Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research on corporate social responsibility (CSR) suggests the need for further exploration into the relationship between small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) and CSR. SMEs rarely use the language of CSR to describe their activities, but informal CSR strategies play a large part in them. The goal of this article is to investigate whether differences exist between the formal and informal CSR strategies through which firms manage relations with and the claims of their stakeholders. In this context, formal CSR strategies seem to characterize large firms while informal CSR strategies prevail among micro, small, and medium-sized enterprises. We use a sample of 3,626 Italian firms to investigate our research questions. Based on a multi-stakeholder framework, the analysis provides evidence that small businesses’ use of CSR, involving strategies with an important impact on the bottom line, reflects an attempt to secure their license to operate in the communities; while large firms rarely make attempts to integrate their CSR strategies into explicit management systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler P., S.-W. Kwon 2002 Social Capital: Prospects for a New Concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besser T. L. 1999 Community Involvement and the Perception of Success Among Small Business Operators in Small Towns. Journal of Small Business Management, 37(4), 16–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Brugmann J., C. K. Prahalad 2007 Cocreating Business’s New Social Compact. Harvard Business Review, 85(2), 80–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane A., D. Matten 2007, Business Ethics, 2nd Ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geer H. 2002. Business and Society. In: L. Zsolnai (ed) Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics. Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland, pp. 59–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson T., L. E. Preston 1995 The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Academy of Management Review 20(1), 65–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2003, SMEs in Europe 2003. Enterprise Publications, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission 2007, Opportunity and Responsibility. How to Help More Small Businesses to Integrate Social and Environmental Issues into What They Do. European Commission, Brussels, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  • Figge F., S. Schaltegger 2000 What is “Stakeholder Value”? Developing a Catchphrase into a Benchmarking Tool. Universität Lüneburg-Pictet-UNEP, Lüneburg, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman E. R. 1984, Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland J., B. van de Ven, N. Stoffele 2003 Strategies and Instruments for Organising CSR by Small and Large Businesses in the Netherlands. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), 45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grayson D. 2004, How CSR Contribute to the Competitiveness of Europe in a More Sustainable World. The World Bank Institute and the CSR Resource Centre, Netherlands, pp 1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Habisch A., H. P. Meister, R. Schmidpeter 2001, Corporate Citizenship as Investing in Social Capital. Logos-Verlag, Berlin, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  • ISTAT 2001 8° Censimento Generale dell’industria e dei Servizi 2001. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H. 2004 A Critique of Conventional CSR Theory: An SME Perspective. Journal of General Management 29(4), 37–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein M., J. Wempe 2002, The Balanced Company: A Theory of Corporate Integrity. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotler P., N. Lee 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility. Doing the Most Good for Your Company and Your Cause. John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangelsdorf D. 1999 Evolution from Quality Management to an Integrative Management System Based on TQM and Its Impact on the Profession of Quality Managers in Industry. The TQM Magazine 11(6), 419–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molteni M., M. Lucchini 2004 I Modelli di Responsabilità Sociale nelle Imprese Italiane. Franco Angeli, Milan, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F. 2006a SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 67(3), 305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F. 2006b The Practitioner’s Perspective on Non-Financial Reporting. California Management Review 48(2), 73–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F., S. Pogutz, A. Tencati 2006 Corporate Social Responsibility in Italy: State of the Art. Journal of Business Strategies 23(1), 65–91

    Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F., A. Russo, A. Tencati 2007 CSR Strategies of SMEs and Large Firms. Evidence from Italy. Journal of Business Ethics 74(3), 285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. 1993, Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam R. 2000, Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon and Schuster, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Pyke F., G. Becattini, W. Sengenberger 1990, Industrial Districts and Inter-Firm Co-operation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, Switzerland

    Google Scholar 

  • Soppe A. 2002. Ethical Theory of the Firm. In: L. Zsolnai (ed) Ethics in the Economy. Handbook of Business Ethics. Peter Lang, Bern, Switzerland, pp 81–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J. 1999 Does Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics. Business Ethics: A European Review 8(3), 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., A. Habisch, R. Schmidpeter 2004, Responsibility and Social Capital: The World of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises. Palgrave Macmillan, Houndmills, UK/New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., R. Jeurissen, R. Rutherfoord 2000 Small Business and the Environment in the UK and the Netherlands: Toward Stakeholder Cooperation. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(4), 945–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., J. F. Lozano 2000 Communicating About Ethics with Small Firms: Experiences from the U.K. And Spain. Journal of Business Ethics 27(1), 43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., R. Rutherfoord: 2003 Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., R. Schmidpeter, A. Habisch 2003 Assessing Social Capital: Small and Medium Sized Enterprises in Germany and the UK. Journal of Business Ethics 47(1), 17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St. John E. P. 1980 Management System Development: An Intervention Model for Developing Colleges and Universities. The Journal of Higher Education 51(3), 285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tencati A., F. Perrini, S. Pogutz 2004 New Tools to Foster Corporate Socially Responsible Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 53(1–2), 173–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson J. K., H. L. Smith 1991 Social Responsibility and Small Business: Suggestions for Research. Journal of Small Business Management 29(aaaJanuary), 30–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Tilley F. 2000 Small Firm Environmental Ethics: How Deep Do They go? Business Ethics: A European Review 9(1), 31–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vyakarnam S., A. Bailey, A. Myers, D. Burnett 1997 Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behaviour in Small Firms. Journal of Business Ethics 16(15), 1625–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is the result of a 2-year basic research project funded by Bocconi University, Italy, and coordinated by Francesco Perrini, whom the authors gratefully acknowledge. We also thank Unioncamere for the support to the data collection. Participants at the conference “The Social Responsibility of Small and Medium Sized Enterprises: Integration of CSR into SME Business Practice,” held in October 2006 at the Copenhagen Business School, are gratefully acknowledged for their comments. Finally, we thank the anonymous reviewers for their insightful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angeloantonio Russo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Russo, A., Tencati, A. Formal vs. Informal CSR Strategies: Evidence from Italian Micro, Small, Medium-sized, and Large Firms. J Bus Ethics 85 (Suppl 2), 339–353 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9736-x

Keywords

Navigation