Abstract
Atmospheric boundary-layer dynamics over heterogeneous surfaces is significant to a wide array of geophysical and engineering applications. Yet, despite over five decades of intense efforts by the research community, numerous open research questions remain. This underlines the complexity of the physical processes that are excited by heterogeneity, the multitude of patterns and manifestations that it can display, and the importance of the implications to research in the atmospheric sciences and beyond. Here, existing knowledge is reviewed and a path forward for research is proposed, starting with the smaller scales near a surface transition and proceeding to the influence on large-scale dynamics and their forecasting.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albertson J, Parlange M (1999) Natural integration of scalar fluxes from complex terrain. Adv Water Resour 23(3):239–252
Albertson J, Katul G, Wiberg P (2001) Relative importance of local and regional controls on coupled water, carbon, and energy fluxes. Adv Water Resour 24(9–10):1103–1118
Ament F, Simmer C (2006) Improved representation of land-surface heterogeneity in a non-hydrostatic numerical weather prediction model. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(1):153–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9066-4
Anderson W (2019) Non-periodic phase-space trajectories of roughness-driven secondary flows in high-\(\text{ re}_\tau \) boundary layers and channels. J Fluid Mech 869:27–84
Anderson W (2020) Turbulent channel flow over heterogeneous roughness at oblique angles. J Fluid Mech 886:A15-1–A15-15
Anderson W, Barros J, Christensen K, Awasthi A (2015) Numerical and experimental study of mechanisms responsible for turbulent secondary flows in boundary layer flows over spanwise heterogeneous roughness. J Fluid Mech 768:316–347
Anderson W, Yang J, Shrestha K, Awasthi A (2018) Turbulent secondary flows in wall turbulence: vortex forcing, scaling arguments, and similarity solution. Environ Fluid Mech 10:1007
André JC, Blondin C (1986) On the effective roughness length for use in numerical three-dimensional models. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 35(3):231–245. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00123642
Avissar R (1992) Conceptual aspects of a statistical-dynamical approach to represent landscape subgrid-scale heterogeneities in atmospheric models. J Geophys Res 97(D3):2729. https://doi.org/10.1029/91JD01751
Avissar R, Pielke RA (1989) A parameterization of heterogeneous land surfaces for atmospheric numerical models and its impact on regional meteorology. Mon Weather Rev 117(10):2113–2136. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<2113:APOHLS>2.0.CO;2
Avissar R, Schmidt T (1998) An evaluation of the scale at which ground-surface heat flux patchiness affects the convective boundary layer using large-eddy simulations. J Atmos Sci 55(16):2666–2689. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1998)055<2666:AEOTSA>2.0.CO;2
Awasthi A, Anderson W (2018) Numerical study of turbulent channel flow perturbed by spanwise topographic heterogeneity: amplitude and frequency modulation within low-and high-momentum pathways. Phys Rev Fluids 3(044):602
Bailey BN, Stoll R (2013) Turbulence in sparse, organized vegetative canopies: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(3):369–400. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-012-9796-4
Båserud L, Reuder J, Jonassen MO, Bonin T, Chilson P, Jiménez MA, Durand P (2020) Potential and limitations in estimating sensible-heat-flux profiles from consecutive temperature profiles using remotely-piloted aircraft systems. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 174:145–177
Bertoldi G, Albertson JD, Kustas WP, Li F, Anderson MC (2007) On the opposing roles of air temperature and wind speed variability in flux estimation from remotely sensed land surface states. Water Resour Res 43(10):W10433. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR005911
Bertoldi G, Kustas WP, Albertson JD (2008) Estimating spatial variability in atmospheric properties over remotely sensed land surface conditions. J Appl Meteorol Clim 47(8):2147–2165. https://doi.org/10.1175/2007JAMC1828.1
Bohrer G, Katul GG, Walko RL, Avissar R (2009) Exploring the effects of microscale structural heterogeneity of forest canopies using large-eddy simulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(3):351–382. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9404-4
Bonin T, Chilson P, Zielke B, Fedorovich E (2013) Observations of the early evening boundary-layer transition using a small unmanned aerial system. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 146:119–132
Bou-Zeid E, Meneveau C, Parlange MB (2004) Large-eddy simulation of neutral atmospheric boundary layer flow over heterogeneous surfaces: blending height and effective surface roughness. Water Resour Res 40(2):W02505. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002475
Bou-Zeid E, Parlange MB, Meneveau C (2007) On the parameterization of surface roughness at regional scales. J Atmos Sci 64(1):216–227. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3826.1
Bou-Zeid E, Overney J, Rogers BD, Parlange MB (2009) The effects of building representation and clustering in large-eddy simulations of flows in urban canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(3):415–436. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9410-6
Bradshaw P (1987) Turbulent secondary flows. Ann Rev Fluid Mech 19:53–74
Brutsaert W (1998) Land-surface water vapor and sensible heat flux: spatial variability, homogeneity, and measurement scales. Water Resour Res 34(10):2433–2442. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR01340
Calaf M, Meneveau C, Meyers J (2010) Large eddy simulation study of fully developed wind-turbine array boundary layers. Phys Fluids 22(1):015,110
Chaney NW, Van Huijgevoort MHJ, Shevliakova E, Malyshev S, Milly PCD, Gauthier PPG, Sulman BN (2018) Harnessing big data to rethink land heterogeneity in Earth system models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 22(6):3311–3330. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-3311-2018
Chen Q, Jia L, Menenti M, Hutjes R, Hu G, Zheng C, Wang K (2019) A numerical analysis of aggregation error in evapotranspiration estimates due to heterogeneity of soil moisture and leaf area index. Agric For Meteorol 269–270:335–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2019.02.017
Claussen M (1990) Area-averaging of surface fluxes in a neutrally stratified, horizontally inhomogeneous atmospheric boundary layer. Atmos Environ 24(6):1349–1360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0960-1686(90)90041-K
Claussen M (1991) Estimation of areally-averaged surface fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 54(4):387–410. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00118868
Claussen M (1995) Flux aggregation at large scales: on the limits of validity of the concept of blending height. J Hydrol 166(3–4):371–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(94)05098-I
Crosman ET, Horel JD (2010) Sea and lake breezes: a review of numerical studies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 137(1):1–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-010-9517-9
Cuxart J, Wrenger B, Martínez-Villagrasa D, Reuder J, Jonassen M, Jiménez MA, Lothon M, Lohou F, Hartogensis O, Dünnermann J, Conangla L, Garai A (2016) Estimation of the advection affects induced by heterogeneities in the surface energy budget. Atmos Chem Phys 16:9489–9504
Cuxart J, Wrenger B, Matjacic B, Mahrt L (2019) Spatial variability of the lower atmospheric boundary layer over hilly terrain as observed with an RPAS. Atmospheres 10:715–727
de Vrese P, Schulz JP, Hagemann S (2016) On the representation of heterogeneity in land-surface–atmosphere coupling. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 160(1):157–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-016-0133-1
Delage Y, Taylor PA (1970) Numerical studies of heat island circulations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 1(2):201–226. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00185740
Elston J, Argrow B, Stachura M, Weibel D, Lawrence D, Pope D (2015) Overview of small fixed-wing unmanned aircraft for meteorological sampling. J Atmos Ocean Technol 32:97–115
Esau IN (2007) Amplification of turbulent exchange over wide arctic leads: large-eddy simulation study. J Geophys Res 112(D8):D08,109
Fan Y, Li Y, Wang X, Catalano F (2016) A new convective velocity scale for studying diurnal urban heat island circulation. J Appl Meteorol Clim 55(10):2151–2164. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-16-0099.1
Fan Y, Li Y, Bejan A, Wang Y, Yang X (2017) Horizontal extent of the urban heat dome flow. Sci Rep 7(1):11681. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-09917-4
Fan Y, Li Y, Yin S (2018) Non-uniform ground-level wind patterns in a heat dome over a uniformly heated non-circular city. Int J Heat Mass Transf 124:233–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2018.03.069
Finnigan J (2000) Turbulence in plant canopies. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 32(1):519–571
Fontan S, Katul G, Poggi D, Manes C, Ridolfi L (2013) Flume experiments on turbulent flows across gaps of permeable and impermeable boundaries. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 147(1):21–39
Garratt JR (1990) The internal boundary layer—a review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 50(1–4):171–203. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00120524
Giorgi F, Avissar R (1997) Representation of heterogeneity effects in earth system modeling: experience from land surface modeling. Rev Geophys 35(4):413–437
Haurwitz B (1947) Comments on the sea-breeze circulation. J Meteorol 4(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1947)004<0001:COTSBC>2.0.CO;2
Hezaveh S, Bou-Zeid E (2018) Mean kinetic energy replenishment mechanisms in vertical-axis wind turbine farms. Phys Rev Fluids 3(9):094,606
Higgins CW, Pardyjak E, Froidevaux M, Simeonov V, Parlange MB (2013) Measured and estimated water vapor advection in the atmospheric surface layer. J Hydrometeorol 14(6):1966–1972. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-D-12-0166.1
Izett JG, Schilperoort B, Coenders-Gerrits M, Baas P, Bosveld FC, van de Wiel BJH (2019) Missing fog? On the potential of high-resolution observations of shallow fog. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 173:289–309
Kader B, Yaglom A (1990) Mean fields and fluctuation moments in unstably stratified turbulent boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 212:637–662
Kanani-Sühring F, Raasch S (2017) Enhanced scalar concentrations and fluxes in the lee of forest patches: a large-eddy simulation study. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 164(1):1–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0239-0
Kang SL (2009) Temporal oscillations in the convective boundary layer forced by mesoscale surface heat-flux variations. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 132(1):59–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-009-9391-5
Kang SL, Lenschow DH (2014) Temporal evolution of low-level winds induced by two-dimensional mesoscale surface heat-flux heterogeneity. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 151(3):501–529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-014-9912-8
Kastner-Klein P, Rotach MW (2004) Mean flow and turbulence characteristics in an urban roughness sublayer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111(1):55–84. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:BOUN.0000010994.32240.b1
Katul G (2019) The anatomy of large-scale motion in atmospheric boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 858:1–4
Katul G, Vidakovic B (1998) Identification of low-dimensional energy containing/flux transporting eddy motion in the atmospheric surface layer using wavelet thresholding methods. J Atmos Sci 55(3):377–389
Katul GG, Oren R, Manzoni S, Higgins C, Parlange MB (2012) Evapotranspiration: a process driving mass transport and energy exchange in the soil–plant–atmosphere–climate system. Rev Geophys 50(3):RG3002
Kenny WT, Bohrer G, Morin TH, Vogel CS, Matheny AM, Desai AR (2017) A numerical case study of the implications of secondary circulations to the interpretation of eddy-covariance measurements over small lakes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 165(2):311–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0268-8
Khvorostyanov VI, Curry JA, Gultepe I, Strawbridge K (2003) A springtime cloud over the beaufort sea polynya: three-dimensional simulation with explicit spectral microphysics and comparison with observations. J Geophys Res 108(D9):4296. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001JD001489
Kröniger K, Katul GG, De Roo F, Brugger P, Mauder M (2019) Aerodynamic resistance parameterization for heterogeneous surfaces using a covariance function approach in spectral space. J Atmos Sci 76(10):3191–3209
Li D, Bou-Zeid E (2013) Synergistic interactions between urban heat islands and heat waves: the impact in cities is larger than the sum of its parts. J Appl Meteorol Clim 52(9):2051–2064. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAMC-D-13-02.1
Li Q, Bou-Zeid E (2019) Contrasts between momentum and scalar transport over very rough surfaces. J Fluid Mech 880:32–58. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2019.687
Li D, Katul GG, Bou-Zeid E (2012) Mean velocity and temperature profiles in a sheared diabatic turbulent boundary layer. Phys Fluids 24(10):105105–105116. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4757660
Li D, Bou-Zeid E, Barlage M, Chen F, Smith JA (2013) Development and evaluation of a mosaic approach in the WRF-Noah framework. J Geophys Res Atmos 118(21):11918–11935. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013JD020657
Liang X, Miao S, Li J, Bornstein R, Zhang X, Gao Y, Chen F, Cao X, Cheng Z, Clements C, Dabberdt W, Ding A, Ding D, Dou JJ, Dou JX, Dou Y, Grimmond CSB, González-Cruz JE, He J, Huang M, Huang X, Ju S, Li Q, Niyogi D, Quan J, Sun J, Sun JZ, Yu M, Zhang J, Zhang Y, Zhao X, Zheng Z, Zhou M (2018) SURF: understanding and predicting urban convection and haze. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 99(7):1391–1413. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-16-0178.1
Lopes AS, Palma JMLM, Piomelli U (2015) On the determination of effective aerodynamic roughness of surfaces with vegetation patches. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 156(1):113–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-015-0022-z
Lüpkes C, Gryanik VM, Hartmann J, Andreas EL (2012) A parametrization, based on sea ice morphology, of the neutral atmospheric drag coefficients for weather prediction and climate models. J Geophys Res Atmos 117(D13):D13112. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012JD017630
Lüpkes C, Gryanik VM, Rösel A, Birnbaum G, Kaleschke L (2013) Effect of sea ice morphology during Arctic summer on atmospheric drag coefficients used in climate models. Geophys Res Lett 40(2):446–451. https://doi.org/10.1002/grl.50081
Mahrt L (2000) Surface heterogeneity and vertical structure of the boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 96(1–2):33–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1002482332477
Mahrt L (2017) Heat flux in the strong-wind nocturnal boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 163:161–177
Mahrt L, Bou-Zeid E (2020) Non-stationary boundary layers. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00533-w
Mahrt L, Thomas CK, Grachev AA, Persson POG (2018) Near-surface vertical flux divergence in the stable boundary layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 169:373–393
Margairaz F, Pardyjak ER, Calaf M (2020) Surface thermal heterogeneities and the atmospheric boundary layer: the relevance of dispersive fluxes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 175(3):369–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00509-w
Miller NE, Stoll R (2013) Surface heterogeneity effects on regional-scale fluxes in the stable boundary layer: aerodynamic roughness length transitions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 149(2):277–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-013-9839-5
Mironov DV, Sullivan PP (2016) Second-moment budgets and mixing intensity in the stably stratified atmospheric boundary layer over thermally heterogeneous surfaces. J Atmos Sci 73(1):449–464. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS-D-15-0075.1
Miyake M (1965) Transformation of the atmospheric boundary layer over inhomogeneous surfaces. University of Washington, Seattle, Tech rep
Momen M, Bou-Zeid E (2017) Mean and turbulence dynamics in unsteady Ekman boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 816:209–242. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2017.76
Omidvar H, Bou-Zeid E, Li Q, Mellado JP, Klein P (2020) Plume or bubble? Mixed-convection flow regimes and city-scale circulations. J Fluid Mech 897:A5. https://doi.org/10.1017/jfm.2020.360
Panofsky HA, Dutton JA (1984) Atmospheric turbulence: models and methods for engineering applications. Wiley, New York
Parlange MB, Brutsaert W (1989) Regional roughness of the landes forest and surface shear stress under neutral conditions. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00121783
Parlange MB, Brutsaert W (1993) Regional shear stress of broken forest from radiosonde wind profiles in the unstable surface layer. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 64(4):355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00711705
Parlange MB, Eichinger WE, Albertson JD (1995) Regional scale evaporation and the atmospheric boundary layer. Rev Geophys 33(1):99–124. https://doi.org/10.1029/94RG03112
Patton EG, Sullivan PP, Moeng CH (2005) The influence of idealized heterogeneity on wet and dry planetary boundary layers coupled to the land surface. J Atmos Sci 62(7):2078–2097. https://doi.org/10.1175/JAS3465.1
Pfister L, Sayde C, Selker J, Mahrt L, Thomas CK (2019) Classifying the nocturnal boundary layer into temperature and flow regimes. Q J R Meteorol Soc 145:1515–1534
Pitman A (2003) The evolution of, and revolution in, land surface schemes designed for climate models. Int J Climatol 23(5):479–510
Poggi D, Katul G (2008) The effect of canopy roughness density on the constitutive components of the dispersive stresses. Exp Fluids 45(1):111–121
Poggi D, Katul G, Albertson J (2004) A note on the contribution of dispersive fluxes to momentum transfer within canopies. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 111(3):615–621
Porson A, Steyn DG, Schayes G (2007a) Sea-breeze scaling from numerical model simulations, part II: interaction between the sea breeze and slope flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9092-2
Porson A, Steyn DG, Schayes G (2007b) Sea-breeze scaling from numerical model simulations, part II: interaction between the sea breeze and slope flows. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 122(1):31–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9092-2
Prandtl L (1952) Essentials of fluid dynamics. Blackie and Son, London
Prueger J, Alfieri J, Hipps L, Kustas W, Chavez J, Evett S, Anderson M, French A, Neale C, McKee L, Hatfield J, Howell T, Agam N (2012) Patch scale turbulence over dryland and irrigated surfaces in a semi-arid landscape under advective conditions during BEAREX08. Adv Water Resour 50:106–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.07.014
Raasch S, Harbusch G (2001) An analysis of secondary circulations and their effects caused by small-scale surface inhomogeneities using large-eddy simulation. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 101(1):31–59. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019297504109
Rao KS, Wyngaard JC, Coté OR (1974) Local advection of momentum, heat, and moisture in micrometeorology. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 7(3):331–348. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00240836
Reuder J, Jonassen M, Olafsson H (2012) The small unmanned meteorological observer SUMO: recent developments and applications of a micro-UAS for atmospheric boundary layer research. Acta Geophys 60:1454–1473
Rihani JF, Chow FK, Maxwell RM (2015) Isolating effects of terrain and soil moisture heterogeneity on the atmospheric boundary layer: idealized simulations to diagnose land-atmosphere feedbacks. J Adv Model Earth Syst 7(2):915–937. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014MS000371
Rotunno R (1983) On the linear theory of the land and sea breeze. J Atmos Sci 40(8):1999–2009. https://doi.org/10.1175/1520-0469(1983)040<1999:OTLTOT>2.0.CO;2
Ryu YH, Baik JJ, Han JY (2013) Daytime urban breeze circulation and its interaction with convective cells. Q J R Meteorol Soc 139(671):401–413. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.1973
Schalkwijk J, Jonker HJJ, Siebesma AP, Bosveld FC (2015) A year-long large-eddy simulation of the weather over cabauw: an overview. Mon Weather Rev 143(3):828–844. https://doi.org/10.1175/MWR-D-14-00293.1
Seth A, Giorgi F, Dickinson RE (1994) Simulating fluxes from heterogeneous land surfaces: explicit subgrid method employing the biosphere-atmosphere transfer scheme (BATS). J Geophys Res 99(D9):18651. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD01330
Shen S, Leclerc MY (1995) How large must surface inhomogeneities be before they influence the convective boundary layer structure? A case study. Q J R Meteorol Soc. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49712152603
Simó G, Cuxart J, Jiménez MA, Martínez-Villagrasa D, Picos R, López-Grifol A, Martí B (2019) Observed atmospheric and surface variability on heterogeneous terrain at the hectometer scale and related advective transports. J Geophys Res Atmos 124(16):9407–9422. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD030164
Sreenivasan K (1999) Fluid turbulence. Rev Mod Phys 71(2):S383
Steyn D (1998) Scaling the vertical structure of sea breezes. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 86(3):505–524. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1000743222389
Steyn DG (2003) Scaling the vertical structure of sea breezes revisited. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 107(1):177–188. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021568117280
Stoll R, Porté-Agel F (2009) Surface heterogeneity effects on regional-scale fluxes in stable boundary layers: surface temperature transitions. J Atmos Sci 66(2):412–431. https://doi.org/10.1175/2008JAS2668.1
Sutton WGL, Brunt D (1943) On the equation of diffusion in a turbulent medium. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 182(988):48–75. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1943.0023
Thomas CK, Kennedy A, Selker J, Moretti A, Schroth M, Smoot A, Tufillaro N (2012) High-resolution fibre-optic temperature sensing: a new tool to study the two-dimensional structure of atmospheric surface-layer flow. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 142:177–192
Timmermans WJ, Bertoldi G, Albertson JD, Olioso A, Su Z, Gieske ASM (2008) Accounting for atmospheric boundary layer variability on flux estimation from RS observations. Int J Remote Sens 29(17–18):5275–5290. https://doi.org/10.1080/01431160802036383
van Heerwaarden CC, Mellado JP, De Lozar A (2014) Scaling laws for the heterogeneously heated free convective boundary layer. J Atmos Sci 71(11):3975–4000. https://doi.org/10.1175/jas-d-13-0383.1
Wang W, Bruyère C, Duda M, Dudhia J, Gill D, Kavulich M, Werner K, Chen M, Lin HC, Michalakes J, Rizvi S, Zhang X, Berner J, Munoz-Esparza D, Reen B, Ha S, Fossell K (2019) Weather research andforecasting model—ARW Version 4 modeling system user’s guide. NCAR MMM, Boulder, CO, Tech rep
Wieringa J (1976) An objective exposure correction method for average wind speeds measured at a sheltered location. Q J R Meteorol Soc 102(431):241–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.49710243119
Willingham D, Anderson W, Christensen KT, Barros J (2013) Turbulent boundary layer flow over transverse aerodynamic roughness transitions: induced mixing and flow characterization. Phys Fluids 26:025111-1–025111-16
Wrenger B, Cuxart J (2017) Evening transition by a river sampled using a remotely-piloted multicopter. Boundary-Layer Meteorol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-017-0291-9
Wyngaard J (2004) Toward numerical modeling in the “terra incognita”. J Atmos Sci 61(14):1816–1826
Yang B, Morse AP, Shaw RH, Paw UKT (2006) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow across a forest edge. Part II: momentum and turbulent kinetic energy budgets. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 121(3):433–457. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-006-9083-3
Yeh GT, Brutsaert W (1971) A solution for simultaneous turbulent heat and vapor transfer between a water surface and the atmosphere. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 2(1):64–82
Zeeman MJ, Selker JS, Thomas C (2015) Near-surface motion in the nocturnal, stable boundary layer observed with fibre-optic distributed temperature sensing. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 154:189–205
Zhou L, Lin SJ, Chen JH, Harris LM, Chen X, Rees SL (2019) Toward convective-scale prediction within the next generation global prediction system. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 100(7):1225–1243. https://doi.org/10.1175/BAMS-D-17-0246.1
Zilitinkevich S, Mammarella M, Baklanov AA, Joffre SS (2008) The effect of stratification on the aerodynamic roughness length and displacement height. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 129:179–190
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank an anonymous reviewer whose comments helped the authors greatly in improving this review. E.B.Z. was supported by the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University and the Physical and Dynamic Meteorology Program of the National Science Foundation under AGS-1026636. G.K. acknowledges support from NSF-AGS-1644382 and NSF-IOS-1754893. Larry Mahrt was supported by Grant 1945587 from the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bou-Zeid, E., Anderson, W., Katul, G.G. et al. The Persistent Challenge of Surface Heterogeneity in Boundary-Layer Meteorology: A Review. Boundary-Layer Meteorol 177, 227–245 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00551-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10546-020-00551-8