral Dissertation, St. Abrose University)’, Dissertation Abstracts International 67(01), 246

  • *Eynon, G., N. T. Hill and K. T. Stevens: 1997, ‹Factors that Influence the Moral Reasoning Abilities of Accountants: Implications for Universities and the Profession’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 1297–1309

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, K. A. (1984). Class size and college students’ evaluations of teachers and courses: A closer look. Research in Higher Education, 21, 45–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • French, W. (2006). Business ethics training: Face-to-face and at a distance. Journal of Business Ethics, 66, 117–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Geiger, M. A. and B. T. O’Connell: 1999, ‹Accounting Student Ethical Perceptions: An Analysis of Training and Gender Effects’, Teaching Business Ethics 2, 371–388

  • Ghorpade, J. (1991). Ethics in MBA Programs: The Rhetoric, the Reality, and a Plan of Action. Journal of Business Ethics, 10, 891–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giacalone, R. A., & Thompson, K. R. (2006). Business ethics and social responsibility education: Shifting the worldview. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 5, 266–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glenn, J. R. (1992). Can a Business and Society course affect the ethical judgment of future managers? Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 217–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, I. L., & Ford, J. K. (2002). Training in organizations: Needs assessment, development, and evaluation. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Halbesleben, J. R. B., A. R. Wheeler and M. R. Buckley: 2005, ‹Everybody Else is Doing It, so Why can’t We? Pluralistic Ignorance and Business Ethics Education’, Journal of Business Ethics 56, 385–398

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R. (1989). Ethical values and decision processes of male and female business students. Journal of Education for Business, 65, 234–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J.R. (1991). Ethical values and decision processes of business and non-business students: A four-group study. Journal of Legal Studies in Education, 9, 215–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hicks, W. D., & Klimoski, R. J. (1987). Entry into training programs and its effects on training outcomes: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 30, 542–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Honeycutt, E. D., J. A. Siguaw and T. G. Hunt: 1995, ‹Business Ethics and Job-Related Constructs: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Automotive Salespeople’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 235–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Hung, H., & Wong, Y. H. (2007). The relationship between employer endorsement of continuing education and training and work and study performance: a Hong Kong case study. International Journal of Training & Development, 11, 295–313.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J. E. and F. L. Schmidt: 2004, Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings, 2nd Edition (Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA)

  • Izzo, G.: 1997, Assessing the Relationship Between Compulsory Ethics Education and the Cognitive Development of Real Estate Practitioners. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, University of Mississippi

  • *Izzo, G.: 2000, ‹Compulsory Ethics Education and the Cognitive Moral Development of Salespeople: A Quasi-Experimental Assessment’, Journal of Business Ethics 28, 223–241

    Google Scholar 

  • *Izzo, G. M., B. E. Langford and S. Vitell: 2006, ‹Investigating the Efficacy of Interactive Ethics Education: A Difference in Pedagogical Emphasis’, Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice 14, 239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jones, G. E. and R. N. Ottaway: 2001, ‹The Effectiveness of Corporate Ethics On-Site Visits for Teaching Business Ethics’, Teaching Business Ethics 5, 141–156

    Google Scholar 

  • Kavathatzopoulos, I. (1993). Development of a cognitive skill in solving business ethics problems: The effect of instruction. Journal of Business Ethics, 12, 379–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Kavathatzopoulos, I.: 1994, ‹Training Professional Managers in Decision-Making About Real Life Business Ethics Problems: The Acquisition of the Autonomous Problem-Solving Skill’, Journal of Business Ethics 13, 379–386

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, P. E., & Siegfried, J. J. (1997). Class size and achievement in introductory economics: Evidence from the TUCE III data. Economics and Education Review, 16, 385–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Key, S.: 1997, ‹Teaching Managers to Respond Ethically to Organizational Crisis: An Inquiry into the Case Method’, Teaching Business Ethics 1, 197–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Kligyte, V., R. T. Marcy, E. P. Waples, S. T. Sevier, E. S. Godfrey, M. D. Mumford and D. F. Hougen: 2008, ‹Application of a Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training in the Physical Sciences and Engineering’, Science and Engineering Ethics 14(2), 251–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Knouse, S. B., & Giacalone, R. A. (1996). The six components of successful ethics training. Business & Society Review, 98, 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. (1969). Stage and sequence: The cognitive development approach to socialization. In: D.A. Goslin (Eds) Handbook of Socialization Theory. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally. pp 347–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolodner, J. L. (1993). Case-based reasoning. San Mateo, CA: Kaufmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kumar, K. and C. Borycki: 1991, ‹The Strategic Framework: Effect on Students’ Business Ethics’, Journal of Education for Business 67, 74–80

    Google Scholar 

  • LeClair, D. T., & Ferrell, L. (2000). Innovation in experiential business ethics training. Journal of Business Ethics, 23, 313–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Lee, C.: 1997, ‹Impacts of Teaching Business Ethics in Korea’, Teaching Business Ethics 1, 131–149

  • *Loe, T. W. and W. A. Weeks: 2000, ‹An Experimental Investigation of Efforts to Improve Sales Students’ Moral Reasoning’, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management 10, 243–251

