Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Fecundity for free? Enhanced oviposition in longevous populations of Drosophila melanogaster

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Biogerontology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Artificial selection for increased life span in experimental populations of Drosophila melanogaster sometimes produces long-lived populations that exhibit greater fecundity than unselected controls. The absence of a trade-off between survival and reproduction in these cases might be an artefact of the rich diet of typical lab culture; if nutritional resources are not limiting then there may be no need to trade off. Here I test the rich diet hypothesis by estimating genetic correlations between survival and age-specific fecundity in three nutritional environments. Experimental material consists of 58 recombinant inbred lines derived from an artificial selection experiment. Reducing the yeast content of medium causes substantial reductions in fecundity but does not alter patterns of genetic correlation. The correlation between life span and early fecundity is non-significant in all environments, while the life span correlations with mid-life fecundity are positive and statistically significant in all environments. The rich diet hypothesis is rejected. Qualitative features of fecundity trajectories are conserved across environments, with long-lived lines exhibiting a secondary peak of oviposition in mid-life. The micro-evolution of extended life span is not a monolithic process and does not necessarily involve direct trade-offs between survival and reproduction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arking R (2003) Aging: a biological perspective: a variety of techniques extend the lives of model organisms, and similar approaches might help human beings stay healthy longer. Am Sci 91:508–515

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arking R, Buck S, Novoseltsev VN, Hwangbo D-S, Lane M (2002) Genomic plasticity, energy allocations, and the extended longevity phenotypes of Drosophila. Ageing Res. Rev 1:209–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bubliy OA, Loeschcke V (2005) Correlated responses to selection for stress resistance and longevity in a laboratory population of Drosophila melanogaster. J Evol Biol 18:789–803

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtsinger JW, Khazaeli AA (2002) Life span, QTLs, age-specificity, and pleiotropy in Drosophila. Mech Ageing Dev 123:81–93

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtsinger AA, Khazaeli JW (2010) Life history variation in an artificially selected population of Drosophila melanogaster: pleiotropy, superflies, and age-specific adaptation. Evolution 64:3409–3416

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Curtsinger JW, Fukui HH, Khazaeli AA, Kirscher A, Pletcher SD, Promislow DEL, Tatar M (1995) Genetic variation and aging. Annu Rev Genet 29:553–575

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond-Barbosa D, Spradling AC (2001) Stem cell and their progeny respond to nutritional changes during Drosophila oogenesis. Dev Biol 231:265–278

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gasser M, Kaiser M, Berrigan D, Stearns SC (2000) Life-history correlates of evolution under high and low adult mortality. Evolution 54:1260–1272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Helle S (2018) Search for a resource-based trade-off between lifetime reproductive effort and women’s postreproductive survival in preindustrial Sweden. J Gerontol Biol Sci. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW (2013) Pleiotropy and life history evolution in Drosophila melanogaster: uncoupling life span and early fecundity. J Gerontol Biol Sci 68:546–553

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Leroi AM, Chippindale AK, Rose MR (1994a) Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 1. The role of genotype-by- environment interaction. Evolution 48:1244–1257

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Leroi AM, Chen WR, Rose MR (1994b) Long-term laboratory evolution of a genetic life-history trade-off in Drosophila melanogaster. 2. Stability of genetic correlations. Evolution 48:1258–1268

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS, Clare MJ (1985) Selection for life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 55:9–18

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS, Clare MJ (1987) Successful selection for increased longevity in Drosophila: analysis of the survival data and presentation of a hypothesis on the genetic regulation of longevity. Exp Gerontol 22:221–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luckinbill LS, Arking R, Clare MJ, Cirocco WC, Buck SA (1984) Selection for delayed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:996–1003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Moghadam NN, Holmstrup M, Manenti T, Mouridsen MB, Pertoldi C, Loeschcke V (2015) The role of storage lipids in the relation between fecundity, locomotor activity, and life span of Drosophila melanogaster longevity-selected and control lines. PLoS ONE 10:e0130334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Fowler K (1992) Direct and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 46:76–91

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Partridge L, Prowse N, Pignatelli P (1999) Another set of responses and correlated responses to selection on age at reproduction in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 266:255–261

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Promislow DEL, Tatar M, Khazaeli AA, Curtsinger JW (1996) Age-specific patterns of genetic variation in Drosophila melanogaster I. Mortality. Genetics 143:839–848

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Rose MR (1984) Laboratory evolution of postponed senescence in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 38:1004–1010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz MB, Kelly TJ, Imberski RB, Rubenstein EC (1985) The effects of nutrition and methoprene treatment on ovarian ecdysteriod synthesis in Drosophila melanogaster. J Insect Physiol 31:947–957

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Stearns SC, Ackermann M, Doebeli M, Kaiser M (2000) Experimental evolution of aging, growth, and reproduction in fruitflies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:3309–3313

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vermeulen CJ, Bijlsma R (2006) Changes in genetic architecture during relaxation in Drosophila melanogaster selected on divergent virgin life span. J Evol Biol 19:216–227

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wit J, Sarup P, Lupsa N, Malte H, Frydenberg J, Loeschcke V (2013) Longevity for free? Increased reproduction with limited trade-offs in Drosophila melanogaster selected for increased life span. Exp Gerontol 48:349–357

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zwaan BJ, Bijlsma R, Hoekstra RE (1995) Direct selection on life span in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 49:649–659

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I thank A. Khazaeli (University of Minnesota) for technical assistance and for comments on an early draft of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Ecology, Evolution, & Behavior, University of Minnesota Twin Cities, 1987 Upper Buford Circle, St. Paul, MN, 55108, USA

    James W. Curtsinger

Authors
  1. James W. Curtsinger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James W. Curtsinger.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author claims no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 61 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Curtsinger, J.W. Fecundity for free? Enhanced oviposition in longevous populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Biogerontology 20, 397–404 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-09791-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10522-018-09791-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation