Abstract
This article examines the network of public archives and private sector organizations engaged in the work of digitizing historical records. Specifically, it focuses on the recent expansion of public–private partnerships involving US state and territorial archives and their effects on citizens’ access to digitized materials. Despite this expansion in the reach of partnerships, research investigating this phenomenon has not kept pace. Here, I present interview and documentary data gathered from government archivists and private sector employees from companies such as Ancestry.com, FamilySearch, and ProQuest. The results explain the processes by which these relationships form and function as well as how they affect access to records. Of particular importance are the ways in which private companies’ priorities drive the selection of records for digitization in these partnerships and how a changing access paradigm, whereby users search for records on third-party platforms, threatens to alienate government archival records from their provenance. This project is the first comprehensive study of public–private partnerships involving state and territorial archives in the USA and serves as the basis for future work.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All interviews were anonymized. Private sector interview participants are indicated by the abbreviation PRI before their interview number, while public sector participants are indicated by PUB.
References
About NHPRC (2013) [US government website]. http://www.archives.gov/nhprc/about/. Accessed 9 July 2016
Astle PJ, Muir A (2002) Digitization and preservation in public libraries and archives. J Librariansh Inf Sci 34(2):67–79. doi:10.1177/096100060203400202
Baker K (1997) The business of government and the future of government archives. Am Arch 60(2):234–252
Benson EE (2008) The National Archives and private partnerships: a new trend for the digital age? DttP Doc People 36(4):29–32
Bishoff L, Allen N (2004) Business planning for cultural heritage institutions. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, no. 124, p 64. http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract/reports/pub124. Accessed 9 July 2016
Bray P, Chan S, Dalton J, Dietrich D, Kapsalis E, Springer M, Zinkham H (2011) Rethinking evaluation metrics in light of Flickr Commons. In: Trant J, Bearman D (eds) Museums and the web 2011: proceedings. Archives & Museum Informatics, Philadelphia
Conway P (2010) Preservation in the age of Google: digitization, digital preservation, and dilemmas. Lib Q 80(1):61–79. doi:10.1086/648463
Cox H (1969) Publication of manuscripts: devaluation or enhancement? Am Arch 32(1):25–32
Cox RJ (1997) Messrs. Washington, Jefferson, and Gates: quarrelling about the preservation of the documentary heritage of the United States. First Monday 2(8). http://firstmonday.org/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/543. Accessed 9 July 2016
Craig B (1998) Old myths in new clothes: expectations of archives users. Archivaria 45. http://journals.sfu.ca/archivar/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12228/13251. Accessed 9 July 2016
Erway R, Farley L, Halbert M, Hastings J, Sandler M (2007) Public/private digitization agreements: analysis and advice for those who follow. Presented at the DLF Fall Forum, Philadelphia. http://diglib.org/forums/fall2007/presentations/Erway.doc. Accessed 9 July 2016
Esterly R (1997) 21st century genealogy: where will the records be? New Mexico Genealogist 13–17
Evans M (2007) Archives of the people, by the people, for the people. Am Arch 70(2):387–400
Hirtle P (2003) Archives or assets? SAA presidential Address presented at the 67th annual meeting of the Society of American Archivists, Los Angeles. http://www.archivists.org/governance/presidential/hirtle.asp. Accessed 9 July 2016
House Administration Committee (2006) Smithsonian Institution Operations, § House Administration Committee (25 May 2006). Washington. http://c-spanvideo.org/program/SmithsonianIn. Accessed 9 July 2016
Jacobs J (2008). The NARA/TGN contract as a bad precedent. 5 Apr 2008. http://freegovinfo.info/node/1783. Accessed 9 July 2016
Kaiser M (2012) Putting 600,000 books online: the large-scale digitisation partnership between the Austrian National Library and Google. Liber Q J Eur Res Lib 21(2):213–225
Kalfatovic M, Kapsalis E, Spiess K, Van Camp A, Edson M (2008) Smithsonian Team Flickr: a library, archives, and museums collaboration in web 2.0 space. Arch Sci 8(4):267–277. doi:10.1007/s10502-009-9089-y
Kaufman P, Ubois J (2007) Good terms-improving commercial-noncommercial partnerships for mass digitization. D-Lib Magazine 13(11/12) http://dlib.org/dlib/november07/kaufman/11kaufman.html. Accessed 9 July 2016
Kennan MA, Cargnelutti T, Keyes H, Jensen P, McLean A (2005) ADT ProQuest collaboration: a case study of a library/vendor alliance. In: ETD2005: evolution through discovery. http://www98.griffith.edu.au/dspace/handle/10072/2904. Accessed 9 July 2016
