Skip to main content
Log in

Information sharing and group efficacy influences on communication and decision quality

  • Published:
Asia Pacific Journal of Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Group efficacy has generally been found to have a positive effect on group performance. This study reveals a less favorable consequence of high group efficacy, its tendency to promote inferior group decisions under certain circumstances. Previous studies have found that members in a group generally exhibit bias towards utilizing shared information to make decisions. This study examines the effect of group efficacy on both the process (in terms of communication) and outcomes (in terms of decision quality and deviation from initial individual preference) of group decision-making. When information was not completely shared by group members prior to group discussion, members of low-efficacy groups communicated more and more readily changed their initial decision preferences. In the end, they were able to make objectively better decisions. These effects of group efficacy were even more pronounced when individual group members had conflicting information in the beginning about the issues prior to group discussion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bandura, A. 1986. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. 1997. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A., & Jourden, F. J. 1991. Self-regulatory mechanisms governing the impact of social comparison on complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60: 941–951.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockner, J. 1988. Self-esteem at work: Research, theory and practice. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burst, A., & Schlesinger, L. A. 1987. The management game. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, M. D., & Edmondson, A. C. 2001. Confronting failure: Antecedents and consequences of shared beliefs about failure in organizational work groups. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 161–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duffy, M. K., Shaw, J. D., & Stark, E. M. 2000. Performance and satisfaction in conflicted interdependent groups: When and how does self-esteem make a difference?. Academy of Management Journal, 43: 772–782.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. 1994. Explorations of the individual and the cognitive self: An assessment of self-efficacy and training across cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39: 89–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earley, P. C. 1999. Playing follow the leader: Status-determining traits in relation to collective efficacy across cultures. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80: 192-212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettys, C., Pliske, R. N., Manning, C., & Casey, J. T. 1987. An evaluation of human actgeneration performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 39: 23–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. 1999. Do they do what they believe they can? Group efficacy effectiveness across tasks and cultures. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, C. B. 2001. Me and us: Differential relationships among goal-setting training, efficacy and effectiveness at the individual and team level. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22: 789–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gigone, D., & Hastie, R. 1993. The common knowledge effect: Information sharing and group judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65: 959–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gist, M. E. 1987. Self-efficacy: Implications for organizational behavior and human resource management. Academy of Management Review, 12: 472–485.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goncalo, J. A., & Duguid, M. M. 2008. Hidden consequences of group-serving bias: Causal attributions and the quality of group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 107: 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greitemeyer, T., & Schulz-Hardt, S. 2003. Preference-consistent evaluation of information in the hidden profile paradigm: Beyond group-level explanations for the dominance of shared information in group decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84: 322–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R. 1990. Group influences on individuals in organizations. In M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.). Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology, 2nd ed., Vol. 3: 199–267. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists.

  • Hollingshead, A. B. 1996. The rank order effect in group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68: 181–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. 1972. Victims of groupthink. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jessup, L. M., Connolly, T., & Galegher, J. 1990. The effects of anonymity on GDSS group process with an idea-generating task. MIS Quarterly, 14: 313–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, P. A., & Nadel, J. I. 1986. Humility revisited: Self-esteem, information search, and policy consistency. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 38: 196–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. S. K., & Schaubroek, J. 2000. Improving group decisions by better pooling information: A comparative advantage of group decision support systems. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85: 565–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. S. K., Schaubroeck, J., & Brown, A. D. 2004. Esteem maintenance among groups: Laboratory and field studies of group performance cognitions. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 94: 86–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson, J. R. Jr., Foster-Fishman, P. G., & Keys, C. B. 1994. Discussion of shared and unshared information in decision making groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67: 446–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsley, D. H., Brass, D. J., & Thomas, J. B. 1995. Efficacy-performance spirals: A multilevel perspective. Academy of Management Review, 20: 645–678.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. 1993. Putting the group back in group support systems: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technology enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. S. Valacich (Eds.). Group support systems: New perspectives. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulvey, P. W., & Ribbens, B. A. 1999. The effects of intergroup competition and assigned group goals on group efficacy and group effectiveness. Small Group Research, 30: 651–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers, D., & Lamm, H. 1976. The group polarization phenomenon. Psychological Bulletin, 83: 602–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pescosolido, A. T. 2003. Group efficacy and group effectiveness: The effects of group efficacy over time on group performance and development. Small Group Research, 34: 20–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, E., Mitchell, T., Thompson, L., & Burr, R. 1996. Group efficacy and shared cognition as predictors of group process and performance. Paper presented at the Academy of Management Meetings, Cincinnati, OH.

  • Powers, W. T. 1973. Behavior: The control of perception. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, W. T. 1991. Commentary on Bandura’s “Human Agency.” American Psychologist, 46: 151–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver, W. S., & Bufiano, K. M. 1996. The impact of group efficacy and group goals on group task performance. Small Group Research, 27: 55–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sniezek, J. A., & Henry, R. A. 1989. Accuracy and confidence in group judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 43: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser G. 1988. Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 24: 393–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G. 1992. Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A thought experiment. Organization Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52: 156–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. 1992. Discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63: 426–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., Stewart, D., & Wittenbaum, G. M. 1995. Expert roles and information exchange during discussion: The importance of knowing who knows what. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31: 244–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., Taylor, L. A., & Hanna, C. 1989. Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57: 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. 1985. Pooling of unshared information in group decision making: Biased information sampling during discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48: 467–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., & Titus, W. 1987. Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53: 81–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasser, G., Vaughan, S. I., & Stewart, D. 2000. Pooling unshared information: The benefits of knowing how access to information is distributed among group members. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82: 102–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner, I. D. 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, D. D., & Stasser, D. 1995. Expert role assignment and information sampling collective recall and decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69: 619–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, D. N. 1994. Overconfidence in initial self-efficacy judgments: Effects on decision processes and performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 59: 452–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valacich, J., & Schwenk, C. 1995. Devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry effects on face-to-face and computer-mediated group decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 63: 158–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., Tischner, C., & Putka, D. J. 2002. Two studies examining the negative effect of self-efficacy on performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 506–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vancouver, J. B., Thompson, C. M., & Williams, A. A. 2001. The changing signs in the relationships among self-efficacy, personal goals, and performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 605–620.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. 2008. Group information elaboration and group decision making: The role of shared task representations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105: 82–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Ginkel, W. P., & van Knippenberg, D. 2009. Knowledge about the distribution of information and group decision making: When and why does it work?. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, in press.

  • Weiss, H. M., & Knight, P. A. 1980. The utility of humility: Self-esteem, information search, and problem-solving efficiency. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 25: 216–223.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, G. 1998. Recasting Janis’s groupthink model: The key role of collective efficacy in decision fiascoes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 73: 185–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittenbaum, G. M., & Stasser, G. 1996. Management of information in small groups. In J. L. Nye & A. M. Brower (Eds.). What’s social about social cognition: Research on socially shared cognition in small groups: 3–28. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, R. E., & Bandura, A. 1989. Impact of conceptions of ability on self-regulatory mechanisms and complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56: 407–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon S. K. Lam.

Additional information

This research was supported by the Research Grant Council of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China, Grant HKU 745407H.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lam, S.S.K., Schaubroeck, J. Information sharing and group efficacy influences on communication and decision quality. Asia Pac J Manag 28, 509–528 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9183-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10490-009-9183-y

Keywords

Navigation