Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Impact of Work-Related Values on the Readiness to Change in Estonian Organizations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study contributes to our understanding of how work-related values, including ethics, are connected with the readiness to change in Estonian organizations. Research in Estonian companies involved 747 respondents. The author examined the influence of work-related values on attitude towards change and organizational learning. Empirical research in Estonian organizations indicates that work-related values predict attitude towards change and organizational learning. This study indicates the need for ethical conduct to achieve a competitive advantage in Estonia. Guidelines for managers and a model of value-based change management are subsequently developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alas R., Ennulo J., & Türnpuu, L. (2006). Managerial Values in the Institutional Context. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 269–278. doi:10.1007/s10551-005-5494-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alas R., & Sharifi S. (2002). Organizational Learning and Resistance to Change in Estonian Companies. Human Resource Development International, 5(3), 313–331. doi:10.1080/13678860210143550

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alas R., & Vadi M. (2004). The Impact of Organisational Culture on Attitudes Concerning Change in Post-Soviet Organisations. Journal for East European Management Studies, 9(1), 20–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., P. M. Wilderom and M. F. Peterson: 2000, ‹Introduction’, in N. M. Ashkanasy, P. M. Wilderom and M. F. Peterson (eds.), Handbook of Organisational Culture & Climate (Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks), pp. 1–18

  • Beatty, R. W. and D. O. Ulrich: 1993, ‹Re-Energizing the Mature Organization’, in T. D. Jick (ed.), Managing Change. Cases and Concepts (Irwin, Burr Ridge, IL), pp. 60–74

  • Bergquist, W.: 1993, The Postmodern Organisation: Mastering the Art of Irreversible Change (Jose-Bass Publisher, San Francisco)

  • Boninger D. S., Krosnick J. W., & Berent M. K. (1995). Origins of Attitude Importance: Self-Interest, Social Identification, and Value Relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 61–80. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coch L., & French J. P. (1948). Overcoming Resistance to Change. Human Relations, 1, 512–523. doi:10.1177/001872674800100408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M., March J., & Olsen J. (1972). A Garbage can Model of Organizational Choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 17(1), 1–25. doi:10.2307/2392088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper J., & Croyle R. T. (1984). Attitude and Attitude Change. Annual Review of Psychology, 35, 394–426. doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.35.020184.002143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DiBella A. J., & Nevis E. C. 1998 How Organizations Learn. An Integrated Strategy for Building Learning Capability. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers

    Google Scholar 

  • Dopson S., & Neumann J. E. (1998). Uncertainty, Contrariness and the Double-Find: Middle Managers’ Reactions to Changing Contracts. British Journal of Management, 9(3), 53–70. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.9.s1.6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver M. (2002). The Learning Organization: Foucauldian Gloom or Utopian Sunshine?. Human Relations, 55(1), 33–53. doi:10.1177/0018726702055001605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey D. 1986 Recent Research on Selective Exposure to Information. In: Berkowitz L. (ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, vol 19, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 41–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvin, D. A.: 1993. ‹Building a Learning Organization’, Harvard Business Review 71, 78–91

  • George, B.: 2003. Authentic Leadership: Rediscovering the Secrets to Creating Lasting Value (Jossey-Bass)

  • Gini, A.: 2004. ‹Moral Leadership and Business Ethics’, in J. B. Ciulla (ed.), Ethics, the Heart of Leadership (Praeger), pp. 25–43

  • Holton E. F. III, & Russell C. J. (1999). Organizational Entry and Exit: An Exploratory Longitudinal Examination of Early Careers. Human Performance, 12(3/4), 311–342. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1203&4_6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson W. R., & Jones-Johnson G. (1992). Differential Predictors of Union and Company Commitment: Parallel and Divergent Models. Psychology (Savannah, Ga.), 29, 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lang R., & Steger T. (2002). The Odyssey of Management Knowledge to Transforming Societies: A Critical Review of a Theoretical Alternative. Human Resource Development International, 5(3), 279–294. doi:10.1080/13678860210142146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lebow, R. and W. L. Simon: 1997, Lasting Change: The Shared Values Process that Makes Company Great (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)

  • Locke E. A. 1976 The Nature and Causes of Job Satisfaction. In: Dunnette M. D. (ed.) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. (pp. 1297–1343). Chicago: Rand McNally College Publication

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahler J. (1997). Influences of Organizational Culture on Learning in Public Agencies. Journal of Public Administration: Research and Theory, 7(4), 519–541

    Google Scholar 

  • McNeese-Smith D. K., & Nazarey M. (2001). A Nursing Shortage: Building Organizational Commitment Among Nurses/Practitioner Application. Journal of Healthcare Management, 46(3), 173–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J. P., & Allen N. J. 1997 Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research and Applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler D. A., & Tushman M. L. (1989). Organizational Frame Bending: Principles for Managing Reorientation. The Academy of Management, Executive Magazine, 3(3), 194–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Piske R. (2002). German Acquisitions in Poland: An Empirical Study on Integration Management and Integration Success. Human Resource Development International, 5(3), 295–312. doi:10.1080/13678860210143541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porras, J. I. and P. J. Robertson: 1987, ‹Organizational Development Theory. A Typology and Evaluation’, in R. W. Woodman and W. A. Pasmore (eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development, Vol. 1 (JAI Press, Greenwich), pp. 1–57

  • Probst G., & Büchel B. 1997 Organizational Learning: The Competitive Advantage of the Future. London: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Pruzan, P.: 1998, ‹From Control to Value-Based Management and Accountability’, Journal of Business Ethics 17(13), 1379–1394

    Google Scholar 

  • Pucik, V., N. Ticy and C. Barnett: 1993, Globalizing Management, Creating and Leading the Competitive Organisation (John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)

  • Randall D., Fedor D., & Longenecker C. (1990). The Behavioral Expression of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 36, 210–224. doi:10.1016/0001-8791(90)90028-Z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichers A. E. (1985). A Review and Re-Conceptualization of Organizational Commitment. Academy of Management Review, 12, 278–287. doi:10.2307/258535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenstiel L., & Koch S. 2001, Change in Socioeconomic Values as a Trigger of Organisational Learning. In: Dierkes M., Antal A. B., Child J., Nonaka I. (eds.), Organisational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 198–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Salaman, G. and J. Butler: 1999, ‹Why Managers Won’t Learn’, in C. Mabey and P. Iles (eds.), Managing Learning (International Thompson Business Press), pp. 34–42

  • Senge, P. M.: 1997, The Fifth Discipline. The Art and Practice of the Learning Organisation (Century Business, London)

  • Struckman C. H., & Yammarino F. J. 2003 Organizational Change: A Categorization Scheme and Response Model with Readiness Factors. In: Woodman R. W., & Pasmore W. A. (eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development, vol. 14, (pp. 1–50). Greenwich, JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugarman B. (2001). A Leaning-Based Approach to Organizational Change: Some Results and Guidelines. Organizational Dynamics, 30(1), 62–67. doi:10.1016/S0090-2616(01)00041-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wagner J. A. III, & Hollenbeck J. R. 1998 Organizational Behaviour: Securing Competitive Advantage. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K. E. 1995 Sensemaking in Organizations. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick K. E., Sutcliffe K. M., & Obstfeld D. (2005). Organizing and the Process of Sensemaking. Organization Science, 16(4), 409–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whelan-Berry K. S., Gordon J. R., & Hinings C. R. 2003 The Relative Effect of Change Drivers in Large-Scale Organizational Change: An Empirical Study. In: Woodman R. W., & Pasmore W. A. (eds.), Research in Organizational Change and Development, vol. 14. (pp. 99–146). Greenwich, JAI Press

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Research was supported by ETF grant 7537.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Estonian Business School, Lauteri 3, Tallinn, 10114, Estonia

    Ruth Alas

Authors
  1. Ruth Alas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruth Alas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alas, R. The Impact of Work-Related Values on the Readiness to Change in Estonian Organizations. J Bus Ethics 86, 113–124 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9838-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9838-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation