Skip to main content
Log in

Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition

  • Published:
Applied Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pythagorean fuzzy sets (PFSs), characterized by membership degrees and non-membership degrees, are a more effective and flexible way than intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) to capture indeterminacy. In this paper, some new diverse types of similarity measures, overcoming the blemishes of the existing similarity measures, for PFSs with multiple parameters are studied, along with their detailed proofs. The various desirable properties among the developed similarity measures and distance measures have also been derived. A comparison between the proposed and the existing similarity measures has been performed in terms of the division by zero problem, unsatisfied similarity axiom conditions, and counter-intuitive cases for showing their effectiveness and feasibility. The initiated similarity measures have been illustrated with case studies of pattern recognition, along with the effect of the different parameters on the ordering and classification of the patterns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov K (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li Y, Olson DL, Qin Z (2007) Similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy (vague) sets: a comparative analysis. Pattern Recognit Lett 28(2):278–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Chen SM (1997) Similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cyber 27(1):153–158

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen SM, Chang CH (2015) A novel similarity measure between Atanssov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 291:96–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hung WL, Yang MS (2004) Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance. Pattern Recognit Lett 25(14):1603–1611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong DH, Kim C (1999) A note on similarity measures between vague sets and between elements. Inf Sci 115(1-4):83–96

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Li DF, Cheng CT (2002) New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognit Lett 23(1-3):221–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Li F, Xu ZY (2001) Measures of similarity between vague sets. J Softw 12(6):922–927

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liang ZZ, Shi PF (2003) Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Pattern Recognit Lett 24 (15):2687–2693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mitchell HB (2003) On the Dengfeng-Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition. Pattern Recognit Lett 24(16):3101–3104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ye J (2011) Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications. Math Comput Model 53(1-2):91–97

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Garg H (2019) A hybrid GSA-GA algorithm for constrained optimization problems. Inf Sci 478:499–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang XL, Xu ZS (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Peng XD, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Peng XD, Selvachandran G (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy set: state of the art and future directions. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-017-9596-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Peng XD, Yang Y (2016) Fundamental properties of interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy aggregation operators. Int J Intell Syst 31(5):444–487

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang C, Li D, Ren R (2016) Pythagorean fuzzy multigranulation rough set over two universes and its applications in merger and acquisition. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):921–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Peng XD, Yang Y (2016) Multiple attribute group decision making methods based on Pythagorean fuzzy linguistic set. Comput Eng Appl 52(23):50–54

    Google Scholar 

  21. Liu ZM, Liu PD, Liu WL, Pang JY (2017) Pythagorean uncertain linguistic partitioned bonferroni mean operators and their application in multi-attribute decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 32(3):2779–2790

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Liang DC, Xu ZS (2017) The new extension of TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision making with hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Appl Soft Comput 60:167–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Peng XD, Yang Y, Song J, Jiang Y (2015) Pythagorean fuzzy soft set and its application. Comput Eng 41(7):224–229

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhan J, Sun B (2018) Covering-based intuitionistic fuzzy rough sets and applications in multi-attribute decision-making. Artif Intell Rev. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-018-9674-7, 2018

  25. Peng HG, Wang JQ (2018) A multicriteria group decision-making method based on the normal cloud model with Zadeh’s Z-numbers. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 26:3246–3260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Chen TY (2019) Multiple criteria decision analysis under complex uncertainty: a pearson-like correlation-based Pythagorean fuzzy compromise approach. Int J Intell Syst 34(1):114–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang W, Pang Y (2018) New Pythagorean fuzzy interaction Maclaurin symmetric mean operators and their application in multiple attribute decision making. IEEE Access 6:39241–39260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Peng XD, Li WQ (2019) Algorithms for interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy sets in emergency decision making based on multiparametric similarity measures and WDBA. IEEE Access 7:7419–7441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Yang Y, Ding H, Chen ZS, Li YL (2016) A note on extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 31(1):68–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wei G, Wei Y (2018) Similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets based on the cosine function and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):634–652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li DQ, Zeng WY, Qian Y (2017) Distance measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications in multiattribute decision making. Control Decis 32(10):1817–1823

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(6):593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeng W, Li D, Yin Q (2018) Distance and similarity measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications to multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(11):2236–2254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Peng X, Yuan H, Yang Y (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy information measures and their applications. Int J Intell Syst 32(10):991–1029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang HH, Liang Y (2018) Hybrid L1/2 + 2 method for gene selection in the Cox proportional hazards model. Comput Meth Prog Bio 164:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Li DQ, Zeng WY (2018) Distance measure of Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 33(2):348–361

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  37. Peng X (2018) New similarity measure and distance measure for Pythagorean fuzzy set. Complex Intell Syst. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40747-018-0084-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Xu ZS, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Grzegorzewski P (2004) Distance between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and/or interval-valued fuzzy sets based on the hausdorff metric. Fuzzy Sets Syst 148(2):319–328

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Boran FE, Akay D (2014) A biparametric similarity measure on intuitionistic fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Inf Sci 255:45–57

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are very appreciative to the reviewers for their precious comments which enormously ameliorated the quality of this paper. Our work is sponsored by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61462019), MOE (Ministry of Education in China) Project of Humanities and Social Sciences (No. 18YJCZH054), Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. 2018A030307033, 2018A0303130274), Social Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (No. GD18CFX06).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xindong Peng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interests regarding the publication for the paper.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Peng, X., Garg, H. Multiparametric similarity measures on Pythagorean fuzzy sets with applications to pattern recognition. Appl Intell 49, 4058–4096 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01445-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-019-01445-0

Keywords

Navigation