    Google Scholar 

  • *Lopez, Y. P., P. L. Rechner and J. B. Olson-Buchanan: 2005, ‹Shaping Ethical Perceptions: An Empirical Assessment of the Influence of Business Education, Culture, and Demographic Factors’, Journal of Business Ethics 60, 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathieu, J. E., Tannenbaum, S. I., & Salas, E. (1992). Influences of individual and situational characteristics on measures of training effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 35, pp. 828–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M., & Donleavy, G. D. (1995). Objections to the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 14, 839–853.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Milner, D., T. Mahaffey, K. Macaulay and T. Hynes: 1999, ‹The Effect of Business Education on the Ethics of Students: An Empirical Assessment Controlling for Maturation’, Teaching Business Ethics 3, 255–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintz, S. M. (1996). Aristotelian virtue and business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 15, 827–838.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Morgan, B., F. Morgan, V. Foster and J. Kolbert: 2000, ‹Promoting the Moral and Conceptual Development of Law Enforcement Trainees: A Deliberate Psychological Educational Approach’, Journal of Moral Education 29, 203–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., S. Connelly, R. P. Brown, S. T. Murphy, J. H. Hill, A. L. Antes, E. P. Waples and L.␣D. Devenport: 2008, ‹A Sensemaking Approach to Ethics Training for Scientists: Preliminary Evidence of Training Effectiveness’, Ethics and Behavior (in press)

  • Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., & Antes, A. L. (2006). Validation of ethical decision making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 319–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees’ attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. Academy of Management Review, 11, 736–749.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oddo, A. R. (1997). A framework for teaching business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 16, 293–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. G. (1983). A fail-safe N for effect size in meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Statistics, 8, 157–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orwin, R. G. (1994). Evaluating coding decisions. In H. Cooper and L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 139–162). New York, New York: Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 173–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Painter-Morland, M., Fontrodona, J., Hoffman, W. M., & Rowe, M. (2003). Conversations across continents: Teaching business ethics online. Journal of Business Ethics, 48, 75–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, S. M. (Chair): 2004, Ethics Education in Business Schools (Report of the Ethics Education Task Force to AACSB International Board of Directors, St. Louis, Missouri)

  • Rest, J. R. (1979). Revised manual for the defining issues test: An objective test of moral judgment development. Minneapolis, MN: Moral Research Projects.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Richards, C. H., J. Gilbert and J. H. Harris: 2002, ‹Assessing Ethics Education Needs in the MBA Program’, Teaching Business Ethics 6, 447–476

  • *Ritter, B. A.: 2006, ‹Can Business Ethics be Trained? A Study of the Ethical Decision-Making Process in Business Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 68, 153–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1979). The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 638–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1991). Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 183–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, R. N. (2000). An experiential approach to teaching ethics in international business. Teaching Business Ethics, 4, 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaupp, D. L., & Lane, M. S. (1992). Teaching business ethics: Bringing reality to the classroom. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 225–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. R. (2002). Business ethics teaching for effective learning. Teaching Business Ethics, 6, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sonenshein, S. (2007). The role of construction, intuition, and justification in responding to ethical issues at work: The sensemaking-intuition model. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 1022–1040.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Stead, B. A. and J. J. Miller: 1988, ‹Can Social Awareness be Increased Through Business School Curricula?’, Journal of Business Ethics 7, 553–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. The Academy of Management Review, 11, 601–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1992). Moral reasoning and business ethics: Implications for research, education, and management. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 445–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (1994). Business ethics/business ethics: One field or two? Business Ethics Quarterly, 4, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K., Weaver, G. R., & Reynolds, S. J. (2006). Behavioral ethics in organizations: A review. Journal of Management, 32, 951–990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Valentine, S. and G. Fleischman: 2004, ‹Ethics Training and Businesspersons’ Perceptions of Organizational Ethics’, Journal of Business Ethics 52, 381–390

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver, G., Treviño, L. K., & Cochran, P. (1999). Corporate ethics practices in the mid–1990 s: An empirical study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 283–294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (1990). Measuring the impact of teaching ethics to future managers: A review, assessment, and recommendations. Journal of Business Ethics, 9, 183–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. (2006). Implementing an organizational ethics program in an academic environment: The challenges and opportunities for the Duquesne University Schools of Business. Journal of Business Ethics, 65, 23–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J. A. (2007). Business ethics training: Insights from learning theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 70, 61–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Weber, J. and S. M. Glyptis: 2000, ‹Measuring the Impact of a Business Ethics Course and Community Service Experience on Students’ Values and Opinions’, Teaching Business Ethics 4, 341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • *Wynd, W. R. and J. Mager: 1989, ‹The Business and Society Course: Does It Change Student Attitudes?’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 487–491

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management and Marketing, Louisiana State University in Shreveport, One University Place, Shreveport, LA, 71115, U.S.A.

    Ethan P. Waples

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Oklahoma, 455 W. Lindsey, Norman, OK, 73019, U.S.A.

    Alison L. Antes, Shane Connelly & Michael D. Mumford

  3. Pearson, Tulsa, OK, 74037, U.S.A.

    Stephen T. Murphy

Authors
  1. Ethan P. Waples
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alison L. Antes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Stephen T. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shane Connelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michael D. Mumford
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ethan P. Waples.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Waples, E.P., Antes, A.L., Murphy, S.T. et al. A Meta-Analytic Investigation of Business Ethics Instruction. J Bus Ethics 87, 133–151 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9875-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9875-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation