Skip to main content
Log in

Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation

  • Published:
Biology & Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

August Weismann rejected the inheritance of acquired characters on the grounds that changes to the soma cannot produce the kind of changes to the germ-plasm that would result in the altered character being transmitted to subsequent generations. His intended distinction, between germ-plasm and soma, was closer to the modern distinction between genotype and phenotype than to the modern distinction between germ cells and somatic cells. Recently, systems of epigenetic inheritance have been claimed to make possible the inheritance of acquired characters. I argue that the sense in which these claims are true does not challenge fundamental tenets of neo-Darwinism. Epigenetic inheritance expands the range of options available to genes but evolutionary adaptation remains the product of natural selection of ‘random’ variation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bennett-Baker P.E., Wikowski J. and Burke D.T. (2003) Age-associated activation of epigenetically repressed genes in the mouse. Genetics 165:2055–2062

    Google Scholar 

  • Cubas P. (2004) Floral zygomorphy, the recurring evolution of a successful trait. BioEssays 26:1175–1184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cubas P., Vincent C. and Coen E. (1999) An epigenetic mutation responsible for natural variation in floral symmetry. Nature 401:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins R. (1987) The Blind Watchmaker. W. W. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett D.C. (1995) Darwin’s Dangerous Idea. Simon & Schuster, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • de Vries H. 1910. The mutation theory. Experiments and observations on the origin of species in the vegetable kingdom, Vol. II. The origin of varieties by mutation. (translated by J.B. Farmer and A.D. Darbishire). Open Court Publishing, Chicago

  • Gustafsson Å. (1979) Linnaeus’ Peloria: the history of a monster. Theor. Appl. Genet. 54:241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D. (1997) Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264:1657–1662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haig D. (2004) The (dual) origin of epigenetics. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 69:67–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E. and Lamb M.J. (1989) The inheritance of acquired epigenetic variations. J. Theoret. Biol. 139:69–83

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E. and Lamb M.J. (1995) Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution. The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka E. and Lamb M.J. (2002) The changing concept of epigenetics. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 981:82–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirschner M.W. and Gerhart J.C. 2005. The plausibility of life. Yale University Press, New Haven

  • Luo D., Carpenter R., Vincent C., Copsey L. and Coen E. (1996) Origin of floral asymmetry in Antirrhinum. Nature 383:794–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monk M. (1995) Epigenetic programming of differential gene expression in development and evolution. Dev. Genet. 17:188–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nanney D.L. (1958) Epigenetic control systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 44:712–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nutting C.C. (1892) What is an “acquired character?”. Am. Nat. 26:1009–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plass C. and Soloway P.D. (2002) DNA methylation, imprinting and cancer. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 10:6–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romanes G.J. (1888) Lamarckism versus Darwinism. Nature 38:413

    Google Scholar 

  • Spencer H. (1893) Professor Weismann’s theories. Contemp. Rev. 63:742–760

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger E. (1894) The periodic reduction of the number of the chromosomes in the life-history of living organisms. Ann. Bot. 8: 281–316

    Google Scholar 

  • Strasburger E. (1906) Typische und allotypische Kernteilung. Ergebnisse und Erörterungen. Jahrbücher für wissentschaftliche Botanik 42:1-71

    Google Scholar 

  • Tucker K.L., Beard C., Dausman J., Jackson-Grusby L., Laird P.W., Lei H., Li E. and Jaenisch R. (1996) Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of unimprinted genes. Genes Dev. 10:1008–1020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varmuza S. (2003a) Epigenetics and the renaissance of heresy. Genome 46:963–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varmuza S. (2003b) Reply to the comment by R. S. Singh on “Rehabilitation of Lamarck and Goldschmidt or renaissance of heresy”. Genome 46:973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1942a) The epigenotype. Endeavour 1:18–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1942b) Canalization of development and the inheritance of acquired characters. Nature 150:563–565

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1953) The Strategy of the Genes. George Allen & Unwin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1959) Canalization of development and genetic assimilation of acquired characters. Nature 183:1654–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waddington C.H. (1968) The evolutionary process. In: Lewontin R.C. (eds) Population biology and evolution. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, New York, pp. 37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Waterland R.A. and Jirtle R.L. (2003) Transposable elements: targets for early nutritional effects on epigenetic gene regulation. Mol. Cell. Biol. 23:5293–5300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A. (1891) Essays upon Heredity and Kindred Biological Problems, Vol. 1. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A. (1893) The all-sufficiency of natural selection. A reply to Herbert Spencer. Contemp. Rev. 64:309–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Weismann A. 1904. The Evolution Theory. Vol. I. (J.A. Thomson and M.R. Thomson, translators). Edward Arnold, London

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Haig.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haig, D. Weismann Rules! OK? Epigenetics and the Lamarckian temptation. Biol Philos 22, 415–428 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9033-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10539-006-9033-y

Keywords

Navigation