Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Chapter 11 and Asbestos: Encouraging Private Enterprise or Conspiring to Avoid Liability?

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores the American bankruptcy system -- especially the Chapter 11 code -- which since 1978 has allowed insolvent companies the opportunity to restructure and reorganise with the benefit of court protection from creditors. Particular attention is focused on asbestos companies, such as Johns--Manville, which have been among the most consistent and controversial filers for bankruptcy under Chapter 11. The history of asbestos and Chapter 11 is explored, against the backdrop of the burgeoning asbestos “crisis”, caused by increasing mortality and litigation. Some of the business and ethical issues involved are highlighted by examining in detail a recent bankruptcy (Federal Mogul/T&N in 2001) that has implications in both Britain and America. Chapter 11 bankruptcy is evaluated, particularly in the light of the trend towards similar mechanisms of insolvency in the UK, Europe and the rest of the world. It is concluded that, certainly as regards the experience with asbestos, Chapter 11 offers an inefficient and inequitable method of rehabilitating or rescuing failing businesses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Associated Press: 2002, ‘Halliburton Paying \$4b for Asbestos Claims’, 18 December.

  • Atlanta Journal-Constitution: 2002, ‘Georgia-Pacific’s Asbestos Nightmare’, 15, 16, 17 September. http://www.accessatlanta.com/ajc/business/0902/georgiapacific/.

  • Bailey, I.: 2001--2002, British Asbestos Newsletter (Winter, Issue 45), 1.

  • Battle, J.: 2002, ‘Armley (Asbestos Compensation)’, In Hansard, 10 January, columns 780--788.

  • M. Bowker (2003) Fatal Deception: The Untold Story of Asbestos. Why It is Still Legal and Still Killing Us Rodale Emmaus, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • British Asbestos Newsletter: 2001–2002, (Issues 44–48). www.lkaz.demon.co.uk.

  • P. Brodeur (1985) Outrageous Misconduct: The Asbestos Industry on Trial Pantheon Books New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Butters, J.: 2001, ‘Asbestos Suits Bankrupt Southfield, Michigan-Based Auto Supplier’, Detroit Free Press, 2 October.

  • Butters, J.: 2003, ‘Trust May Control Supplier’, Detroit Free Press, 1 February

  • C. Calhoun H. Hiller (1988) ArticleTitle‘Coping with Insidious Injuries: The Case of Johns–Manville Corporation and Asbestos Exposure’ Social Problems 35 (April) 162–181

    Google Scholar 

  • B. I. Castleman (1996) Asbestos: Medical and Legal Aspects EditionNumber4 Aspen Law & Business Englewood Cliffs, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Channel 4 News: 2002, ‘Asbestos Claims’, 11 February.

  • Connon, H.: 2002, ‘The Great Asbestos Bonanza’, Observer, 27 January.

  • K. J. Delaney (1998) Strategic Bankruptcy: How Corporations and Creditors Use Chapter 11 to Their Advantage University of California Press San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, K. J.: 1998, Strategic Bankruptcy: How Corporations and Creditors Use Chapter 11 to Their Advantage (University of California Press, San Francisco).

  • A. Etzioni (1997) The New Golden Rule: Community and Morality in a Democratic Society Profile Books London

    Google Scholar 

  • Federal Mogul/T&N: 2001, ‘Debtors’ Informational Brief’, In the US Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, 1 October.

  • Financial Times: 15 January 2001.

  • Financial Times: 6 August 2001.

  • Financial Times: 15 November 2001.

  • Financial Times: 29 November 2001.

  • Financial Times: 8 January 2002.

  • Financial Times: 4 February 2002.

  • Financial Times: 19 February 2002.

  • Financial Times: 9 September 2002.

  • Financial Times: 9 December 2002.

  • J. R. Franks W. N. Torous (1992) ArticleTitle‘Lessons from a Comparison of US and UK Insolvency Codes’ Oxford Review of Economic Policy 8 70–82

    Google Scholar 

  • Gee, D. and M. Greenberg: 2001, ‘Asbestos: From Magic to Malevolent Mineral’, in European Environment Agency, Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896--2000 (EEA, Copenhagen), pp. 52--63.

  • Gibb, F.: 2001, ‘Asbestos Firm Freezes Payouts for Victims’, Times, 12 November.

  • Hansard: 2002, Westminster Hall Debate, ‘Asbestos Sufferers’, 16 January, column 71--91WH.

  • O. Hart (2000) Different Approaches to Bankruptcy, Discussion Paper No. 1903 Harvard Institute of Economic Research Cambridge MA

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Hensler S. Carroll M. White J. Gross (2001) Asbestos Litigation in the US: A New Look at an Old Issue RAND Institute for Civil Justice Santa Monica, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • E. S. Hotchkiss (1995) ArticleTitle‘Post Bankruptcy Performance and Management Turnover’ Journal of Finance 50(March) 3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • R. Johnston A. McIvor (2000) Lethal Work: A History of the Asbestos Tragedy in Scotland Tuckwell Glasgow

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Kilpi (1998) The Ethics of Bankruptcy Routledge London

    Google Scholar 

  • London, S.: 2001, ‘Going Bust for Survival’, Financial Times, 2 October.

  • London, S.: 2002, ‘Critics are Hoping It Could be the End of the Story for Chapter 11’, Financial Times, 20 December.

  • L. M. LoPucki S. D. Kalin (2001) ArticleTitle‘The Failure of Public Company Bankruptcies in Delaware and New York: Empirical Evidence of a “Race to the Bottom”’ Vanderbilt Law Review 54 231–280

    Google Scholar 

  • J. McCulloch (2002) Asbestos Blues: Labour, Capital, Physicians and the State in South Africa James Currey Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Ozonoff (1988) ‘Failed Warnings: Asbestos-Related Disease and Industrial Medicine’ R. Bayer (Eds) The Health and Safety of Workers Oxford University Press New York 139–218

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Peto A. Decarli C. La Vecchia F. Levi E. Negri (1999) ArticleTitle‘The European Mesothelioma Epidemic’ British Journal of Cancer 79(February) 666–672

    Google Scholar 

  • Pickering, J. and Partners: 2002, Press release, Manchester.

  • M. Salem O. Martin (1994) ArticleTitle‘The Ethics of Using Chapter 11 as a Management Strategy’ Journal of Business Ethics 13 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • I. J. Selikoff D. H. K. Lee (1978) Asbestos and Disease Academic Press New York

    Google Scholar 

  • D.A. Skeel SuffixJr. (2001) Debt’s Dominion Princeton University Press Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevenson, R.: 2003, ‘RSA “Wriggled Out” of Liability’, Independent, 28 January.

  • Stiglitz, J., J. M. Orszag and P. R. Orszag: 2002, The Impact of Asbestos Liabilities on Workers in Bankrupt Firms (Commissioned by American Insurance Association, Sebago Associates).

  • Tait, N. and A. Bolger: 2003, ‘Court Case over Asbestos Insurance Starts’, Financial Times, 27 January.

  • Teather, D.: 2002, ‘Asbestos Claims Hit Ex-Cheney Firm’, Guardian, 25 July.

  • G. Tweedale (2001) Magic Mineral to Killer Dust: Turner & Newall and the Asbestos Hazard, 2nd Edition Oxford University Press Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • G. Tweedale (2002) ArticleTitle‘Asbestos and Its Lethal Legacy’ Nature Reviews Cancer 2(April) 311–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren, E.: 1992–1993, ‘The Untenable Case for Repeal of Chapter 11’, Yale Law Journal 102(Pt. 1), 437–479.

  • N. Wikeley (1983) Compensation for Industrial Diseases Dartmouth Publishing Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington, R.: 2003, www.mesothel.com.

  • World Bank: 1999, Global Insolvency Initiative: Building Effective Insolvency Systems:Rehabilitation (World Bank, Washington, DC).

  • Zamoyski, J. J.: 2001, Senior vice-president and general legal counsel, FM. ‘Witness Statement in the Matter of T&N Limited and Others and in the Matter of the Insolvency Act 1986’, High Court of Justice, Chancery Division, Companies Court, 1 October.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Manchester Metropolitan University Business School, M1 3GH, Aytoun Street, Manchester, UK

    Tweedale Geoffrey & Warren Richard

Authors
  1. Tweedale Geoffrey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Warren Richard
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tweedale Geoffrey.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geoffrey, T., Richard, W. Chapter 11 and Asbestos: Encouraging Private Enterprise or Conspiring to Avoid Liability?. J Bus Ethics 55, 31–42 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1776-2

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-004-1776-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation