Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial

  • Clinical trial
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) typically have a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. To determine the impact of combining bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy in patients with metastatic TNBC, we performed an exploratory subgroup analysis of the randomized phase 3 RIBBON-2 trial. RIBBON-2 enrolled patients with metastatic breast cancer that had progressed on first-line non-bevacizumab-containing chemotherapy. After selection of chemotherapy (taxane, gemcitabine, capecitabine, or vinorelbine), patients were randomized 2:1 to receive chemotherapy with either bevacizumab (10 mg/kg every 2 weeks or 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks) or placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. Of 684 patients treated in RIBBON-2, 159 (23%) had TNBC. Baseline characteristics were reasonably balanced in the two treatment groups. The majority received taxane chemotherapy. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.494 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.33–0.74; P = 0.0006]. Median PFS was 6.0 months with bevacizumab–chemotherapy versus 2.7 months with chemotherapy alone. Median OS was 17.9 versus 12.6 months, respectively (HR 0.624, 95% CI 0.39–1.007; P = 0.0534). ORR was 41 versus 18%, respectively (P = 0.0078). The safety profile was consistent with the overall study population and previous phase 3 trials of bevacizumab. Patients with metastatic TNBC derived significant PFS and response benefits from the combination of bevacizumab with second-line chemotherapy. Despite the small sample size and immature data, there was a trend toward improved OS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gluz O, Liedtke C, Gottschalk N et al (2009) Triple-negative breast cancer—current status and future directions. Ann Oncol 20:1913–1927

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI et al (2007) Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 13(15 Pt 1):4429–4434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Lehmann BD, Bauer JA, Chen X et al (2011) Identification of human triple-negative breast cancer subtypes and preclinical models for selection of targeted therapies. J Clin Invest 121:2750–2767

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. O’Shaughnessy J, Osborne C, Pippen JE et al (2011) Iniparib plus chemotherapy in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med 364:205–214

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. O’Shaughnessy J, Schwartzberg LS, Danso MA et al. (2011) A randomized phase III study of iniparib (BSI-201) in combination with gemcitabine/carboplatin (G/C) in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). J Clin Oncol 29(Suppl): Abstract 1007

    Google Scholar 

  6. O’Shaughnessy J, Dieras V, Glaspy J et al. (2009) Comparison of subgroup analyses of PFS from three phase III studies of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Cancer Res 69(Suppl):512s (Abstract 207)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gray R, Bhattacharya S, Bowden C et al (2009) Independent review of E2100: a phase III trial of bevacizumab plus paclitaxel versus paclitaxel in women with metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 27:4966–4972

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miles DW, Chan A, Dirix LY et al (2010) Phase III study of bevacizumab plus docetaxel compared with placebo plus docetaxel for the first-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 28:3239–3247

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robert N, Dieras V, Glaspy G et al (2011) RIBBON-1: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for first-line treatment of HER2-negative locally-recurrent or metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:1252–1260

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Brufsky AM, Hurvitz S, Perez E et al (2011) RIBBON-2: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy for second-line treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 29:4286–4293

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Greenberg S, Rugo H (2010) Triple-negative breast cancer: role of antiangiogenic agents. Cancer J 16:33–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rydén L, Jirström K, Haglund M, Stål O, Fernö M (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 are specific biomarkers in triple-negative breast cancer. Results from a controlled randomized trial with long-term follow-up. Breast Cancer Res Treat 120:491–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Smith IE, Pierga J-Y, Biganzoli L et al (2011) Final overall survival results and effect of prolonged (≥1 year) first-line bevacizumab-containing therapy for metastatic breast cancer in the ATHENA trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 130:133–143

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA et al (2005) Randomized phase III trial of capecitabine compared with bevacizumab plus capecitabine in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23:792–799

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Baselga J, Stemmer SM, Pego A et al. (2010) Cetuximab + cisplatin in estrogen receptor-negative, progesterone receptor-negative, HER2-negative (triple-negative) metastatic breast cancer: results of the randomized phase II BALI-1 trial. Cancer Res 70(24 Suppl):95s (Abstract PD01–01)

  16. Awada A, Bondarenko IN, Tarasova O et al. (2010) Results of the first randomized phase II study of cationic liposomal paclitaxel (EndoTAG™-1) targeting tumor endothelial cells in advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 8):viii5 (Abstract LBA12)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Roché HH, Sparano J, Valero V et al. (2010) Ixabepilone (IXA) and capecitabine (C) in patients (pts) with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC): a retrospective analysis of phase 2 and phase 3 clinical studies. Ann Oncol 21(Suppl 8):viii103 (Abstract 299P)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Irvin WY, Carey LA (2008) What is triple-negative breast cancer? Eur J Cancer 44:2799–2805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Prat A, Parker JS, Karginova O et al (2010) Phenotypic and molecular characterization of the claudin-low intrinsic subtype of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 12:R68

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The RIBBON-2 trial was sponsored and funded by Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA. The sponsor contributed to the study design and performed the statistical analyses. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd.

Conflict of interest

A. Brufsky has a Consultant/advisory role with Genentech. V. Valero has received research funding and honoraria from Genentech/Roche. H.S. Rugo’s institution has received research funding from Genentech/Roche and Lilly/Imclone. A. Duenne is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. N. Bousfoul was formerly a contractor for F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. The other authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical standards

RIBBON-2 was conducted in accordance with US Food and Drug Administration Good Clinical Practice, International Conference on Harmonisation E6 Guideline for Good Clinical Practice, and national and local ethical and legal requirements. All patients provided written informed consent before study-specific screening.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Magee Women’s Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Suite 4628, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA

    Adam Brufsky

  2. The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Unit 1354, Houston, TX, 77030, USA

    Vicente Valero

  3. Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines

    Beatrice Tiangco

  4. Wichita Community Clinical Oncology Program, Wichita, KS, USA

    Shaker Dakhil

  5. Latvian Oncology Center, Riga Eastern University Hospital, Riga, Latvia

    Arija Brize

  6. University of California San Francisco Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1600 Divisidero Street, 2nd Floor, San Francisco, CA, 94115, USA

    Hope S. Rugo

  7. US Oncology, El Paso, TX, USA

    Ragene Rivera

  8. F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd, Grenzacherstrasse 124, 4070, Basel, Switzerland

    Anja Duenne & Naima Bousfoul

  9. Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Nashville, TN, USA

    Denise A. Yardley

  10. Tennessee Oncology PLLC, Nashville, TN, USA

    Denise A. Yardley

Authors
  1. Adam Brufsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Vicente Valero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Beatrice Tiangco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shaker Dakhil
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Arija Brize
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Hope S. Rugo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ragene Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Anja Duenne
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Naima Bousfoul
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Denise A. Yardley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam Brufsky.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brufsky, A., Valero, V., Tiangco, B. et al. Second-line bevacizumab-containing therapy in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: subgroup analysis of the RIBBON-2 trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 133, 1067–1075 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2008-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-012-2008-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation