Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Seismicity parameters for important urban agglomerations in India

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

India’s urban population has increased in the recent times. An earthquake near an urban agglomeration has the potential to cause severe damage. In this article, seismicity parameters for region surrounding important urban agglomerations in India are estimated. A comprehensive earthquake catalogue for the region (6°E–42°E latitude and 60°N–100°N longitude) including historic and pre-historic events has been compiled from various sources. To estimate the parameters, past earthquake data in a control region of radius 300 km has been assembled to quantify the seismicity around each urban agglomeration. The collected earthquake data is first evaluated for its completeness. From combined (historical and instrumental) data, the seismicity parameters b-value, seismic activity rate, λ and maximum expected magnitude (m max ) have been obtained from the methodology proposed by Kijko and Graham (1998). The obtained activity rates indicate that region surrounding Guwahati urban agglomeration is the most seismically active region followed by Srinagar, Patna, Amritsar and Chandigarh.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambraseys N, Bilham R (2009) The tectonic setting of Bamiyan and seismicity in and near Afghanistan for the past twelve centuries. In: Claudio Margottini (ed) UNESCO Special Publication: The Destruction of the Giant Buddha Statues in Bamiyan, Central Afghanistan, UNESCO’s emergency activities for the recovering and rehabilitation of cliff and niches. ISBN 978-448-0375-5

  • Ambraseys N, Jackson D (2003) A note on early earthquakes in northern India and southern Tibet. Curr Sci 84(4): 570–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Balakrishnan TS, Unnikrishnan P, Murthy AVS (2009) The tectonic map of India and contiguous areas. J Geol Soc India 74: 158–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bapat A, Kulkarni RC, Guha SK (1983) Catalogue of earthquakes in India and neighbourhood from historical period up to 1799. Indian Soc Earthq Technol, 211 pp

  • Bilham R (2009) The seismic future of cities. Bull Earthq Eng 7: 839–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bilham R, Gaur VK, Molnar P (2001) Himalayan seismic hazard. Science 293: 1442–1444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1992) Seismotectonics of Himalaya. Curr Sci 62(1–2): 40–71

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1977) Earthquakes of Peninsular India—a seismotectonic study. Bull Seism Soc Am 67(5): 1387–1413

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra U (1978) Seismicity, earthquake mechanisms and tectonics along the Himalayan mountain range and vicinity. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 16(2): 109–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornell CA (1968) Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seism Soc Am 58: 1583–1601

    Google Scholar 

  • de Montessus de Ballore MF (1896) Seismic phenomena in the British Empire. Q J Geol Soc Lond 52: 651–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field DH, Jackson DD, Dolan JF (1999) A mutually consistent seismic-hazard source model for Southern California. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89: 559–578

    Google Scholar 

  • Gansser A (1974) Data for orgenic studies: Himalaya. In: Spencer AM (ed) Mesozoic-Cenzoic Origenic belts. Geological Society, London, pp 267–278

    Google Scholar 

  • Giardini G, Wiemer S, Fäh D, Deichmann N (2004) Seismic hazard assessment of Switzerland, Publication series of the Swiss seismological service. ETH Zürich, 91 pp

  • Gardner JK, Knopoff L (1974) Is the sequence of earthquakes in Southern California, with aftershocks removed, Poissonian?. Bull Seism Soc Am 64: 1363–1367

    Google Scholar 

  • GSI: (2000) Seismo tectonic Atlas of India and its Environs. Geological Survey of India, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Guha SK, Basu (1993) Catalogue of earthquakes (> 3.0) in Peninsular India. AERB Technical Document No. TD/CSE-1, pp 1–70

  • Guha SK, Gosavi PD, Varma MM, Agarwal SP, Padale, JG, Marwadi SC (1968) Recent seismic disturbances in the Shivaj isagar Lake area of the Koyna hydroelectric project, Maharashtra, India. Comprehensive report up to June 1969, Central Water and Power Research Station, Poona-24, India

  • Gupta ID (2006) Delineation of probable seismic sources in India and neighbourhood by a comprehensive analysis of seismotectonic characteristics of the region. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 26: 766–790

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Idriss IM (1985) Evaluating seismic risk in engineering practice. In: Proceedings of the 11th international conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, San Francisco, vol 1, pp 255–320

  • IS 1893: (2002) Indian standard, criteria for earthquake resistance design of structures, Fifth revision, Part-I. (Part I) Bureau of Indian Standard, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar RN, Ghosh S (2004) Microzonation of earthquake hazard in greater Delhi area. Curr Sci 87: 1193–1202

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar RN, Sharma D, Siddiqui JM (1999) Earthquake History of India in medieval times. Indian J History Sci 34(3)

  • Jaiswal K, Sinha R (2007) Probabilistic seismic-hazard estimation for Peninsular India. Bull Seism Soc Am 91(1B): 318–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaila KL, Gaur VK, Harinarayana (1972) Quantitative seismicity maps of India. Bull Seism Soc Am 62: 1119–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Khattri KN (1987) Great earthquakes, seismicity gaps and potential for earthquake disaster along the Himalaya plate boundary. Tectonophysics 138: 79–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A, Graham G (1998) Parametric-historic procedure for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: Part I. Estimation of maximum regional magnitude M max. Pure Appl Geophys 152: 413–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kijko A (2004) Estimation of the maximum earthquake magnitude M max. Pure Appl Geophys 161: 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopoff L, Kagan Y (1977) Analysis of the theory of extremes as applied to earthquake problems. J Geophys Res 82: 5647–5657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar S, Wesnousky SG, Rockwell TK, Ragona D, Thakur VC, Seitz GG (2001) Earthquake recurrence and rupture dynamics of Himalayan Frontal Thrust, India. Science 294(5550): 2328–2331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahiri AK, Sen TK, Rao KR, Jena PR (2001) Economic consequences of Gujarat earthquake. Econ Polit Weekly 36(16): 1319–1332

