Skip to main content
Log in

Seismic Margin Assessment Methodology for NPP Buildings, Structures, and Equipment

  • Published:
Atomic Energy Aims and scope

The conditions for using the SMA method based on foreign databases on seismic classification are examined. In contrast to the initial SMA methodology a modified approach does not presume rejection of computationalexperimental evaluation of seismic safety under real conditions. However, the methodology presented examines the possibility of validated reduction of work, including rejection of computational-experimental checking when using the domestic database now under development. Evaluations of the seismic safety margin are used in the validation of service life extension for NPP, reexamination of safety, and probability analysis of safety as well as in establishing the technical specifications for equipment, modernization and reconstruction, and improving safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Seismic Safety Assessment of Existing Nuclear Facilities, Manual No. NS-G-2.13, IAEA Safety Series, IAEA, Vienna (2014).

  2. Seismic Evaluation of Existing Nuclear Power Plant, Safety Rep. Ser. No. 28, IAEA, Vienna (2003).

  3. P. S. Kaznovskii, A. P. Kaznovskii, E. S. Saakov, and S. I. Ryasnyi, “Confirmation of the seismic resistance of NPP equipment after assembly,” Elektr. Stantsii, No. 12, 2–6 (2012).

  4. A Methodology for Assessment of Nuclear Power Plant Seismic Margin (Rev. 1), EPRI NP-6041-SL, Project 2722–23, Final Report (1991).

  5. Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Power Plant Equipment, Rev. 3A, Washington (2001).

  6. E. S. Saakov, S. I. Ryasnyi, P. S. Kaznovskii, et al., “Comparative analysis of foreign and Russian methodologies for assessing the seismic resistance of NPP equipment,” At. Énerg., 115, No. 6, 309–317 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Earthquake Experience and Seismic Qualification by Indirect Methods in Nuclear Installations, TECDOC 1333, IAEA, Vienna (2003).

  8. A. N. Anan’ev, P. S. Kaznovskii, S. P. Kaznovskii, et al., Seimic Safety of Nuclear Power Plants, Izd. MGTU Baumana, Moscow (2011).

  9. E. S. Saakov, S. I. Ryasnyi, I. I. Zaikin, et al., “Increase of the efficiency of computational and experimental assessment of the seismic safety of NPP equipment using a database,” At. Énerg., 118, No. 3, 137–141 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Translated from Atomnaya Énergiya, Vol. 120, No. 2, pp. 83–90, February, 2016.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saakov, E.S., Ryasnyi, S.I., Kaznovskii, P.S. et al. Seismic Margin Assessment Methodology for NPP Buildings, Structures, and Equipment. At Energy 120, 105–111 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0103-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-016-0103-1

Navigation