Abstract
The adoption of new technologies with high efficiency and low emissions is of great importance in achieving sustainable development. Most studies of technology adoption have been criticized for idealistically assuming only one global decision agent. In this paper, an optimization model of technology adoption with heterogeneous agents is proposed. These agents have different market shares, and each one attempts to identify the optimal technology adoption for a portion of the entire system. The carbon emission trading mechanism is implemented to reduce carbon emissions. Agents’ acceptance of uncertain carbon prices is characterized by calculating their willingness to pay, and a bargaining process is introduced to reasonably allocate the profit. Computational tests are conducted with different market shares and different discounting factors. Numerical results show that implementing the carbon emission trading mechanism is an effective way to promote technology adoption and carbon emission reduction, although it does not certainly lead to less carbon emissions than implementing only a carbon cap. A small gap between agents’ market shares and an increase in the seller’s discounting factor will lead to more adoption in the entire system. A seller’s market may lead to less carbon emissions than implementing only a carbon cap, while a buyer’s market may lead to more carbon emissions. Moreover, it is suggested that governments can propose incentive policies to support small companies to develop and maintain carbon prices at a reasonable level to benefit sellers to promote technology adoption.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allevi, E., Gnudi, A., Konnov, I. V., & Oggioni, G. (2018). Evaluating the effects of environmental regulations on a closed-loop supply chain network: A variational inequality approach. Annals of Operations Research, 261(1–2), 1–43.
Arrow, K. J. (1962). The economic implications of learning by doing. The Review of Economic Studies, 29(3), 155–173.
Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.
Babonneau, F., & Haurie, A. (2018). Energy technology environment model with smart grid and robust nodal electricity prices. Annals of Operations Research, 274(1–2), 101–117.
Boutabba, M. A., & Lardic, S. (2017). EU Emissions Trading Scheme, competitiveness and carbon leakage: New evidence from cement and steel industries. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 47–61.
Camacho-Cuena, E., Requate, T., & Waichman, I. (2012). Investment incentives under emission trading: An experimental study. Environmental & Resource Economics, 53(2), 229–249.
Chen, H., & Ma, T. (2014). Technology adoption with limited foresight and uncertain technological learning. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(1), 266–275.
Chen, H., & Ma, T. (2017). Optimizing systematic technology adoption with heterogeneous agents. European Journal of Operational Research, 257(1), 287–296.
Coase, R. H. (1960). The problem of social cost. Journal of Law and Economics, 3(4), 1–44.
Cong, R., & Wei, Y. (2010). Potential impact of (CET) carbon emissions trading on China’s power sector: A perspective from different allowance allocation options. Energy, 35(9), 3921–3931.
Ding, H., Zhao, Q., An, Z., & Tang, O. (2016). Collaborative mechanism of a sustainable supply chain with environmental constraints and carbon caps. International Journal of Production Economics, 181, 191–207.
Dong, C., Shen, B., Chow, P.-S., Yang, L., & Ng, C. T. (2016). Sustainability investment under cap-and-trade regulation. Annals of Operations Research, 240(2), 509–531.
Du, S., Ma, F., Fu, Z., Zhu, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Game-theoretic analysis for an emission-dependent supply chain in a ‘cap-and-trade’ system. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 135–149.
Du, S., Qian, J., Liu, T., & Hu, L. (2018). Emission allowance allocation mechanism design: A low-carbon operations perspective. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2922-z.
Fan, Y., Mo, J., & Zhu, L. (2016). Carbon trading in China: Policy design and social-economic impact. Beijing: Science Press.
Fang, C., & Ma, T. (2018). Technology adoption optimization with heterogeneous agents and carbon emission trading mechanism. In V. N. Huynh, M. Inuiguchi, D. Tran, & T. Denoeux (Eds.), Integrated uncertainty in knowledge modelling and decision making. IUKM 2018. Lecture notes in computer science (Vol. 10758). Cham: Springer.
García-Cascales, M. S., Lamata, M. T., & Sánchez-Lozano, J. M. (2012). Evaluation of photovoltaic cells in a multi-criteria decision making process. Annals of Operations Research, 199(1), 373–391.
Grubler, A., & Gritsevskii, A. (1997). A model of endogenous technological change through uncertain returns and learning (R&D and investments). Working paper. IIASA, Laxenburg, Austria. http://pure.iiasa.ac.at/id/eprint/12525/1/A%20Model%20of%20Endogenous%20Technological%20Change.pdf.
Guo, J., Zhu, L., & Fan, Y. (2016). Emission path planning based on dynamic abatement cost curve. European Journal of Operational Research, 255(3), 996–1013.
Heller, W. P., & Starrett, D. A. (1976). On the nature of externalities. In Theory & measurement of economic externalities (pp. 9–27).
Heugues, M. (2014). International environmental cooperation: A new eye on the greenhouse gas emissions’ control. Annals of Operations Research, 220(1), 239–262.
Huang, Z., Wei, Y.-M., Wang, K., & Liao, H. (2017). Energy economics and climate policy modeling. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 1–7.
Huenteler, J., Niebuhr, C., & Schmidt, T. S. (2016). The effect of local and global learning on the cost of renewable energy in developing countries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 128, 6–21.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Fourth assessment report: Climate change 2007. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2017). Chair’s vision paper. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: AR6 Scoping Meeting.
Lei, X., Shiyun, T., Yanfei, D., & Yuan, Y. (2018). Sustainable operation-oriented investment risk evaluation and optimization for renewable energy project: A case study of wind power in China. Annals of Operations Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2878-z.
Lema, A., & Lema, R. (2013). Technology transfer in the clean development mechanism: Insights from wind power. Global Environmental Change, 23(1), 301–313.
Lin, B., & Li, J. (2015). Analyzing cost of grid-connection of renewable energy development in China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 50, 1373–1382.
Liu, X., Fan, Y., & Li, C. (2016). Carbon pricing for low carbon technology diffusion: A survey analysis of China’s cement industry. Energy, 106, 73–86.
Ma, T. (2010). Coping with uncertainties in technological learning. Management Science, 56(1), 192–201.
Ma, T., Grubler, A., & Nakamori, Y. (2009). Modeling technology adoptions for sustainable development under increasing returns, uncertainty, and heterogeneous agents. European Journal of Operational Research, 195(1), 296–306.
Phillips, J., Das, K., & Newell, P. (2013). Governance and technology transfer in the Clean Development Mechanism in India. Global Environmental Change, 23(6), 1594–1604.
Pigou, A. C. (1920). The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.
Rubinstein, A. (1982). Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica, 50(1), 97–109.
Sabzevar, N., Enns, S. T., Bergerson, J., & Kettunen, J. (2017). Modeling competitive firms’ performance under price-sensitive demand and cap-and-trade emissions constraints. International Journal of Production Economics, 184, 193–209.
Song, M.-L., Zhang, W., & Qiu, X.-M. (2015). Emissions trading system and supporting policies under an emissions reduction framework. Annals of Operations Research, 228(1), 125–134.
Stańczak, J., & Bartoszczuk, P. (2010). CO2 emission trading model with trading prices. Climatic Change, 103(1–2), 291–301.
Tang, L., Wu, J., Yu, L., & Bao, Q. (2015). Carbon emissions trading scheme exploration in China: A multi-agent-based model. Energy Policy, 81, 152–169.
World Bank. (2000). Entering the 21st century: World development report 1999/2000. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yu, S., Weikard, H.-P., Zhu, X., & van Ierland, E. C. (2017). International carbon trade with constrained allowance choices: Results from the STACO model. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 95–116.
Zhang, H., Cao, L., & Zhang, B. (2017). Emissions trading and technology adoption: An adaptive agent-based analysis of thermal power plants in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 121, 23–32.
Zhang, Y.-J., & Hao, J.-F. (2017). Carbon emission quota allocation among China’s industrial sectors based on the equity and efficiency principles. Annals of Operations Research, 255(1–2), 117–140.
Zhao, J., Hobbs, B. F., & Pang, J. (2009). Long-run equilibrium modeling of emissions allowance allocation systems in electric power markets. Operations Research, 58(3), 529–548.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant 71571069; the Ministry of Education of China under Grant 222201718006; and the China Scholarship Council under Grant 201806740014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fang, C., Ma, T. Technology adoption with carbon emission trading mechanism: modeling with heterogeneous agents and uncertain carbon price. Ann Oper Res 300, 577–600 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03297-w
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-019-03297-w