Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Are We Sending Mixed Messages? How Philosophical Naturalism Erodes Ethical Instruction

Section: Philsophical Foundations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To develop critical thinking skills, higher order ethical reasoning, a better grasp of the implications of ethical decisions, and a basis for ethical knowledge, it is necessary to explore the philosophical premises foundational to one’s ethical persuasion. No philosophical premises are more important than those pertaining to the nature of human personhood and business’ responsibility to respect the inherent value of human beings. Philosophical naturalism assigns the essence of human personhood strictly to causal interactions of physical matter. Substance dualism, on the other hand, posits both a physical aspect and an immaterial substance to personhood, interacting within the totality of each being. This paper argues for the logical superiority of substance dualism in achieving the overriding objective of discerning ethical knowledge. Substance dualism offers a better explanation – and one that more closely follows the way most people commonly experience themselves and others–than naturalism for free agency and accountability, meaningful moral standards, confidence in knowing what ethical decisions to make, and the moral drive residing in conscience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anonymous: 2003, ‘High Stress Levels Leading to Employee Burnout’, Workspan, 46(6), 17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker L. R. (1987) Saving Belief: A Critique of Physicalism. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 134–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne E. F. (2002) Business Ethics: A Helpful Hybrid in Search of Integrity. Journal of Business Ethics 37(2):121–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland P. (1984) Matter and Consciousness. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, p. 21

    Google Scholar 

  • Dean K. L., Beggs J. M. (2006) University Professor and Teaching Ethics: Conceptualizations and Expectations. Journal of Management Education 30(1):15–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duska R. F. (1991) What’s the Point of a Business Ethics Course?. Business Ethics Quarterly 1(4):335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich J. M., Nichols M. L., Elm D. R., Vollrath D. A. (1990) Moral Reasoning in Groups: Leaders Make a Difference. Human Relations 43(5):473–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis B. (1990) Truth and Objectivity. Basil Blackwell Ltd, Oxford, p 19

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliston F. (1985) The Philosopher in the Workplace. Journal of Business Ethics 4(4):331–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A.: 2002, ‘When It Comes to Ethics, B-Schools Get an F’, The Washington Post (August 4), p. B4.

  • Ferris W. P. (1996) The Effectiveness of teaching Business Ethics Using Moral Philosophy and Personal Ethical Codes. Journal of Management Education 20(3):341–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frederick W. (1995) Values, Nature and Culture in the American Corporation. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gioia D. A. (2002) Business Education’s Role in the Crisis of Corporate Confidence. Academy of Management Executive 16(3):142–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasker W. (1999) The Emergent Self. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Haught J. (2005) Science and Scientism: The Importance of a Distinction. Zygon 40(2):363–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson P. R., Indvik J. (2001) Rudeness at Work: Impulse Over Restraint. Public Personnel Management 30(4):457–465

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, J.: 1996, Philosophy of Mind, (Westview, Boulder, CO), pp. 3–4.

  • Kristol, I.: 1987, ‘Ethics, Anyone? Or Morals?’Wall Street Journal (September 15), p.1

  • Lennick D., Kiel F. (2005) Moral Intelligence: Enhaning Business Performance & Leadership Success. Wharton School Publishing, Upper Saddle River NJ, p 51

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, V. and A. Etzioni: 2003, ‘Right vs. Wrong: The Bottom Line on Ethics’, Across the Board (July/August), 59–60

  • Malinowski C. I., Smith C. P. (1985) Moral Reasoning and Moral Conduct: An Investigation Prompted by Kohlberg’s Theory. Journal of Personalitiy and Social Psychology 49(4):1016–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moreland J., Rae S. (2000) Body & Soul. InterVarsity Press, Downers Grove, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, J.: 1999, ‘Are You Trapped? Quitting Not the Only Solution to Difficult work Relationships,’ Los Angeles Times, (March 22), C2, C12.

  • Parasuraman S., Greenhaus J. H., Rabinowitz S., Bedeian A. G., Mossholder K. W. (1989) Work and Family Variables as Mediators of the Relationship Between Wives’ Employement and Husbands’ Well-Being. Academy of Management Journal 32(1):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peacocke A., Gillett G. (eds) (1987) Persons and Personality. Blackwell Press, Oxford, p 55

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker S. (2004) How to Think About the Mind. Newsweek 144(13):78

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993a) Warrant: The Current Debate. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Plantinga A. (1993b) Warrant and Proper Function. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Post J. (1991) Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Paragon, New York, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Raley Y. (2005) Ontological Naturalism. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 86(2):284–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rea S., Plantinga A. (2004) Letters. Newsweek 144(15):17–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1979, Development in Judging Moral Issues (University of Minnesota: Minneapolis).

  • Searle J. (1984) Minds, Brains and Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 92

    Google Scholar 

  • Shuit D. P (2003) Do It Right or Risk Getting Burned. Workforce Management 82(9):80–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Sommers C. H.: (1993) ‘Teaching the Virtues,’ Public Interest (111), 3–13.

  • Swanson D.L. (2004) The Buck Stops Here: Why Universities Must Reclaim Business Ethics Education. Journal of Academic Ethics 2(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swinburne R. (2001) Epistemic Justification. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Walls, G. D., L. M. Capell, and W. E. Greene: 2001, ‘Toward a Source Stressors Model of Conflict Between Work and Family,’ Review of Business, (Summer), 89–91.

  • Wall Street Journal a: 2006, ‘Business Brief’ (Eastern Edition), Jan 10 2006, 1.

  • Wall Street Journal b: 2006, ‘Media Brief’ (Eastern Edition), Aug 1 2006, n/a.

  • Weber J., Gillespie J. (1998) Differences in Ethical Beliefs, Intentions, and Behaviors: The Role of Beliefs and Intentions in Ethics Research Revisited. Business & Society 37(4):447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J., Wasieleski D. (2001) Investigating Influences on Managers’ Moral reasoning: The Impact of Context and Personal and Organizational Factors. Business & Society 40(1):79–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. (1998) The Biological Basis of Morality. The Atlantic Monthly 281(4):53–70

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Marketing, Baylor University, One Bear Place, #98007, Waco, TX, 76798, U.S.A

    Marjorie J. Cooper

Authors
  1. Marjorie J. Cooper
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marjorie J. Cooper.

Additional information

Marjorie J. Cooper (aka Caballero), Ph. D. is a Professor of Marketing in the Hankamer School of Business at Baylor University in Texas. She received her B.A. from Wheaton College in 1970, her M.B.A. from Oklahoma City University in 1977, and her Ph. D. in Business Administration from Texas A&M University in 1981. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Marketing, Journal of Advertising, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Journal of Advertising Research, Journal of Business Research, Psychology & Marketing, Journal of Professional Selling & Sales Management, Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Business Horizons, Journal of Promotion Management, Journal of Small Business Management, Human Systems Management, and elsewhere.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cooper, M.J. Are We Sending Mixed Messages? How Philosophical Naturalism Erodes Ethical Instruction. J Bus Ethics 75, 171–180 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9243-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9243-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation