Abstract
Complier average causal effect (CACE) analysis is a causal inference approach that accounts for levels of teacher implementation compliance. In the current study, CACE was used to examine one-year impacts of PAX good behavior game (PAX GBG) and promoting alternative thinking strategies (PATHS) on teacher efficacy and burnout. Teachers in 27 elementary schools were randomized to PAX GBG, an integration of PAX GBG and PATHS, or a control condition. There were positive overall effects on teachers’ efficacy beliefs, but high implementing teachers also reported increases in burnout across the school year. The CACE approach may offer new information not captured using a traditional intent-to-treat approach.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abenavoli, R. M., Jennings, P. A., Greenberg, M. T., Harris, A. R., & Katz, D. A. (2013). The protective effects of mindfulness against burnout among educators. The Psychology of Education Review, 37, 57–69.
Angrist, J. D., Imbens, G. W., & Rubin, D. B. (1996). Identification of causal effects using instrumental variables. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 91, 444–455.
Barnard, J., Frangakis, C. E., Hill, J. L., & Rubin, D. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments. Journal of American Statistical Association, 98, 299–323. doi:10.1198/016214503000071.
Botvin, G. J., Baker, E., Dusenbury, L., Botvin, E. M., & Diaz, T. (1995). Long-term follow-up results of a randomized drug abuse prevention trial in a white middle-class population. JAMA, 273, 1106–1112.
Bradshaw, C. P., Koth, C. W., Bevans, K. B., Ialongo, N., & Leaf, P. J. (2008). The impact of school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) on the organizational health of elementary schools. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 462–473. doi:10.1037/a0012883.
Bradshaw, C. P., Koth, C. W., Thornton, L. A., & Leaf, P. J. (2009a). Altering school climate through school-wide Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Findings from a group-randomized effectiveness trial. Prevention Science, 10(2), 100–115. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0114-9.
Bradshaw, C. P., Zmuda, J. H., Kellam, S. G., & Ialongo, N. S. (2009b). Longitudinal impact of two universal preventive interventions in first grade on educational outcomes in high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(4), 926–937. doi:10.1037/a0016586.
Bryk, A. S., & Schnieder, B. (2002). Trust in schools: a core resource for improvement. New York: Russell Sage.
Chen, H. T. (1998). Theory-driven evaluations. Advances in Educational. Productivity, 7, 15–34.
Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: II. Classroom effects. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 648–657.
Connell, A. M., Dishion, M. Y., & Kavanagh, K. (2007). An adaptive approach to family intervention: Linking engagement in family-centered intervention to reductions in adolescent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 568–579. doi:10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.568.
Cowen, J. M. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. The Policy Studies Journal, 36, 301–315.
Derzon, J. H., Sale, E., Springer, J. F., & Brounstein, P. (2005). Estimating intervention effectiveness: Synthetic projection of field evaluation results. Journal of Primary Prevention, 26, 321–343.
Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Berg, J., Pas, E. T., Becker, K., Musci, R, Ialongo, N. (2016). How do school-based prevention programs impact teachers? Findings from a randomized trial of combined classroom management and social-emotional programs. Journal of Prevention Science, 1–13.
Domitrovich, C., Bradshaw, C., Greenberg, M., Embry, D., Poduska, J., & Ialongo, N. (2010). Integrated models of school-based prevention: Logic and theory. Psychology in the Schools, 47, 71–88.
Domitrovich, C. E., Bradshaw, C. P., Poduska, J. M., Hoagwood, K. E., Buckley, J. A., Olin, S., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008). Maximizing the implementation quality of evidence-based preventive interventions in schools: A conceptual framework. Advances in School Mental Health Promotion, 1, 6–28.
Domitrovich, C. E., Gest, S. D., Gill, S., Jones, D. J., & DeRouise, R. S. (2009). Teacher factors related to the professional development process of the Head Start REDI intervention. Early Education and Development, 20, 402–430.
Domitrovich, C., Pas, E., Bradshaw, C. P., Becker, K., Keperling, J. P., Embry, D., & Ialongo, N. (2015). Individual and school organizational factors that influence implementation of the Pax Good Behavior Game intervention. Prevention Science, 6(8), 1064–1074.
Domitrovich, C. & Poduska, J. (2008). The social-emotional learning efficacy scale. Unpublished technical report.
Durlak, J. A., & DuPre, E. P. (2008). Implementation matters: A review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 327–350.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D., & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: A meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82, 405–432.
Embry, D., Staatemeier, G., Richardson, C., Lauger, K., & Mitich, J. (2003). The PAX Good Behavior Game (1st ed.). Center City : Hazelden.
Fixsen, D., Naoom, S., Blasé, K., Friedman, R., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute. The National Implementation Research Network (FMHI Publication #231).
Frangakis, C. E., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Principal stratification in causal inference. Biometrics, 58, 21–29.
Frank, J. L., Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2016). Validation of the mindfulness in teaching scale. Mindfulness, 1, 155–163.
Greenberg, M., & Kusché, C. (2006). Building social and emotional competence: The PATHS Curriculum. In S. R. Jimerson & M. J. Furlong (Eds.), Handbook of school violence and school safety: From research to practice (pp. 395–412). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Greenberg, M. T., Kusché, C. A., & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2011). Grade level PATHS (Grades 3-5). South Deerfield: Channing-Bete Co.
Greenberg, M., Kusché, C., Cook, E., & Quamma, J. (1995). Promoting emotional competence in school-aged children: The effects of the PATHS curriculum. Development and Psychopathology, 7, 117–136.
Han, S., & Weiss, B. (2005). Sustainability of teacher implementation of school-based mental health programs. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 33, 665–679.
Holland, P. W. (1986). Statistics and causal inference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 81, 945–970.
Hulleman, C. S., & Cordray, D. S. (2009). Moving from the lab to the field: The role of fidelity and achieved relative intervention strength. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 88–110.
Ialongo, N., Poduska, J., Werthamer, L., & Kellam, S. (2001). The distal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on conduct problems and disorder in early adolescence. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 146–160.
Ialongo, N., Wethamer, L., Kellam, S., Brown, C., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. (1999). Proximal impact of two first-grade preventive interventions on the early risk behaviors for later substance abuse, depression, and anti-social behavior. American Journal of Community Psychology, 27, 599–641.
Jo, B. (2002). Estimation of intervention effects with noncompliance: Alternative model specifications. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 27, 385–409.
Jo, B., Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B. O., Ialongo, N. S., & Brown, C. H. (2008). Cluster randomized trials with treatment noncompliance. Psychological Methods, 13, 1–18.
Jo, B., & Muthén, B. (2003). Longitudinal studies with intervention and noncompliance: Estimation of causal effects in growth mixture modeling. In N. Duan & S. Reise (Eds.), Multilevel modeling: Methodological advances, issues, and applications (pp. 112–139). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Jo, B., Wang, C. P., & Ialongo, N. S. (2009). Using latent outcome trajectory classes in causal inference. Statistics Interface, 2, 403–412.
Kellam, S., Brown, C. H., Poduska, J., Ialongo, N., Wang, W., Toyinbo, P., & Wilcox, H. (2008). Effects of a universal classroom behavior management program in first and second grades on young adult behavioral, psychiatric, and social outcomes. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 95S, S5–S28.
Kusché, C. A., Greenberg, M. T., &, & Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (2011). Grade level PATHS (Grades 1-2). South Deerfield: Channing-Bete Co.
Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. Hoboken: Wiley.
Little, R. J. A., & Yau, L. H. Y. (1998). Statistical techniques for analyzing data from prevention trials: Treatment of no-shows using Rubin’s causal model. Psychological Methods, 3, 147–159.
Main, S., & Hammond, L. (2008). Best practice or most practiced? Pre-service teachers’ beliefs about effective behavior management strategies and reported self-efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 28–39.
Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). Maslach burnout inventory. In R. J. Wood (Ed.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (3rd ed., pp. 191–218). Lanham: Scarecrow Education.
O’Donnell, C. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78, 33–84.
Pas, E., & Bradshaw, C. P. (2014). What affects teacher ratings of student behaviors? The potential influence of teachers’ perceptions of the school environment and experiences. Prevention Science, 15, 940–950. doi:10.1007/s11121-013-0432-4.
Payne, A. A., & Eckert, R. (2010). The relative importance of provider, program, school, and community predictors of the implementation quality of school-based prevention programs. Prevention Science, 11(2), 126–141.
Ringeisen, H., Henderson, K., & Hoagwood, K. (2003). Context matters: Schools and the “research to practice gap” in children’s mental health. School Psychology Review, 32(2), 153–169.
Rohrbach, L. A., Graham, J. W., & Hansen, W. B. (1993). Diffusion of a school-based substance abuse prevention program: Predictors of program implementation. Preventive Medicine, 22, 237–260.
Schochet, P. Z., Puma, M., & Deke, J. (2014). Understanding variation in treatment effects in education impact evaluations: An overview of quantitative methods (NCEE 2014-4017). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, national Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Analytic Technical Assistance and Development. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.
Sobel, M. E. (2006). What do randomized studies of housing mobility demonstrate: Causal inference in the face of interference. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 101, 1398–1407.
Stanger, C., Ryan, S. R., Fu, H., & Budney, A. J. (2011). Parent training plus contingency management for substance abuse families: A Complier Average Causal Effects (CACE) analysis. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 118, 119–126. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2011.03.007.
Stuart, E. A., Perry, D. F., Le, H., & Ialongo, N. S. (2008). Estimating intervention effects of prevention programs: Accounting for noncompliance. Prevention Science, 9, 288–298. doi:10.1007/s11121-008-0104-y.
Weiss, M. J., Bloom, H. S., & Brock, T. (2013). A conceptual framework for studying the sources of variation in program effects. MDRC. New York: MDRC.
Acknowledgments
This research was supported in part by grants from the Institute of Education [R305A080326; R305A130060] and the National Institute of Mental Health [P30 MH08643]. We also thank Celene Domitrovich for her contribution to the project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Berg, J.K., Bradshaw, C.P., Jo, B. et al. Using Complier Average Causal Effect Estimation to Determine the Impacts of the Good Behavior Game Preventive Intervention on Teacher Implementers. Adm Policy Ment Health 44, 558–571 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0738-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-016-0738-1