Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

New state liability exceptions for agritourism activities and the use of liability releases

  • Published:
Agriculture and Human Values Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agritourism activities have gained importance as a mechanism for some farmers to broaden their sources of income. As businesses have pursued agritourism activities, they have been concerned about liability for personal injuries of participants. In some states, providers of agritourism activities have presented legislators with ideas for an agritourism statute to limit liability for injuries resulting from inherent risks. Four new agritourism statutes have been enacted, while six other states have adopted alternative liability provisions that may apply to some agritourism providers. The agritourism statutes provide an affirmative defense to providers to eliminate liability for inherent-risk injuries. An analysis of the statutory provisions shows legislatures making choices on the assignment of liability for accident injuries and the ability of providers to obtain releases from negligence. Because the agritourism statutes impose prerequisites and do not stop meritless lawsuits, they do not offer much assistance to agritourism providers. An evaluation of policy issues suggests that legislatures might consider additional options to address agritourism providers’ concerns.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adam, K.L. 2004. Entertainment farming and agri-tourism. Fayetteville, AR: National Sustainable Agriculture Information Service, National Center for Appropriate Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, S., and S. Hines. 2007. The state of agritourism liability insurance in Montana and the West. Bozeman, MT: The Rural Landscape Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkansas Statutes Annotated. 2008. Section 18-60-107.

  • Barbieri, C., and E. Mahoney. 2009. Why is diversification an attractive farm adjustment strategy? Insights from Texas farmers and ranchers. Journal of Rural Studies 25(1): 58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri, C., and P.M. Mshenga. 2008. The role of the firm and owner characteristics on the performance of agritourism farms. Sociologia Ruralis 48(2): 166–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, P.A., and J. O’Connell. 1997. Accidental justice: The dilemmas of tort law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.P. 1973. Toward an economic theory of liability. Journal of Legal Studies 2(2): 323–349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calabresi, G. 1970. The costs of accidents. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • California Statutes. 1959. Chapter 1507 (currently codified at California Business and Professional Code, Section 2395).

  • Centner, T.J. 2008. America’s blame culture: Pointing fingers and shunning restitution. Raleigh, NC: Carolina Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Che, D., A. Veeck, and G. Veeck. 2005. Sustaining production and strengthening the agritourism product: Linkages among Michigan agritourism destinations. Agriculture and Human Values 22(2): 225–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colorado Revised Statutes. 2008. Section 13-21-121.

  • Connecticut General Statutes. 2002. Section 52-577p.

  • Connecticut General Statutes. 2008. Sections 29-211 and 29-212.

  • Daugstad, K. 2008. Negotiating landscape in rural tourism. Annals of Tourism Research 35(2): 402–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, A., and A. Tchetchik. 2005. Does rural tourism benefit from agriculture? Tourism Management 26(4): 493–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galanter, M. 2000. The conniving claimant: Changing images of misuse of legal remedies. DePaul Law Review 50(2): 647–665.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgia Code Annotated. 2008. Section 4-12-3.

  • Gilles, S.G. 1992. Negligence, strict liability, and the cheapest cost-avoider. Virginia Law Review 78(5): 1291–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holland, R., and K. Wolfe. 2000. Considering an agritainment enterprise in Tennessee?. Knoxville, TN: The University of Tennessee Agricultural Extension Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hylton, K.N. 2008. A positive theory of strict liability. Review of Law and Economics 4(1): 153–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kansas Statutes Annotated. 2008. Sections 74-50,165 to 74-50,173.

  • Kaplow, L., and S. Shavell. 2001. Fairness versus welfare. Harvard Law Review 114(4): 961–1388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, G.C. 2004. Rawlsian fairness and regime choice in the law of accidents. Fordham Law Review 72(5): 1857–1921.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, G.C. 2006. Strict liability and the mitigation of moral luck. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy 2(1): 1–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landes, W.M., and R.A. Posner. 1987. The economic structure of tort law. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Louisiana Annotated Statutes. 2008. Section 9:2795.5.

  • Massachusetts General Laws Annotated. 2008. Chapter 128, Sect. 2E.

  • McGehee, N.G., and K. Kim. 2004. Motivation for agri-tourism entrepreneurship. Journal of Travel Research 43(2): 161–170.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michigan Compiled Laws Annotated. 2008. Section 324.73301.

  • New Hampshire Revised Statutes Annotated. 2008. Section 508:14.

    Google Scholar 

  • New York General Obligations Law. 2008. Section 5-326.

  • Nickerson, N.P., R.J. Black, and S.F. McCool. 2001. Agritourism: Motivations behind farm/ranch business diversification. Journal of Travel Research 40(1): 19–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • North Carolina General Statutes. 2008. Sections 99E-30 to 99E-32.

  • Ohio Revised Code Annotated. 2008. Section 2305.321.

  • Pennsylvania Statutes Annotated. 2008. Section 8339.

  • Ryan, S., K. Debord, and K. McClellan. 2006. Agritourism in Pennsylvania: An industry assessment. Harrisburg, PA: Center for Rural America.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 1980. Strict liability versus negligence. Journal of Legal Studies 9(1): 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shavell, S. 2003. Economic analysis of accident law. Working Paper 9694, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA.

  • Tennessee Code Annotated. 2008. Section 44-20-101.

  • Thilmany, D., M. Sullins, and A. Ansteth. 2007. The 2006 economic contribution of agritourism to Colorado: Estimates from a survey of Colorado tourists. Economic Development Report. Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO.

  • Tweeten, K., L. Leistritz, and N. Hodur. 2008. Growing rural tourism opportunities. Journal of Extension 46(2). http://www.joe.org/joe/2008april/a2.shtml . Accessed 2 January 2009.

  • Utah Code Annotated. 2008. Section 78B-4-512.

  • Veeck, G., D. Che, and A. Veeck. 2006. America’s changing farmscape: A study of agricultural tourism in Michigan. Professional Geographer 58(3): 235–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villano, M. 2007. Old McDonald gave a tour of his farm. New York Times, February 17.

  • Virginia Code Annotated. 2008. Sections 3.2-6400 to 3.2-6402.

  • West Virginia Code. 2008. Sections 20-3B-1 to 20-3B-5.

  • Wolfe, K., and L. Hammock. 2006. Georgia agritourism overview: Results from a 2005 business survey. Athens, GA: The University of Georgia Center for Agribusiness and Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

Cited Cases

  • Alston v. Monk. 1988. 373 S.E.2d 463 (North Carolina Court of Appeals).

  • Baker v. McIntosh. 2004. 132 S.W.3d 230 (Kentucky Court of Appeals).

  • Burns v. Leap. 2007. 645 S.E.2d 751 (Georgia Court of Appeals).

  • City of Santa Barbara v. Superior Court. 2007. 161 P.3d 1095 (California Supreme Court).

  • Elswick v. Lonesome Pine International Raceway, Inc. 2001. 54 Va. Cir. 368 (Virginia Circuit Court of Wise County).

  • Hall v. Sinclair Refining Company. 1955. 89 S.E.2d 396 (North Carolina Supreme Court).

  • Hanks v. Powder Ridge Restaurant Corporation. 2005. 905 A.2d 1156 (Connecticut Supreme Court).

  • Hiett v. Lake Barcroft Community Association, Inc. 1992. 418 S.E.2d 894 (Virginia Supreme Court).

  • Johnson’s Administrix v. Richmond and Danville R.R. Co. 1890. 11 S.E. 829 (Virginia Supreme Court).

  • Knight v. Jewett. 1992. 834 P.2d 696 (California Supreme Court).

  • Laliberte v. White Water Mountain Resorts. 2004. Conn. Super. LEXIS 2194 (Connecticut Superior Court).

  • MacFadyen v. Maki. 2007. 876 N.E.2d 437 (Massachusetts Appeals Court).

  • Markowitz v. Bainbridge Equestrian Center, Inc. 2007. 695 N.W.2d 861 (Ohio Court of Appeals).

  • Mettler v. Nellis. 2005. 695 N.W.2d 861 (Wisconsin Court of Appeals).

  • Miller v. Fallon County. 1986. 721 P.2d 342 (Montana Supreme Court).

  • Murphy v. North American River Runners, Inc. 1991. 412 S.E.2d 504 (West Virginia Supreme Court).

  • Reardon v. Windswept Farm, LLC. 2006. 905 A.2d 1156 (Connecticut Supreme Court).

  • Richards v. Richards. 1994. 513 N.W.2d 118 (Wisconsin Supreme Court).

  • Steele v. Mount Hood Meadows Oregon, Ltd. 1999. 974 P.2d 794 (Oregon Court of Appeals).

  • Waggoner v. Nags Head Water Sports. 1998. 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 6792 (U.S. Fourth Court of Appeals).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, University of Georgia, 301 Conner Hall, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Terence J. Centner

Authors
  1. Terence J. Centner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence J. Centner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Centner, T.J. New state liability exceptions for agritourism activities and the use of liability releases. Agric Hum Values 27, 189–198 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9220-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-009-9220-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation