Skip to main content
Log in

High performance 9T adiabatic SRAM and novel stability characterization using pole zero placement

  • Published:
Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Stability of memory cells always considered as a most significant figure for defining the logic data at output terminals. And the value of logic data is influenced due to the dominance of leakage component at deep submicron technology. Stability analysis and leakage issues of new 9T adiabatic static random access memory (SRAM) cells is presented using the technique of pole zero concept. With the help of flow graph characteristic of memory cell is modeled and validated using MATLAB tool. The elementary cell of proposed SRAM resembles behavior of 4T-SRAM consisting of two high load resistors constructed of PMOS and cross-coupled NMOS pair. NMOS switch is used to restrict short circuit current and two gradually rising and falling wave pulses with controlled switching current flow. The simulation is carried out at 180 nm technology and it has been found that the average power dissipation of the proposed SRAM reduces by a factor of 41 with no performance degradation and energy is efficiently recovered using adiabatic and body biasing technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athas, W. C., Svensson, L. J., Koller, J. G., Tzartzains, N., & Chou, E. Y.-C. (1994). Low-power digital systems based on adiabatic-switching principles. IEEE Transactions on VLSI Systems, 2, 398–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Younis, S. G., & Knight, T. G. (1994). Asymptotically zero energy split-level charge recovery logic. In Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop low power design, CA, April 22–27, 1994.

  3. Takahashi, Y., Nayan, N. A., Sekine, T., & Yokoyama, M. (2014). Low power 9T adiabaitic SRAM. Journal of Engineering, 6, 259–264.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Moon, Y., & Jeong, D. K. (1996). An efficient charge recovery logic circuit. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 31(4), 514–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim, S., & Papaefthymiou, M. C. (1998). True single-phase energy-recovering logic for low-power, high-speed VLSI. In Proceedings of the IEEE international symposium on low-power electronics and design, CA, August 10–12, 1998.

  6. Maksimovic, D., Oklobdzija, V. G., Nikolic, B., & Current, K. W. (2000). Clocked CMOS adiabatic logic with integrated single-phase power-clock supply. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 8(4), 460–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ye, Y., & Roy, K. (2001). QSERL: Quasi-static energy recovery logic. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 36(2), 239–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Takahashi, Y., Fukuta, Y., Sekine, T., & Yokoyama, M. (2006). 2PADCL: Two phase drive adiabatic dynamic CMOS logic. In Proceedings of the IEEE Asia-pacific conference on circuits and systems, Singapore, December 2006.

  9. Takahashi, Y., Sekine, T., & Yokoyama, M. (2007). VLSI implementation of a 4 × 4-bit multiplier in a two phase drive adiabatic dynamic CMOS logic. IEICE Transactions on Electronics, 90(10), 2002–2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye, Y., & Roy, K. (1996). Energy recovery circuits using reversible and partially reversible logic. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 43(9), 769–778.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Mohammad, B. S., Saleh, H., & Ismail, M. (2015). Design methodologies for yield enhancement and power efficiency in SRAM-based SoCs. IEEE Transactions on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI) Systems, 23(10), 2054–2064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Komiyama, H., et al. (2011). Low-power adiabatic SRAM. In Intelligent signal processing and communications systems (ISPACS), December 2011 (pp. 778–784). IEEE.

  13. Abiri, E., & Darabi, A. (2015). Design of low power and high read stability 8T-SRAM memory based on the modified gate diffusion input (m-GDI) in 32 nm CNTFET technology. Microelectronics Journal, 46(12), 1351–1363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Yadav, N., & Jadav, S. (2014). Efficient energy recovery in 9T adiabatic SRAM cell using body bias. International Journal of VLSI and Embedded Systems-IJVES, 05.

  15. Takeda, K., et al. (2006). A read-static-noise-margin-free SRAM cell for low-VDD and high-speed applications. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 41(1), 113–121.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Takahashi, Yasuhiro, & Sekine, Toshikazu. (2009). Two-phase clocked CMOS adiabatic logic. Far East Journal of Electronics and Communications, 3(1), 17–34.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sunil Jadav.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jadav, S., Chandel, R. High performance 9T adiabatic SRAM and novel stability characterization using pole zero placement. Analog Integr Circ Sig Process 98, 347–355 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1308-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-018-1308-0

Keywords

Navigation