Abstract
Financial support for institutional research is relatively stagnant, and thus institutions are likely to seek tuition revenue to offset the costs of research and teaching. It is likely that this has led to increases in tuition driven activities, and thus has limited research activities of academic physical therapy (PT) programs in particular. However, the relationships between sources of program revenue, the number of graduates from PT programs, and the scholarly production of PT faculty have not been studied. The purpose of this paper is to study the effects of types of funding—including research grants and tuition—on the number of physical therapy graduates from each program and the research productivity of physical therapy faculty. Data from 2008 to 2016 were utilized to perform a fixed-effects panel analysis. Panel models created predictions for the number of graduates and the number of peer-reviewed publications for programs from grant funding, annual tuition, and number of funded faculty members. In any given program, a 1% increase in annual tuition is associated with 24% more graduates per year, but a single percentage point increase in the mix of NIH grant funding over other funding types is associated with 8% fewer graduates, all else equal. For every 1% increase in annual tuition, a program can expect to have 41% fewer publications per year. Those institutions with higher numbers of graduates tended to have higher numbers of publications. Higher annual program tuition appears to be associated with both higher numbers of physical therapy graduates and lower levels of publications. Different funding sources have variable effects on degree production and scholarly productivity. Data are self-reported by programs on the Annual Accreditation Report, and cause and effect cannot be established through observational design.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aggregate program data: 2015–2016 physical therapist education programs fact sheets. (2016). Commission on accreditation in physical therapy education. http://www.capteonline.org/AggregateProgramData/.
Angrist, J. D., & Pischke, J. (2009). Mostly harmless econometrics: An empiricist’s companion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Archibald, R. B., & Feldman, D. H. (2011). Why does college cost so much?. New York: Oxford University Press.
Arum, R., & Roksa, J. (2011). Academically adrift: Limited learning on college campuses. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Barringer, S. N. (2016). The changing finances of public higher education organizations: Diversity, change and discontinuity. In E. P. Berman & C. Paradeise (Eds.), The university under pressure (Vol. 46, pp. 223–263). Emerald: Bingley.
Beattie, P., Bezner, J., Binkley, J. M., Black, J., Brenneman, S. K., Brody, L. T., et al. (2000). Clinical research agenda for physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 80, 499–513.
Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata (Revised ed.). College Station: Stata Press.
Cantwell, B. (2014). Laboratory management, academic production, and the building blocks of academic capitalism. Higher Education, 70, 487–502.
Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2013). Global status, inter-institutional stratification, and organizational segmentation: A time-dynamic Tobit analysis of ARWU position among US universities. Minerva, 51(2), 195–223.
Cantwell, B., & Taylor, B. J. (2015). Rise of the science and engineering postdoctorate and the restructuring of academic research. The Journal of Higher Education, 86, 667–696.
Clark, B. R. (1983). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
Covington, K., McCallum, C., Engelhard, C., Landry, M. D., & Cook, C. (2016). Do differences in programmatic resource investments result in different 3-year pass rates on the US National Physical Therapy Examination? Journal of Allied Health, 45(1), 27–32.
Ellis, J., & Alweis, R. (2015). A review of learner impact on faculty productivity. The American Journal of Medicine, 128(1), 96–101.
Evaluative criteria PT Programs. (2014). Commission on accreditation in physical therapy education. http://www.capteonline.org/uploadedFiles/CAPTEorg/About_CAPTE/Resources/Accreditation_Handbook/EvaluativeCriteria_PT.pdf.
Froelich, K. A. (1999). Diversification of revenue strategies: Evolving resource dependence in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 28, 246–268.
Goldstein, M. S., Scalzitti, D. A., & Craik, R. L. (2011). The revised research agenda for physical therapy. Physical Therapy, 91, 165–174.
Griliches, Z., & Hausman, J. (1986). Errors in variables in panel data. Journal of Econometrics, 31(1), 93–118.
Hack, L. M., Coluson, B., Freburger, J., Johnson, M. P., Katz, R. S., Kerwin, J. P., et al. (2016). A model to project the supply and demand of physical therapists 2010–2015. American Physical Therapy Association. http://www.apta.org/WorkforceData/.
Hillman, N. W. (2012). Tuition discounting for revenue management. Research in Higher Education, 53, 263–281.
Holcomb, J. D., Selker, L. G., & Roush, R. E. (1990). Scholarly productivity: A regional study of physical therapy faculty in schools of allied health. Physical Therapy, 70, 66–72.
Jesus, T. S., Koh, G., Landry, M., Ong, P. H., Lopes, A. M. F., Green, P. L., et al. (2016). Finding the “right-size” physical therapy workforce: International perspective across 4 countries. Physical Therapy, 96, 1597–1609.
Jette, D. U. (2016). Unflattening: 2016 Cerasoli lecture. Journal of Physical Therapy Education, 30(3), 4–10.
Johnes, G., & Johnes, J. (2009). ‘Higher education institutions’ costs and efficiency: Taking the decomposition a further step. Economics of Education Review, 2009(28), 107–113.
Kaufman, R. R. (2009). Career factors help predict productivity in scholarship among faculty members in physical therapist education programs. Physical Therapy, 89, 204–216.
Lacy, T. A. (2010). Institutions of higher education as multi-product firms: An empirical analysis. In R. Ahrweiler (Ed.), Innovation in complex social systems (pp. 175–186). New York: Routledge.
Leslie, L. L., Slaughter, S., Taylor, B. J., & Zhang, L. (2012). How do revenue variations affect expenditures within US research universities? Research in Higher Education, 53, 614–639.
Levanon, G., & Cheng, B. (2011). US workers delaying retirement: Who and why and implications for businesses. Business Economics, 46(4), 195–213.
Marsh, H. W., & Hattie, J. (2002). The relation between research productivity and teaching effectiveness: Complementary, antagonistic or independent constructs? The Journal of Higher Education, 73, 603–641.
Mendoza, P. (2012). The role of context in academic capitalism: The industry-friendly department case. The Journal of Higher Education, 83, 26–48.
Murnane, R. J., & Willett, J. B. (2011). Methods matter: Improving causal inference in educational and social science research. New York: Oxford University Press.
Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Riley, S. P., Covington, K., Landry, M. D., McCallum, C., Engelhard, C., et al. (2016). Selectivity of physiotherapist programs in the United States Does not differ by institutional funding source or research activity level. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. http://dx.doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2016.13.17.
Rosinger, K. O., Taylor, B. J., Coco, L., & Slaughter, S. (2016). Organizational segmentation and the prestige economy: Deprofessionalization in high- and low-resource departments. The Journal of Higher Education, 87, 27–54.
Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2012). Transatlantic moves to the market. Higher Education, 63, 583–606.
Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., & Rhodes, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Slaughter, S., Taylor, B. J., & Rosinger, K. O. (2015). A critical reframing of human capital theory in higher education. In A. M. Martinez-Aleman, E. M. Bensimon, & B. Pusser (Eds.), Critical approaches to the study of higher education (pp. 80–102). Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
Smeltzer, S. C., Sharts-Hopko, N. C., Cantrell, M. A., Heverly, M. A., Wise, N. J., Jenkinson, A., et al. (2014). Challenges to research productivity of doctoral program nursing faculty. Nursing Outlook, 62(4), 268–274.
Smeltzer, S. C., Sharts-Hopko, N., Cantrell, M. A., Heverly, M. A., & Jenkinson, A. (2017). Nursing doctoral faculty perceptions related to the effect of increasing enrollments on productivity. Nursing Education Perspectives, 38(4), 201–202.
Stephen, P. (2012). How economics shapes science. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2015). Global competition, US research universities, and international doctoral education: Growth and consolidation of an organizational field. Research in Higher Education, 56, 411–441.
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2016). The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act: Competition, resource concentration, and the “Great Recession” in the US. Higher Education Policy, 29, 199–217.
Taylor, B. J., & Cantwell, B. (2018). Unequal higher eduation: Wealth, status, and student opportunity. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.
Taylor, B. J., Cantwell, B., & Slaughter, S. (2013). Quasi-markets in US higher education: Humanities emphasis and institutional revenues. The Journal of Higher Education, 84, 675–707.
Taylor, B. J., Barringer, S. N., & Warshaw, J. B. (2018). Affiliated nonprofit organizations: Strategic action and research universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 89, 422–452.
Titus, M. A. (2009). The production of bachelor’s degrees and financial aspects of state higher education policy: A dynamic analysis. The Journal of Higher Education, 80, 439–468.
Volk, C. S., Slaughter, S., & Thomas, S. L. (2001). Models of institutional resource allocation: Mission, market, and gender. The Journal of Higher Education, 72, 387–413.
Weisbrod, B. A., Ballou, J. P., & Asch, E. D. (2008). Mission and money: Understanding the university. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Zhang, L. (2009). Does state funding affect graduation rates at public four-year colleges and universities? Educational Policy, 23, 714–731.
Zhang, L. (2010). The use of panel data models in higher education policy studies. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (Vol. 25, pp. 307–350). New York: Springer.
Zhang, L., & Ehrenberg, R. G. (2010). Faculty employment and R&D expenditures at research universities. Economics of Education Review, 29, 329–337.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors whose names are listed above certify that they have NO affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest (such as honoraria; educational grants; participation in speakers’ bureaus; membership, employment, consultancies, stock ownership, or other equity interest; and expert testimony or patent-licensing arrangements), or non-financial interest (such as personal or professional relationships, affiliations, knowledge or beliefs) in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dickson, T., Chen, P.D. & Taylor, B. Impact of funding allocation on physical therapist research productivity and DPT student graduates: an analysis using panel data. Adv in Health Sci Educ 24, 269–285 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9864-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-018-9864-8