Lavoie B, Dempsey L (2004) Thirteen ways of looking at digital preservation. D-Lib Mag. doi:10.1045/july2004-lavoie
Lenstra N (2010) The history and future of local history infrastructure: open access and commodification of local history in the United States and the Anglosphere. Presented at the COINFO 2010: 5th International Conference on Cooperation and Promotion of Information Resources in Science and Technology, Beijing, China: Institute of Scientific and Technical Information of China, Peking University. https://www.ideals.illinois.edu/handle/2142/17434. Accessed 9 July 2016
Limb P (2005) The digitization of Africa. Afr Today 52(2):3–19
Loy M (2011) University of Southampton Library Digitisation Unit: reimagining the value proposition. Ithaka S+R. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/SCA_IthakaSR_CaseStudies_Southampton-_2011.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
Maron N, Smith KK, Loy M (2009) Sustaining digital resources: an on-the-ground view of projects today. Ithaka S+R. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/SR_Report_Sustaining_Digital_Resources_On_Ground_View_Projects_Today0709.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
Martin S (2007) EEBO, microfilm, and Umberto Eco: historical lessons and future directions for building electronic collections. Microform Imaging Rev 36(4):159–164. doi:10.1515/MFIR.2007.159
Massey T (2012) Microforms in a digital world. Against the Grain Press, pp 363–364. doi:10.5703/1288284314767
McKay A (2002) Genealogists and records: preservation, advocacy, and politics. Arch Issues 27(1):23–33
Miles MB, Huberman AM (1994) Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks. https://vivauniversity.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/milesandhuberman1994.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
National Archives and Records Administration (2008) NARA-The Generations Network: digitization agreement (20 May 2008). National Archives and Records Administration. http://www.archives.gov/digitization/pdf/tgn-agreement.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
Pearce-Moses R (2005) Provenance. http://www2.archivists.org/glossary/terms/p/provenance. Accessed 9 July 2016
Pickover M (2008) The DISA Project. Packaging South African heritage as a continuing resource: content, access, ownership and ideology. IFLA J 34(2):192–197. doi:10.1177/0340035208092177
Price L, Smith A (2000) Managing cultural assets from a business perspective. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, D.C., no. 90, p 53. Retrieved from http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract//reports/pub90
Raney ML (1936) Microphotography for libraries. Am Libr Assoc, Chicago
Redmann G (1993) Archivists and genealogists: the trend toward peaceful coexistence. Arch Issues 18(2):121–132
Rosenzweig R (2003) Scarcity or abundance? Preserving the past in a digital era. Am Hist Rev 108(3):735–762
Scott WA (1955) Reliability of content analysis: the case of nominal scale coding. Public Opin Q 19:321–325. doi:10.1086/266577
Serageldin I (1999) Cultural heritage as public good: economic analysis applied to historic cities. In: Kaul I, Grunberg I, Stern M (eds) Global public goods. Oxford University Press. http://www.oxfordscholarship.com/view/10.1093/0195130529.001.0001/acprof-9780195130522. Accessed 9 July 2016
Smith B (1988) Archives and government policy. J Soc Arch 9(5):181–184. doi:10.1080/00379818809511605
Smith KK (2009) BOPCRIS Digitisation Centre 2009: experimentation with sustainability and partnerships for library digitisation projects. Ithaka S+R. http://www.sr.ithaka.org/research-publications/bopcris-digitisation-centre-2009. Accessed 9 July 2016
Springer M, Dulabahn B, Michel P, Natanson B, Reser D, Woodward D, Zinkham H (2008) For the common good: the Library of Congress Flickr Pilot Project. Library of Congress, Washington. http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/flickr_report_final.pdf. Accessed 9 July 2016
Trescott J (2006) Smithsonian hands over TV contract. The washington post. 26 May 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/05/25/AR2006052502242.html. Accessed 9 July 2016
Trifunovic B (2013) The public-private partnership case study in digitization of audiovisual heritage. OCLC Syst Serv Int Digit Lib Perspect 29(1):30–36. doi:10.1108/10650751311294537
Whittick MH (1990) The family silver: privatisation and the archivist. J Soc Arch 11(1–2):1–9. doi:10.1080/00379819009511616
Zorich DM (2003) A survey of digital cultural heritage initiatives and their sustainability concerns. Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, no 118, p 53. http://www.clir.org/pubs/abstract//reports/pub118. Accessed 9 July 2016
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kriesberg, A. The future of access to public records? Public–private partnerships in US state and territorial archives. Arch Sci 17, 5–25 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9268-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10502-016-9268-6