Skip to main content
Log in

Managing portfolio diversity within the mean variance theory

  • S.I.: Application of O. R. to Financial Markets
  • Published:
Annals of Operations Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is well documented that the classical mean variance theory (MVT) may yield portfolios (MVTP) that are highly concentrated and/or are outperformed by equal weight portfolios (EWP). In this work, it is proposed to expand the MVT minimizing objective function with an additional term that explicitly controls portfolio diversity (diversity booster DB). DB decreases with growing number of non-zero portfolio weights and has a minimum when all weights are equal. As a result, high values of DB yield EWP. For performance analysis, portfolio constructed with 12 major US equity ETFs is considered. Out-of-sample performance of maximum Sharpe portfolios is tested using statistics of bootstrapped Sharpe ratios for monthly rebalancing periods. It is found that for the 3-year calibrating window, the diversified MVT portfolio (DMVTP) outperformed both MVTP and EWP in 2012–2015. While the MVTP weights were highly concentrated and had sharp jumps between rebalancing periods, the DMVTP weights slowly changed with time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bender, J., Briand, R., Nielsen, F., & Stefek, D. (2010). Portfolio of risk premia: A new approach to diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(2), 17–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brandtner, M. (2013). Conditional value-at-risk, spectral risk measures and (non-) diversification in portfolio selection problems—A comparison with mean-variance analysis. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(12), 5526–5537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W., Lakonishok, J., & LeBaron, B. (1992). Simple technical trading rules and the stochastic properties of stock returns. Journal of Finance, 47, 1731–1764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bullen, P. S., Mitrinovic, D. S., & Vasic, P. M. (1988). Means and their inequalities. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chaves, D., Hsu, J., Li, F., & Shakernia, O. (2011). risk parity portfolios vs. other asset allocation heuristic portfolios. The Journal of Investing, 20(1), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choueifaty, Y., & Coignard, Y. (2008). Toward maximum diversification. The Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 40–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Vassal, V. (2001). Risk diversification benefits of multiple-stock portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 27(2), 32–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Garlappi, L., & Uppal, R. (2009). Optimal versus Naïve diversification how inefficient is the 1/N portfolio strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22, 1915–1953.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeMiguel, V., Plyakha, Y., Uppal, R., & Vilkov, G. (2013). Improving portfolio selection using option-implied volatility and skewness. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 48, 1813–1845.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denvir, E., & Hutson, E. (2006). The performance and diversification benefits of funds of Hedge funds. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money, 16(1), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duchin, R., & Levy, H. (2009). Markowitz versus the Talmudic portfolio diversification strategies. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35, 71–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2009). Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerber, S., Markowitz, H., & Pujara, P. (2015). Enhancing Multi-Asset Portfolio Construction Under Modern Portfolio Theory with a Robust Co-Movement Measure. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2627803.

  • Green, R. C., & Hollifield, B. (1992). When will mean–variance efficient portfolios be well diversified? Journal of Finance, 47, 1785–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1964). The paternity of an index. The American Economic Review, 54(5), 761.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibragimov, R., & Walden, J. (2007). The limits of diversification when losses may be large. Journal of Banking & Finance, 31(8), 2551–2569.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Inker, B. (2011). Dangers of risk parity. The Journal of Investing, 20(1), 90–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, H., Müller, S., & Weber, M. (2013). How should individual investors diversify? An empirical evaluation of alternative asset allocation policies. Journal of Financial Markets, 19, 62–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013). An introduction to statistical learning with applications in R. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kritzman, M., Page, S., & Turkington, D. (2010). In defense of optimization: The fallacy of 1/N. Financial Analysts Journal, 66, 31–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, W. (2011). Risk-based asset allocation: A new answer to an old question? The Journal of Portfolio Management, 37(4), 11–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maillard S., Roncalli, T., & Teïletche J. (2010). The properties of equally weighted risk contribution portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 36(4), 60–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meucci, A. (2009). Managing diversification. Risk, 22(5), 74–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadler, D., & Schmidt, A. B. (2014). Portfolio theory in terms of partial covariance. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2436478. Accessed 14 June 2016.

  • Pérignon, C., & Smith, D. R. (2010). Diversification and value-at-risk. Journal of Banking & Finance, 34, 55–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian, E. (2011). Risk parity and diversification. Journal of Investing, 20(1), 119–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudin, A. M., & Morgan, J. S. (2006). A portfolio diversification index. Journal of Portfolio Management, 32(2), 81–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sankaran, J. K., & Patil, A. R. (1999). On the optimal selection of portfolios under limited diversification. Journal of Banking & Finance, 23(11), 1655–1666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu, J., & Zhou, G. (2009). Markowitz meets Talmud: A combination of sophisticated and naïve diversification strategies. Journal of Financial Economics, 99, 204–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, H. (2000). A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica, 68, 1097–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to anonymous reviewers for constructive comments to my work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anatoly B. Schmidt.

Appendix

Appendix

See Tables 4, 5 and 6.

Table 4 DMVTP weights for various values of the diversification strength δ: 1-year calibration window
Table 5 Mean daily returns of the US equity ETFs in 2007 – 2015
Table 6 The DMVTP(0.004) performance and asset weights

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Schmidt, A.B. Managing portfolio diversity within the mean variance theory. Ann Oper Res 282, 315–329 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2896-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-018-2896-x

Keywords

Navigation