Skip to main content
Log in

Challenges for a Pragmatic Philosophy of New Technologies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Axiomathes Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An epistemology mainly oriented at a philosophical discussion of natural sciences and technology is sketched out on the basis of the author’s “methodological scheme-interpretationism” combining a realistic and a perspectival pragmatic approach. - In the main part, 12 characteristic features of the New Technologies are presented and discussed as, e.g., operationalization, computerization, models and modularity, virtuality and artificiality, interdisciplinary interaction, comprehensive and complex systems, telematization and remote control, robotics and AI technology and automatization as well as “socio-eco-techno-systems”, technology-driven globalization and the respective problems of individual and social responsibility. - Also, actual trends are listed and future tasks for the international ecological cooperation of states, UN and UNESCO bodies under urgent guidelines of humanitarian values and “practical/concrete humanity” are recommended.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The “technicalization”, “technification”, or “technologisation” of the virtual and of “virtual worlds” is a very noticeable fact everywhere in highly industrialized media & technology systems and in information and communication technologies we all now use and more or less “live by”. There is the problem of gaining a "secondary reality" of information systems, e.g., most notably the Internet and other information and electronic systems technologies impinging more and more even on economic and political as well as "real life" decisions. In particular, real-time and online decisions have nowadays worldwide impact on this planet (see stock rates) as well as economic and social reverberations.

  2. I am not denying thereby the extant phenomena of degradation and decay in information storage via electronic systems, but I claim that very complex information systems take on a quasi-life of their own insofar as no individual person or programmer can survey any more all the developments of a very complex distributed net functioning by co-operation and via all or, rather, practically innumerable parallel influences of millions of interactive users and programmers.

  3. Just recently in August 2018 I had the privilege to deliver an invited “endowed lecture” (IbnRoshd Lecture) at the 24th World Congress of Philosophy (overall theme: Learning to be Human) in Beijing under the title “Ancient and Modern Practical Ethics of Humanity: Concrete Humanity from Mencius to Schweitzer” (cf. Lenk 2019).

References

  • Clarke RA, Knake RK (2010) Cyber war. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • French PA (1984) Collective and corporate responsibility. Philpapers, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ISI (Fraunhofer-Inst.) (1998) (Ed., red.: Cuhls K, K Blind, Grupp H). Delphi ‘98: Studie zur globalen Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik. 2 vol, Karlsruhe

  • Lenk H (1971) Philosophie im technologischen Zeitalter. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart (2nd ed. 1972)

  • Lenk H (ed) (1973) Technokratie als ideologie. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1982) Zur Sozialphilosophie der Technik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (ed) (1991) Wissenschaft und Ethik. Reclam, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1992) Zwischen Wissenschaft und Ethik. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1994) Macht und Machbarkeit der Technik. Reclam, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (1998) Konkrete Humanität. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2003a) Grasping reality. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2003b) Responsibility and risk minimization. Human Factors Ergonom Manuf 13:203–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2003c) Values as standardized interpretative constructs. In: McBride WL (ed) The idea of values. Charlottesville, VI, Philos. Doc. Ctr., pp 85–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2005) Recognizing the structural features of new technologies. In: Mitcham 2005, vol. 1

  • Lenk H (2007) Global technoscience and responsibility. LIT, Berlin–Muenster

  • Lenk H (2015) Human-soziale Verantwortung. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2017) Scheme dynamics. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2018) Human zwischen Öko-Ethik und Ökonomik. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H (2019) Not a long way to concrete humanity?. Projektverlag, Bochum-Freiburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenk H, Maring M (eds) (2001) Advances and problems in the philosophy of technology. LIT, Muenster. (Also: E Agazzi, Lenk H (eds) 1998: Advances in the philosophy of technology. Newark, DE 1999, in: Techne 4 (1998), no. 1; Philosophy & Technology 4, no. 2)

  • Lenk H, Ropohl G (eds) (1987) Technik und Ethik. Stuttgart: Reclam (2nd ed., 1993)

  • Margashak Y et al (eds) (2009) Silicon versus carbon. Springer, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Maring M (2001) Kollektive und korporative Verantwortung. LIT, Münster

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitcham C (ed) (2005) Encyclopedia of science, technology, and ethics. Detroit (2nd Ed. with JB Holbrook: Ethics, Science, Technology, and Engineering. 4 vols. Farmington Hills, MI: Gale, 2015)

  • Ropohl G (1996) Ethik und Technikbewertung. Suhrkamp, Frankfurt/M

    Google Scholar 

  • Unger SH (1982) Controlling technology. Wiley, New York 1982 (2nd ed., 1994)

  • VDI (Verein Deutscher Ingenieure) (ed) (1991) Technikbewertung: Begriffe und Grundlagen. VDI-Richtlinie No. 3780. Düsseldorf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hans Lenk.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lenk, H. Challenges for a Pragmatic Philosophy of New Technologies. Axiomathes 30, 649–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09456-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10516-019-09456-9

Keywords

Navigation