Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Scale-dependent effects of landscape pattern on plant diversity in Hunshandak Sandland

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biodiversity and Conservation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The influence of landscape pattern on plant diversity has strong scale-dependent effects. However, the relationship is still unclear for sandy land, which covers more than one-third of the world’s land mass. Aiming at exploring such scale-dependent effects in sandy land, we conducted a case study in Hunshandak Sandland, northern China. Principal component analysis (PCA) and Redundancy Analysis (RDA) was used to disentangle the relations between landscape pattern and alpha and beta plant diversity. Our results show that landscape pattern has an important influence on plant diversity, however, there existed scale effects. Landscape diversity enhanced the alpha diversity, conversely, reduced the beta diversity for all scales. PSSD (Patch Size Standard Deviation) positively related with alpha diversity whilst negatively related with beta diversity on moderate and large spatial scales, same as LPI (Largest Patch Index) on moderate scales. Shape complexity of patches can slightly increase both alpha and beta diversity at large scales. The adjustment of landscape pattern based on different spatial scales can enhance plant diversity. It is useful to improve plant diversity conservation in sandy land.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alignier A, Baudry J (2016) Is plant temporal beta diversity of field margins related to changes in management practices? Acta Oecol 75:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amici V, Rocchini D, Filibeck G et al (2015) Landscape structure effects on forest plant diversity at local scale: exploring the role of spatial extent. Ecol Complex 21:44–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Massada A, Radeloff VC (2012) Complex effects of scale on the relationships of landscape pattern versus avian species richness and community structure in a woodland savanna mosaic. Ecography 35(5):393–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beever E, Swihart R, Bestelmeyer B (2006) Linking the concept of scale to studies of biological diversity: evolving approaches and tools. Divers Distrib 12(3):229–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennie J, Anderson K, Wetherelt A (2011) Measuring biodiversity across spatial scales in a raised bog using a novel paired-sample diversity index. J Ecol 99(2):482–490

    Google Scholar 

  • Doreen G, Carsten T, Teja T (2005) Local diversity of arable weeds increases with landscape complexity. Perspect Plant Eco Evol Syst 7:85–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel D, Roschewitz I, Tscharntke T et al (2006) Beta diversity at different spatial scales: plant communities in organic and conventional agriculture. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Gering JC, Crist TO (2002) The alpha-beta-regional relationship: providing new insights into local-regional patterns of species richness and scale dependence of diversity components. Ecol Lett 5:433–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He G, Liu HY (2014) Vegetation evolution and its relationship with sand activities in Hebei Bashang region and Hunshandak Sandland vegetation. Acta Sci Nat Univ Pekin 40(4):669–675 (JCR Sci Ed)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess GR, Bartel RA, Leidner AK, Rosenfeld KM, Rubino MJ, Snider SB et al (2006) Effectiveness of biodiversity indicators varies with extent, grain, and region. Biol Conserv 132(4):448–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horak J, Peltanova A, Podavkova A et al (2013) Biodiversity responses to land use in traditional fruit orchards of a rural agricultural landscape. Agric Ecosyst Environ 178(9):71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janišová M, Michalcová D, Bacaro G et al (2014) Landscape effects on diversity of semi-natural grasslands. Agric Ecosyst Environ 182:47–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepš J, Šmilauer P (2003) Multivariate Analysis of Ecological Data using CANOCO. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • López-Martínez JO, Hernández-Stefanoni JL, Dupuy JM et al (2012) Partitioning the variation of woody plant β-diversity in a landscape of secondary tropical dry forests across spatial scales. J Veg Sci 24(1):33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magurran AE (2004) Measuring biological diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Malavasi M, Conti L, Carboni M et al (2016) Multifaceted analysis of patch-level plant diversity in response to landscape spatial pattern and history on Mediterranean dunes. Ecosystems 5:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Markham B, Storey J, Morfitt R (2015) Landsat-8 sensor characterization and calibration. Remote Sens 7(3):2279–2282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGarigal K, Cushman SA, Neel MC (2002) FRAGSTATS: Spatial pattern analysis program for categorical maps. Computer software program produced by the authors at the University of Massachusetts Amherst. http://www.umass.edu/landeco/index.html

  • Mi K (2015) Effects of urbanization on plant diversity and spatial structure optimization research—Shunyi District of Beijing as an example. MS Thesis of Minzu University of China, Beijing

  • Monteiro AT, Fava F, Gonçalves et al (2013) Landscape context determinants to plant diversity in the permanent meadows of southern European Alps. Biodivers Conserv 22(4):937–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morelli F, Pruscini F, Santolini et al (2013) Landscape heterogeneity metrics as indicators of bird diversity: determining the optimal spatial scales in different landscapes. Ecol Indic 34(6):372–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peng Y, Jiang GM, Li YG, Niu SL, Liu MZ, Gao LM (2007) Photosynthesis, transpiration and water use efficiency of four typical grass along the gradient of grazing intensity in Hunshandak Sandland, China. J Arid Environ 70(2):304–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitalu T, Purschke O, Johansson LJ (2012) Responses of grassland species richness to local and landscape factors depend on spatial scale and habitat specialization. J Veg Sci 23(1):41–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler S, Wehrden HV, Poirazidis K et al (2013) Multiscale performance of landscape metrics as indicators of species richness of plants, insects and vertebrates. Ecol Indic 31(1):41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schindler S, Wehrden HV, Poirazidis K et al (2014) Performance of methods to select landscape metrics for modeling species richness. Ecol Model 295:107–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sork VL, Smouse PE (2006) Genetic analysis of landscape connectivity in tree population. Landsc Ecol 21(6):821–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steffan-Dewenter I, Münzenberg U, Bürger C et al (2008) Scale-dependent effects of landscape context on three pollinator guilds. Ecology 83(5):1421–1432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Torras O, Gil-tena A, Saura S (2008) How does forest landscape structure explain tree species richness in a Mediterranean context? Biodivers Conserv 17(5):1227–1240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turtureanu PD, Palpurina S, Becker T et al (2014) Scale- and taxon-dependent biodiversity patterns of dry grassland vegetation in Transylvania. Agric Ecosyst Environ 182(4):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U (2011) Landscape structure, landscape metrics and biodiversity. Living Rev Landsc Res 5:5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U (2015) Indicators to monitor the structural diversity of landscapes. Ecol Model 295:88–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walz U, Syrbe RU (2013) Linking landscape structure and biodiversity. Ecol Indic 31(8):1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang N (2016) Grassland animal husbandry production relation with climate in Hunshandak Sandlandy—With Blue Flag as an example. PhD Thesis of Inner Mongolia Normal University, China

  • Wu J, Hobbs R (2002) Key issues and research priorities in landscape ecology: an idiosyncratic synthesis. Landsc Ecol 17:355–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang J (2010) The study of the relationship between pattern of elm distribution in Hunshandak Sandland and the climate and groundwater. PhD Thesis of Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, China

  • Zhang Y, Wang TW, Cai CF et al (2016) Landscape pattern and transition under natural and anthropogenic disturbance in an arid region of northwestern China. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinform 44:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was financially supported by the 111 Program of the Bureau of China Foreign Experts and the Ministry of Education (2008-B08044); the Top Discipline and First-class University Constriction Project (ydzxxk201618) of Minzu University of China; the 985 Project (MUC98504-14, MUC98507-8) of Minzu University of China.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu Peng.

Additional information

Communicated by Daniel Sanchez Mata.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fan, M., Wang, Q., Mi, K. et al. Scale-dependent effects of landscape pattern on plant diversity in Hunshandak Sandland. Biodivers Conserv 26, 2169–2185 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1351-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10531-017-1351-7

Keywords

Navigation