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave J, Yule D, Sapkota S, Basant K, Madden C, Attal M, Pandey R (2005) Evidence for a Great Medieval Earthquake (~1100 A.D.) in the Central Himalayas, Nepal. Science 307: 1302–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik JN, Mathew G (2005) Evidence of Paleoearthquakes from trench investigations across Pinjore Garden fault in Pinjore Dun, NW Himalaya. J Earth Syst Sci 114(4): 387–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCalpin J (2009) Paleoseismology, Volume 95 of International geophysics series, 2nd edn. Academic press, 613 pp

  • Milne J (1911) A catalogue of destructive earthquakes–A.D. 7 to A.D. 1899, Brit. Assoc Advan Sci Rep, Portsmouth meeting, 1911, Appendix No. 1, pp 649–740

  • Mulargia F, Tinti S (1985) Seismic sample areas defined from incomplete catalogues: An application to the Italian territory. Phys Earth Planet Interiors 40: 273–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NHUD (2007) National urban housing and habitat policy. Government of India Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham T (1883) A catalogue of Indian earthquakes from the earliest times to the end of 1869 A.D. Mem Geol Surv India. XIX, Part. 3

  • PMD: (2007) Seismic hazard analysis and zonation for Pakistan, Azad Jammu and Kashmir. Pakistan Meteorological department, Pakistan

    Google Scholar 

  • Quittmeyer RC, Jacob KH (1979) Historical and modern seismicity of Pakistan, Afghanistan, North Western India and South eastern Iran. Bull Seism Soc Am 69: 773–823

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG (2010) Seismicity parameters for India. Seismol Res Lett 81(2): 207–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Iyengar RN (2006) Seismic hazard estimation of Mumbai city. Curr Sci 92(11): 1486–1494

    Google Scholar 

  • Raghukanth STG, Iyengar RN (2007) Estimation of seismic spectral acceleration in peninsular India. J Earth Syst Sci 116(3): 199–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran CP, Rajendran K, Duarah BP, Baruah S, Earnest S (2004) Interpreting the style of faulting and paleoseismicity associated with the 1897 Shillong northeast India, earthquake: implications for regional tectonism. Tectonics. doi:10.1029/2003TC001605

  • Rajendran K, Rajendran CP, Earnest A, Ravi Prasad GV, Dutta K (2008) Assessing the previous activity at the source zone of the 2001 Bhuj earthquake. J Geophys Res, doi:10.1029/2004JB003309

  • Rao BR (2005) Monograph on history of Indian earthquakes from earliest to 2005. http://seisinfo-india.org/seismocity.html

  • Rao BR, Rao PS (1984) Historical seismicity of Peninsular India. Bull Seism Soc Am 74(6): 2519–2533

    Google Scholar 

  • Reasenberg P (1985) Second-order moment of central California seismicity, 1969-1982. J Geophys Res 90: 5479–5495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L, Armbruster J (1981) Great detachment earthquakes along the Himalayan arc and longterm forecasts. In: Simpson D, Richards M (eds) Earthquake prediction. Am. Geophys, vol 4, Ewing Series. Union, Washington, DC, pp 259–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Seeber L, Armbruster JG, Jacob KH (1999) Probabilistic Assessment of Seismic Hazard for Maharashtra, Government of Maharashtra, Unpublished Report

  • Shanker D, Sharma ML (1998) Estimation of seismic hazard parameters for the Himalayas and its vicinity from complete data files. Pure Appl Geophys 152: 267–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh SK, Garcıa D, Pacheco JF, Valenzuela R, Bansal BK, Dattatrayam RS (2004) Q of the Indian shield. Bull Seism Soc Am 94(4): 1564–1570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stepp JC (1972) Analysis of completeness of the earthquake sample in the Puget sound area and its effect on statistical estimates of earthquake hazard. In: International conference on microzonation, vol II, pp 897–909

  • Sukhija BS, Rao MN, Reddy DV, Nagabhushanam P, Hussain S, Chadha RK, Gupta HK (1999) Paleoliquefaction evidence and periodicity of large prehistoric earthquakes in Shillong Plateau, India. Earth Planet Sci Lett 167: 269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tandon AN, Chaudhury HM (1968) Koyna earthquake of December, 1967, India Meteorol. Dept., Scientific Report No. 59

  • Turner HH (1911) Seismological investigations, XII. Seismic activity, 1899–1903 inclusive, Brit Assoc Advan Sci., 16th Rept., pp 57–65

  • Uhrhammer R (1986) Characteristics of northern and southern California seismicity. Earthq Notes 57: 21

    Google Scholar 

  • USNRC (1997) Regulatory guide 1.165: Identification and characterization of seismic sources and determination of safe shutdown earthquake ground motion. Report No. DG-1032(RG 1.165), USA

  • Valdiya KS (1976) Himalayan transverse faults and folds and their parallelism with subsurface structures of north Indian Plains. Tectonophysics 32: 353–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wenzel F, Bendimerad F, Sinha R (2007) Megacities-megarisks. Nat Hazards 42(3): 481–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiemer S, Wyss M (2000) Minimum magnitude of complete reporting in earthquake catalogs: examples from Alaska, the Western United States, and Japan. Bull Seism Soc Am 90: 859–869

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, IIT Madras, Chennai, India

    S. T. G. Raghukanth

Authors
  1. S. T. G. Raghukanth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. T. G. Raghukanth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raghukanth, S.T.G. Seismicity parameters for important urban agglomerations in India. Bull Earthquake Eng 9, 1361–1386 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9265-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-011-9265-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation