The conditions for using the SMA method based on foreign databases on seismic classification are examined. In contrast to the initial SMA methodology a modified approach does not presume rejection of computationalexperimental evaluation of seismic safety under real conditions. However, the methodology presented examines the possibility of validated reduction of work, including rejection of computational-experimental checking when using the domestic database now under development. Evaluations of the seismic safety margin are used in the validation of service life extension for NPP, reexamination of safety, and probability analysis of safety as well as in establishing the technical specifications for equipment, modernization and reconstruction, and improving safety.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Seismic Safety Assessment of Existing Nuclear Facilities, Manual No. NS-G-2.13, IAEA Safety Series, IAEA, Vienna (2014).
Seismic Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Power Plant, Safety Rep. Ser. No. 28, IAEA, Vienna (2003).
P. S. Kaznovskii, A. P. Kaznovskii, E. S. Saakov, and S. I. Ryasnyi, “Confirmation of the seismic resistance of NPP equipment after assembly,” Elektr. Stantsii, No. 12, 2–6 (2012).
A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin (Rev. 1), EPRI NP-6041-SL, Project 2722–23, Final Report (1991).
Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Rev. 3A, Washington (2001).
E. S. Saakov, S. I. Ryasnyi, P. S. Kaznovskii, et al., “Comparative analysis of foreign and Russian methodologies for assessing the seismic resistance of NPP equipment,” At. Énerg., 115, No. 6, 309–317 (2013).
Earthquake Experience and Seismic Qualification by Indirect Methods in Nuclear Installations, TECDOC 1333, IAEA, Vienna (2003).
A. N. Anan’ev, P. S. Kaznovskii, S. P. Kaznovskii, et al., Seimic Safety of Nuclear Power Plants, Izd. MGTU Baumana, Moscow (2011).
E. S. Saakov, S. I. Ryasnyi, I. I. Zaikin, et al., “Increase of the efficiency of computational and experimental assessment of the seismic safety of NPP equipment using a database,” At. Énerg., 118, No. 3, 137–141 (2015).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 83–90, February, 2016.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saakov, E.S., Ryasnyi, S.I., Kaznovskii, P.S. et al. Seismic Margin Assessment Methodology for NPP Buildings, Structures, and Equipment. At Energy 120, 105–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0103-1
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0103-1