Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Striking a Balance Between Rules and Principles-based Approaches for Effective Governance: A Risks-based Approach

  • OriginalPaper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several recent studies and initiatives have emphasized the importance of a strong ethical organizational DNA (ODNA) to create and promote an effective corporate governance culture of trust, integrity and intellectual honesty. This paper highlights the drawbacks of an excessively heavy reliance on rules-based approaches that increase the cost of doing business, overshadow essential elements of good corporate governance, create a culture of dependency, and can result in legal absolutism. The paper makes the case that the way forward for effective corporate governance is to strike an optimal balance between rules-based and principles-based approaches. The recent corporate scandals have demonstrated that the ethical ODNA is critical to the driving force and basis of legal and regulatory requirements. Effective governance means adhering to ethical principles, not merely complying with rules, and is a crucial guardian of a firm’s reputation and integrity. It is through an effective corporate governance program (that is, one that optimally captures and integrates the appropriate aspects of rules-based and principles-based approaches, and identifies and assesses the related risks) that an organization can reconfigure its ODNA for improved performance. Focusing on the ethical ODNA as the basis of new governance measures provides an opportunity to develop a competitive advantage as it represents a potential source of differentiation, strengthens the relationship with all stakeholders of the organization by building a culture of trust and integrity, and re-instills investor confidence. This paper employs dialectical reasoning that links the ODNA through principles-driven rules in developing a risks-based approach. A comparison from a risk assessment perspective between rules-based and principles-based approaches is presented. Although there have been few applications employing dialectical reasoning in business research, this methodology can be extremely useful in isolating ethical issues and integrating them into the business process. The risks-based approach captures the benefits of both rules-based and principles-based approaches, and incorporates trust-based principles such␣as solidarity, subsidiarity and covenantal relationships.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguirre, D., L. Howell, D. Kletter and G. Neilson: 2005, A Global Check-Up: Diagnosing the Health of Today’s Organizations, Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc

  • Arjoon S. (2005a) A Communitarian Model of Business: A Natural Law Perspective. Journal of Markets and Morality 8(2):455–478

    Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon S. (2005b) Corporate Governance: An Ethical Perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 61:343–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arjoon, S. and Gopaul J. (2003) Ethical Orientation of Future Managers: The Case of Trinidad. Social and Economic Studies 52(1):99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnott R. (2004) Ethics and Unintended Consequences. Financial Analysts Journal 60(3):6–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audi, R. (ed.): 1995, The Cambridge Dictionary of Philosophy (Cambridge University Press)

  • Berenbeim, R.: 2004, ‘Corporate Governance. Vital Speeches of the Day’, Nov. 15 71(3), 87–89

  • Blitz, J.: 2005, ‘Attack by Blair on US-Style Red Tape,’ Financial Times, Friday, May 27, pp. 1–3

  • Buck T., Shahrim A. (2005) The Translation of Corporate Governance Changes Across National Cultures: The Case of Germany. Journal of International Business Studies 36(1):42–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell C., Karri R. (2005) Organizational Governance and Ethical Systems: A Covenantal Approach to Build Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 58:249–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castellani J. (2004) View From The Top. Journal of Accountancy 198(1):19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Deal T., Kennedy A. (1982) Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life. Addison-Wesley, Mass

    Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte and Touche: 2003, “Ethics and Corporate Compliance: The Advantages of a Values-Based Appro- ach,” May, http://www.deloitte.com/us/corpgov

  • Driscoll D., Hoffman W. (2000) Ethics Matters: How To Implement Values-Driven Management. Center for Business Ethics, Bentley College, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Ethics Resource Center: 2005, ‘How Employees View Ethics In Their Organizations: 1994–1995,’ National Business Ethics Survey

  • Felton, R. and P. Fritz: 2005, ‘The View from the Boardroom,’ McKinsey Quarterly, Special Edition: Value and Performance

  • Financial Times: 2004, ‘The Unexpected Cost of Corporate Virtue: Companies are Suffering from Questionnaire Fatigue,’ The Financial Times Limited, London, Edition 1, April 5

  • Fort, T.: 2001, Business as Mediating Institution, Ruffin Series in Business (Oxford University Press)

  • Freeman, E.: 1994, ‘The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions’, Business Ethics Quarterly 4, 409–422

  • Gebler D. (2005) Is Your Culture a Risk Factor? Working Values Ltd., Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M.: 2005, ‘Business Ethics a Priority for Management Schools,’ Economic Perspectives, February, http://www.usinfo.state.gov/journals/ites/0205/ijee/ijee0205.htm

  • Gorelick, J.: 2004, ‘Keepers of the Corporate Conscience: The Role of the Board in Ethical Oversight,’ Presented at the Center for Business Ethics, Ragtheon Lectureship in Business Ethics, October 14, Bentley College, Massachusetts

  • Greenfield W. (2004) Attention to People and Principles is Key to Corporate Governance and Ethics. Employment Relations Today 30(4):6–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grojean M., Resick C., Dickson M., Brent-Smith D. (2004) Leaders, Values and Organizational Climate: Examining Leadership Strategies for Establishing an Organizational Climate Regarding Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 55(3):223–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinn D. (2000) Corporate Compliance and Integrity Programs: The Uneasy Alliance Between Law and Ethics. HEC Forum 12(4):292–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Head, G.: 2005, ‘Why Link Risk Management and Ethics,’ American Institute for CPCU, February

  • Higgins T. (1958) Man as Man: The Science and Art of Ethics. Tan Book and Publishers, Illinois

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmstrom, B. and S. Kaplan: 2003, ‘The State of US Corporate Governance: What’s Right and What’s Wrong?’ September, ECGE Finance Working Paper No. 23, 2003

  • Holst S. (2005) Sarbanes–Oxley, Year Two: The Glass is Half Full, Risk Management 52(3):41–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Hould, V.: 2005, ‘Company Face Crackdown on Tax,’ Financial Times, Friday, May 27, pp. 2

  • Howard R. (1985) Brave New Workplace. Viking Penguin, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackman D. (2004) Does Regulation Make It Worse? Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance 12(2):106–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson R. (2004) Principles versus Rules. The Internal Auditor 61(5):56–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings M. (2000) Professional Responsibilities, Ethics and the Law in Ethical Issues for Today’s Firm, AIMR, Charlottesville, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K.: 2004, ‘Next Steps: Designing an Outcomes-based Ethics and Compliance Program Evaluation,’ in Business Ethics: A Manual on Managing the Responsible Business in Emerging Market Economics, Department of Commerce, Washington, DC

  • Kelly, J.: 2004, ‘Solidarity and Subsidiarity: Organizing Principles for Corporate Moral Leadership in The New Global Economy’, Journal of Business Ethics, 52, 283–295

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney, R. and N. Nielsen: 2005, ‘A Business Perspective on Corporate Governance,” Economic Perspectives, February, http://www.usinfo.state.gov/journals /ites/0205/ijee/ijee0205.htm

  • Kleining, J. (1999) The Ethics of Policing. Cambridge University Press, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Larcker, D., S. Richardson, and I. Tuna: 2005, ‘Ratings Add Fire to the Governance Debate,’ FT Mastering Corporate Governance, Friday, May 27, pp. 6–8

  • Lesley K., Lacey R. (2004) A Matter of Trust. Forbes 174(8):67–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Liebesman S. (2005) Compliance and Ethics Group Formed. Quality Progress 38(3):72–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorsch, J.: 2005, ‘Building Better Boards by Design,’ FT Mastering Corporate Governance, Friday, May 27, pp.␣2–3

  • Lorsch J. (1986) Managing Culture: The Invisible Barrier to Strategic Change. California Management Review, Winter

    Google Scholar 

  • Maitland, A.: 2005, ‘Leading Companies Faulted on Ethics Training,’ National News Business and Economy, February 23, Wednesday, Edition 2, London

  • Marnet, O. (2005) Behavior and Rationality in Corporate Governance. Journal of Economic Issues 39(3):613–632

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer D. (2004) Fort’s Business as Mediating Institution – A Holistic View of Corporate Governance and Ethics. American Business Law Journal 41(4):595–619, Summer

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKee, J.: 2004, “Boardroom Ethics Developing a Culture,” The Director, August, Profile Publishing Limited, http://www.document?_m=a29680c9f645 7e7b40a3046f34785cce_docnum=24fwchp=dGLbVlb-zSkV3/9/2005

  • Moules, J.: 2004, ‘Large Business Make Gains with Combined Governance Code,’ National News Business and Economy, Edition 1, December 2, Thursday, London

  • Neilson, G. and B. Pasternak: 2005, ‘Results: Keep What’s Good, Fix What’s Wrong, and Unlock Great Performance,’ Crown Business

  • Nemerson, V.: 2005, Temptation Island: Managing Effective Compliance and Ethics Programs, Whitepaper, Constangy, Brooks and Smith, LLC

  • Nolan, S.: 2003, ‘Calculating the Cost of Sarbanes–Oxley Compliance,’ Ziff Davis Medium Inc, http://www.baselinemag.com/print-article/03668,a=48956,oo.asp

  • O’Reilley, C.: 1989, ‘Corporations, Culture, and Commitment: Motivation and Social Control in Organization,’ California Management Review, Summer

  • Orlitzky, M., F. Schmidt and S. Rynes: 2003, ‘Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis,’ Organizational Studies, May–June, pp. 403–441

  • Paine L. (1994) Managing for Organizational Integrity. Harvard Business Review 72(2):06–117, March/April

    Google Scholar 

  • Paredes T. (2004) A System Approach To Corporate Governance Reform: Why Imparting U.S. Corporate Law Isn’t The Answer. William and Mary Law Review 45(3):155–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Pascale, R.: 1985, ‘The Paradox of Corporate Culture: Reconciling Ourselves to Socialization,’ California Management Review, Summer

  • Petra S. (2005) Do Outside Independent Directors Strengthen Corporate Boards? Corporate Governance 5(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price A., Kowalski B. (2004) Ethical Obligations Under the New Approach to Sentencing Guidelines. The Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics 17(4):929–946

    Google Scholar 

  • PR Newswire: 2005, The Importance of Corporate Responsibility, February 10, Thursday

  • PR Newswire: 2002, Corporate Culture Can Prevent Ethical Crises and Boast Profits, September 4, http://www. findarticles.com/cf_dls/m4PRN/2002_Sept_4/91043877/print.jhtml

  • Richman, L.: 2005, ‘Compliance and Ethics Programs Under the Federal Sentencing Guidelines After the Supreme Court Booker Decision,’ Wall Street Lawyer, March, pp. 12–16

  • Rusaw A. (2000) Uncovering Training Resistance: A Critical Theory Perspective. Journal of Organizational Change Management 13(3):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruvigny R., Turner R., Burke S. (2000) Reinforcing Ethics by Statute in the UK: A New Regulatory Era. Perspectives 2:22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Sama L., Shoaf V. (2005) Reconciling Rules and Principles: An Ethics-Based Approach to Corporate Governance. Journal of Business Ethics 58(1–3):177–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saner, M.: 2004, Ethics Codes Revisited: A New Focus on Outcomes, Policy Brief No. 20 (Institute on Governance, Canada)

  • Sayther-Cunningham, C.: 2004, Enterprise Risk Management: The COSO Framework, Article 866 (Ethics Resource Center, Washington, DC), December

  • Schwartz M., Dunfee T., Kline M. (2005) Tone at the Top: An Ethics Code for Directors? Journal of Business Ethics 58:79–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities Week: 2004, Expert Board Tips for Assessing CEO Integrity Include Choices on Simple Issues in Gray Areas, September 13, The McGraw-Hill Companies

  • Seglin J. (2000) The Good, The Bad and Your Business: Choosing Right When Ethical Dilemmas Pull You Apart. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Seglin, J.: 2002, ‘An Ethics Code Can’t Replace a Backbone,’ The New York Times, April

  • Stanford J. (2004) Curing The Ethical Malaise In Corporate America: Organizational Structure as the Antidote. Advanced Management Journal 69(3):14–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart D. (1996) Business Ethics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinson, C.: 2004, ‘Business and the Moral Maze,’ Accountancy Magazine, December

  • Teller, H.: 2004, ‘Executives Learning to Live with Governance Reform,’ PR Week (US), Haymarket Publishing Services Ltd, November 29

  • Tinkler H. (2005) Ethics in Business. Vital Speeches of the Day 71(6):170–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L., Brown M. (2004) Managing To Be Ethical: Debunking Five Business Ethics Myths. Academy of Management Executives 18(2):69–81

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L., Weaver G., Gibson D., Toffler B. (1999) Managing Ethics and Legal Compliance: What Works and What Hurts. California Management Review 41(2):131–151

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L., Nelson K. (1999) Managing Business Ethics: Straight Talk about How to do it Right. 2nd ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, C.: 2005, ‘Organizational DNA Should Contain Ethics Component’, February, Strategic Finance 86(8), 19–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor, C.: 2004a, ‘Does Superior Governance Still Lead to Better Financial Performance’, Strategic Finance, October 86(4), 13–14

  • Verschoor, C.: 2004b, ‘Can Organizational DNA Exclude Ethics?’ Strategic Finance, September 86(3), 19–21

  • Verschoor, C.: 2004c, ‘Integrity is a Strategy for Performance’, Strategic Finance, July 86(1), 15–17

  • Wallenberg, J.: 2004, ‘Achieving 3C5 is no Mean Feat – Conformance, Competition and Culture are the Key to Good Corporate Governance,’ The Banker, July 1, Financial Times Business Limited

  • Weaver G., Trevino L., Cochrane P. (1999) Corporate Ethics Practices in the Mid 1990’s: An Empirical Study of the Fortune 1000. Journal of Business Ethics 18:283–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wee, H.: 2002, ‘Corporate Ethics: Right Makes Might,’ Business Week, April 11

  • Werhane, P. and E. Freeman: 1998, Encyclopedic Dictionary of Business Ethics, Blackwell

  • West-Burnham J. (1997) Leadership for Learning – Re-engineering Mind Sets. School Leadership and Management 17(2):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wray, C.: 2005, ‘Economic Perspectives,’ February, http://www.asputo.state.gov/journals/ites/0205/ijee/ijee/ijee0205.htm

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Management Studies, University of The West Indies, St. Augustine, Trinidad, Trinidad and Tobago

    Surendra Arjoon

Authors
  1. Surendra Arjoon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Surendra Arjoon.

Additional information

Sundera Arjoon is a Senior Lecturer in Ethics at the Department of Management Studies, The University of the West Indies, Trinidad, He has served as Head of Department (2002–2005) and as Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Social Sciences (1996–2002). His publications have appeared in the Journal of Business Ethics, Journal of Markets and Morality, Global Development Studies, Social and Economic Studies, Applied Financial Economics, and the Journal of Eastern Carribean Studies. His current teaching and research interests include ethical decision-making, corporate governance, virtue ethics and familial ethics.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arjoon, S. Striking a Balance Between Rules and Principles-based Approaches for Effective Governance: A Risks-based Approach. J Bus Ethics 68, 53–82 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9040-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9040-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation