Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The p160 ER co-regulators predict outcome in ER negative breast cancer

  • Preclinical study
  • Published:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The SRC family of ER co-regulators are frequently overexpressed in breast cancer. Overexpression of AIB1 appears to be linked to hormone resistance in HER2 positive breast cancer. However, the role of these co-regulators in ER negative disease is poorly understood. SRC1, SRC2 and AIB1 expression was determined by immunohistochemical analysis of tissue microarrays constructed from tumours within the Edinburgh Breast Conservation Series (BCS). The BCS represents a fully documented consecutive cohort of 1,812 patients treated by breast conservation surgery in a single institution. Our results demonstrate tumours that overexpress both HER2 and AIB1 were associated with markedly reduced relapse free, distant relapse free and overall survival compared to HER2 and AIB1 only overexpressing tumours irrespective of ER status. In ER negative disease both SRC1 and AIB1 were linked to early relapse and death. The SRC family of ER co-regulators is involved in early relapse and resistance in both ER negative and ER positive breast cancer challenging the conventional concept that this effect is mediated solely via the ER.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-azawi D, Ilroy MM, Kelly G, Redmond AM, Bane FT, Cocchiglia S, Hill AD, Young LS (2008) Ets-2 and p160 proteins collaborate to regulate c-Myc in endocrine resistant breast cancer. Oncogene 27:3021–3031

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Edwards J, Krishna NS, Grigor KM, Bartlett JM (2003) Androgen receptor gene amplification and protein expression in hormone refractory prostate cancer. Br J Cancer 89:552–556

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fleming FJ, Hill AD, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Young LS (2004) Differential recruitment of coregulator proteins steroid receptor coactivator-1 and silencing mediator for retinoid and thyroid receptors to the estrogen receptor-estrogen response element by beta-estradiol and 4-hydroxytamoxifen in human breast cancer. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:375–383

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Fleming FJ, Myers E, Kelly G, Crotty TB, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Hill AD, Young LS (2004) Expression of SRC-1, AIB1, and PEA3 in HER2 mediated endocrine resistant breast cancer; a predictive role for SRC-1. J Clin Pathol 57:1069–1074

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Green AR, Burney C, Granger CJ, Paish EC, El-Sheikh S, Rakha EA, Powe DG, Macmillan RD, Ellis IO, Stylianou E (2008) The prognostic significance of steroid receptor co-regulators in breast cancer: co-repressor NCOR2/SMRT is an independent indicator of poor outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 110:427–437

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harigopal M, Heymann J, Ghosh S, Anagnostou V, Camp RL, Rimm DL (2009) Estrogen receptor co-activator (AIB1) protein expression by automated quantitative analysis (AQUA) in a breast cancer tissue microarray and association with patient outcome. Breast Cancer Res Treat 115:77–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Kirkegaard T, Witton CJ, McGlynn LM, Tovey SM, Dunne B, Lyon A, Bartlett JM (2005) AKT activation predicts outcome in breast cancer patients treated with tamoxifen. J Pathol 207:139–146

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Kirkegaard T, Edwards J, Tovey S, McGlynn LM, Krishna SN, Mukherjee R, Tam L, Munro AF, Dunne B, Bartlett JM (2006) Observer variation in immunohistochemical analysis of protein expression, time for a change? Histopathology 48:787–794

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kirkegaard T, McGlynn LM, Campbell FM, Muller S, Tovey SM, Dunne B, Nielsen KV, Cooke TG, Bartlett JM (2007) Amplified in breast cancer 1 in human epidermal growth factor receptor-positive tumors of tamoxifen-treated breast cancer patients. Clin Cancer Res 13:1405–1411

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lahusen T, Henke RT, Kagan BL, Wellstein A, Riegel AT (2009) The role and regulation of the nuclear receptor co-activator AIB1 in breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 116:225–237

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SK, Kim HJ, Na SY, Kim TS, Choi HS, Im SY, Lee JW (1998) Steroid receptor coactivator-1 coactivates activating protein-1-mediated transactivations through interaction with the c-Jun and c-Fos subunits. J Biol Chem 273:16651–16654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Leyland-Jones BR, Ambrosone CB, Bartlett J, Ellis MJ, Enos RA, Raji A, Pins MR, Zujewski JA, Hewitt SM, Forbes JF, Abramovitz M, Braga S, Cardoso F, Harbeck N, Denkert C, Jewell SD (2008) Recommendations for collection and handling of specimens from group breast cancer clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 26:5638–5644

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Louie MC, Zou JX, Rabinovich A, Chen HW (2004) ACTR/AIB1 functions as an E2F1 coactivator to promote breast cancer cell proliferation and antiestrogen resistance. Mol Cell Biol 24:5157–5171

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Massarweh S, Osborne CK, Creighton CJ, Qin L, Tsimelzon A, Huang S, Weiss H, Rimawi M, Schiff R (2008) Tamoxifen resistance in breast tumors is driven by growth factor receptor signaling with repression of classic estrogen receptor genomic function. Cancer Res 68:826–833

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. McShane LM, Altman DG, Sauerbrei W, Taube SE, Gion M, Clark GM (2006) REporting recommendations for tumor MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK). Breast Cancer Res Treat 100:229–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Myers E, Hill AD, Kelly G, McDermott EW, O’Higgins NJ, Buggy Y, Young LS (2005) Associations and interactions between Ets-1 and Ets-2 and coregulatory proteins, SRC-1, AIB1, and NCoR in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:2111–2122

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Na SY, Lee SK, Han SJ, Choi HS, Im SY, Lee JW (1998) Steroid receptor coactivator-1 interacts with the p50 subunit and coactivates nuclear factor kappaB-mediated transactivations. J Biol Chem 273:10831–10834

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Osborne CK (1998) Tamoxifen in the treatment of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 339:1609–1618

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Osborne CK, Bardou V, Hopp TA, Chamness GC, Hilsenbeck SG, Fuqua SA, Wong J, Allred DC, Clark GM, Schiff R (2003) Role of the estrogen receptor coactivator AIB1 (SRC-3) and HER-2/neu in tamoxifen resistance in breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 95:353–361

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Osborne CK, Shou J, Massarweh S, Schiff R (2005) Crosstalk between estrogen receptor and growth factor receptor pathways as a cause for endocrine therapy resistance in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res 11:865s–870s

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Qin L, Liao L, Redmond A, Young L, Yuan Y, Chen H, O’Malley BW, Xu J (2008) The AIB1 oncogene promotes breast cancer metastasis by activation of PEA3-mediated matrix metalloproteinase 2 (MMP2) and MMP9 expression. Mol Cell Biol 28:5937–5950

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Redmond AM, Bane FT, Stafford AT, McIlroy M, Dillon MF, Crotty TB, Hill AD, Young LS (2009) Coassociation of estrogen receptor and p160 proteins predicts resistance to endocrine treatment; SRC-1 is an independent predictor of breast cancer recurrence. Clin Cancer Res 15:2098–2106

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Torres-Arzayus MI, Zhao J, Bronson R, Brown M (2010) Estrogen-dependent and estrogen-independent mechanisms contribute to AIB1-mediated tumor formation. Cancer Res 70:4102–4111

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Tovey S, Dunne B, Witton CJ, Forsyth A, Cooke TG, Bartlett JM (2005) Can molecular markers predict when to implement treatment with aromatase inhibitors in invasive breast cancer? Clin Cancer Res 11:4835–4842

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang S, Yuan Y, Liao L, Kuang SQ, Tien JC, O’Malley BW, Xu J (2009) Disruption of the SRC-1 gene in mice suppresses breast cancer metastasis without affecting primary tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:151–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors state that they have no financial conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John M. S. Bartlett.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 35 kb)

10549_2011_1426_MOESM2_ESM.doc

Fig. 1 HER2 and SRC expression in ERα positive patients: Relapse free survival Kaplan–Meier survival curves (relapse free survival) for patients with tumours positive (expression of within upper quartile) for either SRCs (grey lines), HER2 (black dotted lines) or both HER2/SRC (grey dotted lines) or negative for both HER2/SRC (black lines). Y axis survival = proportion of patients event free overtime, X axis = duration of follow up (years). Panel A = HER2/AIB1, Panel B = HER2/SRC2, Panel C = HER2/SRC1 (DOC 49 kb)

10549_2011_1426_MOESM3_ESM.doc

Fig. 2 HER2 and SRC expression in ERα positive patients: distant relapse free survival Kaplan–Meier survival curves (distant relapse free survival) for patients with tumours positive (expression of within upper quartile) for either SRCs (grey lines), HER2 (black dotted lines) or both HER2/SRC (grey dotted lines) or negative for both HER2/SRC (black lines). Y axis survival = proportion of patients event free overtime, X axis = duration of follow up (years). Panel A = HER2/AIB1, Panel B = HER2/SRC2, Panel C = HER2/SRC1 (DOC 48 kb)

10549_2011_1426_MOESM4_ESM.doc

Fig. 3 HER2 and SRC expression in ERα positive patients: breast cancer specific survival: Kaplan–Meier survival curves (breast cancer specific survival) for patients with tumours positive (expression of within upper quartile) for either SRCs (grey lines), HER2 (black dotted lines) or both HER2/SRC (grey dotted lines) or negative for both HER2/SRC (black lines). Y axis survival = proportion of patients event free overtime, X axis = duration of follow up (years). Panel A = HER2/AIB1, Panel B = HER2/SRC2, Panel C = HER2/SRC1 (DOC 48 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Spears, M., Oesterreich, S., Migliaccio, I. et al. The p160 ER co-regulators predict outcome in ER negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 131, 463–472 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1426-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1426-1

Keywords

Navigation